VENAL AND VICIOUS RURAL OFFICIALS

After publication in this Web site of segments BLACKMAILED, BULLIED OR BRIBED?, and SASKATCHEWAN’S CURSE, a very annoyed Web reader, a NDP woman activist, stopped me (Lee) on the street to tell me, in no uncertain terms, and at length, that I (Lee) am wrong about NDP Premier Calvert being corrupt and that Premier Calvert simply could not control the RM of Edenwold Administrator, Donna Strudwick, google “ lady janet mcmurtry rules strudwick reports to premier”.

During that one sided conversation the Web reader depicted RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick as such a arrogant, brazen, “poisonous bitch” that Premier Calvert, who is a decent men, could not begin to cope with her (Strudwicks) demands.

I (Lee), as usual, said nothing, just stood and listened, but as I listened to the woman’s words my mind did begin to ramble; I began to wonder, assuming her statements were rooted in truth, why did Premier Calvert not do what Ross Thatcher would have done with RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, just fire the dread full woman’s venal and vicious ass out the door?

The NDP woman activist’s tirade did force my mind to run through the facts, sure NDP Premier Calvert could have fired Strudwick, so Strudwick would then sue for wrong full dismissal, so what?, Premier Calvert was dictating the Judgments, note Web segment BLACKMAILED, BULLIED OR BRIBED?, but then I (Lee) recalled life is not that simple for the Saskatchewan Premiers of today.

The danger of a wrong full dismissal action by Strudwick was not NDP Premier Calverts problem. Calverts problem was exactly the same as the problems faced by the NDP Premier before him, Premier Roy Romanow, and Calvert did not want to suffer the same fate as his predecessor, Premier Roy, suffered, when he (Premier Roy) tried to remove the RMs from the face of Saskatchewan and form Counties to govern Rural Saskatchewan and the hard left of the NDP forced Roys removal as NDP Party Leader and Premier and replaced him with Calvert, note Web segment SASKATCHEWAN’S CURSE.

The woman did also force my (Lee)s mind to run through some basic facts going back to my youth, google “always check your premise” which was a phrase from Ayn Rand’s cult classic “Atlas Shrugged” or the simpler axiom “go back to basics”, and my mind also turned to the modern, more apt phrase, google “when you are up to your ass in alligators its hard to remember your job is to drain the swamp”.

The woman did cause me (Lee) to remember my original premise on behalf of the Argues, ie: our Senior Provincial Political Leaders simply can not cope with the venal and vicious Officials in the RMAA (Rural Municipal Administrators Association) such as RM of Edenwold Administrator, Donna Strudwick and the only way the Earle Argue family of Regina is ever going to be granted development zoning from either the current Administration or the Official Opposition, note Web segment TWEEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE, without paying bribes to her ( Strudwick), is to remove the RMs from the face of Saskatchewan. That is exactly what Premier Roy Romanow with his then Minister Responsible in the 1999 NDP/ Liberal coalition Administration, Jack Hillson, tried to do, note Web segment SASKATCHEWAN’S CURSE.

I (Lee) repeat, the woman’s tirade did force me (Lee) to realize that then NDP Premier Calvert, just like the Argues and I (Lee) serving as the Argues Representative, Premier Roy and his then Minister Responsible, Jack Hillson, in the 1999 NDP/Liberal coalition Government, all had the same basic and insurmountable problem, to wit: the venal and vicious RMAA (Rural Municipal Administrators Association) and Donna Strudwick, and then my mind turned to the fact that NDP Premier Calvert, did know that he had a problem, and even if he is a United Church Minister, his (Calvert)s answer to the Argue problem with RM Administrator Strudwick was to try to use taxpayer money to bribe the Argues to go away quietly.

I (Lee) can prove to a public inquiry that NDP Premier Calvert knew there was a problem with RM Administrator Donna Strudwick and her venal and vicious demands and Premier Calvert also knew, or at least was politically astute enough to be worried, that the Strudwick/Argue situation may be politically dangerous for him because he (Calvert) tried to pay the Argue family a bribe of one million dollars of Saskatchewan taxpayers money to go away quietly.

I (Lee) am not particularly religious but I was baptized a Anglican and can relate to the implication of the relevancy of the shortest verse in the Bible, google, “jesus wept”, where nothing else needs to be said.

I (Lee) can prove to a public inquiry that then Premier Lorne Calvert, in private life a United Church Minister, when the Argues refused to pay RM of Edenwold Administrator, Donna Strudwick, bribes to obtain development zoning, Calvert, instead of firing Strudwick, tried to pay the Argues a million dollar bribe of taxpayer money to go away quietly, as I said above “Jesus wept’.

I (Lee) raised this before, note Web segment SASKATCHEWAN/ AFGHANISTAN CORRUPTION, and note near the end of the segment I set out what is going to be repeated here except that I did not name the NDP heavy hitter who approached me because the NDP activist who came to me was Louise Simard, former Minister of Health in one of the Romanow Administrations, former head of SAHO and at the time she (Louise) came to me she was running errands for Gordon Campbell, the Liberal Premier of British Columbia, as head of the BC version of Saskatchewan’s SAHO.

Louise (Simard) was then President and CEO of HEABC, (Health Employers Association of BC) google “louise simard heabc”, and I (Lee) was concerned that if BC Liberal Premier Gordon Campbell found out that she was still running errands for the NDP Premier of Saskatchewan, Lorne Calvert, she ( Louise) might be booted from her annual $350,000.00 (three hundred and fifty thousand dollar) contract in BC and Louise (Simard) is a good lawyer, excellent Administrator, and a truly Honorable woman, so I (Lee) did not want the fact of her (Louise) being booted from the BC HEABC on my conscience.

I (Lee) can prove to a public inquiry that before Strudwick used “slapp” (google) to sue me (Lee) for libel, remember Strudwick reports to the Premier, google “ the honorable lady justice janet mcmurtry ruled that strudwick reports to premier”, Louise (Simard) approached me with advise to instruct a non-political lawyer to commence a action on behalf of the Argues against the Government of Saskatchewan for one million dollars for Breach of Implied Contract.

Louise Simard is a Honorable and accomplished lawyer so she, (Louise) would never lead the Argues down the garden path and I (Lee) believe would have never approached me, (the Argues Representative), unless she had been instructed to do so by NDP Premier Calvert. The fact of Louise (Simard)s honor and ability notwithstanding I (Lee) still researched the question of “breach of implied contract”, google “breach of implied contract” and note that the law fits the Argue/Strudwick/bribery for zoning problem perfectly.

Web readers are asked to remember the Supreme Court Summary Statement for Case 31940 where it states; “the annexation was solely an attempt to circumvent the Rural Municipality of Edenwold’s Council’s refusal to re-zone the land” and note that the Supreme Court Summary is exactly correct, the then Liberal Minister Responsible, Jack Hillson, amended the Urban Municipalities Act for exactly that reason, to allow a Developer to ask a Village to annex his Development out of a Rural Municipality to circumvent “carrying flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) to the Administrator of that Rural Municipality to provide Development zoning, as ruled by the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, was the only option.

All Web readers are reminded of the hard evidence presented to the Court that the then Liberal Minister Responsible, Jack Hillson, in the 1999 NDP/Liberal coalition Administration, amended section 14 (1) of the Urban Municipalities Act, thereby allowing any Village anywhere in the Province to annex any land out of any Rural Municipality anywhere in the Province, which amendment to the Urban Act could be used to solve the problem of RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick requiring bribes to provide development zoning.

I (Lee), serving as the Argue Representative, was next told by the Liberal Minister Responsible in the Coalition Administration to find a Village to annex the Argue development out of the RM of Edenwold, that was simple to accomplish, the Village of Wood Mountain readily agreed to take on the project, but all of this took time to get done and by then the November 2003 general election occurred, the Liberal Ministers making up the NDP/Liberal coalition were defeated.

The new NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, overruled his former Liberal Ministerial colleagues and ruled that the Village of Wood Mountain should not be allowed to exist, that Wood Mountain Village would not be allowed to annex the Argue development out of the RM of Edenwold and that the only option that the Argues and I (Lee), serving as the Argue Representative, had to obtain development zoning was to carry “flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) to RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, note Supreme Court of Canada Summary Statement for Case 31940.

As set out above, Louise Simard is a able and responsible lawyer and it appeared to me (Lee) that she was right, there could be no doubt whatsoever but that the easily provable facts set out in the three previous paragraphs was a classic case of “ breach of implied contract”, just as she (Louise) had advised, so I, serving as the Argue Representative, took her (Louise)s advice to the Argues, but all three of us, Earle, Sharie and I, had a problem with Louise’s advise and that problem is the venal and vicious Judges of the Saskatchewan Courts.

Polling shows that 39% (thirty nine percent) of Canadian taxpayers believe their Judges are “touched by corruption”, note Web segment WHY IS CANADA SO CORRUPT? and the Argues are included in that 39% (thirty nine percent) of the honest Saskatchewan taxpaying voters who believe that the Queens and Appeal Judges are corrupt.

To be blunt, the Argues and I (Lee), have every reason to believe the Saskatchewan Judiciary are venal and vicious, “white collar thugs” (google), note Web segment BLACKMAILED, BULLIED OR BRIBED?, who are corrupt to the core, so to be blunt, the Argues believed Louise ( Simard)s advise to instruct a Lawyer to go into Court with the Strudwick bribery for zoning problem was a sick joke, so, ever the good soldier, I (Lee) took the Argue message back to Louise and told her why the Argues refused to accept her advise.

Louise (Simard) then spelled it out to me that it was such a clear breach of implied contract that it would never get into Court, implying the Argues did not need to worry about venal and vicious Judges. Louise set out that the matter would be settled out of Court for a million dollar pay out to the Argues; I (Lee) took that to the Argues.

That was a different matter. We trusted Louise (Simard) and she had spelled it out clearly, there was no doubt whatsoever but that the Calvert NDP Administration was offering the Argues, in effect, a million dollar bribe of taxpayer money to go away quietly but to the everlasting credit of Earle and Sharie Argue they refused, they (the Argues) recognized it as being a bribe of taxpayer money and in the same way they (the Argues) refused to pay Strudwick her bribes to be granted zoning they refused to accept the Calvert (NDP) bribe of $1,000,000.00 (one million dollars) of taxpayers money to go away.

I (Lee), serving as the Argue Representative, may have been partly responsible for the Argue decision to turn down the Calvert million dollar bribe to go away, because I did advise the Argues that if the Calvert NDP Administration was prepared to pay a one million dollar bribe of taxpayer money for them (the Argues) to go away quietly, that meant they (Calvert people) were worried about the political ramifications of their Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, brazen instructions to the Argues that their only option to obtain development zoning from his Senior Official, RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, was to pay bribes to Strudwick to provide that development zoning, and that they (Calvert people), at the end of the day, had no choice but to overrule RM Administrator Strudwick and grant the Argues development zoning, but I (Lee) was wrong.

As unbelievable as it is, my (Lee)s advise to the Argues was wrong. The NDP Political Leaders allowed RM Administrator Strudwicks venal and vicious demands for bribes from the Developers to provide development zoning to stand and trump not only honesty, decency, sanity, and Canadian Law, but also political common sense.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that the bribes have got to be paid to Strudwick to obtain development zoning in the RM of Edenwold; there is no ifs, ands, buts, or maybes, and no exceptions, in the RM of Edenwold, bribes have got to be paid to RM Administrator Donna Strudwick to obtain development zoning.

I (Lee) ask all Web readers to again google search “ the honorable lady justice janet mcmurtry rules strudwick reports to premier” and note that after the Argues refused to accept the offer of a million dollar bribe to go away, the next thing that the Calvert NDP Administration did to solve the Argue zoning problem was that they instructed Strudwick to use, “slapp” (google) a libel action to destroy me (Lee) serving as the Argue Representative, they (the Calvert NDP Administration) thought that would solve the problem.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that when the Argues refused the $1,000,000.00 (one million dollar) bribe of tax payer money to go away quietly, the Calvert NDP Administration decided that they had had enough of both the Argues and I (Lee) representing the Argues, and they (the Calvert Administration) believed that Strudwick, her two-bit shyster of a Government Lawyer, Glen Dowling and one of their tame Queens Bench Judges, could use a Strudwick “slapp” (google) legal action to ring my (Lee)s neck like a chicken.

It was Winston Churchill who said it first, google “some chicken, some neck”, in a speech to the Canadian Parliament. One of the French Leaders of the day predicted that Hitler would wring Churchill’s neck like a Chicken, then after Hitler lost the “battle of britain” (google), and failed to invade England, Churchill told that story in a speech to the Canadian Parliament and ended his speech with reference to “some chicken, some neck”.

I (Lee) can make the same claim, I took Strudwick’s, google “slapp” against me through to the Supreme Court of Canada, and ended up with the Supreme Court Summary Statement for case 31940 that forms the basis for this Web site that was first posted 4 (four) months before the November 2007 General Election and many Saskatchewan Bloggers believe this Web site cost Calvert the less than 3000 (three thousand) votes that he (Calvert) lost that election by. As Winston Churchill said, “some chicken, some neck”.

Notwithstanding the above facts regarding this Web site, the Rural Leaders are still insisting that I (Lee) am the stupidest man in Canada, and that may even be true, but my Webmaster is a pretty smart guy and he has this Website designed to take advantage of every key word that either he or I can think of, which key word may often lead a Web searcher, no matter what they are looking for, to this Web site, that is how the Great Google works his magic.

I (Lee) ask all Web readers to google “the un-googling of mick gzowski” and note the author of the article does a better job than I of setting out how the Great Google works his magic, and at this point I defy any spin doctor, even Jaime Watt, google “ jaime watt navigator ltd.” to overcome the fully documented facts set out in this Web site condemning the NDP Politico, Len Taylor, and proving that the Senior Saskatchewan Government Official, Donna Strudwick, lied to block zoning for the Argue families $30,000,000.00 (thirty million dollar) residential subdivision, until her (Strudwick)s bribes were paid.

I (Lee) remind all Web readers that when Strudwick used a “slapp” (google) action to charge me with libel, that because of Cabinet secrecy, I was not aware of the fact that then Premier Roy Romanow and Jack Hillson, the Minister Responsible in the 1999 NDP/Liberal Coalition Government, had obtained Cabinet approval to remove the RMs from the face of Saskatchewan and form Counties, and I was sure as hell not aware that the hard left of the NDP had forced Premier Roy to resign as Leader of the NDP and Premier before he could put final effect to the removal of the RMs and form Counties, note Web segment SASKATCHEWAN’S CURSE.

I (Lee) also remind all Web readers that the Outlook Community Leaders had obtained four legal opinions that my letters to Calvert and Taylor were not libel and I had a massive amount of Government documents and un-contradicted affidavits as evidence supporting the fact that Strudwick was lying through her teeth to block zoning for the Argues $30,000,000.00 (thirty million dollar) residential subdivision Development until her bribes were paid, so I (Lee) was certain that I could prevail against Strudwicks “slapp” (google) action.

It is true that long ago John Crosbie had provided me (Lee) with a copy of the Judicial Council of Canada report, “Masters In Their Own House” setting out that the Provincial officials are dictating Judgments to Judges, note Web segment TURNING OVER ROCKS, but as paranoid as I (Lee) am, because of the fact that I had spent a decade, through every Federal and Provincial election and by-election, winter and summer, knocking on doors for the NDP I never imagined that Lorne Calvert, a United Church Minister, intended to use his power to control the Judiciary to destroy me, note BLACKMAILED, BULLIED OR BRIBED?, so I was certain that I would prevail against Strudwick, despite this I (Lee) still gave the Calvert NDP a chance to treat the Argues fairly.

I (Lee) can prove to a public inquiry that I set out, in writing, to NDP Premier Calvert, his Cabinet and Caucus, a proposal whereby they allow Strudwicks libel action against me, the Argues Representative, to run its course but parallel to Strudwicks libel action, they (the Calvert Administration), treat the Argues fairly by granting them development zoning and I offered the Calvert NDP Cabinet and Caucus a choice of three proposals for them (the Calvert NDP) to provide the Argues with development zoning;

The first choice Premier Calvert was given was to follow through on the original plan developed by Jack Hillson, the then Liberal Minister Responsible in the 1999 NDP/Liberal Coalition Administration, to wit; to bypass Strudwick by the Village of Wood Mountain annexation of the Argue development out of the RM of Edenwold, or;

The second choice was to have their then Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, order the incorporation of the Argue development quarter as a incorporated Village, google “saskatchewan municipalities act, 61 (1) (a) (ii) and (2) (b)” and note steps to be taken by the Minister, or; A third choice I offered the Calvert NDP Cabinet and Caucus was where the Argues give their Development quarter and the 350 gpm (gallon per minute) spring to SASK WATER and they (SASK WATER) in return grant the Argues a in “perpetuity” (google) lease on the 80 (eighty) acres the Argues need for their Development and also grant the Argues the amount of water that they would need for their Development, 20% (twenty percent) of the 350 gpm spring.

The Argues only needed about 7% (seven percent) of the water flow for their residential development but Sharie Argues family have been in the beer Brewing business in England for the last 150 (one hundred and fifty) years and given the quantity and high quality of the Argue spring water flow Sharie’s family wanted to set up a draft beer brewing plant as part of the development.

I (Lee), on behalf of the Argues, had completed the detail work on the plan with Liquor and Gaming and because it would have meant another 50 (fifty) or so jobs, I had obtained initial approval, so we asked to keep another 13% (thirteen percent) of the water flow to accommodate that plan, but as set out above, the Calvert NDP Administration laughed at the offer, Strudwicks bribes had to be paid.

In effect, on behalf of the Argues I (Lee) offered the Calvert NDP a trade off; that instead of paying bribes to their senior Government Official, RM of Edenwold Administrator, Donna Strudwick, to obtain zoning, they (the Argues) would donate 80% (eighty percent) of their Spring Water flow to the public through SASK WATER and I (Lee) pointed out to the Calvert NDP Cabinet and Caucus that under the unique circumstance, to wit; SASK WATER already owns the water works in White City which water works is about four miles away from the Argue Development quarter and that the area is short of water, that such a deal with the Argues would be a win-win for everyone.

I (Lee) even swallowed my pride and offered that I would allow Strudwicks libel action to go without public challenge and pay whatever the Courts awarded her (Strudwick) out of the money gained from the Argues being granted development zoning, but the Calvert NDP Cabinet and Caucus remained adamant, they (Calvert and company) laughed at my offer, on behalf of the Argues, to give the public 80% (eighty percent) of their spring water flow instead of paying bribes to Strudwick, and in effect, the NDP Cabinet and Caucus reiterated that the bribes had to be paid to RM Administrator Strudwick before the Argues would be granted development zoning.

When I (Lee) made that offer to the Calvert NDP Cabinet and Caucus it was because I knew Revenue Canada had, in the past, allowed bribes paid to Official Government scum, such as Donna Strudwick, to obtain development zoning, to be deducted as a cost of doing business in Canada, note Web segments TURNING OVER ROCKS, and TWEEDLEEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE , and I was interested in finding out if Revenue Canada would allow me to deduct the cost of Strudwicks Libel award as a cost of obtaining development zoning for the Argues, it would have worked out for everyone, including Strudwick, who would have gotten her libel award in lieu of bribes.

But it was not to be. As set out above, the Calvert NDP Cabinet and Caucus laughed at the Ague proposal to give 80% (eighty percent) of their Spring Water flow to the public to avoid paying bribes to Strudwick to obtain zoning, which lead to the Supreme Court of Canada Summary Statement for Case 31940 and this Web site.

Web readers should be apprised that rumor is rife that the RM of Edenwold Council, after ten years of effort by the Argues, and the Council approval of a 160 (one hundred and sixty) lot residential development for the Argues, and the RM Administrator Donna Strudwick overturning her Council and declining zoning approval, that the RM Council is now considering allowing the Argues to go ahead with a residential Development allowing for 3.5 (three and a half) acre lots, which would result in the Argues with a 17 (seventeen) lot development instead of a 160 (one hundred and sixty) lot development and the Argues, assuming they were able to sell any lots, might come close to recovering their original investment, but it is not that simple.

The Argues had asked me (Lee) to find away to obtain zoning for their 160 (one hundred and sixty) lot residential development without bribing RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, consequently every plan I developed for the Argues was designed to by pass RM of Edenwold Administrator, Donna Strudwick.

As set out above I offered the NDP Administration of Lorne Calvert, three separate solutions, ie: 1) the Hillson annexation by a Village solution; 2) the Argue Development quarter being incorporated as a separate Village under Section 61 (1) and (2) of the Municipalities Act, and; 3) the Argues giving their development quarter and 350 gpm Spring Water flow to SASK WATER in exchange for a lease back of the land needed for the 160 (one hundred and sixty) lot development and enough of the water flow to service the development with the rest of the water flow, (about 80%) going to the public.

But the Calvert NDP Administration laughed at my offer on behalf of the Argues and told me (Lee) to go “fuddle-duddle” (google) myself, in effect, the Calvert NDP Administration insisted that Strudwick had to be paid her bribes before the Argues would be granted development zoning, and now rumors are rife the Argues will be granted limited zoning approval by the Edenwold Council, why the about face?

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that this Web site, after four years and 10,000 (ten thousand) house hold visits, which translates into about 25,000 (twenty five thousand) honest voting taxpayers having read it, including Edenwold Ratepayers, may be having effect, but I (Lee) believe that the explanation for the rumors that the RM of Edenwold Council may grant Argues limited zoning approval is that, because of this Web site, Strudwick has given up the idea of trying to figure out a way to expropriate the Argue development quarter for her own use or that the Argues will ever be forced to bribe her to obtain Development zoning, so she (Strudwick) is trying out a new plan.

Web readers are asked to google “donna strudwick rm of edenwold housing inspections” note the third search reference, after a couple of segments of this Web site are noted, is a search result stating “Instructors-SARM” and note that Donna Strudwick, who knows less about house construction than I (Lee) do, is one of the SARM housing inspector instructors and Strudwick has found a new means of blocking the Argues from going ahead with their development.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that if the Argues are granted development zoning by the RM of Edenwold Council, the Argues will never have that a house certified for sale by the RM of Edenwold Housing Inspectors lead by Donna Strudwick.

I (Lee) have come to know Earle and Sharie Argue very well, they are among the finest people in Canada. Even though it cost them (the Argues) the loss of a fortune, $10,000,000.00 (ten million dollars), they (the Argues) refused to pay RM of Edenwold Administrator Strudwick bribes to be granted development zoning, even when the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, ruled that paying bribes to Strudwick was their only option to obtain development zoning and then they (the Argues) refused to accept a smaller fortune, a $1,000,000.00 (one million dollar) bribe of Saskatchewan taxpayer money the NDP Administration of Lorne Calvert offered them (the Argues) to go away quietly.

The Argues have exactly the same problem they have always had. There can be no doubt whatsoever but that former RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick, who’s son is on the RM Council, still controls the RM of Edenwold and will no doubt be as determined as ever to stop the Argues from realizing their dream.

Former RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick never stops, and never backs off and the woman never will back off unless/until the RMs and their venal and vicious Administrators (the RMAA) are removed from the face of Saskatchewan, as then Premier Roy Romanow and Jack Hillson, his Minister Responsible in the 1999 NDP/Liberal coalition Administration tried to do, note Web segment SASKATCHEWAN’S CURSE.

But google “hope springs eternal”, and all Web readers are asked to note that a few Saskatchewan bloggers believe that this Web site cost the NDP Administration of Lorne Calvert the November 2007 General Election and it is a fact that by the November 2007 General Election, this Web site had about 1500 (fifteen hundred) household visits, about 3500 (thirty five hundred) voters and Calvert lost that November 2007 Election by less than 3000 (three thousand) votes.

Calvert lost ten ridings by less than 300 (three hundred) votes each in the November 2007 General Election. Since then this Web site has been expanded which has brought the situation to where it is, at this point about 10,000 (ten thousand) house hold visits, meaning about 25,000 (twenty five thousand) voters have visited the Web site and if this Web site has forced the RM of Edenwold Council and Donna Strudwick to change tactics there may be some hope.

Since day one of the effort to obtain zoning for a development proposed by the Earle Argue Family of Regina, several individuals with experience, knowledge and ability, including four Senior Regina Lawyers, have been advising both the Argues and I (Lee) of the impossibility of obtaining development zoning from a senior Provincial Government Official, the RM of Edenwold Administrator, Donna Strudwick, and it has now been definitely established that it is, in fact, impossible to get by Strudwick and her son, who is on the RM of Edenwold Council, and obtain development zoning for the Argues without paying Donna Strudwick bribes.

The indisputable fact of the Argues need to carry flowers, chocolates and perfume (bribes) to Strudwick to obtain development was set out by the Supreme Court of Canada Summary Statement for Case 31940, where the High Court stated that then NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, ruled that the only option that I (Lee) had to obtain zoning for the Argue’s development was to carry “flowers, chocolates and perfume” to Strudwick, (and her Council) this notwithstanding the fact that Section 123 (1) of the Criminal Code of Canada, MUNICIPAL CORRUPTION sets out that it is a contravention of the Criminal Code to provide anything to a Municipal Official to obtain a favor.

Since it is a contravention of the Criminal Code to carry anything to a Municipal Official to gain consideration there can be no doubt whatsoever but that the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, ruleing that my (Lee)s only option to obtain development zoning for the Argues was to contravene the Criminal Code which ruling by Len Taylor is a contravention of Section 464 of the Criminal Code, COUNSELLING AN OFFENCE, but the Wall Administration refuses to lay charges against Len Taylor under the Criminal Code. WHY?

I (Lee) ask all Web readers who are honest taxpaying voters to think long and hard about this and consider whether or not they want to see a continuation of these venal and vicious acts by their senior Government officials, such as RM of Edenwold Administrator, Donna Strudwick, and if they (the honest taxpayers) do not like it, that they write their Member of Parliament (MP) demanding a public inquiry into rural zoning corruption in Saskatchewan to be conducted by a honest Judge from Alberta or the United States with Saskatoon lawyer Jack Hillson serving as inquiry Counsel.

Google “greed and jealousy” note that it is the motivating force in all human actions so it is possible that the hard left of the NDP ordered the Argues destroyed because of the fact they (the Argues) were going to complete a fine residential development and make $10,000,000.00 (ten million dollars), pre tax profit, but the hard evidence is that the Argues, and I (Lee) serving as the Argue Representative, were destroyed because of our refusal to bribe RM Administrator Donna Strudwick to provide development zoning even when instructed to pay those bribes by the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that I (Lee) have established that the Argues were deeply harmed by the NDP Administration of Lorne Calvert, yet nothing has been done to correct that harm by the current Sask Party Administration, maybe the destruction of the Argues dream development is as a result of “greed and jealousy” (google) of the hard left of the NDP or maybe its because of the Argues refusal to pay Strudwick bribes but no matter what the motive the current Wall Administration has a duty to deal with the problem.

The Supreme Court of Canada Summary Statement for Case 31940 sets out that the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, ruled that the only option the Argues had to obtain Development zoning was to carry flowers, chocolates and perfume (bribes) to RM Administrator Donna Strudwick and her Council, which includes Strudwicks son and the Argues, who are honorable people, refuse to pay Strudwick and her Council bribes, as ordered by the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, and have suffered massively because of that refusal.

The facts, supported by hard evidence, have, through this Web site, (with visits now in the ten thousand range), been before the Saskatchewan honest tax paying voters for four years, yet the Wall Administration refuses to deal with the problem. WHY?

The Argues, especially Sharie, are/were intensely political (pro NDP) and in Harker v. Regina (City), the so called Casino Case, the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal ruled that all zoning issues are political and the Courts must not interfere and I (Lee) pushed that Appeal Court precedent hard through all levels of Court to the Supreme Court of Canada but accomplished nothing beyond the fact of Supreme Court setting out in their all important Summary Statement that the Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, ruled that the Argues only option to obtain development zoning was to carry “flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) to Strudwick and her Council.

Notwithstanding the hard evidence of the Argues NDP political credentials and the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal precedent that all zoning issues are political, come hell or high water, bribes have got to be paid to the venal and vicious official Government scum, such as RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, to obtain development zoning, and this fact is now carved in stone by the Supreme Court of Canada.

As set out above, the Argues, both Earle and Sharie were strong CCF/ NDP, especially Sharie, because she is of Scottish descent and her Grandfathers were colleagues and confidants of Tommy Douglas and active in the formation of the Wheat Pool and Co-op, which here in Saskatchewan is akin to a Russian Communist Party Member carrying a membership card with a single digit number.

Sharie (Argue) is a school teacher, with two Masters degrees, one in Music and one in English and active in the Teachers Union and she and her husband Earle were always strong, card carrying, CCF/NDP supporters, and given the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal ruling that all zoning issues are political, if anyone deserved to be treated fairly in a zoning issue by the NDP, it was Earle and Sharie Argue.

Notwithstanding the well established fact of the Argues political credentials, the Calvert NDP Administration destroyed them (the Argues) because of their refusal to pay bribes to one of Calverts Senior Government Officials, RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick, who, I remind all Web readers reports to the Premier, google “ the honorable lady justice janet mcmurtry rules that strudwick reports to premier”.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that the implications of these facts, to wit: the NDP’s destruction of the Argues to cater to venal and vicious scum such as Government zoning official, RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, are profound and deeply disturbing, to the point of being “sickening unto death” (google).

I (Lee) had hoped, and still hope, that the NDP actions in destroying the Argues, and I (Lee), serving as the Argue Representative, because of our refusal to bribe Senior Government official, RM Administrator, Strudwick, had crossed a political corruption line which, if I (Lee) could keep this Web site before the voting public, would result in the NDP losing the November 2011 General Election but there always is a “sickening unto death” (google) worry that Premier Brad Wall, despite his Mennonite soul, may fall into the same big money corruption trap that Grant Devine, lead down the garden path by Lane (the Hon J. Gary) and Eric Bernstein, fell into in the 1980’s.

I (Lee) know that Link decided to gamble on a run at becoming Premier based on his belief that Premier Brad Wall would end up being a one term Premier by getting caught trying to use the Devine Gang Corruption Handbook to “disappear” Ten Billion dollars of taxpayer money, but so far that has not happened and there is only another year and a half until the next General election.

It was my (Lee)s hope, and still is, that the proven fact of the NDP’s corruption in ruling that the Developers only option to obtain development zoning was to bribe the NDP Senior Officials who approve the zoning, coupled with the fact that Link’s senior organizer, Ernest Morin, being caught forging 1000 (one thousand) NDP Memberships “ndp ernest morin meadow lake membership forgery scandal” would garner all public attention during the countdown to the November 2011 General election where the voters are going to have to decide which Saskatchewan Political Party, the Sask Party or the NNP offer the best hope.

BUT there can be no doubt whatsoever but that no Saskatchewan voter will ever forget the fact that the Devine Gang “disappeared” Ten Billion dollars of Saskatchewan Tax payer money during the 1980’s, basically a average of one Billion dollars a year for their (the Devine Gang)s time in power and there may be a few honest voting taxpayers who do not relate to what a Billion dollars is. One Billion dollars is one thousand million dollars but a better way to relate to the Ten Billion taxpayer dollars the Devine gang “disappeared” during the 1980’s is to compare the Devine Gang Ten Billion tax payer dollars to the ecological disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, when British Petroleum (BP) bribed the US Minerals Management Service, (MMS) google “bp bribes mms”, to allow them (BP) to by pass deep water oil drilling safety regulations.

Experts are estimating that the cost of that ecological horror could reach fifteen Billion dollars, google, “for bp, spill’s cost is spreading as quickly as gulf oil mccarthy”, and as this Web site segment is being written TV Networks are spending their days with talking heads, setting out the economic ramifications, the loss of two thirds of the US shrimp industry, total disaster for the Gulf fisherman, total loss of the gulf Tourism industry, total devastation and death for millions of birds, the entire economic loss is estimated to be, in 2010 dollars, fifteen billion dollars, google “ bp agrees to set up $20-billion spill fund”.

The Devine Gang “disappeared” Ten Billion dollars from the taxpayers but that was in 1980 dollars, so given the change in the value of the dollar in the last 30 (thirty years), about 2% (two percent) a year, that means that the Devine Gang “disappearance” of Ten Billion Dollars compares to BP/MMS corruption driven disaster in the Gulf of Mexico, the dollar value of the economic devastation is about the same in the US Gulf States as it was in Saskatchewan.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that the Saskatchewan economy cannot stand the “disappearance” of another Ten Billion dollars, and if the honest taxpaying voters thinks that the Wall Sask Party Administration intends to follow in the footsteps of the Devine gang and “disappear” a Billion dollars each and every year to equal the one Billion Dollars that the Devine Gang “disappeared” from the Saskatchewan taxpayer each year of their Administration, then the Wall Administration must be defeated in November of 2011.

But so far there is no indication that is the intention of the Wall Administration and the Wall people would have to do that every year for ten years to equal the Devine Gang “ disappearance” of Ten Billion dollars, and it may be difficult for the Wall Sask Party Administration to pull that off the second time.

Conversely there can be no doubt whatsoever but that since the Devine Gang was able to “disappear” Ten Billion dollars of tax payer money, it may be possible for Premier Brads people to “disappear” another Ten Billion dollars of tax payers money but after the Devine Gang’s Houdini trick, senior journalist’s such as James Wood, will be watching like a hawk so it will be much harder for the Sask Party to disappear Ten Billion dollars than it was for Grant Devine, Lane (the Hon. J. Gary) and Eric Bernstein, harder but not impossible, especially when the Administration dictates Judgments to Judges, note Web segment BLACKMAILED, BULLIED OR BRIBED?

BUT I (Lee) repeat, if the Saskatchewan voters believe that the Wall Administration is a rerun of the Devine Gang, and the Devine Gang “disappearance” of Ten Billion dollars of tax payer money, then the Wall Administration has got to be defeated in November 2011 even if it means that the honest taxpayers are saddled with Link and the horror of a venal and vicious NDP Administration demanding that bribes must be paid to venal and vicious Official Government scum, such as RM Administrator Strudwick, to provide development zoning.

I (Lee) repeat, if the honest Saskatchewan voters fear a rerun of the Devine Gang then Premier Brad Wall and his Sask Party must be defeated in the November 2011 General Election because the Saskatchewan taxpayers have not paid off the Ten Billion dollars of debt resulting from the Devine Gang “disappearance” of taxpayer money and another ten Billion dollars of debt resulting from a Sask Party “disappearance” of a second Ten billion dollars could force a situation where Saskatchewan is disbanded as a Province and the area it occupies divided between Manitoba and Alberta.

Alberta and Manitoba have a combined population of about 4,000,000 (four million) people, four times Saskatchewan, both Provinces have the usual bloated bureaucracy in place, Alberta and Manitoba have the highest ratio of Government officials to honest tax payers in Canada, google “alberta and manitoba ratio of civil servants to population” so Alberta and Manitoba could take over Administering Saskatchewan’s million people without missing a step or increasing their civil service.

The idea of dividing Saskatchewan between Alberta and Manitoba is not nonsense. The original plan for dividing the prairies into Provinces was worked on by the Federal Officials during the count down to 1905 and not one draft design included a area shaped like Saskatchewan, or named Saskatchewan, note the map below.

But then a venal Federal official, the Lieutenant Governor of the North West Territories, the Hon Edgar Dewdney, decided he could make a few million dollars by forming the Province of Saskatchewan and controlling land use in the capital he (Dewdney) planned to create.

I (Lee) would find it wonderfully ironic and very fitting, if Saskatchewan, born in corruption, was to die in corruption, and if that were to occur ie: Saskatchewan divided between Alberta and Manitoba, the Argues would be granted development zoning because Alberta has long ago removed the RMs and formed Counties and while Manitoba still has RM’s, it (Manitoba) has taken Rural Zoning control away from the Rural Administrators and given that zoning control to their Provincial Community Planning officials in Winnipeg.

I (Lee) ask that all honest taxpaying voters think about their choices for the next General election in November 2011 and the danger of the Sask Party pulling off a rerun of the Devine Gang’s “disappearance” of Ten Billion dollars, because the venal and vicious policies of the NDP Opposition demanding that bribes must be paid to their Officials, such as RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick, to provide zoning for economic development, are just as devastating for the economy as the Devine Gangs trick of “disappearing” Ten Billion dollars note Web segment, TWEEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE.

It is a cruel choice because all honest Saskatchewan taxpaying voters, must think long and hard about the fact that a NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, ruled that honest Saskatchewan citizens, such as the Earle Argue family of Regina, are required to carry flowers, chocolates and perfume, (pay bribes) to venal vicious Official Government scum such as RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick, to be granted development zoning, note Supreme Court of Canada Summary Statement Case 31940.

The honest taxpaying voters should also realize there can be no doubt whatsoever but that in the long run the venal and vicious acts of Saskatchewan’s Senior Government Officials, such as RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, under the NDP, while it may take a few years longer, will destroy Saskatchewan with the same certainty as the Devine Gang corruption.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that Link has underestimated Premier Brad Wall. Link does appear to be suffering on all fronts, google “a tough campaign for women to win ndp nominations mandryk” but Link has other problems.

One example of those problems is the true brilliance of the Sask Party selling SCN (Saskatchewan Communications Network) to Blue Point Investments Corporation in Ontario, whose owner, Bruce Classen, has close ties to the Quebec TV Mogul setting up Quebecor/ Sun News, so called, “fox news north”, (Google).

Quebecor/Sun News is a right wing google TV network based in Quebec managed by Kory Teneycke, who is forthright, even blunt, about the fact “fox news north” will be pushing the Conservative Political agenda in Canada as hard as the CBC pushes the Liberal Political agenda in Canada and Fox News in the United States pushes the Republican Political agenda in the US, or at least as hard as CRTC, controlled by the Harper PMO, will let him (Kory) push.

Web readers will remember that Kory (Teneycke) was Prime Minister Stephen Harpers Communication’s Director, but of greater importance Kory (Teneycke) is from Young, Saskatchewan and is a close personal friend of Premier Brad Wall, they ( Premier Brad and Kory) have worked on several campaign’s together, do a keyword google search, “quebecor sun news scn bluepoints investment corporation teneycke” and “kory teneycke long time friend of premier brad wall”, so there can be no doubt whatsoever but that SCN will be pushing the Sask Party in the countdown to the November 2011 General Election.

Web readers may remember that the original Tommy Douglas CCF Administrations did exactly the same thing, to great effect, in the dawn of TV in Saskatchewan in the mid 1950’s. A well known Saskatchewan PR expert, a original “spin doctor” (google) one of the best, George Bothwell, ran the Tommy Douglas CCF TV shows promoting the wonderfullness of the Douglas CCF Administrations on a regular weekly TV show, the same era as “Gunsmoke”, “ I love Lucy”, “Father knows best”, and “Leave it to Beaver”, and under George Bothwell’s brilliant direction it worked like a dream and the CCF/NDP became Saskatchewan’s Natural governing party.

Well, the fact is that SCN will be doing the same thing for Premier Brad and the Sask Party, not just with a weekly TV infomercial, like the Tommy Douglas Show, of 50 (fifty) years ago, but 24 hour infomercial, just like Fox News endlessly beats the drum for the Republicans in the US, and CBC endlessly beats the drum for the Liberals here in Canada. The Wall SCN plan is truly brilliant and will help to see the end of the CCF/NDP in Saskatchewan and a end to the corrupt relationship between the hard left of the NDP and the RM Administrators, note Web segment SASKATCHEWAN’S CURSE.

I (Lee) remind all Web readers that all Economists agree that “corruption economies” (google) are doomed and I ask all Web readers to note Web segment SASKATCHEWAN/ AFGHANISTAN CORRUPTION, where I (Lee) set out that a Saskatchewan Blogger draws a comparison of the two corrupt economies.

Afghanistan is doomed because of corruption and our economy is doomed unless corruption is ended and a good start would be to make sure the RMs are removed, replaced with Counties, and all rural zoning decisions are turned over to a panel made up of Village Mayors in each County, note Web segments SASKATCHEWAN’S CURSE and FLOWERS, CHOCOLATES AND PERFUME.

I (Lee) remind all Web readers of British Statesman Edmund Burke and his famous dictum from the 1700s, google, “ all that is necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing” and that letters to their MPs go postage free and I ask all Web readers to write their MPs demanding a public inquiry into rural zoning corruption in Saskatchewan to be conducted by a honest Judge from Alberta or the United States with Saskatoon lawyer Jack Hillson as inquiry Counsel.

regina websites

Buy your Apple and
Mac Magsafe Power Adapters here!

Buy your toshiba laptop and
notebook power adapters here!

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: