SEA OF CORRUPTION

Ernst & Young survey re corruption” sets out the massive cost of Corruption to the North American economy and it was John F. Kennedy who said “ when we got into office the thing that surprised me most was to find that things were just as bad as we’d been saying they were” (google). I (Lee) ask all Web readers to note that notwithstanding the fact that I was aware of both the Ernst & Young study and John Kennedy’s facetious remark I am still surprised at my accuracy in predicting the sea of corruption regarding the massive taxpayer subsidies of Ethanol Plants in Saskatchewan but even more surprised at the stature of the individuals involved in the corruption.

All Web readers are asked to note that what I (Lee) predicted in Web site segment dated September 2nd 2009, FOLLOW THE MONEY, and segment dated October 15th 2009, WHY IS CANADA SO CORRUPT?, has already come to be, to wit; I predicted that there will be endless and massive taxpayer money poured into all Ethanol plants to keep them operating and note that after only a year, the Terra Grain Fuels Ethanol plant at Belle Plaine, has already been given a Federal grant of $77,750,000.00 (seventy seven million seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars) “ethanol plant gets government boost” (google), and “government of canada invests in biofuels in saskatchewan” (google). Please note that this Plant only cost $130,000,000.00 (one hundred and thirty million dollars) to build in the first place.

Lee Harding, the Saskatchewan director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation is as outraged as all voting taxpayers should be and all Web readers are asked to note again “ethanol plant gets government boost” (google), and note that the sea of corruption is more widespread than even I (Lee) thought it was, because the individuals benefiting from that $77,750,000.00 (seventy seven million seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars) of tax payer money are not the Saskatchewan hotshots ( Link and Drummond ) who I assumed would benefit but a small group of the eastern super elite.

All Web readers are asked to review again Web site segment dated September 2nd 2009 FOLLOW THE MONEY, taking special notice of my (Lee)s belief that the NDP Administration of Lorne Calvert bowed to RM Administrator Donna Strudwick and her RMAA ilk because of the need to keep control of Rural Zoning through Strudwick and the RMAA to ensure there was zoning for more Ethanol Plants so as to be able to demand more taxpayer subsidies and I (Lee) stand by that claim, but I (Lee) was wrong about it being Drummond et al. who was going to benefit from that massive corruption.

Now I (Lee) ask all Web readers to note yet again the article “ethanol plant gets government boost” (google) and note that Drummonds Ethanol Plant, Terra Grain Fuels, is part of a holding company called Universal Energy Group which Drummond recently sold to a Eastern outfit called “just energy income fund” (google), and Web readers are asked to note that the Board of Directors of “just energy income fund” (google) includes Ontarios Political/Legal/Judicial legend, Roy McMurtry, and his ilk who are now receiving that massive (seventy seven million dollar) taxpayers Ethanol subsidies.

I (Lee) ask all Web readers to note that Roy McMurtry is the father of the Honorable Lady Justice Janet McMurtry, the Queens Bench Judge who found me (Lee) guilty of libel of RM Administrator Donna Strudwick when I (Lee) complained to then NDP Premier Calvert that his Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, had ruled that my (Lee)s only option to obtain development zoning for the Argues was to bribe RM Administrator Strudwick and it is Lady Janets Father and his Board Colleagues of “just energy income fund” (google) who will now benefit from that control of Rural Development Zoning through having the legal right to pay bribes to the Rural Administrators, such as RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick, to be granted development zoning.

Lady Janet’s father, Roy McMurtry, and his board colleagues are now benefiting from their ownership of the largest Ethanol Plant in Canada and the massive taxpayer subsidies and the fact that the Honorable Lady Justice Janet McMurtrys Queens Bench ruling carves in stone the fact that Rural Administrators have absolute control of Rural Development Zoning, and her (Lady Janets) ruling gives the Ethanol Plant owners the right in Saskatchewan law to obtain development zoning for more Ethanol Plants simply by carrying flowers, chocolates and perfume (bribes) to the Rural Administrators, as was ruled by the NDP Minister then Responsible, Len Taylor, as being the only option to obtain zoning “ supreme court of canada summary statement case 31940” (google)

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that Lady Janet’s ruling has taken nepotism and a “incestuous conflict of interest” (google) beyond normal, arrogant, run of the mill, bureaucratic corruption, right to the edge of reason and I (Lee) ask that all Web readers note that the “just energy income fund” (google) board members are a who’s who of eastern political and judicial heavy hitters, inparticularly Lady Janets’s Father, Roy McMurtry, and these are the individuals who are now benefiting from the fact the Harper Feds have mandated 5% Ethanol use in all car fuel by 2010.

I (Lee) ask all Web readers to note that I was, in the main, correct in what I set out in Web site segments dated September 2nd 2009, FOLLOW THE MONEY, and October 15th 2009, WHY IS CANADA SO CORRUPT? ie: Ethanol Production involves the usual sea of Government Corruption and corrupt accumulation of taxpayers dollars by individuals with ties to Government officials and Politicians, including the necessity of the Ethanol Plant owners to control Rural Development zoning where the Ethanol Plants are built, and I (Lee) was only wrong about who was going to benefit from that sea of corruption; it is not going to be Link and Drummond, only Lady Janet McMurtry’s father, Roy, and his eastern ilk.

I (Lee) ask all Web reading, voting, tax payers to note that there are massive, simply massive, amounts of taxpayer money involved in taxpayer subsidized Ethanol Production. All Web readers are asked to note “federal mandate of 5% ethanol use after 2010” (google) means that two billion liters of Ethanol is needed in Canada each year and with Saskatchewan having nearly half of all arable land in Canada that means that Saskatchewan will need to produce a billion gallons of Ethanol a year and the Terra Grain Fuels Plant at Belle Plaine produces about a million and a half liters, meaning that six more plants of a similar size are needed here in Saskatchewan and that means a need for the Ethanol Plant owners to control Rural Zoning, all of which I (Lee) set out in detail in Web site segment dated September 2nd, 2009 FOLLOW THE MONEY.

The Terra Grain Fuels Plant, after a years operation, was given $77,750.000.00 (seventy seven million seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars) of tax payers money over seven years, over eleven million dollars a year. Six more plants means a annual subsidy of taxpayer money of well over sixty million dollars a year, in ten years Roy McMurtry and his eastern ilk will have removed seven hundred million dollars of taxpayer money from the economy, there are seven of them so that is one hundred million dollars each. It is not exactly a Madoff level (fifty Billion dollars) or a Devine Gang level (ten Billion dollars) or even a Gary Drummond Channel Lake (one Billion dollars) “disappearance” ( google) of tax payer money but it should still receive a honorable mention in the history of corruption in Government.

Where I (Lee) was wrong, (and should have known that this would be the situation), is that the heavy hitters in the east, such as Lady Janet McMurtrys father, Roy McMurtry, and his ilk, would never in a million years allow a couple of good old boys from Saskatchewan, such as Link and Drummond, even with Link as Premier, (guys like Roy McMurtry eat Premiers for lunch), to acquire those hundreds of millions of dollars from taxpayer subsidized Ethanol Production and I (Lee) ask all Web readers to look again at the Board of Directors of “just energy income fund” (google) and note that the Hon. Hugh Segal, is a $100,000,000.00 man, the Hon. Michael Kirby is a $100,000,000.00 man, as is the Hon.Gordon Griffen is another $100,000,000.00 man.

The Hon. Roy McMurtry, is both a $100,000,000.00 man and the father of Queens Bench Judge, the Honorable Lady Justice Janet McMurtry, who gave her father, the Hon. Roy, and his ilk the ability to legally (sort of) conduct this massive Ethanol scam in the first place. There can be no doubt whatsoever but that the eastern “heavy hitters” (google), such as Roy McMurtry, are going to get whatever they want and if they wanted a simple way to control Rural Development zoning for the construction of more Ethanol plants so as to be able to receive more tax payer subsidies they got it with Roy McMurtry’s daughter, Lady Justice Janets McMurtry’s, Queens Bench Judgement that there was nothing illegal with the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor’s, ruling the only option the Developers have to obtain Development zoning from Donna Strudwick and her RMAA ilk is to provide those Rural Administrators with “flowers, chocolates and perfume”, I (Lee) ask all Web readers to note yet again, for the umpteenth time, the “supreme court of canada summary statement case 31940”

I (Lee) also ask all Web readers to note yet again, for the upteenth time, that Lady Justice Janet McMurtry’s Queens Bench ruling is in direct conflict with Section 123 (1) MUNICIPAL CORRUPTION Part IV of the Criminal Code of Canada, which states that a Developer is in contradiction of the Criminal Code and subject to five years in prision if he provides anything to a Municipal Official, and Section 123 (3) of the Criminal Code defines a Municipal Official as being a Rural Administrator.

Notwithstanding the rumours as set out at the start of the Web site segment dated November 21st 2009, STRUDWICK AND THE HON JIM REITER, ie: that the Wall Administration was planning to remove Rural Development Zoning control from the RM Administrators and turn it over to the Senior Bureaucrats in Community Planning, there was nothing in the throne speech, nothing in Question Period, nothing in the scrums, there has been nothing whatsoever anywhere, not even more rumours, to suggest any attempt by the Wall Administration to address Rural Zoning corruption.

BUT now, that the facts are established that the eastern political and judicial heavy hitters, such as the Honorable Lady Justice Janet Lady McMurtrys father, Roy McMurtry and his ilk, are the only individuals, along with a handful of Saskatchewan’s largest farm families, to benefit from taxpayer subsidized Ethanol Plants, and that fact is now public knowledge through this Web site, Premier Brad may have to rethink the question of who controls Rural Development zoning and the fact that eastern hotshots like Roy McMurtry and his cohorts will benefit from the fact that Rural Development zoning depends only on having the kind of soul that can stand to carry “flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) to the Rural Administrators, such as Strudwick, to allow the building of more taxpayer subsidized Ethanol Plants here in Saskatchewan.

Despite the fact that there has been no hint of a break through on the question of Premier Wall or Opposition Leader Link dealing with Rural Zoning corruption, note Web site segment dated June 18th, 2009, TWEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE, my (Lee)s friends and colleagues have now boosted my chances of getting the Argues Development zoning without bribing RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, originally set at zero, then changed to fifty-fifty and now to 66% (two thirds), in the main because of the fact of the eastern political/judicial elite receiving massive taxpayer subsidies, $77,000,000,00 (seventy seven million dollars) for Ethanol production and the number of visits to this Web site indicating a growing interest by the Saskatchewan taxpaying voters in this Sea of Corruption.

All cartoons are “brilliant nonsense” (google), and I (Lee) always read “Hagar” and “Perarls Before Swine” for words of wisdom and in the October 21st “Pearls before Swine” strip, the pigs, while debating what happenes when you die, decided to ask google, one of the pigs pointed out that Google did not know everything, but the rest were aghast at this heresy and all pigs then began shouting “All Praise to the Google”, and it is fact that 75% (seventy five percent) of households in North America are on the internet and I (Lee) have plotted a graph of the visits to this Web site over the last two years finding that the visits to this Web sites are increasing “exponentially” (google).

The Access zap2it TV Ads and Web sites such as this one cause people to talk to each other and given the corruption driven financial meltdown everyone that I (Lee) know is becoming increasingly edgy about his/her financial future because it is self evident that the only thing keeping the economy going is the current Federal stimulus spending which is generated by the printing of money and will result in a Federal Government debt of a hundred Billion dollars and with Canada’s two economic engines, Ontario and Alberta, debt at fifty Billion and eight Billion respectively, and the rest of the Provinces debt at God knows how much, and with the United States economy in worse shape than Canada’s, all tax paying voters know that the Canadian economy is doomed, note Web site segment dated January 22nd 2009 START CLEANING UP BRIBERY AT THE BOTTOM, and April 26th, 2009, SASKATCHEWAN/ AFGHANISTAN CORRUPTION.

:Saskatchewan’s Minister of Finance, the Hon Rod (Gantefoer) is predicting recession
“ saskachewan likely facing recession: finance minister james wood ” (google) and the honest Saskatchewan taxpaying voters know that they, their family and friends, are faced with losing jobs, homes, cars and pension plans, while I (Lee) have amassed and set out in this Website hard evidence that one segment of the Saskatchewan Bureaucracy, the three hundred members of the RMAA (Saskatchewan Rural Municipal Administrators Association), are a self regulating association with the legal right to demand “flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) to provide Development zoning, consequently as the voting taxpayers start to lose homes, cars and pensions, this Web site is going to be of increasing interest to the honest Saskatchewan tax paying voters which will result in a increasing numbers of Web site visits.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that graphs showing “exponential growth curves” (google) can and do reflect reality, note that interest paid on interest “compound interest” (google) is the simple example of this fact. I (Lee) have always been fascinated by the “probability theory” (google) and these “exponential” (google) curves, I (Lee) have always been very edgy about relying on them to reflect reality because it is a fact that figures can be designed to lie and liars really do figure.

As example, it was the supposed professionals pretending to be stock brokers and/or investment bankers and/or financial advisiors, who, when they were not actually “white collar thugs” (google) running out and out “ponzi” (google) schemes to literally defraud their clients, right from the get-go, were at best using these “exponentially” (google) increasing graphs and the “probability theory” (google) to hood wink their clients into believing that they (the financial advisors) had some sort of a magic way to make a bunch of money without working at it and it was this kind of manipulation coupled with the out and out fraud, and Corruption of the Government Burueaucrats in the Government regulatory agencys that were paid bribes to let the fraud artists get away with the corruption resulting in the sea of corruption that has forced the Western Liberal Democracies to their kness right at the edge of the abyss.

The foregoing notwithstanding the fact is that a graph plot of visits to this Web site do show a exponential increase and as a result eveyone that I (Lee) know, partly for that reason, believes that I am going to eventually accomplish the impossible for the Argues and obtain development zoning for their thirty million dollar residential development without paying bribes to RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick.

I (Lee) am very proud of myself for what has been accomplished so far because four different Regina Lawyers told the Argues that it was impossible to get by Donna Strudwick and obtain zoning for their subdivision and no less than the great Link (NDP Opposition Leader Dwain Lingenfelter), then serving as Premier Roy’s Deputy Premier, told me (Lee) repeatedly that it was impossible to get by Strudwick and obtain Development zoning for the Argues thirty million dollar residential development.

Then to chisel into stone those high level legal and Political opinions that Donna Strudwick had to be paid bribes for the Argues to be granted zoning the NDP Member for the Battle Fords and Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, told me (Lee) that the only option that I (Lee) had to have a chance to obtain development zoning for the Argues was to “carry flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) to RM Administrator Strudwick, note “supreme court of canada summary statement for case 31940” (google), but all of the foregoing notwithstanding, the consensus among my friends now is that the Web site publicity is giving me (Lee) a fighting chance to obtain development zoning for the Argues without bribing RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick.

It has taken nearly a decade but there can be no doubt whatsoever but that I (Lee) have fought the corruption of Saskatchewan’s “natural governing party” (google) the NDP, as well as Saskatchewan’s massively corrupt RCMP, Judicial and NDP legal community to a standstill and while I (Lee) have still not won the day for the Argues, they (the Argues) now at least have some hope of obtaining development zoning without bribing RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Satrudwick.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that credit for the accomplishment must go to many good people other than myself (Lee):

First, Earle and Sharie Argue had the courage and integrity to stand firm and flatly refuse to even consider paying bribes to RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick notwithstanding the fact that they believed that their refusal to bribe Strudwick meant the loss of their dream of bringing good homes to people by designing and creating a unique and important development while adding to Saskatchewans economic development, and making themselves ten million dollars realizing their dream.

Second, Saskatoon Lawyer Jack Hillson, serving as the Liberal Minister Responsible in the 1999 NDP/Liberal coalition Administration had the courage and integrity to openly defy RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick, as well as both SARM and the RMAA by amending Section 14 (1) of the Urban Act to allow a Developer to have a Village annex his development out of a Rural Municipality thereby by passing need for the Developer to pay bribes to the Rural Administrator to obtain development zoning.

Third, the Outlook Community Leaders, in particular Lloyd Smith, who went right to the wall time and time again, note Web site segment dated October 4th, 2007, “ Update with reply from Law Society of Saskatchewan”, to see the Argues granted zoning for their development without bribing RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick. There can be no doubt whatsoever but that without Lloyd’s involvement and actions my quest for development zoning for the Argues without bribing Donna Strudwick would not have gotten off the ground, let alone to the point that it is now at.

Fourth, Dr. Carl Baar, co-author with the Hon Jules Deschenes, of the Judicial Council of Canada report, “Masters In Their Own House”, the report that sets out that the Provincial Administrations use their control of the Queens and Appeal Bench Judges working lives to control Judicial rulings, and it was Dr. Baar who told me (Lee) that the only way to overcome the absolute corruption of Canadian Government Bureaucrats was publicity, to wit: the only hope is to just keep prying the rocks over so the public can see the corrupt Government Bureaucrats crawl away to get under another rock and to keep on turning the rocks over until the corrupt Bureaucrats run out of rocks to crawl under.

Credit must go to, the Hon John Crosbie, now serving as the Lieutenant Governor of Newfoundland, at the time one of Mulroneys Senior Ministers, who provided me (Lee) with the then confidential Judicial Council of Canada report “Masters In Their Own House” on the corruption of the Administration of Justice in Canada; the Editor of the Saskatoon Star Phoenix who had the courage and integrity to run my (Lee)s first Web site Ad; the Board of Directors of Access Communication who had the courage and integrity to run my (Lee)s zap2it Web site Ads.

Credit must also go to, the Supreme Court of Canada for their Summary Statement in case 31940; my (Lee)s Web Master came up with a truly brilliant Web site design and in open defiance of RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, had the courage and integrity to implement and maintain it; to the SMB (Saskatchewan Municipal Board) members who had the courage and integrity to openly defy RM Administrator Donna Strudwick and rule that the Argues had received all Provincial Departmental approvals for their Development; His Worship Michael Klein, Mayor of the Village of Wood Mountain, who had the courage and integrity to openly defy Strudwick, SARM and the RMAA and have his Village try to annex the Argue Development out of Strudwick’s RM.

But the most credit for what has been accomplished on behalf of the Argues must go to a truly remarkable man, Vinton Cerf, known as the “father of the internet” (google). There were forerunners, but Vinton Cerf is the man who established the use of Web sites as we know them to be functioning today “how the internet came to be” (google), and this is crucial to the Argues because there can be no doubt whatsoever but that it was this Web site that has created a situation where the Argues have even a faint hope of obtaining zoning for their thirty million dollar residential subdivision because up until now, all Senior Regina Lawyers and all Senior Politicans had maintained the position that it was impossible for the Argues to obtain development zoning without bribing Strudwick.

As set out above, I (Lee) am very proud of myself for making effective use of the tools available to come as close as we ( the Argues and I) have to accomplishing the impossible. It is generally believed that this Web site is responsible for the fact that Link nearly lost the Regina Douglas-Park By-election and the fact that he (Link) suffered a 40% (forty percent) drop in popular support in Douglas-Park and with recent polling showing that trend continuing “ndp running into a solid wall mandryk” (google) means that it is impossible for the NDP to win the November 2011 General election, so one Rural Zoning Corruption problem is solved, the NDP Party of Saskatchewan.

With the assumption being that I (Lee) have accomplished the impossible with this Web site and created a situation where the Argues will obtain development zoning without bribing Strudwick, the question is asked of me (Lee), repeatedly, what am I going to get out of it, and the answer to that question is nothing, I (Lee) can accept nothing from the Argues for accomplishing the impossible for them.

Originally the Argue family had offered that if I (Lee) was able to obtain development zoning for them without bribing RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick that I (Lee) could contract the infrastructure work on their thirty million dollar residential
development, about a million dollars worth of work that would show a profit of about 20% (twenty percent), to the Contractor, but if the agreement with the Argues was ever finalized the Courts would simply seize the amount of Strudwicks libel award $10,000.00 (ten thousand dollars) from whatever the Argues paid to me (Lee) under that Contract agreement, and give it to Strudwick to satisfy the libel judgment, and if that was done it would mean that Strudwick may as well have been paid her bribes in the first place to provide development zoning, and we (the Argues and I) will not pay RM Administrator Donna Strudwick one red cent in bribes, ever.

The infrastructure work on the Argues residential subdivision development would have been perfect to allow me (Lee) a project where I could do the work I (Lee) was trained to do and enjoy doing, oversee construction projects, and could have done it without the need to pay bribes to Government Bureaucrats, but it was not to be, RM Administrator Donna Strudwick was able to block the Argues development for over a decade by suing me (Lee) the Argues Representative for libel, and winning the legal action, all because the Argues, and I (Lee) as the Argues Representative, refused to carry flowers, chocolates and perfume (bribes) to her (Strudwick) to provide development zoning, again note “supreme court of canada summary statement case 31940” (google)

A few Web readers believe that assuming I (Lee) do accomplish the impossible and the Argues are granted development zoning without bribing Strudwick it is unfair that I (Lee) am not able to benefit, and of course it is grossly unfair, but that fact does not bother me (Lee), all Saskatchewan Administrations have been brutally unfair to honest Saskatchewan citizens since the Administration of Ross Thatcher whose interest as Premier was Provincial economic development rather than self enrichment, nevertheless, I (Lee) am reasonably content for several reasons, a few of those reasons are:

—-assuming the Argues are granted development zoning I (Lee) will then be able to pursue retribution for the horror of my being found guilty of libel of that dreadfull woman, RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, and to allow me (Lee) to follow to its logical conclusion the reference in W.H.Auden’s great poem “what all schoolchildren learn: to whom evil is done do evil in return” (google)

—-75% (seventy five percent) of households in North America have the internet (Saskatchewan is especially wired in) and a great many normal internet searches will lead the user to this Web site. As example, conduct a normal search for the “rm of edenwold” and note that the first two references in the search answer are to this Web site, while the third reference on the list is to what the searcher was probably looking for in the first place, the RM of Edenwold Web site.

—-Search for the RM of Edenwold lawyer, “regina lawyer glen w. dowling” and this Web site comes up as part of the search results, search for Court of Appeal Judge, Lane (the Hon. J. Gary) “court of appeal judge the hon j. gary lane” and note that the first two search results are this Web site, try the “honorable lady justice janet mcmurtry” or “rcmp staff sergeant brent lewis” and note the first two search results are this Web site.

—-Many Saskatchewan Tax paying voters will be interested in Links Meadow Lake Membership Fraud, try search words “ rcmp investigate ndp meadow lake membership fraud” and note that this Web site is items two and three in the search results.

—-Rather than just conduct a search for references to the evil, lying, corrupt individuals involved in the Argue/Strudwick bribes/zoning issue try a search for the good guys, try “his worship mayor michael klein” or “outlook community leader lloyd smith” or “saskatoon lawyer jack hillson” or “earle and sharie argue rural zoning” and this Web site comes up as a search result.

—-Another more oblique web search reference will surface as follows: many people will be interested in Dr. Michael Atkinson’s University of Saskatchewan lectures in Government Corruption and will try search words such as “ dr. michael atkinson u of s canadian government corruption” or any similar search words and this Web site will come up and any person interested in Government Corruption will soon realize that this Web site has as much real life information about Government Corruption as four years of Dr. Atkinsons classes on Government Corruption.

—-The point is that my (Lee)s Webmaster is a genius, his basic Web site design has created a situation that is so interlocked with the internet and Web system that a great many unrelated Web searches result in a Web browser being led to this Web site.

As set out in preceding paragraphs what has occurred so far toward obtaining development zoning for the Argues thirty million dollar residential subdivision without bribing RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick is very encouraging and as a result it is my (Lee)s intention to continue running the Access zap2it TV Ads and keep this Website in place asking for a public inquiry with a goal of obtaining compensation for the Argues because they were blocked for over a decade from being granted development zoning because of their refusal to pay bribes to the RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick, and the inquiry may also allow me (Lee), the Argues representative, to clear my name of libel of Donna Strudwick for my complaint to the then Premier Calvert about her (Strudwick)s corruption.

I (Lee) serving as the Argues representative, am so “sickened unto death” (google) at the corruption I have uncovered in the Saskatchewan Government during the process of trying to obtain zoning for the Argues without bribing Strudwick, that I have stopped caring about anything. Nevertheless, I (Lee) will carry on for the last inch on the last foot of the last mile to obtain compensation for the Argues when they were denied development zoning because of their refusal to bribe RM Administrator Donna Strudwick and to try to clear my name of libel of that dreadfull woman (Strudwick) for my complaint to then NDP Premier Calvert about her corruption.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that at the end of the day seven rock solid facts regarding corruption in Rural Development Zoning in Saskatchewan have been established, corruption supported by the then NDP Minister Responsible Len Taylor and the Saskatchewan Courts, facts that can not be denied, debated or questioned, to wit:

Fact one; The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal ruled in the Regina Casino case, Harper v. Regina (City), that all zoning issues are political and the Courts must not interfere.

Fact two; As set out in the Supreme Court of Canada Summary Statement for case 31940, the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, made a political ruling that the only option a Developer has to have a chance to obtain development zoning is to carry flowers, chocolates and perfume to the R M Administrator controling zoning.

Fact three; Section 123 (1) of the Criminal Code of Canada, MUNICIPAL CORRUPTION, states that it is a Criminal Code offence to carry anything to a Municipal Administrator to obtain favour, to wit: there can be no doubt whatsoever but that flowers, chocolates and perfume carried to a Rural Administrator to obtain rural development zoning is a bribe.

Fact four; In a ruling dated December 22nd 2004 the SMB (Saskatchewan Municipal Board) stated that in the Argue/Strudwick zoning issue the Argues had been granted all
Provincial Department approvals and that Strudwicks refusal to grant development zoning was costing the Saskatchewan taxpayers a substantial amount of tax revenue.

Fact five; Section 20 (9) of the Muncicipal Board Act states that a SMB ruling has the same weight in Saskatchewan Law as a Public inquiry.

Fact six; RCMP Staff Sergeant Brent Lewis destroyed evidence of RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwicks corruption when he was instructed to do so by Donna Strudwicks Government lawyer Glen Dowling,

Fact seven; The Saskatchewan Courts, ignoring their own ruling that all zoning issues are political and the Courts must not interfere, did interfere, and when Strudwick sued me (Lee) for libel for complaining to then Premier Calvert about his Minister Responsible and Strudwick, the Saskatchewan Courts did rule that I was guilty of libel for my complaining to then NDP Premier Lorne Calvert that his Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, had ruled that the Argues only option to obtain zoning for their Development was to carry flowers, chocolates and perfume to RM Administrator Donna Strudwick.

The seven facts set out above are rock solid and by themselves, as a group of stand alone facts, establish a need for a public inquiry into the Argue/Strudwick zoning dispute, BUT in addition to these seven facts, I (Lee) serving as the Argues representative, have researched, found and placed in this Web site, considerable well documented evidence that the Argue family were blocked by the NDP Administration, including a group of NDP activists, Lawyers and a Queens Bench Judge with political and family ties to NDP Premier Lorne Calvert and his Ministers, from being granted zoning for their development until RM Administrator Strudwicks bribes were paid.

There is considerable and conclusive evidence that the blocking of the Argues from being granted development zoning until Strudwick’s bribes were paid was so far reaching that it included the deliberate destruction of myself ( Lee), serving as the Argue representative, because of my refusal to back off on my efforts to obtain zoning for the Argues without bribing Donna Strudwick.

I (Lee) repeat that the evidence is considerable and conclusive that this deliberate, planned, organized blocking of zoning for the Argue development until Strudwicks bribes were paid, and my (Lee)s personal destruction, was undertaken by a group of well connected NDP Lawyers, Judges and Ministerial level Politicians, in effect a sea of corruption, which also warrants a public inquiry, consequently the only possible means to get to the bottom of the Argue/Strudwick zoning issue is for the Urban taxpaying voters to demand that the Provincial Administration, the Sask Party, order a public inquiry be undertaken by a Alberta Judge.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that if a public inquiry conducted by a Alberta Judge, accepts the hard evidence, such as the Supreme Court of Canada Summary Statement, a dozen uncontradicted affidavits and a SMB ruling, that the Argues have been denied development zoning for over a decade because of their ( the Argues) refusal to bribe RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick, the Argues must be granted compensation for their lost decade of enjoyment of their development.

The Argues Bankers, the CIBC, were so interested in the Argue Development that they brought (flew in) a development financing expert from BC to study the Argues development plan and that expert was so impressed with the Argue development as planned that she (the CIBC expert) concluded the Argues would sell out their 160 lot development in less than a year and show a pretax profit of ten million dollars, consequently it would be a simple matter for any Accountant to now take those established facts and calculate the amount of money the Argues would have made, even at Bank interest, over the decade that was lost to them because of their refusal to bribe Donna Strudwick, and simply add that amount to the ten million dollars original profit the Argues lost because of their refusal to bribe RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Srtrudwick.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that the Saskatchewan Courts blocking of zoning for the Argues development until RM Administrator Strudwicks bribes were paid would have been a relatively minor, run of the mill, everyday bit of Saskatchewan Judicial corruption compared to other examples of much more horrifying instances of Saskatchewan Judicial Corruption and I (Lee) ask all Web readers to bear with me while I set out just two well documented examples of that fact.

Saskatchewan Justice, acting with “malice aforethought” (google) incarcerated both David Milgaard and Colin Thatcher for over twenty years each for murders they did not commit. David was incarcerated because the Justice system needed a fall guy to calm the fears of the Saskatoon taxpaying voters because of a long series of brutal rapes one of which ended with the murder of Saskatoon nurse Gail Miller, which lead to the Courts falsely incarcerating David Milgaard because he was handy and poor.

The Saskatchewan Courts are so corrupt that the lawyer the Courts assigned to conduct the Milgaard defence was Calvin Tallis, the lawyer who acted for the Saskatoon City Police service. The nepotistic practices of the Saskatchewan Courts have not changed in forty years because all Web readers will note that the fact of the Court assigning Saskatoon City Police Lawyer, Cal Tallis, to defend Milgaard, is the same nepotistic horror as that of the Courts assigning a NDP activist, the Honorable Lady Justice Janet McMurtry, who was married to NDP Premier Calverts Attorney General Chris Axworthy, to hear Strudwicks libel action against me (Lee), the Argues Representative, note Web site segment dated July 26th 2007, RURAL ZONING IN SASKATCHEWAN.

Back to the David Milgaard horror. To add corrupt horror to corrupt horror, despite the fact that after David Milgaards false incarceration for the Gail Miller murder, the wife of the real murderer, Larry Fisher, acting alone, went to and told the Police that Milgaard was innocent because her husband, Larry Fisher, had actually raped and murdered Gail Miller, which was then proven to be true by DNA evidence, but the Saskatchewan Courts, instead of acting immediately to order the release of David (Milgaard), simply went along with the Provincial Government plan to find Larry Fisher and incarcerate him (Fisher) for the Miller murder, which they did do, finding him in Winnipeg, and then incarcerated him (Fisher) for the Miller murder. The Saskatchewan Courts sat back and watched for over a decade while Saskatchewan Justice had two guys, Milgaard and Fisher, doing hard time for the murder of the same Saskatoon nurse, Gail Miller.

I (Lee) repeat, Saskatchewan Justice then had two of them, Fisher and Milgaard, doing hard time for the murder of the same young woman, a Saskatoon nurse named Gail Miller, but acting with full knowledge and “malice aforethought” (google) the Saskatchewan Courts, in a obvious effort to keep the Milgaard horror covered up, left David Milgaard doing hard time for his entire youth.

David would still be in prision except for the fact that his mother, Joyce Milgaard, never stopped prying the rocks over until eventually she got the facts out in the open. Any Web reader who is interested may read the facts on line “david milgaard inquiry report” (google) and it is true that once Joyce got enough rocks turned over David was granted ten million dollars in compensation although many Saskatchewan citizens wonder if a hundred million dollars would have been enough money for what was done to David.

Colin Thatcher is about as different as it is possible to be from David Milgaard. David was very young, as poor as a church mouse, and he (David) was usually stoned on marihuana and was a perfect fall guy for the Saskatchewan Courts purposes of calming the fears of the Saskatoon voting taxpayers, whereas Colin Thatcher was the exact opposite of David, but was still railroaded for a murder that he did not commit because the Devine Gang were worried about finalizing their plan to “disappear” ten Billion dollars of Saskatchewan taxpayers money

Colin was the son of former Premier Ross Thatcher and was very wealthy, a MLA and former Cabinet Minister, he did not drink to any extent and did not use drugs of any sort and was about as normally suspicious, smart, skeptical and paranoid as is possible to be and still function, but they (the Devine Gang and Courts) were still able to incarcerate him for a murder he did not commit.

Colin Thatcher, like his father before him, Ross Thatcher, was a true statesman and a honorable man, whose interest in public service, (politics) was the good of the people, ie: Provincial economic development, rather than using his Political power for personal enrichment and during the Devine Gang era there were a few of the Devine Gang backbench MLA’s who did not like what their true Political Leaders, Lane (the Hon J. Gary) and his ilk, were doing, and Regina Northwest MLA Bill Sveinson was one of those Devine Gang Back benchers who did not like it.

When Devine fired Colin (Thatcher) as Energy Minister, Bill (Sveinson) tried to convince Colin that they should cross the floor to the Provincial Liberals. There was no doubt whatsoever but that the Provincial Liberals had no more hope of forming a Saskatchewan Provincial Government then they have now and Colin kept pointing this fact out, BUT, Colin did eventually agree with Bill (Sveinson) that they should cross the floor to the Liberals and Colin agreed that if nothing else, a well run Liberal campaign would take enough votes off the Devine Gang to put the NDP back in power, and Colin did agree that as corrupt as the NDP were they were not as corrupt as the Devine Gang.

It is my (Lee)s memory that Colin was charged with Jo-Ann’s murder the day after he (Colin) agreed with Bill Sveinsons plan for them to cross the floor to the Liberals. There may have been a leak somewhere, or perhaps Lane’s people saw Colin and Bill with their heads togeather once to often and acted on the assumption of what they (Colin and Bill) were likley planning, or perhaps Colins office or phones were bugged, but the Devine Gang knew perfectly well that if two political figures with the stature of Colin Thatcher and Bill Sveinson ran a active campaign for the Provincial Liberals that enough Liberal votes would be drained off the Devine Gang to put the NDP back in power.

It was of great importance to the Devine Gang because if they had lost the next General election they could not have disappeared the ten Billion dollars of Saskatchewan tax payer money that they planned to disappear, so Lane ( the Hon J. Gary) as the Devine Gang Attorney General, simply charged Colin with Jo-Anns murder and the rest of what occurred is set out in Colins great Book “final appeal colin thatcher” (google).

I (Lee) ask all Web readers to note that the foregoing examples of Judicial corruption and horror regarding David Milgaard and Colin Thatcher are set out as examples of how far the Saskatchewan Courts will go to protect the corrupt elite of Saskatchewan’s Political and Bureaucratic Leadership and allow their (the bureaucrats) rape and pillage of the Provincial Treasury as well as demands for bribes and kickbacks from the business community and the right to run any corrupt scheme that occurs to them that might amuse them, (politicians and bureaucrats) or bolster their egos.

I (Lee) am not claiming that either the Argues, or I (Lee), serving as the Argues Representative, have suffered from the Judicial corruption to the extent that David and Colin have, but we ( the Argues and I) did suffer from that Corruption and there is no doubt whatsoever but that I (Lee) can provide a public inquiry considerable and conclusive evidence that the NDP Administration of then Premier Lorne Calvert ordered the Courts to destroy me (Lee) because of my refusal to pay Strudwick her bribes to grant the Argues development zoning as was ordered by the then NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, as being the Argues only option to obtain development zoning, BUT I (Lee) repeat, this fact notwithstanding, I (Lee) make no claim that the massively corrupt Saskatchewan Justice system inflicted harm on the Argues and I similar to the harm inflicted on David Milgaard and Colin Thatcher.

But I (Lee) do claim that the harm the Argues and I suffered from the Corrupt Saskatchewan Justice system can be equated with the harm done Richard Klassen “martinsville nightmare” (google) and I (Lee) do believe that compensation of at least ten million dollars plus interest, is due the Argues on their zoning issue with Strudwick and whatever compensation Richard Klassen is given, I (Lee) should also be given and that is the claim that I (Lee) would make to a public inquiry Commissioner and Counsel.

Both Klassen and I (Lee) suffered from the fact that the Saskatchewan Courts, acted with “malice aforethought” (google) to destroy both of us. In Klassen’s case, despite the fact there was no hard evidence, no missing babies, no baby bones, no hard evidence whatsoever, based only on the word of a couple of very young children who later recanted their claims, a Saskatchewan Justice official falsely accused Richard Klassen of running a Satanic Cult and killing and eating babies. This charge appeared to be made for the sole purpose of allowing a Crown Prosecutor to make a name for himself, and the Saskatchewan Courts even ruled that the Crown Prosecutor acted with malice although the Supreme Court of Canada did over turn the lower Courts rulings regarding malice “saskatchewan prosecutor wins supreme court appeal cbc” (google).

I (Lee) ask that all Web readers take note of CBC news item “saskatchewan prosecutor wins supreme court appeal cbc” (google) and Canwest news item “court reverses malice ruling janice tibbetts” (google) and take particular notice that the Supreme Court Judges ruled as they did because they did not see how Crown Prosecutor Miazga could have any motive to destroy Klassen BUT in my (Lee)s situation there was motive for the NDP Government of the day, the Calvert Administration, to deliberately destroy me (Lee). The NDP motive was my (Lee)s refusal to pay bribes to RM Administrator Strudwick, a woman who reported to the Premier “strudwick reports to premier” (google) to cause Strudwick to approve Development zoning for the Earle Argue family of Regina, “supreme court of canada summary statement case 31940” (google)

I (Lee) repeat, in my case a NDP Queens Bench Judge, the Honorable Lady Justice Janet McMurtry, found me guilty of libel for lodging a complaint with then NDP Premier Calvert that his Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, had ruled that my (Lee)s only option to obtain development zoning for the Argues thirty million dollar residential development project was to “carry flowers, chocolates and perfume” to RM Administrator Strudwick, which, if those gifts had been carried to Strudwick, as ordered by the Minister Responsible, would have been a contravention of Section 123 (1) of Canada’s Criminal Code MUNICIPAL CORRUPTION, which prevents anything being carried to Municipal officials in exchange for a benefit, such as development zoning.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that the Saskatchewan Courts have destroyed both Klassen and I (Lee) to support corruption within the Saskatchewan Bureaucracy, but in the Klassen case the Supreme Court concluded that Crown Prosecutor Miazga had no motive to destroy Klassen so there was no malice, only justice error and the Supreme Court left in place the award of the original two point eight million dollars the Province had given Klassen following the Saskatchewan Courts malice rulings.

I (Lee) repeat that in my destruction there was a motive, the motive was my (Lee)s refusal to pay Strudwick her bribes to obtain development zoning for the Argues as instructed by the then NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, and the only possible way to determine a fair resolution is a public inquiry conducted by a Alberta Judge .

The Province had already concluded that Klassen had been subjected to two point eight million dollars worth of suffering caused by Saskatchewan Justice and that sounds just fine to me (Lee). No amount of money, one million or ten million dollars is of any use to me (Lee) anyway because my only interest in life is contracting road work and I can not contract Highway work because I will not pay bribes to the Saskatchewan Department of Highway Engineers and I can not contract Grid Road work from the RMs (Rural Municipalities) because I will not pay bribes to the Rural Administrators.

I (Lee) stupidly believed that the worldwide financial meltdown, resulting in Canada creating a fifty to one hundred million dollar taxpayer Federal debt for a huge stimulus for infrastructure might cause our Governments, Federal and Provincial, to clean up the corruption of their Bureaucracy’s, but I (Lee) was living in my usual dream world and was wrong, the corruption has become even worse, as example, the cost of Road work in the City of Montreal has increased by a third in the last year because the Province of Quebec has done nothing about the fact that the City of Montreal Bureaucrats are working with the mafia to launder taxpayer stimulus money out of the system, “mafia reported to control 80 percent of roadwork contracts in city” (google).

A knowledgeable Web reader has brought to my, (Lee)s, attention his belief that if the RMs were eliminated and Counties formed, as I (Lee) advocate, that the overall Corruption problems in Rural Saskatchewan would get much worse under County Administrators, and the worry is that Saskatchewan Rural Municipal Administration would become as Corrupt as Municipal Administration in the City of Montreal, note Macleans November 9th 2009 article, “ Montreal is a disaster martin patriquin” (google)

I (Lee) disagree with the Web reader who belives that County Administrators would be even more corrupt than RM Administrators because the fact is that the tiny little postage stamp RMs are usually run by a small handful of Farm Families and one or two corrupt Administrators and it is easy to keep corrupt happenings all in the family, and whatever does get out in the open is small enough that it does not interest the media.

But a small value corruption in each RM multiplied by the 300 (three hundred) RMs ends up with the cost to the Saskatchewan taxpayers being significant BUT if the RMs were eliminated and thirteen Countys formed overlaying the Health and School Districts each County would replace a average of 23 (twenty three) RM’s so corruption in each County would be twenty three times that of one RM and more likely to be noticed.

As example there are seven elected officials in a RM, six council members, and one Reeve, along with one Administrator, one assistant Administrator and one Roads Foreman in each of the RMs, and if each one of those ten Officials stole as little as $10,000.00 (Ten thousand dollars) each that would be only $100,000.00 (one hundred thousand dollars) in each RM each year and would not be noticed by the Auditors BUT the total cost to the taxpayers Province wide for all 300 (three hundred) Rural Municipalities would be $30,000,000.00 (thirty million dollars), a lot of taxpayer dollars stolen but barely noticable in each individual RM.

To put it another way, take that $30,000,000.00 (thirty million dollars) Province wide total cost of corruption to the taxpayer each year and divided it by thirteen Countys would mean there was $2,307,692.00 stolen by each County Administrator and assistant or two, each year, that amount would most certainly be noticed by the auditors.

I (Lee) also remind all Web readers that my (Lee)s plan was to save $75,000,000.00 (seventy five million dollars) a year in RM Administration costs, by eliminating the RMs and use $25,000,000.00 (twenty five million dollars) of that saving to administer the thirteen Countys and divide the remaining $50,000,000.00 (fifty million dollars) up among the 450 (four hundred and fifty) Villages and tiny Towns as a annual grant of a bit over $100,000,00 (one hudred thousand dollars) for each Village and in return the Village Mayors would be the solution to Rural Municipal Administration Corruption.

That Web readers worry about the anticipated corruption of the County Administrators could be resolved as follows: The four hundred and fifty Village Mayors would have to do something to earn that annual one hundred thousand dollars of grant money and they would have to form committees to study and approve Rural Zoning applications from Developers in each County anyway and that same committee of Village Mayors could study complaints about the corruption of the County Administrators and their staff.

A County corruption complaint line could be established just like the “8477 tips” (google) line, call it the “2222 cccc” line for County Corruption Complaint Commission, and the Village Mayors could deal with those County Corruption complaints, passing legitimate complaints on to the RCMP which may or may not, have any effect, but the Harper Feds are promising action on white collar crime “harper and white collar crime” (google) so the Mounties may have to take notice of what the Village Mayors send them.

There are four hundred and fifty Villages in Saskatchewan and if thirteen counties are formed to overlay the School and health districts that means a average of 35 (thirty five) Villages in each County, not to large a group to make up a Committee, and in this day and age of meeting conducted through the use of Web cams and the internet that could be done from the Village offices with no travel cost. The Developers could apply for zoning permission including land location, air photos and plans, all of which can be scanned into the computers and studied in committee by Village Mayors in each County, and in the same way, using the same Webcam and internet system the Village Mayors could consider any corruption complaint they received.

It is true that some Web readers, including the Village Mayors themselves, may not like the idea of using the four hundred and fifty Village Mayors as whistle blowers to control the anticipated corruption of the County Administrators but the obvious fact remains that the elimination of the RM’s and formation of Counties would realize a significant savings in the cost of Rural Administration and if the worry is that Rural Administration change alone would accomplish nothing in Rural Zoning corruption the one obvious solution to the bribery for Rural Development zoning problem is to follow my (Lee)s plan to place the elected officials, the Village Mayors and Councils, in charge of Rural Development zoning instead of the County Bureaucrats, but I (Lee) repeat, at least one Web reader has a problem with that plan, so let us look at it again.

If the elimination of the RMs and the creation of Countys along with the parrallel creation of Committes of Village Mayors to oversee zoning and other County corruption issues is unacceptable then the simple solution to the bribery for zoning problem would be to follow the brilliant plan designed by the then Liberal Minister Responsible Jack Hillson, when Jack (Hillson) as then Minister Responsible, amended Section 14 (1) of the Urban Act, so as to allow any Village to annex any development property out of any RM in the Province, note Web site segment dated Septermber 2nd, 2009 FOLLOW THE MONEY and/or segment dated August 25th, 2009, TURNING OVER ROCKS.

It must also be noted that the Argues would be at very great risk even if a Public inquiry were to now simply provide them (the Argues) with development zoning, even with added compensation for their lost decade, because the Argues would still not have a snowballs chance in hell to ever complete their development given the well established corruption of the Saskatchewan Courts and with the RMAA in place and functioning as a self regulating association similar to Lawyers, Accountants, Doctors, Nurses et al., dictating judgements to the Saskatchewan Courts.

What could/would happen, given the absolute corruption of the Saskatchewan Queens and Appeal Bench Courts where the Argues would have no defence whatsoever, if they (the Argues) were granted development zoning, RM Administrator Strudwick, or any RM Administrator, could expropriate the Argues 350 gpm (gallon per minute) spring water flow leaving the Argues without water and a useless development being sued by the individuals who the Argues had sold lots too because suddenly there was no water.

Expropriation of the Argues spring water flow by Strudwick has always been a worry, and when the NDP Administration of Lorne Calvert refused to accept the “annexation by a Village” solution designed by the then Liberal Minister Responsible, Jack Hillson, note Web site segment dated September 2nd 2009, FOLLOW THE MONEY, I (Lee) serving as the Argues Representative, designed a alternate solution, as follows:

In my (Lee)s August 28th 2006 written submission, FLOWERS, CHOCOLATES AND PERFUME, to then NDP Premier Calvert, his Cabinet and Caucus, I (Lee), serving as the Argue Representative, offered the Calvert NDP Administration a solution to the problem, to wit: that to solve the Argues zoning problem with Strudwick, the Argues turn their development quarter and its 350 gpm (gallon per minute) spring water flow over to SASK WATER at no charge and my (Lee)s plan was that in return SASK WATER grant the Argues, in “perpetiuty”, (google) a lease on their 160 lot development plus a extra acre or two more land for their planned brewery, plus the right to use a negotiated amount of their spring water flow, say as little as 20% (twenty percent) with all the rest of the spring water flow, 80% (percent), going for Saskatchewan public use under the direction of SASK WATER.

The plan that I (Lee) set out for Calvert, his Cabinet and Caucus, to resolve the Argue/Strudwick zoning debacle was a sound plan and I (Lee) was very proud of it. The fact is that there was a precedent for my plan because SASK WATER has run a Water Pipeline from the Town of Outlook to the west along Highway 15 for the little Villages along number 15 Highway between Outlook and Rosetown.

BUT of greater importance to my (Lee)s plan was the fact that SASK WATER had already assumed ownership and responsibility for the operation of the water works in the Town of White City, which is about four miles away from the Argues Development quarter and its 350 gpm (gallon per minute) spring water flow. White City is short of water and there can be no doubt whatsoever but it would cost the taxpayers less money for SASK WATER to hire a firm of Consulting Engineers to call tenders to build a four mile pipeline across open farm land from the Argues development quarter to White City than it would for the Regina City Engineers to negotiate a Contract with Wappell to build a water pipeline out from Regina along number one highway to White City.

Notwithstanding the commonsense of the plan I (Lee) set out for the Calvert brain trust to solve the Argue/Strudwick problem, the NDP Administration of Lorne Calvert ignored my SASK WATER proposal to resolve the Argues refusal to pay bribes to RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick to obtain development zoning and insisted that the only option the Argues had to obtain zoning for their thirty million dollar development was to carry flowers, chocolates and perfume, (pay bribes) to Strudwick “supreme court of canada summary statement case 31940” (google)

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that for the Argues and I (Lee), serving as the Argues Representative, to be treated fairly, will require that the Wall Administration order a public inquiry conducted by a Alberta Judge into why the Argues were denied development zoning after thay had met all Provincial Department conditions and why I (Lee), serving as the Argue Representaive in a effort to obtain that development zoning without bribing RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick, was personally destroyed for my refusal to “carry flowers, chocolates and perfume” ( bribes) to Strudwick when told to do so by the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor.

The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal has ruled that all zoning issues are political and the Courts must not interfere and there can be no doubt whatsoever but that while it might annoy Donna Strudwick and her RMAA ilk in the short term it may be in the best long term “political” interest of the Wall Administration to order a public inquiry into the fact that Lorne Calverts NDP Administration did deny the Argues zoning because of their refusal to bribe RM Administrator Donna Strudwick to provide that development zoning a bureaucrat who reports to the Premier “strudwick reports to premier” (google).

While recent polling shows the NDP has a problem, “ndp running into a solid wall mandryk” (google) the predicted recession over the next couple of years has the potential to reverse that NDP problem to be a problem for the ruling Sask Party, “bad news for everyone but the ndp mandryk” (google) and the situation for the NDP may not be hopeless whether or not criminal charges in the “ndp meadow lake membership fraud” (google) are ever laid against Link or any of his backroom advisors.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that when Link loses the November 2011 General Election, Saskatchewan’s natural governing Party, the NDP will simply boot Link and elect a new Leader, and the Wall Administration will always be vulnerable to the fact that their spiritual God father, the Devine Gang, did disappear Ten Billion dollars of Saskatchewan Tax payer money, again note Murrays Political Column “bad news for eveyone but the ndp mandryk” (google), the Sask Party will never shake lose from those Devine Gang ties and a large portion of that Ten Billion dollars is still on the Provincial balance sheet as a debt and with “saskatchewan likley facing recession; finance minister james wood” (google) that huge debt will not be paid off any time soon.

As a result the Wall Administratiuon would be well advised to prove that when it comes to corruption there is nothing to choose between the Calvert NDP Administration and that of the Devine Gang, note Web site segment dated June 18th, 2009, TWEEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE, and a simple way for the Wall Administration to set out that proof to the tax paying voters would be a public inquiry conducted by a Alberta Judge into the fact that the Argues were denied devlopment zoning until they paid bribes to a RM Administrator, a woman named Donna Strudwick, a Government Bureaucrat who reported to the NDP Premier, “strudwick reports to premier” (google).

This Website has set out in Web site segment dated June 18th, 2009, TWEEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE, considerable and conclusive evidence that except for a question of degree, the Devine Gang and the Calvert NDP are identically corrupt. The Devine Gang disappeared Ten Billion dollars of Saskatchewan Taxpayer’s money, whereas the group of NDP Senior Politicians, along with their hotshot lawyers and bureaucrats are content to launder considerably less of the taxpayers money out of the system, BUT like being a little bit pregnant, the principal of corruption is the same and there can be no doubt whatsoever but that it would be of Political benefit to the Wall Administration to have the fact of the Calvert NDP corruption established by a public inquiry.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that to be fair to the Argues and I (Lee) serving as the Argues Representative, it is crucial that the public inquiry be conducted by a Alberta Judge rather than a Saskatchewan, Manitoba or Ontario Judge. The NDP control the Administration of Justice in Manitoba and one of the focuses of the inquiry would be the fact that the Judge for Strudwick’s libel action against me (Lee), serving as the Argues Representative, is a NDP activist, the Honorable Lady Justice Janet McMurtry, who was married to Premier Calvert’s Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Chris Axworthy, a individual who is now serving as Dean of Law at one of Manitoba’s Universities, note Web site segment dated July 26th 2007, RURAL ZONING IN SASKATCHEWAN, so the use of a Manitoba Judge to conduct the inquiry would be a waste of time and money.

The Wall Administration must not ask that a Ontario Judge conduct the inquiry because the Honorable Lady Justice Janet McMurtry’s father, Roy McMurtry, is a Political/ Legal/Judicial legend in the Province of Ontario “ontario judge roy mcmurtry” (google) and with Roy McMurtry on the Board of Directors of “just energy income fund” (google) which owns a large Saskatchewan Ethanol Plant which will require Rural Development zoning control to allow Ethanol Plant expansion, it would be a equal waste of time and money for a Ontario Judge to conduct the inquiry.

It is a question as old as the Greeek City States “who will watch the watchers” (google) but there should be a answer somewhere and perhaps Newfoundland Premier Danny Williams might allow one of his Judges to conduct the inquiry or maybe since Premier Brad seems to be getting along so well with the US State Governors, a Montana or North Dakota Judge, or a Judge from any northern tier US state, might be the answer.

To be certain of a fair inquiry it is crucial that the inquiry Counsel be as fair, unbiased and knowlegable as the Judge conducting the inquiry but that is a difficult role to fill because all senior Saskatchewan lawyers are political, either NDP, Sask Party/ Conservative or Liberal. Saskatoon Lawyer Jack Hillson is a Liberal, he ran for the Leadership of the Provincial Liberal Party, but Jack (Hillson) does fit as perfectly as it is possible to find because the Liberal Party of Saskatchewan, down to 5% in the polls, is no longer a politically relevant force in Saskatchewan.

The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal has ruled that all zoning issues are political so there must be a political solution to any zoning issue here in Saskatchewan and Jack Hillson has proven that he is a Liberal but since the Saskatchewan Liberals are no longer politically relevant in Saskatchewan Jack would be perfect as inquiry counsel. Jack Hillson has proven beyond doubt that he is truly a Honorable man, as well as a able and experienced lawyer with Ministerial level experience in Government and has a encyclopedic knowledge of the issues surronding the Argue/Strudwick zoning dispute.

Assuming that a public inquiry conducted by a Alberta or United States Judge supported the premise that the Argues refusal to pay bribes to RM Administrator Donna Strudwick as instructed by the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, to obtain development zoning, was legally, ethically and morally unacceptable and that my (Lee)s personal destruction for my refusal to pay those bribes to Strudwick on behalf of the Argues was legally, ethically and morally unacceptable and that fact was spelled out clearly in the inquiry’s report that inquiry may work out well for the Wall Administration.

The reason that it might work out well for the Wall Administration politically is that if a public inquiry concluded that the NDP Administration of Lorne Calvert was as corrupt as the Devine Gang and that fact was in evidence before the Saskatchewan taxpaying voters in this Website as advertised by Access TV, in “perpetuity” (google) it is possible that, recession or no recession, “ saskatchewan likley facing recession: finance minister james wood” (google) and even noting the fact that “budget might cloud poll glow mandryk” (google) the Sask Party could stay in power in Saskatchewan in “perpetuity”, such as in Alberta, or at least for a few decades.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that if the actions of the five Sasktel employees “five sasktel employees in conflict of interest” (google) warrant being fired and a Regina City Police Criminal Investigation is ordered into their alleged corruption then the action of the NDP MLA for the Battlefords, Len Taylor, the then Minister Responsible as being the Argues only option to obtain zoning from RM Administrator Donna Strudwick for their (*the Argues) thirty million dollar residential subdivision was to carry her (Strudwick) “ flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) and if the Wall Administration was to charge Len Taylor with contravention of Section 464 of Canadas’s Criminal Code, COUNSELLING AN OFFENCE, note web site segment dated August 25th, 2009, TURNING OVER ROCKS that may lead to a public inquiry.

If the Regina City Police conduct a Criminal investigation into how many acre feet of flowers, tons of chocolates and gallons of perfume, Regina lawyer Wil Olive, “ one of the ten most influential men in saskatchewan olive” (google), NDP Party Vice President and NDP “ heavy hitter”(google), carried to the SPMC Bureaucrats to be granted the right to a option to purchase the 200 acre Old Fort San Lake front property, note Web site segment dated September 2nd, 2009, FOLLOW THE MONEY, and note that this Wil Olive is the same Wil Olive who orchestrated the “ndp meadow lake membership fraud” (google), then this may lead to a public inquiry.

regina computer repair

At the end of the day there can be no doubt whatsoever but that something has got to be done about Rural Zoning Corruption in Saskatchewan and all Web readers are asked to begin a campaign by phone, letter, fax, or e-mail to their Sask Party MLA requesting a public inquiry conducted by a Alberta or United States Judge into the facts surronding the situation where the Argue family of Regina was prevented from being granted zoning for their thirty million dollar residential development because of their (the Argues) refusal to carry flowers, chocolates and perfume (bribes) to RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick.

Buy your Apple and
Mac Magsafe Power Adapters here!

Buy your toshiba laptop and
notebook power adapters here!

One Response to “SEA OF CORRUPTION”

  1. STIRRING IN THE SEWAGE LAGOON « Rural Zoning in Saskatchewan Says:

    […] Rural Zoning in Saskatchewan Does Economic Development Matter to the People of Saskatchewan? « SEA OF CORRUPTION […]

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: