LONG CAUSE

Housekeeping: Review EBERLE & BROS. PROBE and note that Eberle has not been charged under the criminal code, then Google “ former chief judge john klebuc retires polischuk” review the search result, note former Chief Judge Klebuc ensured that the Saskatchewan Queens and Appeal Bench Courts were integrated into using the internet to conduct Court cases, which supports my (Lee)s attempt to obtain approval for the Argues $30M development without bribing the Strudwick, note the Web site address masthead above, then scroll down to first paragraph in “draft of cause” for ramifications, first note below:

Google “chris hedges says america on road to revolution even in baltimore the current”, its audio but I (Lee) urge all readers listen to the 24 minute rundown by this Pulitzer prize winning Journalist and Author where he sets out why the American people have been forced to the edge of revolution. Note that here in Canada, officials such as the Strudwick are sanctioned by the Judiciary to demand bribes to approve economic development, google “scc 31940”.

Google “johnstone: let’s put first past the post in the past johnstone” and “newfoundland nuns question potash corp dealings in western sahara cbc” and “psac forecasts drilling to fall by half in 2015 leader post” and “ ‘slow recovery’ in oil prices predicts mohr johnstone” and “don’t count on stable oil prices chidley” and “small business optimism in sask slips in april leader post” and “mandryk: notley has sask ndp hoping mandryk” and “right or not lessons in alta polls mandryk” and “can a third orange wave splash across canada simpson”.

Readers are asked to review more Murray below, google “mandryk: cold comfort in country of origin labelling trade win mandryk” and “mandryk: neither wall or broten looked great mandryk” review Murray’s warning to Wall, in effect, the taxpayers can not afford his policy of forcing Developers to pay Strudwick and her SARM ilk bribes to approve Saskatchewan economic developments, Google “scc 31940”, now note more Alberta/Saskatchewan stuff below:

Google “judge lifts publication ban in legal dispute between jonathon denis and estranged wife brenna palmer van rassel”. Readers are asked to note Alberta Solicitor General (SG) Denis beat and abused his wife, warning her that complaining was useless because he controlled the Courts, Denis’s boast of Court control is confirmed by post BLACKMAILED, BULLIED OR BRIBED?, and google “susan mcgrath cba states judges demand bribes”, my (Lee)s point for a decade regarding the Strudwick corruption, google “hubris definition”.

Google “ancient greek leaders viewed hubris as a criminal offence” and “freud look to the mother” and I am told Denis’s estranged beauty Queen wife is a clone of his (Denis)’s Mother, Court records show that Denis’s Mother depicted his Beauty Queen wife to be a “bitch” a re-run of the Shakespeare famous tragedy, Hamlet, where Hamlet kills his Father so he can google “fuddel-duddel” his Mother, Denis, google “incest a criminal code offense” Denis and his Mother may, or may not, have committed incest, BUT review post FACTS: EDENWOLD EVIL para. 70.-81, and CROWN COCKROACHES, note there is hard evidence of a “incestuous conflict of interest”, which is a criminal code offense.

Google “how did god destroy sodom and gomorrah?” do oil CEO’s believe that NDP raining on them is the same as burning sulfur?, note my (Lee)s confidants point out that Denis’s wife beating charge is still in Court so is “she said he said” and if Denis wants to sue me (Lee) for libel a trail has been blazed right to the Supreme Court, for him, google “scc 31940”, Denis, like Lane, has never practiced law, his only legal work has been to dictate Judgments to Judges.

It is lovely, just effing lovely, that Brenna (Denis’s wife) claim is on the public record, and readers may be interested that the Alberta Legislature Library has a copy of Dr, Carl Baar’s Judicial Council report “Masters in Their Own House”, post TWEEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE, and again google “susan mcgrath cba judges demand bribes”, review TURNING OVER ROCKS RURAL ZONING, Canada’s leading Judicial scholar Dr. Carl Baar, told me (Lee) that the Provincial officials dictate Judgments to the Queens/Appeal Bench Judges, remember, it was the arrogant asshole, Alberta SG, Denis, who stabbed Lynda Haverstock in the back, DEJA VU DEVINE, Denis worked for Lynda who resigned when she had over 50% of the vote during her leadership challenge, note below:

Review DRAFT OF CAUSE, where I (Lee) set out two possible scenario’s of

“ breach of implied contract” flowing from the Strudwick’s demand for “flowers, chocolates and perfume” to approve the Argues $30M Development, google “scc 31940”. The two scenario’s were set out as my ask of lawyers for two different considerations, one for myself as the Argues representative, against the RM of Edenwold Council, and another, as Louise Simard had intended for the Argues, against the Province, regarding the Argue development and I remind lawyers the “breach of implied contract” theory was advanced by one of their own, Louise Simard, a very smart lady lawyer, note below:

After review of DRAFT OF CAUSE, a confidant asked, why it had to be either/or: either breach of implied contract against Edenwold Council on my (Lee)s behalf for the Strudwicks action blocking the Argue development until she was carried “flowers, chocolates and perfume” Google “scc 31940” OR Louise’s original intent a “breach of implied contract” action against the Province on Argues behalf based on the Strudwicks ordering Minister Responsible, NDP Taylor, to block Liberal Minister Responsible Hillson’s plan to circumvent the Strudwick’s demand for “flowers, chocolates and perfume” to approve Argue Development Google “scc 31940”, my confidant ‘s point, why not do both at the same time?

I (Lee) am not a lawyer so can not act for the Argues. In DRAFT OF CAUSE, my ask is for a lawyer to act for me against Edenwold Council, and if they decline, my plan was to act for myself and either way use any funds gained to maintain and advertise this Web site on Access TV in the hope,however vain, that publicity forces the Edenwold Council to override the Strudwick and grant the Argue Development without carrying “flowers chocolates and perfume” to the Strudwick, google “scc 31940”, but there can be no doubt whatsoever but that, given the Alberta SG, Denis’s public boast, that plan may be dangerous.

I (Lee) will go the last inch on the last foot of the last mile for the Argues as I promised, but am not a lawyer, which fact is a double edged sword, because while Strudwick can not order the Law Society to disbar me, I can not act for the Argues and while in a sane world Lawyers could make a lot of money acting for the Argues, it is now clear that a lawyer, or myself, can not use the Courts, now that Alberta SG Jonathon Denis has confirmed for the public record, that the Provincial Officials dictate Judgments to the Queens/Appeal Judges.

I (Lee) was daydreaming there is a chance the Supreme Court would see Justice prevail, BUT Google “richards finds lee guilty of libel of strudwick” and “jackson or richards to canadian supreme court” review search results, and then review FRANK AND THE LADY, note that the wondrous woman, Lady Bev, has been able to prevail against the white collar thugs Harper appoints to her Court, but at some point Lady Bev people will be outnumbered by the thugs, and if Harper appoints Richards to the Supreme Court that may be the no hope point for the Courts and Strudwick will win, and Richards is not the only worry,

Google “vic toews may be appointed to supreme court” the search results show rumor is rife that Harper may appoint his buddy Vic Towes to the Supreme Court. Review TOP COP DAYDREAMS, note near post end for documented evidence that Towes impregnated a staffer young enough to be his daughter and walked away from his rent, Google “towes salary seized for unpaid rent” and “what is vic towes annual salary” Note the arrogant Harper asshole, Towes, is paid $288K a year of taxpayer money, but still tries to stiff his landlord, while Harper shortlists Towes to the Supreme Court, this is true Harper insanity.

As evilly corrupt as the Ruling Elite are, this Web site and publicity may still be able to obtain approval for the Argue development without bribing the Strudwick. Google “rural zoning web site blocks lanes appointment as chief judge” review the search results note bloggers believed this Web site blocked that effing Lane’s appointment as Saskatchewan Chief Judge, now Google “richards rules that even if lee is right he still libeled strudwick”, review all search results and with this Web site in the top 35 most visited Web sites out of the 30M Web site domains Richards and Towes may have the same problem that effing Lane had, but that will not stop Harper appointing some other thug to the Supreme Court.

I (Lee) emphasis that in Canadian Law truth is never libel so the Richards Judgment finding me guilty of libeling the Strudwick even if I am right was idiotic and Richards is a lot of things BUT he is not a idiot, so there must have been some other explanation, Google “did chief judge richards attend lanes high school girl cocaine parties”, review the search results, and ask the question, did Lane and the Strudwick blackmail Richards into submission?, and note below:

Google “the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing burke”. I (Lee) realize that with no mortgages to pay, no wife needing shoes, or children needing a University degree, it is easy for me to quote Edmund Burke to the lawyers, BUT I remind lawyers that Harper has to make the Supreme Court appointment by the end of August and suggest the Lawyers wait and see if Lady Georgina is appointed to the Supreme Court before they dismiss my ask as set out in post DRAFT OF CAUSE and in the meantime study and note the potential fee for my ask is Tony Merchant type legal fee.

Review post CROCODILES DO CRY and note the Argue Development is now valued at $16M for land alone and review SOME STUPID-SOME JOKE, scroll to near post end and Google “canada should charge industry for water: report de suza”, the study recommends a charge of ten cents per thousand liters to industry, which works out to about a $87,000.00 value annually for the Argues 350 gpm spring water flow. PFRA uses two cents a gallon while estimating water value which is more generous, $376,920.00 annually for the Argues.

Use a twenty year time frame in estimating water flow value to the Argues and the total over a twenty years is $7,538,400.00, say $8M, add that to the $16M land value for a total of $24M, which number the lawyers need to justify in Court if they use Louise’s “breach of implied contract”, advice to sue the Province, again review DRAFT OF CAUSE, and note below:

My (Lee)s suggested use of twenty years as time frame to claim compensation for the Argues water is based on my experience working for Archie Clampitt who used one generation, (twenty years), to calculate value of wheat grown while calculating compensation for land expropriation for Grid Road diversion from road allowances. Lawyers will relate to the amount of contingency fee they would get for winning a $24M breach of implied contract for the Argues, should they decide to undertake such action against the Province, note below

Google “normal contingency fee percentages”, note the fee ranges from 15% to 40%, hence the lawyers contingency fee of the $24M would range from $3.6M to $9.6M and at the end of the day the Argues will end up with amounts ranging from $15M to $21M, up to ten million more profit than the CIBC Development experts predicted they (Argues) would make, Google “cibc development experts predict argues will make ten million development profit”, and note below:

Review WALL OF UNFAIRNESS, note that the “ cibc experts value argue 20 acre acreage across from ck tower at $2M” that was why the Argue net worth was $2M, the Developer net worth required by Provincial departments to grant Developers approval to do developments, the point of WALL OF UNFAIRNESS, is that Wall gave Deveraux $2M of taxpayer money to color up his financial statement to the point that he could do developments, while Joe (Pettick) had to prove to the Provincial Departments the Argues had their own $2M, note below:

The Argue 20 acres is on the east edge of Regina and the next Regina expansion east will swallow up the Argues and maybe Regina City will allow the Argues to develop that 20 acres; at city size lots, 6 lots per acre, 120 lots at whatever Regina east end lots are priced at these days, +/-$80K, another +/- $10M for the Argues and if the lawyers accommodate my (Lee) ask, that is my job as the Argue Representative, note below:

Again review DRAFT OF CAUSE, scroll down to paragraph 15. note that I used the CIBC expert prediction of Argue Developer profit of $10M as a base for my claim, I will now change that to $24M as set out above, 10% is $2.4M and the $1.2M I end up with at 50% contingency fee agreement with a lawyer will be used to maintain and run Access ads for this Web site, advising Saskatchewan taxpayers how much money the Strudwick bribe demands have cost them, ie: $800K a year in lost tax revenue plus the payout of whatever is awarded to the Argues in damages, now note below:

Readers are asked to note below a draft of my (Lee)s cause of action against Edenwold Council, if a lawyer decides to take it on for me, he will have to decide what part of it to use or he may wish to design his own Statement of Claim.

STYLE OF CAUSE TO REFLECT LEE (Plaintiff) v RM of EDENWOLD # 158 (Defendant) (draft)

This Honorable Court is respectfully asked to take Judicial notice their former Chief Judge, the Hon John Klebuc, ensured this Honorable Court was fully integrated into use of the internet to conduct Court cases, and to take Judicial notice of the fact of Bill C-51, allowing Canadian Citizens to be charged under the Criminal Code of Canada for publishing Website statements deemed to support terrorism and the Honorable Court is respectfully asked to take Judicial notice of Website, https://ruralzoning.wordpress.com., published by the Plaintiff .

This Honorable Court is respectfully asked to take Judicial notice the Plaintiff’s Website is in response to Supreme Court Summary Statement for Case 31940, and Web site assessor, https://ruralzoning.wordpress.com.webstatsdomain.org/ deems the Plaintiff published site to be in the top 35 most watched Web sites in the 30M World Web site domains,therefore capable of providing evidence supporting Plaintiff case against the Defendant Council.

1.THAT the Plaintiff seeks damages for the Defendant’s refusal to accept Plaintiff’s request through Web site https://ruralzoning.wordpress.com which Web site purpose is to gain approval for the Developer and their Corporate creature, Spring Meadow Estates, thirty million dollar ($30M) residential development without carrying “flowers chocolates and perfume” to Defendant Administrator Donna Strudwick (herein after the Strudwick) as ruled by a Minister of the Crown was Plaintiffs only option.

Supreme Court Summary Statement Case 31940

2. THAT the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal ruled all zoning issues are political and the Court should not interfere unless the situation descends to farce.

Web site post TWO LADYS AND THE LEAVE BOOK paragraph 15.

3, THAT the Developer had already received approval for his development from the Defendant Council and the Plaintiff asked Regina Architect Joe Pettick to ensure the Developer received approval from all Provincial Departments.

Web site post TWO LADYS AND THE LEAVE BOOK paragraphs 1.- 6.

4. THAT part of the proof in paragraph 3. preceding was a favorable ruling by the Saskatchewan Municipal Board which Board ruling has the same weight in Saskatchewan law as a Queens Bench Ruling.

Web site post TWO LADYS AND THE SHALL LETTER all documents

5. THAT notwithstanding Provincial Department approval, the Strudwick, who reports to the Premier and Minister, refused to grant Development approval whereupon the Developer, after a failed legal attempt, asked the Plaintiff to serve as his Representative to obtain Development approval, without carrying flowers, chocolates and perfume to Defendants Administrator, the Strudwick.

Web site post TWO LADYS AND THE LEAVE BOOK paragraph 7. – 18.

6. THAT the Plaintiff, serving as the Developer Representative, did the political work requested by the Developer and as required by the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal, paragraph 2. preceding.

Supreme Court of Canada Summary Statement Google “scc 31940”

7. THAT the Plaintiff obtained political resolution when the Minister in the 1999 NDP/Liberal coalition, the Hon Jack Hillson, amended the Urban Act, allowing a Village to annex a development out of a RM, but the Strudwick demanded the next Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, over rule the first Minister Responsible, Jack Hillson, and Taylor ruled that the Village of Wood Mountain should not be allowed to exist and the only option the Plaintiff had to obtain approval for the Developer was to carry “flowers, chocolates and perfume” to the Strudwick.

Post TWO LADYS AND THE LEAVE BOOK para19- 22, Google “scc 31940”

8. THAT the Criminal Code of Canada Section 123 (1) (2) (3) MUNICIPAL CORRUPTION states that it is a contravention of the Criminal Code of Canada to carry anything to a Municipal official to curry favor.

Post TWO LADYS AND THE LEAVE BOOK paragraph 23.

THAT Canada’s Foreign Anti-Bribery Act has no time limit on investigation of bribery and corruption.

Canada’s Foreign Anti-Bribery Act

10. THAT the Plaintiff, serving as the Developer Representative complained to the Premier about his Minister Responsible ruling that the Plaintiffs only option to obtain approval was to carry “flowers, chocolates and perfume” to Strudwick.

Post TWO LADYS AND THE LEAVE BOOK paragraph 27.

11. THAT RCMP Staff Sergeant Brent Lewis destroyed affidavit evidence of RM of Edenwold ratepayers claim that the Strudwick and the Defendant wanted to destroy the Developer to obtain the Developers Development quarter and 350 gpm spring water flow for their personal use.

Post TWO LADYS AND THE LEAVE BOOK paragraphs 34. – 37.

12. THAT a Judge of this Honorable Court ignored the implication of RCMP Staff Sergeant’s admitted destruction of evidence, paragraph 10. preceding.

Post TWO LADYS AND THE LEAVE BOOK paragraphs 37., 41.

13. THAT the Strudwick launched successful Queens Bench libel action against the Plaintiff for his written complaint to the Premier paragraph 9. preceding, but the Court Registrar, Maurice J. Herauf Q.C. failed to keep a trial transcript.

Post TWO LADYS AND THE LEAVE BOOK paragraph 61.

14. THAT Maurice J. Herauf Q. C., the Court Registrar who failed to keep the Trial Transcript, paragraph 12. preceding, was promoted to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal, and notwithstanding Registrar Herauf’s failure to keep trial transcript the Plaintiff appealed to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal.

Post WITCHES OF EDENWOLD documents 1 and 2

15. THAT the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal ruled that even if the Plaintiff was right in his claim he had still libeled the Strudwick, which Appeal ruling the Plaintiff notes was a travesty, this Honorable Court is respectfully asked to take Judicial notice of the fact that in Canadian law truth is never libel.

Post WITCHES OF EDENWOLD document 4 Appeal Judgment

16. THAT the Plaintiff asked leave to appeal of the Supreme Court, leading to Supreme Court Summary Statement leading to the Plaintiff’s establishment of this Web site, https://ruralzoning.wordpress.com in July of 2007, which Web site has remained in place through two Saskatchewan General Elections, continually advertised on Access TV in Saskatchewan, and is now assessed as in the top 33 of the most watched Web sites in the 30 million World Web site domains.

Supreme Court of Canada Summary Statement Case 31940 and masthead of posts ASSESSOR SITE and WALL AND THE ASSESSOR SITE

17. THAT the Plaintiff asks this Honorable Court to take Judicial notice that the Supreme Court Clerks were as help full and supportive as Government Official’s could possibly ever be, they, the Supreme Court Clerks, in effect, took the Plaintiff, a layman, deemed by the Minister Responsible, the Hon Jim Reiter, to be the stupidest man in Canada, by the hand and lead him through the detail of the Supreme Court of Canada Leave Application, leading to Supreme Court Summary Statement, the basis for this Web site

Google “scc 31940”

18. THAT the Plaintiff states that Regina lawyer David McKay accepted instruction from West Meadow Raceway Association to launch legal action for “unfair” treatment and through secret agreement established precedent that a creature of the Provincial Government, the Saskatchewan Liquor and Gaming Authority (SLGA), must treat West Meadows Raceway, fairly, thereby forcing SLGA to settle the $6M lawsuit, albeit with all involved sworn to secrecy

Post ONE GOOD MAN

19. THAT the Plaintiff states the Defendant, a creature of the Saskatchewan Government, contravened the West Meadows Raceway legal precedent, paragraph 17. preceding, which precedent requires fair treatment of taxpayers.

Post PROBES LOST LOVE, first five paragraphs under masthead.

20. THAT the Plaintiff claims unfair treatment regarding water to service the Developers development compared to the treatment of the adjacent RM of Sherwood Reeve by the Sherwood Council. The Plaintiff asked Regina Architect Joe Pettick to prepare development plans and obtain Provincial Department approvals for the Developers Development and UMA Engineering proof of available water to service Development water, which was done.

Post TWO LADYS AND THE SHALL LETTER with documents.

21. THAT the unfair treatment of the Developer continued with the Defendant Administrator, the Strudwick, refusal to accept the proof of water flow provided by the Developers Engineers, UMA, paragraph 19. preceding and instructed that SASK WATER redo the water flow study which was done and established the Developers spring water flow at 350 gpm, enough for a population of 7500.

Post REITER-BARCLAY TWO STEP

22. THAT unfair treatment of the Plaintiff by the Defendant was that Proof of Developers spring water flow of 350 gpm was established, enough water to service a population of 7500, twenty five times the Developers planned population of 300, notwithstanding which the Defendant denied development approval until their Administrator, the Strudwick, was carried “flowers, chocolates and perfume”.

Paragraph 3 preceding Google “scc 31940”

23. THAT this Honorable Court is reminded Section 123 (1) (2) (3), MUNICIPAL CORRUPTION, of the Criminal Code of Canada, states that it is a contravention of the Criminal Code to carry anything to a Municipal Official to curry favor.

Google “section 123 (1) municipal corruption criminal code of canada”

24. THAT, in comparison to the Defendant Council, the RM of Sherwood Council, immediately adjacent to the Defendant Council RM, approved the Sherwood Reeve’s $200 Million dollar Development without the Sherwood Reeve Development having access to any water supply whatsoever, and which development did not have approval from any Provincial Departments.

Google “reeve of rm of sherwood tossed from office over land deal conflict cbc” which CBC article includes Barclay Sherwood corruption report.

25. THAT in comparison to the Sherwood Council approval of the Sherwood Reeve development, the Defendant refused the Developer, as represented by the Plaintiff, development approval, notwithstanding the fact of a 350 gpm spring on the Developers development quarter which 350 gpm spring water flow is so significant only 3% of the water flow is required to service the Developer project.

Review paragraph 20 proof preceding

26. THAT the Plaintiff was advised by Dr. Carl Baar, co author of Judicial report “Masters In Their Own House “ copyright held by the Judicial Council of Canada which report states that the Provincial officials control Judicial decisions through day to day control of the working lives of the Queens and Appeal Bench Judges and Dr. Carl Baar advised the Plaintiff that the only means to obtain fair treatment from Provincial Ruling Elite officials is through publicity.

Posts TURNING OVER ROCKS & BLACKMAILED, BULLIED OR BRIBED?

27. THAT as advised by Canadian Judicial and legal expert, Dr. Carl Baar, must be done, Web site https://ruralzoning.wordpress.com is ranked in the top 33 most watched Web sites out of 30 million World Web domain sites; despite the Web site ranking of the Plaintiff Web site, the Defendant RM continues its unfair treatment of the Plaintiff by refusing to grant the Developer approval.

Masthead of post EBERLE & THE BROS. PROBE

28. THAT a second example of comparatively unfair treatment of the Plaintiff, the Ontario Government granted the “caledonia couple” millions of dollars compensation, when their Web site support, Caledonia Wake up Call, was ranked only in the top 86,883 most watched Web sites out of 30 million.

WALL AND THE ASSESSOR SITE, last few paragraphs

29. THAT a third example of comparatively unfair treatment is the Administrator of Lamont Alberta, demanded bribes to approve a development, just as the Strudwick required flowers, chocolates and perfume, to grant development approval, but the Lamont Administrator was charged under the Criminal Code while the Strudwick was not charged.

SCC 31940 and ONE INFLUENTIAL MAN

30. THAT a fourth example of unfair treatment of the Plaintiff is the fact that Alberta Premier Redford was under criminal investigation for use of a Alberta Government airplane when the Strudwick was not investigated for demanding flowers, chocolates and perfume to approve Developers Development.

SCC 31940 and EBERLE & THE BROS. PROBE

31. THAT a fifth example of comparatively unfair treatment of the Plaintiff is the fact the fraud and corruption of the Council of the RM of Britannia #502 was addressed by concerned Judicial Elite, even unto the Supreme Court of Canada, while the proven bribery demands of the Defendant RM Administrator, the Strudwick, has been ignored by all Political and Judicial Authorities.

SCC 31940 post CROCODILES DO CRY

32. THAT a sixth example of unfair treatment of the Plaintiff is for the Harper Fed to allow the Strudwick to contravene Section 123 (1) (2) (3) MUNICIPAL CORRUPTION, of the Criminal Code of Canada, and demand flowers, chocolates and perfume to approve Developers development, while the Harper Fed used the Strudwick Dairy farm as a base to make a political boast announcing the destruction of the Canadian Wheat Board.

SCC 31940 ASSET NUMBERS

33. THAT a seventh example of unfair treatment of the the Plaintiff is that the Harper Fed charged Senator Duffy under Section 121 of the Criminal Code of Canada for taking bribes, while the Strudwick, as a Municipal official, is not charged under Section 123 of the same Criminal Code for demanding flowers.

Google “duffy charged under section 121” HARPER 122-STRUDWICK 123

34. THAT a eighth example of unfair treatment of the Plaintiff is that it is unfair for the Provincial Administration to give Developer Deveraux $2M of taxpayer money to color up his financial statement to support his development company, while requiring the Plaintiff to prove the Argues have their own $2M and still require the Plaintiff to carry “flowers chocolates and perfume “ to the Defendants Administrator, the Strudwick, to be granted Development approval.

Posts WALL OF UNFAIRNESS CROCODILES DO CRY SCC 31940

35. THAT it was unfair, and not even financially necessary, paragraph 33. preceding, for the Provincial Administration to give Developer Deveraux $2M of taxpayer money to color up his financial statement, all Deveraux would have to do to obtain the $2M cash he needed was to sell his Mexican Condo,

Google “mandryk: ndp charge against wall intolerable mandryk”

36. THAT it is unfair to the Plaintiff for the Provincial Administration, to pander to the Defendant by their moralistic stance carrying Provincial Legislation to stop their Saskatchewan Liquor and Gaming Agency (SLGA) from licensing strip clubs allowing women to remove their clothes in bars for tips, while allowing women RMAA officials, who report to the Premier and Minister Responsible, to demand flowers chocolates and perfume to approve economic developments.

Post EBERLE AND THE BROS. PROBE Google “scc 31940”

37. THAT it is unfair to the Plaintiff that the Saskatchewan Law Society, where the Saskatchewan Attorney General is a board member, ruled the economic interests of the Defendant Council are identical to their Administrator, the Strudwick, who reports to the Premier and Minister Responsible.

Google “lady justice janet mcmurtry rules strudwick reports to premier”

Post Update with reply from the Law Society of Saskatchewan

38. THAT the Defendant unfairly allowed their Administrator, the Strudwick, to make the final decision regarding the Developers Development, notwithstanding the Plaintiffs Web site ask that the Defendant make use of Schwab Investment offer of free economic advice from Schwab’s AI (artificial intelligence), which AI does not require flowers chocolates and perfume to approve developments.

EBERLE & THE BROS. PROBE BID RIGGING BASTARDS

39. THAT the Defendant unfairly allowed their Administrator, the Strudwick, to use her power on the executive of the Rural Municipal Administrators Association (RMAA) to destroy the career of RMAA Member Larry Hubbard, when he acted on behalf of the Plaintiff. The Strudwick destroyed Hubbard by ordering his move to Administer a RM on the Alberta Border who ruled he (Hubbard) was suffering mental problems, forcing the end of his career.

FACTS: EDENWOLD EVIL paragraphs 55 – 57

40. THAT Canada’s Revenue Agency (CRA) unfairly refused to grant the Plaintiff permission to establish a tax free non-profit corporation to raise funds for enhanced TV ads of this Web site in Saskatchewan and Ottawa.

SCHILLER ON STUPIDITY RURAL ZONING MONEY-MONEY-MONEY

41. THAT the Defendants Administrator, the Strudwick’s, requirement, leading to breach of implied contract, paragraph 8. preceding, may be compared to implied contracts between John Deere and General Motors, and Farmers using John Deere tractors controlled by computer codes owned by John Deere and operating General Motors vehicles controlled by computer codes owned by General Motors, all of which operate under implied contract.

Google “we can’t let john deere destroy the very idea of ownership wired”

42. THAT Farmers make up all RM Councils and the Defendant Council operate John Deere tractors and General Motors cars and trucks under a implied contract with John Deere and GM, the Council members, either are familiar with, or should be familiar with, implied contracts, have a implied contract to be fair, therefore acted unfairly by allowing their Administrator, the Strudwick, to demand flowers, chocolates and perfume to approve the Developers development.

Google “we can’t let john deere destroy the very idea of ownership wired” Google “rm councils required to act with fairness”

43. THAT the Defendant Council acted unfairly by stating in public that they did not need or want the tax revenue generated by the Developers development and then adopting a policy of refusing to allow the Village of Wood Mountain to annex the Developers development out of the RM of Edenwold as had been ordered by the Provincial Minister Responsible.

FACTS: EDENWOLD EVIL paragraphs 37 – 38

Google “rm councils required to act with fairness”

44. THAT the Plaintiff claims the Defendant unfair treatment caused his failure to obtain Development approval for the Developer, which Development CIBC Chartered Bank experts projected would earn $10M (ten million) pretax profit for the Developer and the Plaintiff, based on normal business development success fees of 10% (ten percent) claims restitution of $1M (one million) plus costs for Defendants unfair treatment of the Plaintiff as the Developer Representative.

SHERWOOD $200M REEVE Google “business success fee”

45. THAT this Honorable Court is asked to take Judicial notice that all funds this Honorable Court awards the Plaintiff against the Defendant will be used by the Plaintiff, for enhanced TV ads for this Web site in Saskatchewan and Ottawa, to obtain approval for the Developers Development without carrying flowers chocolates and perfume to Defendant Administrator, the Strudwick.

AFFIDAVIT OF INTENT, document 4

46. THAT this Honorable Court is respectfully reminded that John Difenbaker, declined to use witnesses in court, relying on documents, and asks the Plaintiff use Web site https://ruralzoning.wordpress.com to achieve Justice.

Google “john diefenbaker did not use defense witnesses in court”

This Honorable Court is respectfully asked to review the Supreme Court of Canada Summary Statement for Case 31940 and note that when the Plaintiff complained to the Premier that his Minister ruled that the Plaintiff’s only option to obtain approval for a $30M residential development, was to carry the Strudwick “flowers chocolates and perfume” the Plaintiff was found guilty of libel of the Defendants Administrator, the Strudwick, who was awarded $10,000.00.

The award was put on hold following the Supreme Court Summary but finding of libel guilt for lodging complaint of the Strudwicks demand with the Premier was pure insanity, and Web site https://ruralzoning.wordpress.com advertised on Access TV in Saskatchewan and Ottawa Cable Channel, is the most cost effective way to inform taxpayers of this Official bribe insanity.

NOTARY SEAL ALL OF WHICH IS RESPECTFULLY SUBMITTED.

Alberta Solicitor General Jonathon Denis’s boasts that he controls the Alberta Queens and Appeal Bench proves my (Lee)s claim TURNING OVER ROCKS RURAL ZONING and BLACKMAILED, BULLIED OR BRIBED? with Harper appointing Judges such as Richards and Toews to ensure that his base, the official Ruling Elite, such as the Strudwick, ASSET NUMBERS, are free to demand bribes to approve Developments, is a sick joke, but note below:

The Harper Fed is going to fall, they are desperate, google “justin trudeau targeted in anti-abortion flyers raj” and “high court rejects argument kadar was adult offender mcleod and vautar” and “court ok’s class action by those denied sick leave benefit while on paternal leave ctv news” and “don’t apologize ms may montreal simon”, note Harper hiding in a closet ordering Liz’s arrest.

66% of voters hate Harper and are determined to see him gone and despite their denials, after the election, Trudeau and Mulcair will join forces to defeat Harper in the house, if they don’t, their supporters hate Harper so much they will skin them (Trudeau and Mulcair) alive, Google “the world turns on hate john 15:18”, and note the current NDP Leadership, Breton and his Brain Trust, hate me (Lee) as much as Wall’s Brain Trust and the Highway Engineers hate me, and Strudwick hates the Argues for owning their development, but note below:

Review post “ Update with letter from Law Society of Saskatchewan rural zoning” note the RCMP destroyed evidence, and the Courts ignored affidavit evidence the Strudwick and her RM Council planned to take the Argue development and its 350 gpm spring and give it to the Strudwick. Google “scc 31940”, note the Supreme Court of Canada Web site showing that +/- 38,000 Web visitors are aware of hard (Supreme Court of Canada) evidence of the corruption of Donna Strudwick, as Administrator of the RM of Edenwold.

I (Lee) have no interest in living in a world where the Courts are controlled by Government officials as corrupt as that lying slut of the Strudwick, but readers are asked to google “lee does not have balls to suicide rural zoning” so google “perseverance wiki” and note I have soldiered on for the Argues, taking this Web site to where it is ranked in the top 35 most visited Web sites in the 30M world wide Web site domains, scroll back to the masthead under the title.

Google “mandryk: convention shows ndp has ways to go mandryk”. NDP Leader Breton came to form Government, and all I (Lee) ask is for the Argues to be granted approval for their development without bribing the Strudwick. Breton is asked to note that he can win the April 2016 General Election by doing the paint by number stuff, review FLOWERS, CHOCOLATES AND PERFUME.

Readers are asked to note that working title for the July post is SHORT CAUSE and the August post is in regard to the Department of Highway Engineers demand for bribes, working title is BID RIGGING BASTARDS.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: