TWEEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE

Tweedledum and Tweedledee” are two fictional characters from the Lewis Carrol novel, Through the Looking-Glass. The two fictional characters are famous for being indistinguishable and the relevancy to Saskatchewan politics is that the June 6th, 2009 election of Dwain Lingenfelter (Link) as the NDP Leader is the start of the 2011 election campaign with the voters facing a “lose-lose” (google) situation because unlike the Scandinavian Countries where the Political Parties seem to be equally honest “equality corruption and social trust” ( google), here in Saskatchewan, the Sask Party and NDP have identical policy positions allowing Rural zoning Corruption.

Premier Brad Wall is a amiable enough man but his Sask Party is the direct descendant of Grant Devine’s Progressive Conservative Party that “ disappeared” ten Billion dollars of tax payer money “saskatchewan tories in fraud scandal” ( google). Grant Devine set a Commonwealth Corruption precedent by having a dozen Cabinet Ministers incarcerated for fraud “ rcmp probe operation fiddle” (google), and Devine’s descendant, Premier Brad Wall, refuses to end the Rural Zoning Corruption policy established by the NDP.

Notwithstanding the NDP membership debacle “ ndp membership report robert hale” ( google), I know Dwain Lingenfelter ( Link) to be the finest, most experienced, able and honest man to serve as a Saskatchewan Political Leader since Ross Thatcher and believe that Link should be our next Premier even if his hands are tied by the Corruption of the NDP Party he now leads having ordered that bribes must be paid to their Senior Official, RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, to provide development zoning.

The Party that he (Link) leads is just as corrupt as the Devine Gang because the Calvert NDP also set a Commonwealth Corruption precedent by having a Cabinet Minister order that the only option that a Developer has to obtain zoning for his development is to carry flowers, chocolates and perfume (bribes) to their (the NDP)s Senior Official, Strudwick,
“ supreme court of canada summary case 31940” (google)

The Criminal Code states that it is a contravention of the Code to provide a benefit of any kind to a Municipal Official to obtain zoning “ criminal code of canada section 123 (1) part iv” (google) and it is a axiom of Common Law that the Minister speaks for the Crown and the Crown Commands “ minister of the crown wikipedia” ( google) so
based on Common Law, a Ministers order is as if the Crown itself, (the Queen), ordered bribes paid to its Senior Official (Strudwick), to obtain zoning, consequently I (Lee), acting as the Argues Representative, lodged a written complaint with then Premier Calvert regarding the Crown order to carry his (Calvert)s Senior official “ strudwick reports to premier” ( google), flowers, chocolates and perfume, a bribe.

Before I (Lee) filed that written complaint with then Premier Calvert the Outlook Community Leaders obtained a “ legal opinion” ( google) from four lawyers and all four agreed that my complaint letter to Calvert set out the truth and therefore did not libel Donna Strudwick or anyone else, “ truth is defense against libel” ( google)

But after my complaint to Calvert Strudwick used “ libel chill” (google) to sue me (Lee) for libel and Calvert’s brain trust used their administrative control of the Queens and Appeal Bench Judges to make sure that Strudwick won her libel action against me for my complaint to then Premier Calvert about his Minister (Taylor)’s order to pay her
(Strudwick) bribes to provide the Argues with development zoning. Web readers are asked to refer to “alberta legislative library online catalogue masters in their own house” (google) for access to the Judicial Council of Canada report which establishes that the Provincial Administrations control Judicial decisions.

The new Common Law “ judge made law” (google) regarding the fact that flowers, chocolates and perfume (bribes) must be carried to RM Administrator Donna Strudwick to obtain development zoning is a legal contradiction because the Developers, or their Representatives, are subject to five years in prison under “ section 123 (1) municipal corruption criminal code of canada part iv” (google) when they carry anything to the Rural Administrators to obtain development zoning so the Developers, and/or their Representatives are caught in a “catch -22” (google), asking, which law takes precedent?

Because of that Catch-22, and to add to that Corruption horror, consider the fact that when the Developer, or his Representative, complains to the Premier about the need to pay bribes to the Rural Administrator to obtain development zoning the Rural Administrator uses “libel chill” (google) to destroy the Developer, or his Representative, by charging him with libel for his complaint to the Premier about the fact that his only option to obtain development zoning is to pay bribes to the Official who grants zoning.

My (Lee)’s personal destruction by finding me guilty of libel for my complaint to then Premier Calvert about Taylor’s (his Minister) ruling that my only option to obtain zoning for the Argue development was to bribe Donna Strudwick is the same idiotic nonsense as when, with no hard, or physical (baby bones or some such) evidence whatsoever, and based on the word of a couple of young children with a ax to grind who had been watching too much television, Saskatchewan Justice charged Richard Klassen with running a Satanic Cult and eating babies, yet Klassen is granted a inquiry “ martensville saskatchewan justice richard klassen inquiry” (google), while both the Calvert NDP and the Wall Sask Party ignored the established fact of Rural Zoning Corruption, a problem that costs the voting tax payers enormous sums of money.

Strudwick’s win of her libel action against me (Lee), the Argues Representative, has had the effect of the continued blocking of zoning for the Argues residential subdivision until Strudwicks bribes were paid, as ordered by her Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, and the Argues thirty million dollar residential subdivision would have paid about $400,000.00 ( four hundred thousand dollars) annually in school and property taxes.

There are 300 Rural Municipalities in Saskatchewan, 300 x $400,000.00 equals one hundred and twenty million dollars, the annual loss to the economy assuming that every RM is blocking a Argue type of development until the Administrators bribes are paid.

Another example of a economic loss to the taxpayers due to Taylor’s order to pay Strudwick bribes and her (Strudwick)s apparent control of the Calvert brain trust is that the Argues development quarter has a spring that flows at 350 gallons per minute (gpm), enough water flow to service a urban population of at least 3500 (thirty five hundred) and I (Lee), acting as the Argue representative, offered Calvert a deal where the Argues would turn 80% of that spring water flow over to the public for their use if the Calvert Administration would grant the Argues residential development zoning and allow them (the Argues) to use the remaining 20% of the water flow to service their development.

BUT Calvert’s brain trust refused the Argue offer to give their spring water flow to the public, and maintained their position that the only option that I (Lee) had to obtain development zoning for the Argues was to carry RM Administrator Strudwick flowers, chocolates and perfume “ supreme court of canada summary case 31940” ( google) before zoning would be granted and it is impossible to calculate the loss to the taxpaying voting public due to the Calvert brain trust refusal to accept the Argues offer to give 80% of their spring water flow to the public in exchange for being granted development zoning without having to bribe RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick.

NDP activists will claim that comparing the Devine Gang Corruption to the Calvert Corruption is comparing apples and oranges because it would take eight years for the annual loss of one hundred and twenty million dollars under the Calvert Corruption to equal one Billion dollars which would still only be one tenth of the ten Billion dollars of taxpayers money that the Devine Gang “ disappeared”, and that is true on the face of it.

But I (Lee) believe that if you factor in the “ culture of corruption” ( google) and loss of hope caused by the Calvert Minister ordered, Court sanctioned, institutionalized, in house Corruption, ie: the payment of bribes to Senior Government Officials, such as Strudwick, under the NDP, to provide development zoning, that in the long run it is probable that the Calvert Corruption will cost the taxpayers as much money(ten billion dollars) as the Devine Gang “ disappeared” over their ten years in power.

In house, institutionalized, Court approved, Corruption costs honest taxpayers a great deal of money in other, more oblique, ways. As example, in an attempt to delay the Corruption driven financial meltdown forcing the US and Canada to the edge of the financial abyss, both the US Treasury and the Bank of Canada are printing money,
“ carney printing money” ( google), and inflation will follow as night follows day, “china picks gold francis” (google) which means that Corrupt Government Officials, such as Strudwick, to maintain their standard of living, are going to demand higher bribes to provide development zoning for the Developers.

Up until 1990 Revenue Canada allowed Developers to deduct the cost of bribes to Corrupt Government Officials, such as Strudwick, as a business expense “ revenue canada allows deduction of bribes as business expense” (google). Bribes to Corrupt Government officials, such as Strudwick, were considered by Revenue Canada to be a cost of doing business, which decreased inflationary pressure by allowing Developers cost of bribes to Corrupt Government Officials to be included along with all their other development costs such as lot surveys, road construction, sewer and water installation.

But, the Developers were not required to name the Corrupt Government Official that the bribe was paid to, so the Corrupt Government Official receiving the bribe did not have to pay tax on the bribe, putting unearned income in the hands of the Corrupt Government Official, such as Strudwick, causing a increase in inflation offsetting the decrease in inflation by allowing the Corrupt Developers to claim bribes to Corrupt Government Officials, such as Strudwick, as a business expense.

It was a Revenue Canada trade off to try to decrease Corruption driven inflation but in 1990 fear of public outrage forced Revenue Canada to change the law to prevent the Corrupt Developers from being allowed to deduct the cost of bribes to Corrupt Government Officials, such as Strudwick, as a business expense, note page 235 in
“ comparative income taxation: a structural analysis hugh j. ault” ( google), creating a murky Corruption/bribes for zoning situation between 1990 and 2006.

But then, in 2006, the Calvert NDP Administration and the Saskatchewan Queens and Appeal Bench Courts ( upheld by the Supreme Court of Canada) “ supreme court of canada summary case 31940” ( google) ruled that the only option that a Developer has to obtain development zoning is to “ carry flowers, chocolates and perfume” ( pay bribes) to the Corrupt Provincial Government Officials, such as Strudwick, who approve zoning, thereby re-establishing the fact of Government sanctioned bribes for zoning..

The Saskatchewan Crown has now reinforced the fact that democratically elected leaders around the world have long established, behind the scenes, unofficial policies of forcing the business community to pay bribes to Senior Government Officials, such as Strudwick, “corruption and government susan rose-ackerman” (google).

But I (Lee) believe that this time the Corruption has gone over a line here in po-dunk Saskatchewan because you can search the Web “ until the cows come home”( google) and there is no other G-20 Country in the world, or no third world Country, not even Afghanistan, where a Minister of the Crown actually orders that the only option that a Developer has to obtain development zoning is to carry flowers, chocolates and perfume (bribes) to the Senior Government Official ( Strudwick) responsible for approving development zoning, “ supreme court of canada summary case 31940” ( google)

As public interest in this Website grows I (Lee) receive a lot of neat stuff, as example one bemused Web reader provided information taken from the Globe and Mail that a German shrink, Dr. Michael Linden, developed a theory regarding insanity, “post-traumatic embitterment disorder dr michael linden” ( google) and my mind instantly turned to how fortunate I am that the German shrink had not developed his theory 25 years ago because at that time I (Lee) was trying to publicize the fact that the Devine Gang was massively Corrupt and Lane (the Hon J. Gary), now a Saskatchewan Court of Appeal Judge, then the Devine Gang Finance Minister, made public claim that I (Lee) was insane, but he (Lane) did not dare to try to prove his public claim because he knew that I (Lee) was right, the Devine Gang was causing many millions of Saskatchewan taxpayers dollars to disappear, “disappeared” ( google)

When I (Lee) refused to back off, Lane, (then the Devine Gang Attorney General and former Minister of Finance), had me (Lee) charged under the Criminal Code with threatening for my public statement that he (Lane) “should” be shot, but of course because Lane, as Finance Minister, had just finished presiding over a annual deficit of one point three BILLION dollars, it was impossible to swear in a Jury that did not agree with me that Lane “should” be shot, so my jury returned a” not guilty” verdict and it was shortly before the 1991 election that Prime Minister Mulroney appointed Lane (the Hon J. Gary) to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal, where he has been ever since.

But if Lane, ( the Hon J. Gary) had of had the German ( Dr. Michael Linden) shrink’s theory to wave around at the time, “ post traumatic embitterment disorder dr michael linden” (google) he might have been able to prove that I (Lee) was insane, rather than having to try to find a jury that did not agree with me that he (Lane) “should” be shot.

I (Lee) remind all Web readers that until recently our society has allowed “disgruntled dissenters” (google) to function and the shrinks had a view that revenge is theraputic
“ revenge is sweet” (google) yet I (Lee) have been destroyed by Ministerial and Court rulings because of my refusal to pay bribes to a Senior Government official, Strudwick, to obtain zoning for the Argues, and in our current “politically correct” (google) and
“ libel chill” (google) world, a world of such absolute Government Corruption, that I may be found insane for complaining about the need to pay bribes to obtain zoning.

Of course I (Lee) am bitter, (and offer no apology for that bitterness), about the fact that our Political Leaders are so determined to protect the Corruption of their Officials that they (our Political Leaders) create a nonsensical medical mental situation to deem a individual insane “ post traumatic embitterment disorder dr michael linden” ( google) for refusing to accept a Crown Minister order that the only option to obtain development zoning is to bribe the Corrupt Government Official, such as Strudwick, who controls development zoning “ supreme court of canada summary case 31940” (google), if anything is insanity, it is Len Taylor’s order to pay Strudwick bribes to obtain zoning..

IN SUMMARY: the Calvert NDP Administration ruling has created a economic situation here in Saskatchewan where the Developers only option to obtain development zoning for their projects is to pay bribes to the Senior Government officials, such as Strudwick, to grant zoning, except that now the Corrupt Developers paying the bribes can no longer deduct those bribes as a business expense and must absorb the cost of those bribes personally, so lot prices must go up so that the Developer can maintain his own standard of living and still pay bribes to Corrupt Government Officials, such as Strudwick, which will lead to ever higher property assessment and ever higher taxes.

This inflationary cost spiral based on a ever increasing nontaxable bribe income to the Corrupt Senior Officials, such as Strudwick, will lead to financial disaster for many honest taxpayers and will lead to hyperinflation by 2010, “hyperinflation special report” (google) and honest taxpayers in a cold climate country such as Canada will freeze to death in the dark. Look at a documentary “i.o.u.s.a.” (google), and note hyperinflation in Germany after World War I, “ hyperinflation in germany post ww I” (google).

During the period of the NDP/Liberal Coalition Saskatchewan Administrations I (Lee) found that the two Liberal Ministers, Jack Hillson and Ron Osika, to be honorable men who, by amending Section 14.1 of the Urban Municipalities Act, allowed a Village to annex the Argue Development out of the RM of Edenwold, bypassing the need to pay Strudwick bribes to provide the Argues with development zoning, but their (the Liberal Ministers) brilliant plan was denied by the NDP, the dominant partner in the Coalition, and except for those two Liberal Ministers, Government Corruption Policy has remained entrenched since the last honest Administration, that of Premier Ross Thatcher.

The Corruption of the Saskatchewan Department of Highway Engineers under NDP Premier Blakney, the Corruption of the Devine Gang, “saskatchewan tories in fraud scandal” set British Commonwealth history and the Calvert NDP Corruption regarding Rural Zoning are all examples of the “culture of corruption” (google)

This policy of absolute corruption is responsible, at least so far as a Province of a million people can be held responsible, for the financial meltdown facing the US and Canada, but despite this fact the Leaders of the Sask Party and NDP Opposition, the Tweedledum and Tweedledee of Saskatchewan Politics, refuse to address zoning Corruption in Rural Saskatchewan, hard evidence that our two Political Leaders are leading Political Parties as identically Corrupt as those ruling Afghanistan.

regina computer repair

Buy your Apple and
Mac Magsafe Power Adapters here!

Buy your toshiba laptop and
notebook power adapters here!

Advertisements

One Response to “TWEEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE”

  1. STRUDWICK AND THE HON JIM REITER « Rural Zoning in Saskatchewan Says:

    […] refuse to address the Rural Zoning Corruption issue, note Web site segment dated June 18th 2009, TWEEDELDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE. The aforegoing notwithstanding there may be hope for the Argues Development because there can be […]

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: