ARE THE LAWYERS RIGHT?

First go to post SHERWOOD’S $200M REEVE, scroll into the post to about half way and note the paragraphs referring to Regina lawyer Tony Merchant, then scroll to near post end and review the paragraphs regarding the new Chief Judge, Richards, and my (Lee)s supposed guilt of libel of Lanes friend Donna Strudwick, post FACTS: EDENWOLD EVIL para. 30., note it gets much sicker.

Now google “court hears arguments appealing lawyer’s suspension polischuk”, I (Lee) apoligize for not linking the three items in the earlier post but until Heather had published her article I had no way to know abut this brazen Judicial horror;
Web readers should ask any Professor of Law at any University BUT there can be no doubt whatsoever but that given that the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal first sic’s that google “fuddel-duddel” Lane on Tony regarding his Indian billings and now allows Lane to sit on Tony’s license Appeal is the most sickening conflict of interest known to man, Lane hates Tony more than he hates me.

Note that of the handful of confidants that I (Lee) raised this question with, few have any great love for Tony, but all despise Lane and hope the Supreme Court Judges sensibilities are as shocked as theirs at this brazen Court of Appeal action using Lane against Tony while the Canadian Judicial Council (CJC) sneers at a well documented complaint regarding Lane’s “conduct unbecoming”, as the Devine AG; GARY LANE AND THE CJC and google “cic1 rural zoning”.

Now google “ sherwood plans box city in brown” & “proposed Wascana village in rm of sherwood moves ahead brown” again review SHERWOOD’S $200M REEVE, note that except for my (Lee)s reference to the Reeve’s contravention of Section 121, google “121 frauds on the government”, which the Leader Post lawyers fear of libel claims would have blocked, Vanessa’s articles summarize, succinctly and accurately, the points I (Lee) tried to make in Web post SHERWOODS $200M REEVE.

Web readers are urged to google “photos: r.m. of sherwood planning mega-project south east of regina cjme” & “great prairie development corporation”, &
“ the dnac project consultant inc. team” and note that it is a one man operation established a year ago; no one knows who bankrolls him and Moose Jaw sent him packing. Perennial left wing candidate for Regina Mayor, Chad Novak, supports the one man developer operation, google “chad novak for taxpayers of regina: introducing: new regina!!! “wascana village”, but the Star Phoenix Editorial Board refuses to endorse the Sherwood Reeves plan, note below:

Google “regional plans critically needed star phoenix” and note that the Saskatoon Star Phoenix Editorial Board urges the Wall Administration take control of Sherwood and Corman Park, exactly as Premier Roy Romanow tried to do, SASKATCHEWAN’S CURSE and STATESMAN ATTEMPT TO END EVIL.

Review LADY LORI-SOLUTIONS, note that history shows that back in the day Lt. Governor Edgar Dewdney created Regina City and the RM of Sherwood surrounding the City and used the combination to scam a fortune and RM watchers are waiting to see if the Sherwood Reeve can pull the same scam as Dewdney did; for more interest regarding the ongoing Regina/Sherwood battle, review the June 25, 2013 Metro, page 2 article “city, sherwood seeking mediation to smooth over development spat”. I (Lee) failed to find it, but computer geniuses could try to google “metronews.ca”; note below:

My (Lee)s long time friend Outlook Community Leader Lloyd Smith suggested using mediation and one of the Sherwood Council did not go along with the Reeves development plans so that would give the mediator a start toward a sane solution. Review posts ZONING PROBLEMS WITH A RURAL MUNICIPALITY? & “Update with reply from the Law Society of Saskatchewan”; note that Outlook Community leader Lloyd Smith has hands on knowledge of the mindset of the Officials administering Saskatchewan’s 300 RMs.

Lloyd Smith has spent the last couple decades serving as a broker of heavy equipment and commoditys, and has also been asked to design and Chair negotiations, planning large do-able deals that makes economic sense to both groups, and Lloyd knows the Hon Jim Reiter personally so could, perhaps, resolve RM of Sherwood v. Regina City, its worth a try.

Now google “duffy to be charged under section 122 breach of trust”, & “proof of duffy-wright cheque won’t spare pmo from rcmp probe plecash” and note the RCMP have dubbed their undertaking into the Duffy/Wright $90M Senate Housing scam, google “project amble” and are dealing with Duffy/Wright under Section 122, Breach of Trust; as a note of interest google “duffy wright breach of trust”, note a post of this Web site, along with search reference to the RCMP nuts and bolts of the conduct of the investigation, turn up in the search

Web readers are now asked to google “similar fact evidence”, it is a recognized tool in Criminal Law, now google “lorne mclaren wiki” note Mclaren served three and a half years in prison for “Breach of Trust”, remember what McLaren had done to warrant three and a half years incarceration?, note below:

Google “eric bernston wiki”. Devines PC donations had gone to nothing so in desperation, Deputy Premier Eric Berntson ordered McLaren, as PC Caucus Chair, to force the PC MLA’s to turn half their taxpayer funded Communications Allowance over to a fund controlled by McLaren which was used to advertise the PCs in the 1991 General Election that Devine lost to the NDP. McLaren was following orders from Deputy Premier Eric Bernston, who as a Senator, was incarcerated for fraud and Breach of Trust, caught in what the RCMP dubed “operation fiddle”, SEA OF CORRUPTION, again google “similar fact evidence”.

The Breach of Trust was the subject of media reports at the time that taxpayer money was diverted from the MLA communication funds but the diverted taxpayer money did not benefit McLaren personally and he was following orders from Deputy Premier Bernston, yet McLarens acts were Judged to be Breach of Trust, and he was incarcerated for 3 1/2 years for acting under orders.

That “acting under orders” defence did not work for the Nazi SS at Nuemberg after WW II and it did not work for McLaren, so legally it can not work for the RM Administrator, Strudwick who controls the RM so with McLaren/Bernston and Duffy/Wright as precedent, why is Donna Strudwick getting a free ride on a RCMP investigation for contravention of Section 123 of the Criminal Code?

Google “four regina lawyers advised earle and sharie argue it was impossible to obtain approval for their thirty million dollar development without paying bribes to rm of edenwold administrator donna strudwick”, review, as many, or as few, of those posts as wished or needed, BUT for confirmation of the correctness of the spirit of that legal advice for the Argues google “scc 31940” and review the Supreme Court Summary Statement, its succient and accurate; now note below:

The Supreme Court of Canada Summary Statement for Case 31940 refers to my (Lee) serving as the Argue Representative and the Court reference to the fact that the NDP Minister stated that my only option to obtain development approval for the Argues was to carry “flowers, chocolates and perfume” to Strudwick, which NDP Ministerial edict was impossible to honor, note below:

Review post WITCHES OF EDENWOLD, scroll down to the documents, page 3, copy of Section 123 (1) MUNICIPAL CORRUPTION, and note that it is a contravention of the Criminal Code of Canada to carry anything to a Municipal Official to curry favor, with a penalty of five years in prision for contravention of that MUNICIPAL CORRUPTION Section of the Criminal Code.

Review TWO LADYS AND THE LEAVE BOOK para. 34. – 41. uncontradicted evidence that RCMP Staff Sgt. Brent Lewis destroyed affidavit evidence of Strudwick corruption; why, given the RCMP actions in the McLaren precedent set out preceding, and the RCMP now investigating Duffy/Wright for Breach of Trust and the legal concept of google “similar fact evidence” why are Strudwick, Len Taylor, RCMP Staff Sgt. Brent Lewis not investigated for Breach of Trust?

I (Lee) promised the Argues to go the last inch on the last foot of the last mile to obtain approval for their thirty million dollar residential development without bribing RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick and again google “scc 31940” and note when that SCC Summary Statement was released in July of 2007 proving the fact of Strudwicks need for “flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) to approve the Argue development then as soon as the SCC Statement was released I established this Website https://ruralzoning.wordpress.com,.

This site and its genius Web master has served to this day and the site host, WordPress, deems this site to be “well liked and well watched”, note the three solid green bars at the end of each post in the search results and it has a good roxor ranking, refer to the last paragraphs in post LADY JANET AND THE CJC, but the Devine-Wall Brain Trust stand firm, Strudwicks bribes must be paid.

Note that visit numbers are now at thirty three thousand but my (Lee)s effort on behalf of the Argues, despite the significant economic benefit to the taxpayers if the Argue development was allowed to go ahead, has been ignored by the Devine-Wall Brain Trust and there can be no doubt whatsoever but that Donna Strudwicks bribe income is placed well before Saskatchewan taxpayers benefit .

I (Lee) have done my best to be reasonable in my ask of the Devine-Wall Brain Trust for a Argue/Strudwick resolution, google “lee did not come to clean a augean stable”, count the Web posts where I make the point that my only interest in the issue is to obtain Earles development for him without having to bribe RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick, but have been ignored.

It is true that I (Lee) have mentioned a secondary goal, my desire to clear my name of libel of Strudwick, BUT there can be no doubt whatsoever but that I must accept that is a impossible dream; after a couple more years of this Web site, ie: after the November 2015 General Election, the Devine-Wall Brain Trust may decide that it is in their political interest to grant Earle his development without paying Strudwick her bribes, but the Queens and Appeal Bench Courts will never admit in a million years that they caved in to the lying, corrupt slag Strudwick and was blackmailed, bullied or bribed, to rule that I had libeled her.

BUT I (Lee) would be content with a symbol; as example, if the Devine-Wall Brain Trust decided it was in their political interest to grant Earle approval for his thirty million dollar development with bribing that slag of a Strudwick, that would mean that I, the stupidest man in Canada, accomplished what four Regina Lawyers deemed to be “impossible”, and a NDP Crown Minister ruled was my only option, ie: pay Strudwick her bribes.

As result, if I (Lee), a non-lawyer, obtained Earles development for him without bribing Strudwick, that would be a miracle, and I should be sainted, but the Devine-Wall Brain Trust are dubed as Premier Brads “catholic mafia” and I am Anglican, so it is impossible for them to expect that their Pope would grant me, a baptised Anglican, Sainthood, I accept that as fact with no offense taken.

BUT if the Devine-Wall Brain Trust did grant Earle development approval it could quite properly ask the U of S to grant me a Honarary Doctorate of Law, it would cost the taxpayers nothing except the paper and ink, and would drive that google “fuddel-duddel” Lane crazy. I (Lee) was told at the time that when Joe Pettick was granted a Honarary Law Degree Lane went crazy, and I believe he would go crazier if I was granted a Honarary Law Degree, but why not if I accomplish a miracle and Earle is granted his development without having to bribe RM Administrator Donna Strudwick?, now note below:

I (Lee) advanced three ideas for a solution to the Argue refusal to pay Strudwick bribes, ideas that could accomplish that goal without costing the taxpayers one red cent, or cost the Devine-Wall Brain Trust one square inch loss of face, the only loser would be Strudwick who would not get her bribes to approve the Argue devlopment, review my three ideas in post VENAL VISCIOUS RURAL OFFICIALS, & SARM LEADER LIES note the three ideas advanced are all sound plans, any of which would work perfectly and cost the taxpayers nothing.

Review LADY LORI-SOLUTIONS, note that I (Lee) existed for a while in a dream world where the Justice system might clean up the Strudwick corruption, review GARY LANE AND THE CJC, but that came to nothing, google “cic1 rural zoning”, note the CJC snicker and sneer at me.

Review LADY JANET AND THE CJC, note the CJC will not even acknowledge my complaint, sent by registered letter over a year ago. Again review LADY LORI-SOLUTIONS, note my suggestion that the Saskatchewan Courts could use Saskatchewan precedents to address the Strudwick corruption but have been ignored, and now know why I have been ignored by the CJC, ie: the Chief Judges are the CJC, note below:

Web readers are asked to review the last few paragraphs of post SHERWOODS $200M REEVE, note that Richards, the Appeal Judge who dismissed my Appeal in the Strudwick libel case, has been appointed Saskatchewan’s new Chief Judge, now again google “scc 31940”, review yet again the SCC Summary Statement, and note below:

The Supreme Court of Canada confirms my (Lee)s claim that a NDP Minister Responsible ruled that my only option to obtain approval for Earles development was to carry “flowers, chocolates and perfume” to Donna Strudwick, and note the reality of Section 123 MUNICIPAL CORRUPTION, every voting taxpayer recognizes that ruling as being a NDP Ministers order to pay bribes to one of his Officials, Donna Strudwick, a official who the Court ruled reported to the Premier and Minister, google “strudwick reports to premier and minister rural zoning”.

The Saskatchewan Queens/Appeal Bench Courts, with Richards now appointed Chief Judge, ruled that my (Lee)s complaint to NDP Calvert about having to pay bribes to Strudwick to obtain development approval was libel, but review post LADY’S LETTERS AND SLAPP, scroll down to the two letters that Richards ruled libeled Strudwick, review the letters and note below:

Web readers are reminded that the Rural Leaders laugh at me (Lee) and deem me to be the stupidest man in Canada and this Web site to be a stupid joke, despite those facts note that before I filed the letters with NDP Taylor and NDP Calvert, while I may well be the stupidest man in Canada, the Outlook Community Leaders are not stupid and had the letters “lawyered” to check for libel, four lawyers did that and offered opinion that the letters documented truth, so were not libel, google “truth is never libel”, so I filed the letters.

Now review WITCHES OF EDENWOLD, scroll down to the documents, note pages 4. to 14., Richards Appeal Judgement, note that Richards sets out in his paragraph 27. on pages 12. and 13. that even if what I said about Strudwick was “correct” I (Lee) still libeled her (Strudwick) now review post TWO LADYS AND THE APPEAL BOOK, scroll down to the Leave Book and note paragraphs 38. – 41. and 62.- 64. where I address Richards point in the Leave Book.

Web readers are asked to note that Strudwick is so arrogant she did not even respond to the Leave Book, and the Supreme Court, in its wisdom and based on my (Lee)s “Leave Book” responded as they did with their Summary Statement proving my basic claim, again google “scc 31940” Strudwick’s demand for “flowers, choclates and perfume” to provide Earle Argue with Development approval which SCC Summary Statement provided a base for this Web site.

Chief Judge Richards looks like a fool, or corrupt, so that is why, with Richards now appointed Saskatchewan’s Chief Judge, Saskatchewan Courts will never deal with the Strudwick corruption, as I (Lee) was daydreaming in post LADY LORI-SOLUTIONS; this Web site’s visit numbers are now over thirty thousand and are increasing every day, but Chief Judge Richards does have a solution available to him, its draconian and dangerous, Lane tried it and failed, so Richards may not have the balls to use it, but note below:

Go to post TWO LADYS AND THE SHALL LETTER, review the first few paragraphs, note that if Chief Judge Richards comes to believe that this Web site may accomplish the goal of obtaining approval for Earles thirty million dollar development without paying Strudwick her bribes he (Richards) could charge me (Lee) under the Criminal Code with either google “scandalizing the court” or “ section 296 blasphemous libel”, it is not clear to me from google if the ancient charge of “scandalizing the court” is still available to the Chief Judge, but Section 296 is available and it is a Criminal Code offence with a penalty of two year incarceration, which means a Jury Trial.

The problem for Chief Judge Richards with that is that its a Criminal Code offence which means a Jury Trial and a Jury would have to review this Web site to determine if it is “blasphemous libel” and I (Lee) will take my chances any time on a Jury trial on the question regarding the Chief Judge and this Web site, where the Chief Judge, as Appeal Judge, review WITCHES OF EDENWOLD, documents page 12. – 13. paragraph [27]., ruled that I libeled Strudwick even if I was “correct” in my claims of her corruption, google “truth is never libel wiki”.

If I (Lee) am wrong about a Jury I will end up serving two years in jail and the Chief Judge will give a Native Posse Leader a walk on a few of his murders of Rival Drug Lords in exchange for slaughtering me while in jail but that is immaterial; google “Canada is so corrupt lee does not care if he lives or dies rural zoning”, I have repeated that fact in several posts; I have few nightmares, one is Norway Rats, who I equate with Saskatchewans Ruling Elite Officials and Judges, and second nightmare is the fact I do not have the balls to suicide.

Review LADY LORI-SOLUTIONS, and note the point of the few preceding paragraphs regarding Saskatchewans new Chief Judge is that there can be no doubt whatsoever but that my (Lee)s day dream of the Saskatchewan Courts accomplishing my goal of obtaining approval for Earles thirty million dollar development without bribing Donna Strudwick by revisiting my libel guilt verdict of Strudwick, is just that, ie: a day dream, the 4 Regina lawyers are right, Strudwick has got to be bribed for Earle to be granted development approval.

The 4 Regina lawyers advised it was impossible to obtain approval for Earles thirty million dollar development without bribing RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick and I (Lee) was so arrogant that I thought that it could be done and while I did give it a hell of a shot, go to post FACTS: EDENWOLD EVIL, note the many instances where I was justified in believing that I had done it, but was wrong and the lawyers right, Strudwicks bribes have got to be paid to obtain development approval in the RM of Edenwold.

Review TURNING OVER ROCKS RURAL ZONING, and note that Dr. Carl Baar co- author of the Judicial Council of Canda report “Masters In Their Own House” BLACKMAILED BULLIED OR BRIBED?, advised me (Lee) the Officials and Judges have no fear of their political Masters, their only fear is the public and there can be no doubt whatsoever but that this Web site has been doing a hell of a job of getting the message out and there are three different NGOs affected by this Web site documenting Strudwick corruption; 1) SARM ( the Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities), 2) the RMAA (Rural Municipal Administrators Association), 3) the Queens and Appeal Bench Judges.

As set out above, with Richards as Saskatchewan’s new Chief Judge the Saskatchewan Queens and Appeal Bench Court will work behind the scenes to make sure that Earle does not get development approval without bribing Strudwick, just exactly as the Court, in effect, ruled must be done, and anyone who complains about carrying the “flowers, chocolates and perfume”, ie: paying bribes to Strudwick, is guilty of libel, google “scc 31940”, but the Queens/Appeal Judges are appointed for life so do not care about poor publicity.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that SARM/RMAA will suffer from the publicity generated by this Web site, review posts SARM LEADER LIES & LADY LORI AND A SARM MOTION & SHERWOODS $200M REEVE, but there can also be no doubt whatsoever but that those corrupt bastards are so arrogant that they believe that the Wall Administration has no choice but to protect their arrogant corruption forever to stay in power, they may, or may not, be right, but are so arrogant they do not care about publicity.

The only hope for me (Lee) to obtain development approval for Earle without bribing Donna Strudwick is the Devine-Wall Brain Trust, and that does appear to be as hopeless as the NGO possibility’s but Web readers should review HARPER 122-STRUDWICK 123, & SHERWOODS $200M REEVE, and note the corruption touchs the Harper PMO.

Web readers, especially Sask Party supporters, are asked to take particular note of the uproar over the Duffy Senate $90K fraud and the bigger uproar over the Nigel Wright $90K cheque to protect Duffy from fraud charges, and now the even bigger uproar over CBCs Greg Weston unearthing the fact of a secret Harper PMO slush fund where Nigel Wright has signing authority, note the existence of the Harper secret slush fund answers a basic question, ie: why would Wright give Duffy $90K?, the answer is simple, he wouldn’t, note below:

In the unlikely event that Harper ever appointed a thirty something divorcee or widow with great legs, elliptical rump, and a propensity for short skirts and high heels to the Senate and the poor woman, alone in Ottawa, with no place to live, Wright, who is a investment Banker, as wealthy as any of Barack’s Wall Street Bank Bastards, may out of the goodness of his heart, and with Senate salarys not able to provide for basic needs, and not wanting to see the poor woman forced to scam the taxpayers on her Senate housing allowance to buy groceries may have given her $90K for down payment on a Ottawa Condo.

Review the first couple paragraphs of HARPER 122-STRUDWICK 123 and SHERWOODS $200M REEVE, note the hard fact is that if Wright had given a gift of $90K to a mythical divorcee/widow Harper had appointed to the Senate, for a down payment on a Ottawa Condo, it would still have been a contravention of the Criminal Code of Canada, but a Jury would have at least been able to understand Wrights motive, a good old fashioned Ottawa sex scandal, akin to google “munsinger affair wikipedia”, but note below:

With Duffy there is, or was, until CBC’s Greg Weston great work digging up the Harper slush fund, no explanation. He (Duffy), while not as wealthy as Wright, is not as destitute as the mythical divorcee/widow, and the slush fund used to cover up is taxpayer money and believe me (Lee) while Alberta Reformers would not have liked the mythical sex scandal its at least understandable and they will be in a insane fury at the secret slush fund using their donations to bail out a sleaze bag such as Duffy; to the Reformers it could have been worse only if Wright had been stupid enough to bail out both sleaze bags, Duffy and Wallin.

The Reformers despise, to the level of irrational hatred, the shyster sleaze bags such as Duffy, Wallin, and eastern investment Bankers such as Nigel Wright and many of them will believe that these corrupt bastards lead Harper down the Garden path, but will still never forgive him and Harper is doomed, google “canadians jump on tredeau bandwagon poll shows authier”.

As a note of interest for Web readers a couple of my confidants do not like my (Lee)s use of words such as “slags” to depict Strudwick and Lady Janet, and “corrupt bastards” to depict Duffy/Wright and the Sherwood Reeve, in these posts; well Web readers, my word choice is in good company, google “fed fights back against ‘feral hogs’ financial times”, note that the Obama people set out why they depict the Wall Street Bank Bastards as “feral hogs”, very fitting.

The fact is that sooner or later that Wright/Duffy Cheque for $90K is going to surface and if Wright wrote the cheque on a Conservative Party slush fund the Conservatives situation will end up worse than it was following Mulroney when the PCs ended up with two Federal ridings….. do Web readers remember that?

Remember the joke about Charest’s wife Michele (Dionne), she was/is a neat lady, well liked and popular with the Hill jounalists, but to make the point they still made up a tacky joke, ie: “have you heard? Michele is sleeping with half the Tory Caucus”, which, of course, she was, her husband; Web readers are asked to think of it, 2 MPs and Sask Party members, are asked to review HARPER 122-STRUDWICK 123 & SHERWOODS $200M REEVE and think about it.

There is no doubt whatsoever but that Harper and the Conservatives can not survive, google “trudeau protest was manned by Tory interns and organized by pmo huff post” & “canadians jump on trudeau bandwagon poll shows authier”, note that the Harper PMO is terrified by the fact that Trudeau will be Prime Minister after November of 2015, and any of the Devine-Wall Brain Trust who thinks the Wall Administration will not need all the help they can get to survive that Political nightmare is living in a dream world, as example, google “queen city a royal pain for wall mandryk”, and note below:

Web readers, especially Sask Party supporters, are asked to google “lee offers deal to settle strudwick corruption at no taxpayer cost”, and note the several search results showing posts of this Web site where that offer is made and also review post AFFIDAVIT OF INTENT, scroll to the documents, page 4, my (Lee)s affidavit to use any restitution funds accruing to me from resolution of the Argue/Strudwick bribery debacle to establish a Foundation to maintain this Web site.

Sask Party supporters are urged to phone, e-mail, visit their offices, or write their Sask Party MLA urging them to review this post and think about the implications for the NDP of this Web site being advertised on Access TV 3 times a hour, 24 hours a day 365 days a year, pointing out that a NDP Minister Responsible ruled that a Developers only option to obtain development approval was to bribe his Official Strudwick and this fact has been of general interest to Web readers.

Review SHERWOODS $200M REEVE, and note that I (Lee) have made much of the fact that the SARM President Dave Marit’s robo-call scam failed BUT google “robo-calls court case: conservative mp’s seek $355K from voters huff post” and note that notwithstanding the fact the Judge blamed the robo-call debacle on the Harper Administration, which debacle Marit quarter backed, the Harper MPs are seeking damages, google “sickening unto death”.

Sask Party supporters should know that the Devine-Wall Brain Trust hates me (Lee) as much as Lane hates me and as much as Strudwick hates Earle and Sharie Argue, but tell them to get over it, remind them that I will not benefit personally from any restitiution, tell them to review post AFFIDAVIT OF INTENT and scroll down to the documents, note page 4 and think about the implications.

Sask Party supporters are asked to advise the Devine-Wall Brain Trust to review post SOME STUPID-SOME JOKE and note what was accomplished by this Web site in November of 2011 with only limited Access advertising and tell them to think what could be done with a properly funded Foundation advertising this Web site in the +/-100,000 Saskatchewan homes Access TV services.

Imagine what the result would be for the NDP in November of 2015 should the Foundations Access Ad program reach the practical limit where more Access Ads did not increase the visit count, and the Foundation then began a Ad program for this Web site on Shaw which provides TV service to another +/- 100,000 homes in Saskatoon, Prince Albert, Moose Jaw and Swift Current;
Sask Party supporters are asked to remind the Devine-Wall Brain Trust of some significant collateral benefit from this Web site, as just one example below:

Review GARY LANE AND THE CJC, & LADY JANET AND THE CJC, note reference to the BBB concern about the corruption of a Eastern based out fit named “Just Energy” controlled by Lady Janet McMurtry’s father, Ontario legal and political legend, well, the bastards are back, google “private gas company selling door-to-door in Regina book”.

Note that if the 4 Regina lawyers are wrong and I (Lee) can obtain approval for Earles development without bribing Donna Strudwick and be granted enough restitution to maintain and advertise this Web site there will be benefit as below:

1) The taxpayers will benefit from tax Earles development providing houses and creating employment, and paying income tax on Developer profit and annual property tax.

2) The Devine-Wall Brain Trust will benefit from this Web site publishing the fact that the NDP Political Elite rule that their Officials, such as RM Administrator, Donna Strudwick, must be carried “flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) to approve developments, which should help in the four year Election cycle.

3) The non-political voter/taxpayer will benefit from the information of the corruption of Officials running the NGOs such as SARM, the RMAA, the Queens /Appeal Bench Courts, and Saskatchewan Department of Highway Engineers.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: