LADY’S, LETTERS AND SLAPP

Web readers are asked to review Web segment WHY IS CANADA SO CORRUPT? and note that when I (Lee) established this Web site in 2007, Dr. Michael Atkinson, a Professor from the University of Saskatchewan, who instructs a class on corruption in Government, was using polls showing that 66% (sixty six percent) of voters believed that all Politicians are corrupt and that 39% (thirty nine percent) of voters believe all Judges are corrupt.

Dr. Atkinson must be a excellent instructor because, google “most think corruption on the rise survey finds associated press”, now in 2011, four years later, 79% (seventy nine percent) of voters believe the Politicians are corrupt, a increase of 13% (thirteen percent) in four years; in four more years it will be at 92% (ninety two percent) and two and a half years after that, 100% (one hundred percent) of voters will believe that all Politicians are corrupt. ….

Saskatchewan is only part of North America’s “public corruption evil” google BUT I (Lee) am sure Premier Brad does not want to see 100% (one hundred percent) of voters believing all Politicians are corrupt during his watch and Premier Brad may want to address the rural zoning corruption policy of his corrupt predecessor Premier Lorne Calvert and Link, the NDP Leader of the Official Opposition, and order a public inquiry into the fact that the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, ruled that the Argues only option to obtain development approval was to carry “flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) to RM Administrator Donna Strudwick for that approval.

With that need for a public inquiry into rural zoning corruption in mind, Web readers are asked to note the Boundary Board ruling of December 22nd 2004, as set out in Web segment TWO LADYS AND THE SHALL LETTER, where the Boundary Board, in their first paragraph on page 8 (eight) of their ruling, states that the Argues may apply again to RM Administrator Donna Strudwick for development approval, but when Earle (Argue) tried to do that, as ruled by the Boundary Board he could, the RM Administrator, Strudwick, ordered him (Earle) off the premises. This caused Earle (Argue) to conclude that bribes still had to be paid Strudwick to obtain development approval, notwithstanding the Boundary Board ruling.

In Saskatchewan Law, a Boundary Board ruling has the same weight as a Queens Bench Ruling, consequently, the Argues could have gone to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal with Strudwicks refusal to reconsider his zoning application, as ordered by the Municipal Boundary Board, BUT, four Regina Lawyers advised that it was impossible to get by Strudwick, so I (Lee), as the Argue Representative, advised the Argues that because of the corruption of the Saskatchewan Courts the only possible means to overcome Strudwicks lies and corruption was a public appeal as advised by Dr. Carl Baar, co-author of the Judicial Council of Canada Report “Masters In Their Own House” note Web segment BLACKMAILED BULLIED OR BRIBED?

The NDP Political Elite, the SARM (Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities) Elite, and the RMAA (Rural Municipal Administrators Association) Elite insist that I (Lee) am the stupidest man in Canada for my refusal, on behalf of the Argue family, to bribe RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, to obtain development approval for the Argues, but is that true?

Notwithstanding the SARM and RMAA Elite belief that I (Lee) am the stupidest man in Canada, I am still a “good soldier” and I ask Web readers to note again Web segments TURNING OVER ROCKS, STIRRING IN THE SEWAGE LAGOON and BLACKMAILED BULLIED OR BRIBED? and note that I planned, as advised by Dr. Carl Baar, co-author, with Jules Deschenes, of the Judicial Council of Canada report “Masters in Their Own House”, to prepare a public appeal to try to obtain development approval for the Argues without bribing RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick.

Web readers are asked again to take special note of Web segments TURNING OVER ROCKS, and STIRRING IN THE SEWAGE LAGOON, note that the co-author of the Judicial Council report, “Masters In Their Own House”, Dr. Carl Baar, advised me (Lee) that the only possible way to overcome the “ public corruption evil ” (google) of the heinous Provincial Government Officials and Queens Bench Judges, was public appeal and the first step was a political appeal to the NDP Political Elite.

After being apprised of Dr. Carl Baars advise, and discussing the content of the Judicial Council of Canada Report, “Masters In their Own House”, the Wood Mountain Village Mayor and Council, the Argue Family and the Outlook Community Leaders, decided, because of the corruption of the Courts, that the only approach would be a political/public appeal, first to the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, and if that failed, then to the NDP Premier, Lorne Calvert, and if that failed to appeal to the public through the internet so that was the approach that I (Lee) planned and that was what has now been done in a effort to obtain development approval for the Earle Argue family for their $30,000,000.00 (thirty million dollar) residential development without bribing RM of Edenwold Administrator Strudwick.

At the time I (Lee) believed that everything was going well with my plan to accomplish the impossible and obtain development approval for the Argues without bribing Donna Strudwick. As advised by Dr. Carl Baar, note Web segment TURING OVER ROCKS, and STIRRING IN THE SEWAGE LAGOON, following the Municipal Board Application and the Boards ruling, Web segment TWO LADYS AND THE BOUNDARY BOARD RULING, we had a rock solid paper trail of Official, formal Government documents, including the Municipal Boundary Board ruling, establishing that the Argues had been granted development approval by Strudwick, with the internet and Great Google perfect tools to take that hard evidence to the public.

My plan, as advised by Dr. Carl Baar, as being the only possible solution to over come the “ public corruption evil” (google), to bypass the Courts by public appeal must have leaked, because Strudwick and her two bit-shyster, Glen Dowling, paid by the taxpayers, decided to move first against me (Lee) and use a “slapp” (google) action to stop me from using publicity to obtain development approval for the Argues, ie; Strudwick used SLAPP to sue me (Lee), the Argue Representative, for libel because of my complaint to NDP Premier Calvert about her lies regarding the Argue development approval, which lies by a Municipal Official, are a contravention of Section 123 (2) MUNICIPAL CORRUPTION of the Criminal Code of Canada.

RM Administrator Strudwick’s use of a “slapp” (google) action stopped me (Lee) for a two year period, from 2005 to 2007 (when it got to the Supreme Court), from using publicity, such as this Web site, to obtain development zoning for the Argues $30,000,000.00 (thirty million dollar) residential development without paying Strudwick her bribes, as ruled by the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, was the Argues, and my, only option.

Strudwick’s use of a “slapp” (google) action worked fine for her (Strudwick) as a delaying tactic, but the end result is a Supreme Court of Canada Summary Statement for case 31940, which Summary Statement is conclusive evidence of what I (Lee) claim regarding Strudwick corruption, ie: the Argues (and I) were told by the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, that our only option to obtain development approval was to carry “flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) to RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick.

Web readers are asked to google “slapp” and note that the term is a acronym for “ Strategic Legal Action Against Public Participation”. There can be no doubt whatsoever but that my (Lee)s two letters worried RM of Edenwold Administrator Strudwick and her boss, then NDP Premier Lorne Calvert, google “ strudwick reports to premier” that she (Strudwick) used a “slapp’ (google) action against me, the Argue Representative, to stop my efforts to obtain development zoning for the Earle Argue family of Regina without bribing her (Strudwick), or else NDP Premier Calvert ordered her to start the “slapp” (google) against me (Lee), the Argue Representative, once the Argue family refused the million dollar bribe of tax payer money to go away quietly, note Web segment VENAL AND VICIOUS RURAL OFFICIALS.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that Strudwick and her boss, NDP Premier Lorne Calvert, google “ strudwick reports to premier” were annoyed because I (Lee) refused to pay bribes to Strudwick even after the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, ruled that the only option that I (Lee) had to obtain development approval for the Argues was to carry “flowers, chocolates and perfume” (a bribe) to Strudwick, note Supreme Court Summary Statement for Case 31940.

Web readers are asked to note that it is common practice for the Official Government scum, such as RM Administrator Strudwick, to use their two-bit shysters, such as Glen Dowling, whose legal fees are paid by the taxpayers, to start “slapp” (google) actions against “whistle blowers” (google) such as I (Lee), to block any attempt, such as my attempt to obtain development approval for the Argues without carrying “flowers, chocolates and perfume” ( bribes) to Strudwick as ruled by the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, as being the only option the Argues had to obtain development approval.

As a note of interest, Web readers are asked to google “province considers stamping out slapps” and note that half of the US States and Quebec have anti-slap legislation to stop big companies from using nonsense libel actions to scare off protestors and/or stop heinous Official Government scum, such as RM Administrator Strudwick, from using the SLAPP tactic to maintain their flow of bribe money to approve economic development projects such as the Argue $30,000,000.00 (thirty million dollar) residential development.

The purpose of this segment is to provide Web readers with the detail of the action that I (Lee) took to obtain development approval for the Argues, to wit: two letters, one to the Premier and one to the Minister Responsible, letters that caused her (Strudwick) enough concern to use her two-bit shyster, Glen Dowling, (paid by the taxpayers) and her “slapp” (google) action to block my effort to obtain development approval without bribing her (Strudwick).

I (Lee) repeat, the action that I took that annoyed Strudwick, was to write two letters, the first dated January 11th, 2005, to the then NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, and the second dated February 3rd, 2005, to then NDP Premier Lorne Calvert. SARM and the RMAA Elites never stop laughing at me and insisting that I (Lee) am the stupidest man in Canada, and that may well be true, but I do have a few very smart friends and confidants, and the Outlook Community leaders insisted the letters must be checked by a lawyer for libel before I submitted the letters to the NDP Political Elite.

The Outlook Community Leaders obtained a legal opinion from four different lawyers and the advice from all four was the same, the statements made in my letters to Taylor and Calvert told the exact truth and were fully documented with unimpeachable evidence, so based on Canadian Law, which states clearly that if a statement is true, it is not libel, so the letters could not possibly be libel, as a result of that advise, I filed the two letters with the NDP Elite, Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, and Premier, Lorne Calvert.

Web readers are asked to note that the two letters are shown here as Strudwick filed them with the Court, when Strudwick’s two-bit shyster, Glen Dowling, started Strudwick’s “slapp” (google) libel action against me, and Web readers are asked to note the letters contain references to attached documents to prove the statements made, but Strudwick did not include the proof documents when she filed her libel claim based on the two letters.

I (Lee) ask Web readers to google “ encyclopedia of everyday law libel and slander”, and scroll down to “Back Ground”, and note the first line in the third paragraph where it states “Truth is an absolute defense”, and keep that fact in mind while reviewing my letters to the NDP Leader Elite, Taylor and Calvert, and the remainder of this Web segment; note the letters below.

I (Lee) ask all Web readers to again review Web segment TWO LADYS AND THE SHALL LETTER and I ask Web readers to note that Lady Lori Douglas has the chickpea size soul of a street prostitute, but is a Queens Bench Judge under the NDP Administration in Manitoba and is a Associate Chief Judge, so therefore has power to set Queens Bench Judicial Standards Canada wide, but moonlights from her day job administering Justice to have her lawyer husband post her bondage-pornographic giving oral sex in on-line pictures, got caught at it and tried to end the potential for publicity and public revulsion by paying blackmail to a Black extortionist, who then, as extortionist’s Black, White, Red Green or Blue, often do, refused to stay bought, and sued everyone in sight for more money leading to media interest.

Lady Justice Lori Douglas was appointed to the Manitoba Queens Bench Court in 2005, google “nude photo’s of judge contained in complaint cbc” and Strudwick’s libel action against me (Lee) was the first case Lady Janet had heard as a Queens Bench Judge when she (Lady Janet) wrote Judgment finding me (Lee) guilty of libel of Strudwick on August 25th 2006.

Lady Janet heard Strudwick’s libel action against me in December of 2005 so it took her 9 (nine) months to write Judgment that should have taken her 9 (nine) minutes to decide and 9 (nine) hours to write, so Lady Lori had plenty of time to brainwash Lady Janet that her only duty, as a Queens Bench Judge, is to ensure the flow of bribes to Saskatchewan’s NDP official Elite, note Web segment BLACKMAILED BULLIED OR BRIBED?

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that the Honorable Lady Justice Janet McMurtry, a new Queens Bench Judge hearing her first case, would have been indoctrinated by Lady Justice Lori Douglas and would have been following the heinous Queens Bench Ethical rules established by Lady Justice Lori Douglas, note Web segment TWO LADYS AND THE SHALL LETTER, when she (Lady Janet) made her judicial rulings regarding the facts of my alleged libel set out in my letters, ie; my complaint to the Premier, as the Representative of the Earle Argue family of Regina, of the need to pay bribes to RM Administrator Strudwick to be granted development approval, as ruled by the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, was my only option.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that, Saskatchewan Queens Bench Judge, Lady Justice Janet McMurtry, functioning under the Calvert NDP Administration and guided by the Queens Bench moral and ethical guide lines set by Lady Justice Lori Douglas, under the Manitoba NDP Administration, made certain that the Earle Argue family of Regina suffered a economic loss of at least $10,000,000.00 (ten million dollars) because of their (the Argues) refusal to pay bribes to RM Administrator Donna Strudwick to obtain development approval.

Web readers are asked to note that the Argues are so steeped in honor that even when it was ruled by the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, that paying bribes to Strudwick was their only option to obtain development approval, the Argues still refused to pay Strudwick’s bribes even to earn $10,000,000.00 (ten million dollars) and Lady Janet, in effect, upheld that “public corruption evil” (google) NDP policy by finding me (Lee) the Argue Representative, guilty of libel of Strudwick for my complaint to NDP Premier Calvert about RM Administrator Strudwick’s lies and corruption.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that the heinous Saskatchewan NDP Government policy has destroyed the Argue family’s dream of a residential development and the chance to make $10,000,000.00 (ten million dollars) pre-tax profit, and for the RM of Edenwold ratepayers to receive substantial tax revenue is the same “public corruption evil” policy that allows heinous official Government scum, such as RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, discretionary zoning power, google “sarm discretionary zoning power” which she (Strudwick) uses to demand tax free bribes from the Developers, note Web segment TWO LADYS AND THE BOUNDARY BOARD RULING.

A Web reader has brought my (Lee)s attention to the fact that Saskatchewan Queens Bench Judge, the Honorable Lady Justice Janet McMurtry, following the heinous Queens Bench Judicial ethical standards set by Manitoba’s Queens Bench Associate Chief Judge, Loris Douglas, has not only allowed SARM (Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities) to maintain their discretionary zoning power to demand bribes from honest Developers such as the Earle Argue family of Regina, but Lady Janet also covered up the fact that SARM and the Administrators have discretionary zoning power.

I (Lee) ask all Web readers to note the fact that SARM falsified their “clearing the path” (google) study on Rural Economic Development by failing to disclose in their Web site that the Senior Administration, the Provincial Legislature, has granted the RM and their corrupt administrators, the power to use Discretionary zoning to “favor” Developers, google “sarm discretionary zoning” which point establishes “the evil of public corruption” (google), as follows;

SARM, following hearings in their “clearing the path” (google) economic development study, determined and set out in a written first draft that the fact of Discretionary zoning power is leading to “development favoritism” which is causing “a lack of economic development” in Rural Saskatchewan and the cover up of this fact by the Honorable Lady Justice Janet McMurtry, was brought to my attention by a Web reader.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that what the Web reader brought to my (Lee)s attention is a better method of accomplishing what I have been using in this Website for the last 3 1/2 (three and a half) years to prove to the honest voters, that the RMAA (Rural Municipal Administrators Association) Members refuse to grant development zoning until their bribes are paid.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that I (Lee) have been preoccupied with trying to use the fact the then NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, ruled that the Earle Argue family of Regina’s only option to obtain development approval was to carry “flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) to RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick, note Supreme Court of Canada Summary Statement for Case 31940.

I (Lee) believed that the Public would assume that the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, would not have singled out the Argue family as being the only Developer required to pay bribes to Strudwick to obtain development approval and that all Developers always had to bribe all Rural Administrators to obtain development approval, so the problem of bribes to the Rural Administrators to obtain development approval was universal here in Saskatchewan and costing the tax payers substantial tax revenue, so my plan for public appeal should have worked, but may not be the best approach.

The Web readers point is; I (Lee) had the Argue/Strudwick bribes for development problem nailed down cold with massive hard evidence which was perfect to prove to a honest Court that the Argues had to bribe Strudwick to be granted development approval, but the obvious fact of the corruption of the Saskatchewan Courts, note Web segment BLACKMAILED BULLIED OR BRIBED?, has created the need for public appeal to the honest taxpaying voters, as advised by Dr. Carl Baar, which requires a different approach.

The Web readers point is; the taxpaying voters do not give a rats ass about the Argues loss of $10,000,000.00 (ten million dollars) or my (Lee) being personally destroyed, any more than Link, Lorne Calvert, Len Taylor, Glen Dowling, Lady Janet or Lady Lori do, so I (Lee), have to prove to the honest taxpaying voters that the problem extends beyond the Argue family and that Rural corruption is costing all honest taxpaying voters significant money in lost tax revenue.

The Web reader brought this fact to my attention and provided me with the information to prove the fact that SARM was aware of “development favoritism” and all Web readers are asked to google “sarm clearing the path final report” and scroll down to ISSUE #6: The Discretionary Use Provision.

After noting what is set out in the preceding paragraph, Web reader are asked to now note page 3 (three), the third paragraph, in my Taylor letter, what is marked with a asterisk and underlined, is the results of the original findings of the SARM “Clearing the Path” study, note that the study report originally stated ISSUE #6: The Discretionary Use Provision is Being Misused and concludes that “developer favoritism” was blocking Rural economic development but four words, “misused”, “blocking” and “ developer favoritism” were removed in the final report which was then published, in its falsified form, on the SARM Website after Strudwick started her SLAPP action against me (Lee), this is SARM cover up of rural zoning corruption.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that the SARM contradiction and cover up is “public corruption evil” but there can also be no doubt whatsoever but that Lady Janet’s Queens Bench cover up of the “evil of public corruption” of SARM and the RMAA is worse than the corrupt actions of the SARM and the RMAA Elite because Lady Janet swore a oath to act with honor, whereas the SARM and RMAA Elite swear to nothing and have no interest other than their own personal economic interest, note Web segment TWO LADYS AND THE SHALL LETTER, the Boundary Board Ruling page 3. paragraph [5] e. where the Board rules that the Edenwold Council had repeatedly stated in public that they had no interest in the tax revenue the Argue development would provide to the RM ratepayers.

If the Lady Janet had read the two letters that Strudwick used as a basis to sue me (Lee) for libel it would have been impossible for her (Lady Janet) to miss what is spelled out and underlined in that paragraph in the Taylor Letter, to wit: the fact that SARM itself spells out in its “clearing the path” (google) study that “developer favoritism” is blocking rural development, but Lady Janet chose to ignore that glaring fact, and this Judicial cover up of the “evil of public corruption”, and is actually more heinous than the SARM original cover up itself, note the preceding paragraph; this is Queens Bench public corruption at its most evil, google “public corruption is evil”.

The fact is that I (Lee) may live to see the end of the “public corruption evil” of SARM and the RMAA Elite ruling Rural Saskatchewan like a feudal age fiefdom. Web readers are asked to note a recent Globe and Mail article, google “the growing problem paul waldie” and note that the Farm Family Elite who control SARM and the RMAA are so inefficient that despite massive Government subsidies the rest of the worlds farmers are burying them, this fact, coupled with their google, “public corruption evil” regarding rural zoning corruption should cause enough public revulsion to finish the RMs as the Administrative units for Rural Saskatchewan.

Web readers are reminded that my (Lee)s letter to the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, was one of the two letters that Strudwick had based her libel action on, note Strudwicks affidavit/exhibit reference in the lower right hand corner of page 1 of my letter to Len Taylor and at the top right hand corner of page 1 of my Calvert letter.

Web readers are asked to note that when Strudwick submitted my Taylor and Calvert letters to the Court in support of her libel action, she (Strudwick) did not include the proof documents and the Queens Bench Trial Judge, the Honorable Lady Justice Janet McMurtry, did not demand that Strudwick or Glen Dowling, Strudwick’s two-bit shyster, paid by the taxpayers, provide the proof documents originally attached to the two letters, but that fact is immaterial, note below:

Even without the proof documents attached to the Taylor letter the body of my Taylor letter is plain English. Lady Janet had to have read my Taylor letter to rule on it and Lady Janet had to have known what SARM set out following their economic development study and there can be no doubt whatsoever but that Lady Janet, following the Judicial Ethical standard set by Manitoba’s Lady Lori, Lady Janet ignored SARMS own words setting out the developer favoritism of the RMAA and found me (Lee) guilty of libel of Strudwick, note Web segment, BLACKMAILED, BULLIED OR BRIBED?

The Outlook Community Leaders had the four lawyers check my letters for libel, all four lawyers advised that the letters were not libel because they (the letters) set out well documented truth; the question is, why did Lady Janet still find me (Lee) guilty of libel of Strudwick? ; the answer to the question is self evident, note Web segment BLACKMAILED, BULLIED OR BRIBED?; Lady Janet had already been either blackmailed by the NDP Elite, or bribed by SARM, or bullied into submission by Lady Justice Lori Douglas, and there can be no doubt whatsoever but that I (Lee) can raise serious question before a public inquiry as to whether or not that venal and vicious woman, Lady Justice Janet McMurtry, even bothered to read the two letters the RM Administrator, Donna Strudwick, based her “slapp” (google) libel action on before she (Lady Janet) wrote libel Judgment against me.

Honest, taxpaying, voters, are urged to not lose sight of the forest for the trees. As evil, ugly, repulsive, and loathsome the Official Government scum, such as RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick, and the two Queens Bench Judges, the Honorable Lady Justice Janet McMurtry, and the Associate Chief Judge of the Manitoba Queens Bench Court, Lady Lori Douglas are, these massively corrupt women are of little importance because they always function as instructed by the Senior Government Officials, note the Judicial Council of Canada report “Masters In Their Own House” as set out in Web segment BLACKMAILED BULLIED OR BRIBED?, and in the Argue/Strudwick question of bribes for development approval, they (the Judges) function as instructed by the NDP Political Elite, to make sure that Strudwick gets her bribes, remember “strudwick reports to premier” (google).

Web readers are asked to note in Web segment BLACKMAILED, BULLIED OR BRIBED? on one of the flyleaf pages of the Judicial Council of Canada report, there is reference to a quote from Judge Learned Hand, ( great name for a Judge) he stated “Nothing is Perfect” and there can be no doubt whatsoever that, despite my (Lee)s endless complaint in this Web site about the corruption of the Judiciary, the fact is that even if our Judges were perfect, even if our Judiciary were all honorable men and women made up of Angels with Gabriel or God himself as Chief Judge, it would not matter one iota.

Web readers are asked to note again Web segment BLACKMAILED, BULLIED OR BRIBED? and note in the heart of that Web segment, Chapter III of the Judicial Council report, “Masters in Their Own House”, it sets out that the Judges support staff are all Provincial Officials hired and paid by the Province, all colleagues of Strudwick, who reports to the Premier, google “strudwick reports to premier”, and the Judges support staff simply refuse to publish anything the Judges rule if that decision is in conflict with what the Judges had been ordered to rule by the NDP Political Elite, so striking the Judges honest, or placing a host of Angels lead by Gabriel as the Chief Judge, on the Judicial Benches, would not solve “ the evil of public corruption”.

I (Lee) remind all Web readers that two Honorable Political leaders, Roy Romanow and Jack Hillson, note Web segment SASKATCHEWAN’S CURSE did their best to deal with the “public corruption evil” of the heinous official Government scum who rule the Rural Municipalities like feudal age fiefdoms and that at this point, given the massive amount of evidence amassed, all that is needed is a public inquiry to solve the problem of Rural Zoning corruption and gain a “substantial” amount of tax revenue, note the Municipal Board FACTS: paragraph [5] j. and k. on page 3 of the Municipal Board ruling note Web segment TWO LADYS AND THE SHALL LETTER.

I (Lee) can easily prove to a public inquiry that then Premier Roy Romanow and his then Minister Responsible in the 1999 NDP/Liberal Coalition Government, Jack Hillson, had taken a serious run at ending the postage stamp RMs feudal age control of Rural Saskatchewan by forcing the RMs to amalgamate and form Counties with honest Administration, in the hope of promoting some economic development in Rural Saskatchewan only to face vociferous opposition from the Rural leaders before he got it done, note again, for the upteenth time, Web segment SASKATCHEWAN’S CURSE.

At Premier Roys request the Ministers Responsible in the 1999 NDP/Liberal Coalition Government, originally Clay Serby, then Jack Hillson, had taken the plan for amalgamation of the RMs to the point where they had Cabinet Approval, but SARM demanded the right to have amalgamation on their terms and when then Premier Roy agreed to SARMs demands and then resigned as Premier and NDP Party Leader, SARM forgot about their agreement to amalgamate, again note Web segment SASKATCHEWAN’S CURSE.

Premier Roy, second only to Ross Thatcher, was the best Premier the Province has ever had, he (Roy) stood alone and saved the Province from bankruptcy following the Devine Gang “disappearance” of Ten Billion taxpayer dollars, and I (Lee) believe that the only reason the hard left of the NDP would have to force his (Roy)s removal as Premier and NDP Party Leader was because of his insistence on RM amalgamation into Counties, again note Web segment SASKATCHEWAN’S CURSE.

The only possible explanation for the hard left of the NDP demanding Premier Roys resignation was to stop his (Roy)s Minister Responsible, Jack Hillson, in the 1999 NDP/Liberal Coalition Administration, from forcing the amalgamation of the RMs into larger Rural administrative units (Counties) and in effect removing the need for the corrupt Rural Administrators, is the hard left NDP hatred of the business community and the insistence that the business community must remain subject to the bribery demands of the Senior Officials, such as RM of Edenwold Administrator, Donna Strudwick.

More “ evil of public corruption” bribery and corruption of public officials; A Web reader, intrigued with my setting out the facts regarding the Accountant, the Clinic of Doctors, the bribes to the Doctors from the Drug Company, the Revenue Canada agents, and the Drug company VP, note Web segment TWO LADYS AND THE BOUNDARY BOARD RULING, brought to my (Lee)s attention a Leader Post article dated November 27, 2010, google “medical bribes an open secret sisters say charlie fidelman” and a Globe and Mail article dated December 17th, 2010, google “ insurer alleges toronto area medical clinic bilking system perkins and robertson” which article sets out that it is common practice for Canadian Doctors, paid as Government Officials, to demand cash bribes from patients and/or their families to perform operations and to defraud the Insurance companies by billing for not done doctoring.

Web readers are asked to note a Murray (Mandryk) political column, google “ ndp gets unlikely political first aid as physicians confront sask party mandryk” and note that the Provinces Doctors, are nothing more or less than highly paid Senior Government officials, exactly like RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, google “strudwick reports to premier” and the Doctors, like Strudwick, also demand bribes to do their job, again google “medical bribes an open secret sisters say charlie fidelman” and if any Web reader believes that bribes to Doctors to perform operations, or to any Government Official, such as RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, to do his/her job, is a question for a RCMP criminal investigation they are living in a dream world.

I (Lee) remind Web readers that when Outlook Community leader Lloyd Smith, took affidavits to the RCMP regarding the corruption of RM Administrator Strudwick , her (Strudwick)s two bit shyster, Glen Dowling, paid by the taxpayers, telephoned RCMP Staff Sergeant Brent Lewis, who then, acting on Dowlings orders, destroyed the hard evidence of Strudwick’s lies and corruption…. and when I (Lee) complain to the Law Society regarding Dowlings action, the Saskatchewan Law Society, controlled by the NDP Elite, laughed at me and tells me to go “fuddle-duddle” (google) myself, note Web segment “Update with reply from Law Society of Saskatchewan”.

It is true that RCMP Staff Sergeant Brent Lewis’s “public corruption evil” of destroying evidence of the corruption of public officials, such as RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, is not as evil as the acts of “pig man picton” (google) when he slaughtered a dozen or so native prostitutes and feed them to his pigs, but I (Lee) ask all Web readers to consider this question:

Do I (Lee) have to prove that the official scum, the NDP Elite, the SARM and RMAA Elite, and the handmaidens of those Elites, to wit: RCMP Staff Sergeants, Queens Bench Judges and Lawyers paid by the taxpayer, who blocked development approval for the Argue development until the Argues paid bribes to a Government official, RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, are as evil as “pig man pickton” (google) before a Public inquiry is called?

I (Lee) remind all Web readers that a public inquiry was called into the Mulroney-Schreiber corruption horror and the David Milgaard Judicial horror with out any indication whatsoever that the level of “public corruption evil” involved was at the Pig Man Picton “horror movie” level of horror. What has been done to the Argues, and I (Lee), by the NDP Elite because of the Argue refusal to bribe a senior Government official, RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, is not at the “pig man picton” level of horror but is all part of the “evil of public corruption” (google), and in economic terms the corruption of the Elite is just as evil because it is driving Canada to the edge of the financial abyss, google “all economists say corruption economies are doomed”

Web readers are asked to review Web segment SASKATCHEWAN/ AFGHANISTAN CORRUPTION and note that a Saskatchewan Blogger observed that the Judiciary in Saskatchewan is as corrupt as the Judiciary in Afghanistan and Web readers are asked to note that the WikiLeaks founder has now opened up the fact that Canada’s Federal Administration knew of the Afghanistan Corruption, google “afghanistan is so corrupt it makes the canadian ambassador’s blood boil”; in short, the Feds knew that the Judges in Afghanistan are just as corrupt as our Judges here in Saskatchewan.

Web readers are asked to note Regina Leader Post article for December 4th 2010, google “ glib comment condemned juliet o’neil” and note that the University of Calgary Professor, Tom Flanagan, has been condemned for his statement that WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange should be assassinated.

I (Lee) disagree most adamantly with Tom (Flanagan) about the WikiLeaks founder; I believe that the WikiLeaks guy is the ultimate “whistleblower” and has done a good days work and should have statues built in his honor, songs composed to him, and medals awarded to him, for his work in making sure that the Canadian Public is aware that the Afghanistan Judiciary is as corrupt as Saskatchewan’s, again note Web segment SASKATCHEWAN/ AFGHANISTAN CORRUPTION.

I (Lee) strongly disagree with Tom about the assassination of the WikiLeak guy, BUT I have always admired him (Tom) and so want to make sure that if his detractors have their way and in the event he (Tom) is charged under the Criminal Code for his public statement that the WikiLeaks guy should be assassinated Tom must be made aware that I personally set a legal precedent here in Western Canada for being found not guilty for my public statement that the Devine Gang Finance Minister and Attorney General, ie: that fuddel-duddle Lane (the Hon J. Gary) should be shot, it happened as follows:

My (Lee)s Highway Contracting Company, Western Earth Moving, had thrived during the Liberal Administration of Ross Thatcher because as long as the Highway contractors donated 2% (two percent) of the value of the contracts to the Liberal Party of Saskatchewan, Premier Thatcher protected the Highway Contractors from the Corrupt Saskatchewan Department of Highway Engineers and their demand for bribes, but after the Government changed from Liberal back to NDP in 1971, Blakeney allowed the Highway Engineers to again demand bribes, which I refused to pay and after three years, plagued by the actions of the corrupt Government of Saskatchewan Highway Engineers, Western ran out of money.

Western’s Civil lawyer at the time, D.A. Mackenzie of Esterhazy, advised that I (Lee) go to work as a political organizer for Devine so I organized the North East Corner of the Province for the PC’s so well that I was given personal public credit, (articles in local media), for the fact that the PCs won 4 (four) out of 5 (five) seats in the “Red Square” area of the Province, google “saskatchewan ndp plans to go rural in former red square”.

When Devine formed Government in April of 1982 both D. A. (Mackenzie) and I thought that the Western problem would be solved but once Devine had fronted the defeat of Blakeney and formation of a PC Government, Lane (the Hon J. Gary) moved in and took over and before the Devine Decade of Disaster was over the Devine Gang had “disappeared” Ten Billion dollars of Saskatchewan tax payer money, some of it into Swiss Bank accounts, making the bribes the Blakeney Saskatchewan Department of Highway Engineers demand look like a office girl had raided the stamp box for makeup money.

When the Devine administration refused to address the Western issue, I (Lee) prepared an appeal to all the Legislative Members, but Lane, acting as Attorney General, confiscated my appeal material from the MLAs. Because of my work organizing “red square” for the PC’s I knew virtually all the Devine back bench personally and they, the PC back bench, to a man/woman hated Lane (the Hon J. Gary) and when he (Lane ) confiscated my Western appeal many of the backbenchers phoned to tell me Lane had taken my appeal material away from them and they could do nothing for me, my standard response to the backbench PC MLAs was, “Lane should be shot”.

That was before the Great Google had set up his Website machine so I (Lee) started running full page Ads in Saskatchewan’s Weekly newspapers lodging public complaints that Lane had confiscated my MLA appeal material, so Lane then, acting as the Devine Gang Attorney General, charged me (Lee) under the Criminal Code with “threatening” him, as Attorney General, for my statement to the back bench PC MLA’s that “ Lane should be shot”.

Lane charged me (Lee) with “threatening” him in December of 1985 but as Attorney General he had control of the criminal trial agenda so stalled my trial for over three years and did not take the threatening charge to trial until January of 1989 when public opinion finally forced him (Lane) to take the criminal charge against me to trial where my Jury was out for about fifteen minutes before finding me not guilty of “threatening” Lane.

Web readers are reminded that by then it was a matter of public record that Lane had served for one year as the Devine Gang Finance Minister instead of Attorney General and during that one year as Finance Minister Lane (the Hon J. Gary) caused one point three Billion dollars, (yes Virginia that is a B as in a Billion, one thousand million dollars). It is a matter of public record that Lane, as finance Minister caused 1300 (thirteen hundred) million dollars to “disappear” in one year out of a Province of a million people.

Saskatchewan has a population of a million people and one and a third Billion taxpayer dollars disappeared under Lanes personal direction, so he, (Lane), disappeared $1300.00 (thirteen hundred dollars) for every man woman and child in Saskatchewan, over $5000.00 (five thousand dollars) per average family. The fact is that I (Lee) probably could have actually shot that “fuddle-duddle” (Google) Lane and the Crown could have used the Devine Gang Caucus as their jury pool and I would have been found “not guilty”, but I didn’t shoot him (Lane) so the Saskatchewan people now have to put up with him (Lane) for at least another decade as a Court of Appeal Judge.

Melville Lawyer Merv Ozirny defended me at my jury trail for the statement that “ Lane should be shot”. Merv is believed to be one of the top Criminal defense lawyers in Western Canada and he presented my jury with three high level, precedent, “should be shot” type of situations, all of which had been widely reported on in the media but no criminal charges had ever been laid.

The first precedent was when then Prime Minister Brian Mulroney was making a speech in a small town near Saskatoon and David Orchards brother was in the audience heckling him (Mulroney) he, (Mulroney) told him (David Orchards brother) that he would not leave the hall alive which was widely reported on in the media, but Mulroney was not charged with threatening.

The second precedent that Merv gave my Jury was that the Agriculture Secretary for the State of Minnesota was in Regina making a speech to the NFU (National Farmers Union), and he, the Secretary (similar to a Minister in Canada) stated that both Mulroney and Regan should be hung for treason for implementing NAFTA and the audience, the NFU farmers, gave him (the Secretary) a standing ovation which was reported on in the media but the US Agriculture Secretary was not charged with threatening here or in the US.

The third precedent Merv used for my Jury was another US example. Remember that this all occurred over a decade ago, at the dawn of the terrorist age, and Colonel Gaddafi of Libya, was using his oil money to bank roll a few budding terrorist cells, so a US Senator, in a speech, stated that “Gaddafi should be shot” and the US Human rights groups started demanding that the US Attorney General charge the Senator under the Criminal Code for his Gaddafi statement, (just like the rights groups are demanding Tom be charged today) so the US Attorney General made a speech; he detailed the instances of terrorism Gaddafi had bankrolled and set out that he (the Attorney General) agreed with the Senator that Gaddafi should be shot and added the words “if we can ever catch the bastard we sure as hell will shoot him”, again there was plenty of media coverage.

As I (Lee) said above, after Merv had provided those three examples, making the point that notwithstanding the wide spread media coverage of the high level public threats, no charges were ever brought in the examples cited and then Merv worked his magic on my Jury in closing argument and my Jury was out for fifteen minutes before returning a “ not guilty” verdict on the charge.

In 1991, two years after I (Lee) was found “not guilty“ of threatening Lane, and a few months before the fall of the Devine Gang, notwithstanding the fact that he ( Lane) had never practised law a day in his life, (Lane only did politics) Mulroney appointed that “fuddle-duddle” (google) Lane (the Honorable J. Gary) to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal where he has been ever since, and when Strudwick started her “slapp” (google) libel action against me, Jim Hipkin, Reeve of the RM of Lumsden, warned me to be very care full of Strudwick because she and Lane were close personal friends.

It has been said; “what goes around comes around” (google). The fact that Merv Ozirny saved me (Lee) from prison for my statement that “Lane should be shot” allowed me the ability to stop Lane from being named Chief Judge for Saskatchewan when he (Lane) was short listed for the position after Bayda retired, note Web segment FLOWERS, CHOCOLATES AND PERFUME, which meant that he (Lane) could not, as Chief Judge, order that his friend, RM Administrator Strudwick, may expropriate the Argues development quarter and 350 gpm spring water flow for her personal use, note Web segment “Update with reply from Law Society of Saskatchewan”.

My being able to stop Strudwicks expropriation of the Argue Development quarter and spring water flow means that the Argue family still has a chance to make their $10,000,000.00 (ten million dollar) pre tax profit from their development and not have to live with seeing two of the white collar criminal Elite scum, Donna Strudwick and Lane (the Hon J. Gary), expropriate their (the Argue)s development and make the $10,000,000.00 (ten million dollars) instead of the Argues, and this is all because of the fact that Merv Ozirny saved me (Lee) from a prison sentence for stating; “Lane should be shot”.

There was a great deal of media on the Lane stuff but it was pre-google so I (Lee) can not refer the Web reader to the media as I have been doing with the Argue/Strudwick/bribes/for zoning, but I will make sure that Tom (Flanagan) is aware of this Web site, particularly this segment, and if he is charged under the Criminal Code for his WikiLeak Statement I will make sure that he (Tom) gets all Court documents and the extensive media of the day.

Should Tom (Flanagan)s defense team question my (Lee)s credibility there will be the usual Court legal paper trail in the Court archives, or they can talk to Melville Lawyer Merv Ozirny, or Tom can talk to Senator Dave Tkachuk, who I worked for organizing “red square” before the 1982 General Election, actually anyone who knows me will tell Tom, I am “always glad to help”.

Web readers are asked to google “flanagan draws another complaint mike barber” and note that a BC Human Rights legal group want Tom charged under section s. 464 of the Criminal Code COUNSELLING AN OFFENCE NOT COMMITTED and Web readers are asked to note that is the Criminal Code section that I (Lee) have been pleading for the Wall Administration to use to charge the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, for his ruling that the Argues only option to obtain development approval was to carry “flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) to RM Administrator Donna Strudwick.

The RCMP destroy the evidence of the corruption of Saskatchewan’s white collar criminal Elite, note Web segment “Update with reply from Law Society of Saskatchewan” but note that since Len Taylor committed the Criminal Code offence under s. 464 while sitting in his office in the Legislative Building, I (Lee) have pleaded with the Wall Administration to ask the Regina City Police to investigate, note Web segments TURNING OVER ROCKS and SASKATCHEWAN’S CURSE, but Premier Brad has ignored me.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that the Rural leaders are treating rural Saskatchewan as if it was their feudal age fiefdom. As example, google “rm of rudy town of outlook feedlot” and note that the RM of Rudy is ignoring the concerns of the Outlook citizens who do not want a Brooks Alberta smell problem and do not want a 36,000 (thirty six thousand) head feedlot next door to their Town and the Town of Outlook residents were talking about legal action to stop the feedlot but that is a waste of money.

Web readers are asked to google “susan mcgrath says judges take bribes” and note that a woman named Susan McGrath, the Lobby head of the Canadian Bar Association, says that the Queens and Appeal Bench Judges take bribes, in short, the Judges are for sale to the highest bidder and Web readers are reminded that SARM self insures, google “sarm self insures” and note that each RM has a stockpile of two million tax payer money in their accounts, there are three hundred RMs, so SARM has a slush fund of one half a Billion dollars (yes Virginia that is a B as in a Billion, one thousand million) dollars to bribe Judges, so the Towns do not have a snowballs chance in hell of out bidding SARM in a bidding war for a favorable Queens Bench ruling.

As ruled by NDP Minister Responsible Len Taylor, note Supreme Court of Canada Summary Statement for Case 31940, the only option that a Developer has to obtain development approval is to bribe the RM Council and the fact is that the RM Council are the guys getting the bribes from the Alberta feedlot operators, and live on their farms, so do not have to live in Outlook next door to the 36,000 (thirty six thousand) head feedlot and the Brooks Alberta level smell of the feedlot; the rural zoning Corruption problem must be addressed.

A good place to start would be with a Milgaard type of public inquiry into the blocking of the Argue Families $30,000,000.00 (thirty million dollar) development and my personal destruction by a NDP Queens Bench Judge as ordered by the NDP Elite because of my refusal to pay bribes to RM Administrator Donna Strudwick to obtain the Argues development approval.

There is hope. I (Lee) ask all honest Web readers to listen carefully and you can sometimes hear “the tumbrills clattering on the cobblestones” (google), and to always remember the wise words of Edmund Burke, google “the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing”.

I ask all taxpaying voters to contact their Member of Parliament (MP) asking for a public inquiry to be conducted by a honest Judge from Alberta or the US and Sask Party supporters are asked to review Web segment LADY LORI AND A UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCE, note my (Lee)s personal commitment to the Premier, should he (Premier Brad) order a public inquiry.

Buy your Apple and
Mac Magsafe Power Adapters here!

Buy your toshiba laptop and
notebook power adapters here!

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: