“Ernst & Young survey re corruption” sets out the massive cost of Corruption to the North American economy and it was John F. Kennedy who said “ when we got into office the thing that surprised me most was to find that things were just as bad as we’d been saying they were” (google). I (Lee) ask all Web readers to note that notwithstanding the fact that I was aware of both the Ernst & Young study and John Kennedy’s facetious remark I am still surprised at my accuracy in predicting the sea of corruption regarding the massive taxpayer subsidies of Ethanol Plants in Saskatchewan but even more surprised at the stature of the individuals involved in the corruption.

All Web readers are asked to note that what I (Lee) predicted in Web site segment dated September 2nd 2009, FOLLOW THE MONEY, and segment dated October 15th 2009, WHY IS CANADA SO CORRUPT?, has already come to be, to wit; I predicted that there will be endless and massive taxpayer money poured into all Ethanol plants to keep them operating and note that after only a year, the Terra Grain Fuels Ethanol plant at Belle Plaine, has already been given a Federal grant of $77,750,000.00 (seventy seven million seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars) “ethanol plant gets government boost” (google), and “government of canada invests in biofuels in saskatchewan” (google). Please note that this Plant only cost $130,000,000.00 (one hundred and thirty million dollars) to build in the first place.

Lee Harding, the Saskatchewan director of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation is as outraged as all voting taxpayers should be and all Web readers are asked to note again “ethanol plant gets government boost” (google), and note that the sea of corruption is more widespread than even I (Lee) thought it was, because the individuals benefiting from that $77,750,000.00 (seventy seven million seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars) of tax payer money are not the Saskatchewan hotshots ( Link and Drummond ) who I assumed would benefit but a small group of the eastern super elite.

All Web readers are asked to review again Web site segment dated September 2nd 2009 FOLLOW THE MONEY, taking special notice of my (Lee)s belief that the NDP Administration of Lorne Calvert bowed to RM Administrator Donna Strudwick and her RMAA ilk because of the need to keep control of Rural Zoning through Strudwick and the RMAA to ensure there was zoning for more Ethanol Plants so as to be able to demand more taxpayer subsidies and I (Lee) stand by that claim, but I (Lee) was wrong about it being Drummond et al. who was going to benefit from that massive corruption.

Now I (Lee) ask all Web readers to note yet again the article “ethanol plant gets government boost” (google) and note that Drummonds Ethanol Plant, Terra Grain Fuels, is part of a holding company called Universal Energy Group which Drummond recently sold to a Eastern outfit called “just energy income fund” (google), and Web readers are asked to note that the Board of Directors of “just energy income fund” (google) includes Ontarios Political/Legal/Judicial legend, Roy McMurtry, and his ilk who are now receiving that massive (seventy seven million dollar) taxpayers Ethanol subsidies.

I (Lee) ask all Web readers to note that Roy McMurtry is the father of the Honorable Lady Justice Janet McMurtry, the Queens Bench Judge who found me (Lee) guilty of libel of RM Administrator Donna Strudwick when I (Lee) complained to then NDP Premier Calvert that his Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, had ruled that my (Lee)s only option to obtain development zoning for the Argues was to bribe RM Administrator Strudwick and it is Lady Janets Father and his Board Colleagues of “just energy income fund” (google) who will now benefit from that control of Rural Development Zoning through having the legal right to pay bribes to the Rural Administrators, such as RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick, to be granted development zoning.

Lady Janet’s father, Roy McMurtry, and his board colleagues are now benefiting from their ownership of the largest Ethanol Plant in Canada and the massive taxpayer subsidies and the fact that the Honorable Lady Justice Janet McMurtrys Queens Bench ruling carves in stone the fact that Rural Administrators have absolute control of Rural Development Zoning, and her (Lady Janets) ruling gives the Ethanol Plant owners the right in Saskatchewan law to obtain development zoning for more Ethanol Plants simply by carrying flowers, chocolates and perfume (bribes) to the Rural Administrators, as was ruled by the NDP Minister then Responsible, Len Taylor, as being the only option to obtain zoning “ supreme court of canada summary statement case 31940” (google)

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that Lady Janet’s ruling has taken nepotism and a “incestuous conflict of interest” (google) beyond normal, arrogant, run of the mill, bureaucratic corruption, right to the edge of reason and I (Lee) ask that all Web readers note that the “just energy income fund” (google) board members are a who’s who of eastern political and judicial heavy hitters, inparticularly Lady Janets’s Father, Roy McMurtry, and these are the individuals who are now benefiting from the fact the Harper Feds have mandated 5% Ethanol use in all car fuel by 2010.

I (Lee) ask all Web readers to note that I was, in the main, correct in what I set out in Web site segments dated September 2nd 2009, FOLLOW THE MONEY, and October 15th 2009, WHY IS CANADA SO CORRUPT? ie: Ethanol Production involves the usual sea of Government Corruption and corrupt accumulation of taxpayers dollars by individuals with ties to Government officials and Politicians, including the necessity of the Ethanol Plant owners to control Rural Development zoning where the Ethanol Plants are built, and I (Lee) was only wrong about who was going to benefit from that sea of corruption; it is not going to be Link and Drummond, only Lady Janet McMurtry’s father, Roy, and his eastern ilk.

I (Lee) ask all Web reading, voting, tax payers to note that there are massive, simply massive, amounts of taxpayer money involved in taxpayer subsidized Ethanol Production. All Web readers are asked to note “federal mandate of 5% ethanol use after 2010” (google) means that two billion liters of Ethanol is needed in Canada each year and with Saskatchewan having nearly half of all arable land in Canada that means that Saskatchewan will need to produce a billion gallons of Ethanol a year and the Terra Grain Fuels Plant at Belle Plaine produces about a million and a half liters, meaning that six more plants of a similar size are needed here in Saskatchewan and that means a need for the Ethanol Plant owners to control Rural Zoning, all of which I (Lee) set out in detail in Web site segment dated September 2nd, 2009 FOLLOW THE MONEY.

The Terra Grain Fuels Plant, after a years operation, was given $77,750.000.00 (seventy seven million seven hundred and fifty thousand dollars) of tax payers money over seven years, over eleven million dollars a year. Six more plants means a annual subsidy of taxpayer money of well over sixty million dollars a year, in ten years Roy McMurtry and his eastern ilk will have removed seven hundred million dollars of taxpayer money from the economy, there are seven of them so that is one hundred million dollars each. It is not exactly a Madoff level (fifty Billion dollars) or a Devine Gang level (ten Billion dollars) or even a Gary Drummond Channel Lake (one Billion dollars) “disappearance” ( google) of tax payer money but it should still receive a honorable mention in the history of corruption in Government.

Where I (Lee) was wrong, (and should have known that this would be the situation), is that the heavy hitters in the east, such as Lady Janet McMurtrys father, Roy McMurtry, and his ilk, would never in a million years allow a couple of good old boys from Saskatchewan, such as Link and Drummond, even with Link as Premier, (guys like Roy McMurtry eat Premiers for lunch), to acquire those hundreds of millions of dollars from taxpayer subsidized Ethanol Production and I (Lee) ask all Web readers to look again at the Board of Directors of “just energy income fund” (google) and note that the Hon. Hugh Segal, is a $100,000,000.00 man, the Hon. Michael Kirby is a $100,000,000.00 man, as is the Hon.Gordon Griffen is another $100,000,000.00 man.

The Hon. Roy McMurtry, is both a $100,000,000.00 man and the father of Queens Bench Judge, the Honorable Lady Justice Janet McMurtry, who gave her father, the Hon. Roy, and his ilk the ability to legally (sort of) conduct this massive Ethanol scam in the first place. There can be no doubt whatsoever but that the eastern “heavy hitters” (google), such as Roy McMurtry, are going to get whatever they want and if they wanted a simple way to control Rural Development zoning for the construction of more Ethanol plants so as to be able to receive more tax payer subsidies they got it with Roy McMurtry’s daughter, Lady Justice Janets McMurtry’s, Queens Bench Judgement that there was nothing illegal with the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor’s, ruling the only option the Developers have to obtain Development zoning from Donna Strudwick and her RMAA ilk is to provide those Rural Administrators with “flowers, chocolates and perfume”, I (Lee) ask all Web readers to note yet again, for the umpteenth time, the “supreme court of canada summary statement case 31940”

I (Lee) also ask all Web readers to note yet again, for the upteenth time, that Lady Justice Janet McMurtry’s Queens Bench ruling is in direct conflict with Section 123 (1) MUNICIPAL CORRUPTION Part IV of the Criminal Code of Canada, which states that a Developer is in contradiction of the Criminal Code and subject to five years in prision if he provides anything to a Municipal Official, and Section 123 (3) of the Criminal Code defines a Municipal Official as being a Rural Administrator.

Notwithstanding the rumours as set out at the start of the Web site segment dated November 21st 2009, STRUDWICK AND THE HON JIM REITER, ie: that the Wall Administration was planning to remove Rural Development Zoning control from the RM Administrators and turn it over to the Senior Bureaucrats in Community Planning, there was nothing in the throne speech, nothing in Question Period, nothing in the scrums, there has been nothing whatsoever anywhere, not even more rumours, to suggest any attempt by the Wall Administration to address Rural Zoning corruption.

BUT now, that the facts are established that the eastern political and judicial heavy hitters, such as the Honorable Lady Justice Janet Lady McMurtrys father, Roy McMurtry and his ilk, are the only individuals, along with a handful of Saskatchewan’s largest farm families, to benefit from taxpayer subsidized Ethanol Plants, and that fact is now public knowledge through this Web site, Premier Brad may have to rethink the question of who controls Rural Development zoning and the fact that eastern hotshots like Roy McMurtry and his cohorts will benefit from the fact that Rural Development zoning depends only on having the kind of soul that can stand to carry “flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) to the Rural Administrators, such as Strudwick, to allow the building of more taxpayer subsidized Ethanol Plants here in Saskatchewan.

Despite the fact that there has been no hint of a break through on the question of Premier Wall or Opposition Leader Link dealing with Rural Zoning corruption, note Web site segment dated June 18th, 2009, TWEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE, my (Lee)s friends and colleagues have now boosted my chances of getting the Argues Development zoning without bribing RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, originally set at zero, then changed to fifty-fifty and now to 66% (two thirds), in the main because of the fact of the eastern political/judicial elite receiving massive taxpayer subsidies, $77,000,000,00 (seventy seven million dollars) for Ethanol production and the number of visits to this Web site indicating a growing interest by the Saskatchewan taxpaying voters in this Sea of Corruption.

All cartoons are “brilliant nonsense” (google), and I (Lee) always read “Hagar” and “Perarls Before Swine” for words of wisdom and in the October 21st “Pearls before Swine” strip, the pigs, while debating what happenes when you die, decided to ask google, one of the pigs pointed out that Google did not know everything, but the rest were aghast at this heresy and all pigs then began shouting “All Praise to the Google”, and it is fact that 75% (seventy five percent) of households in North America are on the internet and I (Lee) have plotted a graph of the visits to this Web site over the last two years finding that the visits to this Web sites are increasing “exponentially” (google).

The Access zap2it TV Ads and Web sites such as this one cause people to talk to each other and given the corruption driven financial meltdown everyone that I (Lee) know is becoming increasingly edgy about his/her financial future because it is self evident that the only thing keeping the economy going is the current Federal stimulus spending which is generated by the printing of money and will result in a Federal Government debt of a hundred Billion dollars and with Canada’s two economic engines, Ontario and Alberta, debt at fifty Billion and eight Billion respectively, and the rest of the Provinces debt at God knows how much, and with the United States economy in worse shape than Canada’s, all tax paying voters know that the Canadian economy is doomed, note Web site segment dated January 22nd 2009 START CLEANING UP BRIBERY AT THE BOTTOM, and April 26th, 2009, SASKATCHEWAN/ AFGHANISTAN CORRUPTION.

:Saskatchewan’s Minister of Finance, the Hon Rod (Gantefoer) is predicting recession
“ saskachewan likely facing recession: finance minister james wood ” (google) and the honest Saskatchewan taxpaying voters know that they, their family and friends, are faced with losing jobs, homes, cars and pension plans, while I (Lee) have amassed and set out in this Website hard evidence that one segment of the Saskatchewan Bureaucracy, the three hundred members of the RMAA (Saskatchewan Rural Municipal Administrators Association), are a self regulating association with the legal right to demand “flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) to provide Development zoning, consequently as the voting taxpayers start to lose homes, cars and pensions, this Web site is going to be of increasing interest to the honest Saskatchewan tax paying voters which will result in a increasing numbers of Web site visits.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that graphs showing “exponential growth curves” (google) can and do reflect reality, note that interest paid on interest “compound interest” (google) is the simple example of this fact. I (Lee) have always been fascinated by the “probability theory” (google) and these “exponential” (google) curves, I (Lee) have always been very edgy about relying on them to reflect reality because it is a fact that figures can be designed to lie and liars really do figure.

As example, it was the supposed professionals pretending to be stock brokers and/or investment bankers and/or financial advisiors, who, when they were not actually “white collar thugs” (google) running out and out “ponzi” (google) schemes to literally defraud their clients, right from the get-go, were at best using these “exponentially” (google) increasing graphs and the “probability theory” (google) to hood wink their clients into believing that they (the financial advisors) had some sort of a magic way to make a bunch of money without working at it and it was this kind of manipulation coupled with the out and out fraud, and Corruption of the Government Burueaucrats in the Government regulatory agencys that were paid bribes to let the fraud artists get away with the corruption resulting in the sea of corruption that has forced the Western Liberal Democracies to their kness right at the edge of the abyss.

The foregoing notwithstanding the fact is that a graph plot of visits to this Web site do show a exponential increase and as a result eveyone that I (Lee) know, partly for that reason, believes that I am going to eventually accomplish the impossible for the Argues and obtain development zoning for their thirty million dollar residential development without paying bribes to RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick.

I (Lee) am very proud of myself for what has been accomplished so far because four different Regina Lawyers told the Argues that it was impossible to get by Donna Strudwick and obtain zoning for their subdivision and no less than the great Link (NDP Opposition Leader Dwain Lingenfelter), then serving as Premier Roy’s Deputy Premier, told me (Lee) repeatedly that it was impossible to get by Strudwick and obtain Development zoning for the Argues thirty million dollar residential development.

Then to chisel into stone those high level legal and Political opinions that Donna Strudwick had to be paid bribes for the Argues to be granted zoning the NDP Member for the Battle Fords and Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, told me (Lee) that the only option that I (Lee) had to have a chance to obtain development zoning for the Argues was to “carry flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) to RM Administrator Strudwick, note “supreme court of canada summary statement for case 31940” (google), but all of the foregoing notwithstanding, the consensus among my friends now is that the Web site publicity is giving me (Lee) a fighting chance to obtain development zoning for the Argues without bribing RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick.

It has taken nearly a decade but there can be no doubt whatsoever but that I (Lee) have fought the corruption of Saskatchewan’s “natural governing party” (google) the NDP, as well as Saskatchewan’s massively corrupt RCMP, Judicial and NDP legal community to a standstill and while I (Lee) have still not won the day for the Argues, they (the Argues) now at least have some hope of obtaining development zoning without bribing RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Satrudwick.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that credit for the accomplishment must go to many good people other than myself (Lee):

First, Earle and Sharie Argue had the courage and integrity to stand firm and flatly refuse to even consider paying bribes to RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick notwithstanding the fact that they believed that their refusal to bribe Strudwick meant the loss of their dream of bringing good homes to people by designing and creating a unique and important development while adding to Saskatchewans economic development, and making themselves ten million dollars realizing their dream.

Second, Saskatoon Lawyer Jack Hillson, serving as the Liberal Minister Responsible in the 1999 NDP/Liberal coalition Administration had the courage and integrity to openly defy RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick, as well as both SARM and the RMAA by amending Section 14 (1) of the Urban Act to allow a Developer to have a Village annex his development out of a Rural Municipality thereby by passing need for the Developer to pay bribes to the Rural Administrator to obtain development zoning.

Third, the Outlook Community Leaders, in particular Lloyd Smith, who went right to the wall time and time again, note Web site segment dated October 4th, 2007, “ Update with reply from Law Society of Saskatchewan”, to see the Argues granted zoning for their development without bribing RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick. There can be no doubt whatsoever but that without Lloyd’s involvement and actions my quest for development zoning for the Argues without bribing Donna Strudwick would not have gotten off the ground, let alone to the point that it is now at.

Fourth, Dr. Carl Baar, co-author with the Hon Jules Deschenes, of the Judicial Council of Canada report, “Masters In Their Own House”, the report that sets out that the Provincial Administrations use their control of the Queens and Appeal Bench Judges working lives to control Judicial rulings, and it was Dr. Baar who told me (Lee) that the only way to overcome the absolute corruption of Canadian Government Bureaucrats was publicity, to wit: the only hope is to just keep prying the rocks over so the public can see the corrupt Government Bureaucrats crawl away to get under another rock and to keep on turning the rocks over until the corrupt Bureaucrats run out of rocks to crawl under.

Credit must go to, the Hon John Crosbie, now serving as the Lieutenant Governor of Newfoundland, at the time one of Mulroneys Senior Ministers, who provided me (Lee) with the then confidential Judicial Council of Canada report “Masters In Their Own House” on the corruption of the Administration of Justice in Canada; the Editor of the Saskatoon Star Phoenix who had the courage and integrity to run my (Lee)s first Web site Ad; the Board of Directors of Access Communication who had the courage and integrity to run my (Lee)s zap2it Web site Ads.

Credit must also go to, the Supreme Court of Canada for their Summary Statement in case 31940; my (Lee)s Web Master came up with a truly brilliant Web site design and in open defiance of RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, had the courage and integrity to implement and maintain it; to the SMB (Saskatchewan Municipal Board) members who had the courage and integrity to openly defy RM Administrator Donna Strudwick and rule that the Argues had received all Provincial Departmental approvals for their Development; His Worship Michael Klein, Mayor of the Village of Wood Mountain, who had the courage and integrity to openly defy Strudwick, SARM and the RMAA and have his Village try to annex the Argue Development out of Strudwick’s RM.

But the most credit for what has been accomplished on behalf of the Argues must go to a truly remarkable man, Vinton Cerf, known as the “father of the internet” (google). There were forerunners, but Vinton Cerf is the man who established the use of Web sites as we know them to be functioning today “how the internet came to be” (google), and this is crucial to the Argues because there can be no doubt whatsoever but that it was this Web site that has created a situation where the Argues have even a faint hope of obtaining zoning for their thirty million dollar residential subdivision because up until now, all Senior Regina Lawyers and all Senior Politicans had maintained the position that it was impossible for the Argues to obtain development zoning without bribing Strudwick.

As set out above, I (Lee) am very proud of myself for making effective use of the tools available to come as close as we ( the Argues and I) have to accomplishing the impossible. It is generally believed that this Web site is responsible for the fact that Link nearly lost the Regina Douglas-Park By-election and the fact that he (Link) suffered a 40% (forty percent) drop in popular support in Douglas-Park and with recent polling showing that trend continuing “ndp running into a solid wall mandryk” (google) means that it is impossible for the NDP to win the November 2011 General election, so one Rural Zoning Corruption problem is solved, the NDP Party of Saskatchewan.

With the assumption being that I (Lee) have accomplished the impossible with this Web site and created a situation where the Argues will obtain development zoning without bribing Strudwick, the question is asked of me (Lee), repeatedly, what am I going to get out of it, and the answer to that question is nothing, I (Lee) can accept nothing from the Argues for accomplishing the impossible for them.

Originally the Argue family had offered that if I (Lee) was able to obtain development zoning for them without bribing RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick that I (Lee) could contract the infrastructure work on their thirty million dollar residential
development, about a million dollars worth of work that would show a profit of about 20% (twenty percent), to the Contractor, but if the agreement with the Argues was ever finalized the Courts would simply seize the amount of Strudwicks libel award $10,000.00 (ten thousand dollars) from whatever the Argues paid to me (Lee) under that Contract agreement, and give it to Strudwick to satisfy the libel judgment, and if that was done it would mean that Strudwick may as well have been paid her bribes in the first place to provide development zoning, and we (the Argues and I) will not pay RM Administrator Donna Strudwick one red cent in bribes, ever.

The infrastructure work on the Argues residential subdivision development would have been perfect to allow me (Lee) a project where I could do the work I (Lee) was trained to do and enjoy doing, oversee construction projects, and could have done it without the need to pay bribes to Government Bureaucrats, but it was not to be, RM Administrator Donna Strudwick was able to block the Argues development for over a decade by suing me (Lee) the Argues Representative for libel, and winning the legal action, all because the Argues, and I (Lee) as the Argues Representative, refused to carry flowers, chocolates and perfume (bribes) to her (Strudwick) to provide development zoning, again note “supreme court of canada summary statement case 31940” (google)

A few Web readers believe that assuming I (Lee) do accomplish the impossible and the Argues are granted development zoning without bribing Strudwick it is unfair that I (Lee) am not able to benefit, and of course it is grossly unfair, but that fact does not bother me (Lee), all Saskatchewan Administrations have been brutally unfair to honest Saskatchewan citizens since the Administration of Ross Thatcher whose interest as Premier was Provincial economic development rather than self enrichment, nevertheless, I (Lee) am reasonably content for several reasons, a few of those reasons are:

—-assuming the Argues are granted development zoning I (Lee) will then be able to pursue retribution for the horror of my being found guilty of libel of that dreadfull woman, RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, and to allow me (Lee) to follow to its logical conclusion the reference in W.H.Auden’s great poem “what all schoolchildren learn: to whom evil is done do evil in return” (google)

—-75% (seventy five percent) of households in North America have the internet (Saskatchewan is especially wired in) and a great many normal internet searches will lead the user to this Web site. As example, conduct a normal search for the “rm of edenwold” and note that the first two references in the search answer are to this Web site, while the third reference on the list is to what the searcher was probably looking for in the first place, the RM of Edenwold Web site.

—-Search for the RM of Edenwold lawyer, “regina lawyer glen w. dowling” and this Web site comes up as part of the search results, search for Court of Appeal Judge, Lane (the Hon. J. Gary) “court of appeal judge the hon j. gary lane” and note that the first two search results are this Web site, try the “honorable lady justice janet mcmurtry” or “rcmp staff sergeant brent lewis” and note the first two search results are this Web site.

—-Many Saskatchewan Tax paying voters will be interested in Links Meadow Lake Membership Fraud, try search words “ rcmp investigate ndp meadow lake membership fraud” and note that this Web site is items two and three in the search results.

—-Rather than just conduct a search for references to the evil, lying, corrupt individuals involved in the Argue/Strudwick bribes/zoning issue try a search for the good guys, try “his worship mayor michael klein” or “outlook community leader lloyd smith” or “saskatoon lawyer jack hillson” or “earle and sharie argue rural zoning” and this Web site comes up as a search result.

—-Another more oblique web search reference will surface as follows: many people will be interested in Dr. Michael Atkinson’s University of Saskatchewan lectures in Government Corruption and will try search words such as “ dr. michael atkinson u of s canadian government corruption” or any similar search words and this Web site will come up and any person interested in Government Corruption will soon realize that this Web site has as much real life information about Government Corruption as four years of Dr. Atkinsons classes on Government Corruption.

—-The point is that my (Lee)s Webmaster is a genius, his basic Web site design has created a situation that is so interlocked with the internet and Web system that a great many unrelated Web searches result in a Web browser being led to this Web site.

As set out in preceding paragraphs what has occurred so far toward obtaining development zoning for the Argues thirty million dollar residential subdivision without bribing RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick is very encouraging and as a result it is my (Lee)s intention to continue running the Access zap2it TV Ads and keep this Website in place asking for a public inquiry with a goal of obtaining compensation for the Argues because they were blocked for over a decade from being granted development zoning because of their refusal to pay bribes to the RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick, and the inquiry may also allow me (Lee), the Argues representative, to clear my name of libel of Donna Strudwick for my complaint to the then Premier Calvert about her (Strudwick)s corruption.

I (Lee) serving as the Argues representative, am so “sickened unto death” (google) at the corruption I have uncovered in the Saskatchewan Government during the process of trying to obtain zoning for the Argues without bribing Strudwick, that I have stopped caring about anything. Nevertheless, I (Lee) will carry on for the last inch on the last foot of the last mile to obtain compensation for the Argues when they were denied development zoning because of their refusal to bribe RM Administrator Donna Strudwick and to try to clear my name of libel of that dreadfull woman (Strudwick) for my complaint to then NDP Premier Calvert about her corruption.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that at the end of the day seven rock solid facts regarding corruption in Rural Development Zoning in Saskatchewan have been established, corruption supported by the then NDP Minister Responsible Len Taylor and the Saskatchewan Courts, facts that can not be denied, debated or questioned, to wit:

Fact one; The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal ruled in the Regina Casino case, Harper v. Regina (City), that all zoning issues are political and the Courts must not interfere.

Fact two; As set out in the Supreme Court of Canada Summary Statement for case 31940, the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, made a political ruling that the only option a Developer has to have a chance to obtain development zoning is to carry flowers, chocolates and perfume to the R M Administrator controling zoning.

Fact three; Section 123 (1) of the Criminal Code of Canada, MUNICIPAL CORRUPTION, states that it is a Criminal Code offence to carry anything to a Municipal Administrator to obtain favour, to wit: there can be no doubt whatsoever but that flowers, chocolates and perfume carried to a Rural Administrator to obtain rural development zoning is a bribe.

Fact four; In a ruling dated December 22nd 2004 the SMB (Saskatchewan Municipal Board) stated that in the Argue/Strudwick zoning issue the Argues had been granted all
Provincial Department approvals and that Strudwicks refusal to grant development zoning was costing the Saskatchewan taxpayers a substantial amount of tax revenue.

Fact five; Section 20 (9) of the Muncicipal Board Act states that a SMB ruling has the same weight in Saskatchewan Law as a Public inquiry.

Fact six; RCMP Staff Sergeant Brent Lewis destroyed evidence of RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwicks corruption when he was instructed to do so by Donna Strudwicks Government lawyer Glen Dowling,

Fact seven; The Saskatchewan Courts, ignoring their own ruling that all zoning issues are political and the Courts must not interfere, did interfere, and when Strudwick sued me (Lee) for libel for complaining to then Premier Calvert about his Minister Responsible and Strudwick, the Saskatchewan Courts did rule that I was guilty of libel for my complaining to then NDP Premier Lorne Calvert that his Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, had ruled that the Argues only option to obtain zoning for their Development was to carry flowers, chocolates and perfume to RM Administrator Donna Strudwick.

The seven facts set out above are rock solid and by themselves, as a group of stand alone facts, establish a need for a public inquiry into the Argue/Strudwick zoning dispute, BUT in addition to these seven facts, I (Lee) serving as the Argues representative, have researched, found and placed in this Web site, considerable well documented evidence that the Argue family were blocked by the NDP Administration, including a group of NDP activists, Lawyers and a Queens Bench Judge with political and family ties to NDP Premier Lorne Calvert and his Ministers, from being granted zoning for their development until RM Administrator Strudwicks bribes were paid.

There is considerable and conclusive evidence that the blocking of the Argues from being granted development zoning until Strudwick’s bribes were paid was so far reaching that it included the deliberate destruction of myself ( Lee), serving as the Argue representative, because of my refusal to back off on my efforts to obtain zoning for the Argues without bribing Donna Strudwick.

I (Lee) repeat that the evidence is considerable and conclusive that this deliberate, planned, organized blocking of zoning for the Argue development until Strudwicks bribes were paid, and my (Lee)s personal destruction, was undertaken by a group of well connected NDP Lawyers, Judges and Ministerial level Politicians, in effect a sea of corruption, which also warrants a public inquiry, consequently the only possible means to get to the bottom of the Argue/Strudwick zoning issue is for the Urban taxpaying voters to demand that the Provincial Administration, the Sask Party, order a public inquiry be undertaken by a Alberta Judge.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that if a public inquiry conducted by a Alberta Judge, accepts the hard evidence, such as the Supreme Court of Canada Summary Statement, a dozen uncontradicted affidavits and a SMB ruling, that the Argues have been denied development zoning for over a decade because of their ( the Argues) refusal to bribe RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick, the Argues must be granted compensation for their lost decade of enjoyment of their development.

The Argues Bankers, the CIBC, were so interested in the Argue Development that they brought (flew in) a development financing expert from BC to study the Argues development plan and that expert was so impressed with the Argue development as planned that she (the CIBC expert) concluded the Argues would sell out their 160 lot development in less than a year and show a pretax profit of ten million dollars, consequently it would be a simple matter for any Accountant to now take those established facts and calculate the amount of money the Argues would have made, even at Bank interest, over the decade that was lost to them because of their refusal to bribe Donna Strudwick, and simply add that amount to the ten million dollars original profit the Argues lost because of their refusal to bribe RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Srtrudwick.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that the Saskatchewan Courts blocking of zoning for the Argues development until RM Administrator Strudwicks bribes were paid would have been a relatively minor, run of the mill, everyday bit of Saskatchewan Judicial corruption compared to other examples of much more horrifying instances of Saskatchewan Judicial Corruption and I (Lee) ask all Web readers to bear with me while I set out just two well documented examples of that fact.

Saskatchewan Justice, acting with “malice aforethought” (google) incarcerated both David Milgaard and Colin Thatcher for over twenty years each for murders they did not commit. David was incarcerated because the Justice system needed a fall guy to calm the fears of the Saskatoon taxpaying voters because of a long series of brutal rapes one of which ended with the murder of Saskatoon nurse Gail Miller, which lead to the Courts falsely incarcerating David Milgaard because he was handy and poor.

The Saskatchewan Courts are so corrupt that the lawyer the Courts assigned to conduct the Milgaard defence was Calvin Tallis, the lawyer who acted for the Saskatoon City Police service. The nepotistic practices of the Saskatchewan Courts have not changed in forty years because all Web readers will note that the fact of the Court assigning Saskatoon City Police Lawyer, Cal Tallis, to defend Milgaard, is the same nepotistic horror as that of the Courts assigning a NDP activist, the Honorable Lady Justice Janet McMurtry, who was married to NDP Premier Calverts Attorney General Chris Axworthy, to hear Strudwicks libel action against me (Lee), the Argues Representative, note Web site segment dated July 26th 2007, RURAL ZONING IN SASKATCHEWAN.

Back to the David Milgaard horror. To add corrupt horror to corrupt horror, despite the fact that after David Milgaards false incarceration for the Gail Miller murder, the wife of the real murderer, Larry Fisher, acting alone, went to and told the Police that Milgaard was innocent because her husband, Larry Fisher, had actually raped and murdered Gail Miller, which was then proven to be true by DNA evidence, but the Saskatchewan Courts, instead of acting immediately to order the release of David (Milgaard), simply went along with the Provincial Government plan to find Larry Fisher and incarcerate him (Fisher) for the Miller murder, which they did do, finding him in Winnipeg, and then incarcerated him (Fisher) for the Miller murder. The Saskatchewan Courts sat back and watched for over a decade while Saskatchewan Justice had two guys, Milgaard and Fisher, doing hard time for the murder of the same Saskatoon nurse, Gail Miller.

I (Lee) repeat, Saskatchewan Justice then had two of them, Fisher and Milgaard, doing hard time for the murder of the same young woman, a Saskatoon nurse named Gail Miller, but acting with full knowledge and “malice aforethought” (google) the Saskatchewan Courts, in a obvious effort to keep the Milgaard horror covered up, left David Milgaard doing hard time for his entire youth.

David would still be in prision except for the fact that his mother, Joyce Milgaard, never stopped prying the rocks over until eventually she got the facts out in the open. Any Web reader who is interested may read the facts on line “david milgaard inquiry report” (google) and it is true that once Joyce got enough rocks turned over David was granted ten million dollars in compensation although many Saskatchewan citizens wonder if a hundred million dollars would have been enough money for what was done to David.

Colin Thatcher is about as different as it is possible to be from David Milgaard. David was very young, as poor as a church mouse, and he (David) was usually stoned on marihuana and was a perfect fall guy for the Saskatchewan Courts purposes of calming the fears of the Saskatoon voting taxpayers, whereas Colin Thatcher was the exact opposite of David, but was still railroaded for a murder that he did not commit because the Devine Gang were worried about finalizing their plan to “disappear” ten Billion dollars of Saskatchewan taxpayers money

Colin was the son of former Premier Ross Thatcher and was very wealthy, a MLA and former Cabinet Minister, he did not drink to any extent and did not use drugs of any sort and was about as normally suspicious, smart, skeptical and paranoid as is possible to be and still function, but they (the Devine Gang and Courts) were still able to incarcerate him for a murder he did not commit.

Colin Thatcher, like his father before him, Ross Thatcher, was a true statesman and a honorable man, whose interest in public service, (politics) was the good of the people, ie: Provincial economic development, rather than using his Political power for personal enrichment and during the Devine Gang era there were a few of the Devine Gang backbench MLA’s who did not like what their true Political Leaders, Lane (the Hon J. Gary) and his ilk, were doing, and Regina Northwest MLA Bill Sveinson was one of those Devine Gang Back benchers who did not like it.

When Devine fired Colin (Thatcher) as Energy Minister, Bill (Sveinson) tried to convince Colin that they should cross the floor to the Provincial Liberals. There was no doubt whatsoever but that the Provincial Liberals had no more hope of forming a Saskatchewan Provincial Government then they have now and Colin kept pointing this fact out, BUT, Colin did eventually agree with Bill (Sveinson) that they should cross the floor to the Liberals and Colin agreed that if nothing else, a well run Liberal campaign would take enough votes off the Devine Gang to put the NDP back in power, and Colin did agree that as corrupt as the NDP were they were not as corrupt as the Devine Gang.

It is my (Lee)s memory that Colin was charged with Jo-Ann’s murder the day after he (Colin) agreed with Bill Sveinsons plan for them to cross the floor to the Liberals. There may have been a leak somewhere, or perhaps Lane’s people saw Colin and Bill with their heads togeather once to often and acted on the assumption of what they (Colin and Bill) were likley planning, or perhaps Colins office or phones were bugged, but the Devine Gang knew perfectly well that if two political figures with the stature of Colin Thatcher and Bill Sveinson ran a active campaign for the Provincial Liberals that enough Liberal votes would be drained off the Devine Gang to put the NDP back in power.

It was of great importance to the Devine Gang because if they had lost the next General election they could not have disappeared the ten Billion dollars of Saskatchewan tax payer money that they planned to disappear, so Lane ( the Hon J. Gary) as the Devine Gang Attorney General, simply charged Colin with Jo-Anns murder and the rest of what occurred is set out in Colins great Book “final appeal colin thatcher” (google).

I (Lee) ask all Web readers to note that the foregoing examples of Judicial corruption and horror regarding David Milgaard and Colin Thatcher are set out as examples of how far the Saskatchewan Courts will go to protect the corrupt elite of Saskatchewan’s Political and Bureaucratic Leadership and allow their (the bureaucrats) rape and pillage of the Provincial Treasury as well as demands for bribes and kickbacks from the business community and the right to run any corrupt scheme that occurs to them that might amuse them, (politicians and bureaucrats) or bolster their egos.

I (Lee) am not claiming that either the Argues, or I (Lee), serving as the Argues Representative, have suffered from the Judicial corruption to the extent that David and Colin have, but we ( the Argues and I) did suffer from that Corruption and there is no doubt whatsoever but that I (Lee) can provide a public inquiry considerable and conclusive evidence that the NDP Administration of then Premier Lorne Calvert ordered the Courts to destroy me (Lee) because of my refusal to pay Strudwick her bribes to grant the Argues development zoning as was ordered by the then NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, as being the Argues only option to obtain development zoning, BUT I (Lee) repeat, this fact notwithstanding, I (Lee) make no claim that the massively corrupt Saskatchewan Justice system inflicted harm on the Argues and I similar to the harm inflicted on David Milgaard and Colin Thatcher.

But I (Lee) do claim that the harm the Argues and I suffered from the Corrupt Saskatchewan Justice system can be equated with the harm done Richard Klassen “martinsville nightmare” (google) and I (Lee) do believe that compensation of at least ten million dollars plus interest, is due the Argues on their zoning issue with Strudwick and whatever compensation Richard Klassen is given, I (Lee) should also be given and that is the claim that I (Lee) would make to a public inquiry Commissioner and Counsel.

Both Klassen and I (Lee) suffered from the fact that the Saskatchewan Courts, acted with “malice aforethought” (google) to destroy both of us. In Klassen’s case, despite the fact there was no hard evidence, no missing babies, no baby bones, no hard evidence whatsoever, based only on the word of a couple of very young children who later recanted their claims, a Saskatchewan Justice official falsely accused Richard Klassen of running a Satanic Cult and killing and eating babies. This charge appeared to be made for the sole purpose of allowing a Crown Prosecutor to make a name for himself, and the Saskatchewan Courts even ruled that the Crown Prosecutor acted with malice although the Supreme Court of Canada did over turn the lower Courts rulings regarding malice “saskatchewan prosecutor wins supreme court appeal cbc” (google).

I (Lee) ask that all Web readers take note of CBC news item “saskatchewan prosecutor wins supreme court appeal cbc” (google) and Canwest news item “court reverses malice ruling janice tibbetts” (google) and take particular notice that the Supreme Court Judges ruled as they did because they did not see how Crown Prosecutor Miazga could have any motive to destroy Klassen BUT in my (Lee)s situation there was motive for the NDP Government of the day, the Calvert Administration, to deliberately destroy me (Lee). The NDP motive was my (Lee)s refusal to pay bribes to RM Administrator Strudwick, a woman who reported to the Premier “strudwick reports to premier” (google) to cause Strudwick to approve Development zoning for the Earle Argue family of Regina, “supreme court of canada summary statement case 31940” (google)

I (Lee) repeat, in my case a NDP Queens Bench Judge, the Honorable Lady Justice Janet McMurtry, found me guilty of libel for lodging a complaint with then NDP Premier Calvert that his Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, had ruled that my (Lee)s only option to obtain development zoning for the Argues thirty million dollar residential development project was to “carry flowers, chocolates and perfume” to RM Administrator Strudwick, which, if those gifts had been carried to Strudwick, as ordered by the Minister Responsible, would have been a contravention of Section 123 (1) of Canada’s Criminal Code MUNICIPAL CORRUPTION, which prevents anything being carried to Municipal officials in exchange for a benefit, such as development zoning.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that the Saskatchewan Courts have destroyed both Klassen and I (Lee) to support corruption within the Saskatchewan Bureaucracy, but in the Klassen case the Supreme Court concluded that Crown Prosecutor Miazga had no motive to destroy Klassen so there was no malice, only justice error and the Supreme Court left in place the award of the original two point eight million dollars the Province had given Klassen following the Saskatchewan Courts malice rulings.

I (Lee) repeat that in my destruction there was a motive, the motive was my (Lee)s refusal to pay Strudwick her bribes to obtain development zoning for the Argues as instructed by the then NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, and the only possible way to determine a fair resolution is a public inquiry conducted by a Alberta Judge .

The Province had already concluded that Klassen had been subjected to two point eight million dollars worth of suffering caused by Saskatchewan Justice and that sounds just fine to me (Lee). No amount of money, one million or ten million dollars is of any use to me (Lee) anyway because my only interest in life is contracting road work and I can not contract Highway work because I will not pay bribes to the Saskatchewan Department of Highway Engineers and I can not contract Grid Road work from the RMs (Rural Municipalities) because I will not pay bribes to the Rural Administrators.

I (Lee) stupidly believed that the worldwide financial meltdown, resulting in Canada creating a fifty to one hundred million dollar taxpayer Federal debt for a huge stimulus for infrastructure might cause our Governments, Federal and Provincial, to clean up the corruption of their Bureaucracy’s, but I (Lee) was living in my usual dream world and was wrong, the corruption has become even worse, as example, the cost of Road work in the City of Montreal has increased by a third in the last year because the Province of Quebec has done nothing about the fact that the City of Montreal Bureaucrats are working with the mafia to launder taxpayer stimulus money out of the system, “mafia reported to control 80 percent of roadwork contracts in city” (google).

A knowledgeable Web reader has brought to my, (Lee)s, attention his belief that if the RMs were eliminated and Counties formed, as I (Lee) advocate, that the overall Corruption problems in Rural Saskatchewan would get much worse under County Administrators, and the worry is that Saskatchewan Rural Municipal Administration would become as Corrupt as Municipal Administration in the City of Montreal, note Macleans November 9th 2009 article, “ Montreal is a disaster martin patriquin” (google)

I (Lee) disagree with the Web reader who belives that County Administrators would be even more corrupt than RM Administrators because the fact is that the tiny little postage stamp RMs are usually run by a small handful of Farm Families and one or two corrupt Administrators and it is easy to keep corrupt happenings all in the family, and whatever does get out in the open is small enough that it does not interest the media.

But a small value corruption in each RM multiplied by the 300 (three hundred) RMs ends up with the cost to the Saskatchewan taxpayers being significant BUT if the RMs were eliminated and thirteen Countys formed overlaying the Health and School Districts each County would replace a average of 23 (twenty three) RM’s so corruption in each County would be twenty three times that of one RM and more likely to be noticed.

As example there are seven elected officials in a RM, six council members, and one Reeve, along with one Administrator, one assistant Administrator and one Roads Foreman in each of the RMs, and if each one of those ten Officials stole as little as $10,000.00 (Ten thousand dollars) each that would be only $100,000.00 (one hundred thousand dollars) in each RM each year and would not be noticed by the Auditors BUT the total cost to the taxpayers Province wide for all 300 (three hundred) Rural Municipalities would be $30,000,000.00 (thirty million dollars), a lot of taxpayer dollars stolen but barely noticable in each individual RM.

To put it another way, take that $30,000,000.00 (thirty million dollars) Province wide total cost of corruption to the taxpayer each year and divided it by thirteen Countys would mean there was $2,307,692.00 stolen by each County Administrator and assistant or two, each year, that amount would most certainly be noticed by the auditors.

I (Lee) also remind all Web readers that my (Lee)s plan was to save $75,000,000.00 (seventy five million dollars) a year in RM Administration costs, by eliminating the RMs and use $25,000,000.00 (twenty five million dollars) of that saving to administer the thirteen Countys and divide the remaining $50,000,000.00 (fifty million dollars) up among the 450 (four hundred and fifty) Villages and tiny Towns as a annual grant of a bit over $100,000,00 (one hudred thousand dollars) for each Village and in return the Village Mayors would be the solution to Rural Municipal Administration Corruption.

That Web readers worry about the anticipated corruption of the County Administrators could be resolved as follows: The four hundred and fifty Village Mayors would have to do something to earn that annual one hundred thousand dollars of grant money and they would have to form committees to study and approve Rural Zoning applications from Developers in each County anyway and that same committee of Village Mayors could study complaints about the corruption of the County Administrators and their staff.

A County corruption complaint line could be established just like the “8477 tips” (google) line, call it the “2222 cccc” line for County Corruption Complaint Commission, and the Village Mayors could deal with those County Corruption complaints, passing legitimate complaints on to the RCMP which may or may not, have any effect, but the Harper Feds are promising action on white collar crime “harper and white collar crime” (google) so the Mounties may have to take notice of what the Village Mayors send them.

There are four hundred and fifty Villages in Saskatchewan and if thirteen counties are formed to overlay the School and health districts that means a average of 35 (thirty five) Villages in each County, not to large a group to make up a Committee, and in this day and age of meeting conducted through the use of Web cams and the internet that could be done from the Village offices with no travel cost. The Developers could apply for zoning permission including land location, air photos and plans, all of which can be scanned into the computers and studied in committee by Village Mayors in each County, and in the same way, using the same Webcam and internet system the Village Mayors could consider any corruption complaint they received.

It is true that some Web readers, including the Village Mayors themselves, may not like the idea of using the four hundred and fifty Village Mayors as whistle blowers to control the anticipated corruption of the County Administrators but the obvious fact remains that the elimination of the RM’s and formation of Counties would realize a significant savings in the cost of Rural Administration and if the worry is that Rural Administration change alone would accomplish nothing in Rural Zoning corruption the one obvious solution to the bribery for Rural Development zoning problem is to follow my (Lee)s plan to place the elected officials, the Village Mayors and Councils, in charge of Rural Development zoning instead of the County Bureaucrats, but I (Lee) repeat, at least one Web reader has a problem with that plan, so let us look at it again.

If the elimination of the RMs and the creation of Countys along with the parrallel creation of Committes of Village Mayors to oversee zoning and other County corruption issues is unacceptable then the simple solution to the bribery for zoning problem would be to follow the brilliant plan designed by the then Liberal Minister Responsible Jack Hillson, when Jack (Hillson) as then Minister Responsible, amended Section 14 (1) of the Urban Act, so as to allow any Village to annex any development property out of any RM in the Province, note Web site segment dated Septermber 2nd, 2009 FOLLOW THE MONEY and/or segment dated August 25th, 2009, TURNING OVER ROCKS.

It must also be noted that the Argues would be at very great risk even if a Public inquiry were to now simply provide them (the Argues) with development zoning, even with added compensation for their lost decade, because the Argues would still not have a snowballs chance in hell to ever complete their development given the well established corruption of the Saskatchewan Courts and with the RMAA in place and functioning as a self regulating association similar to Lawyers, Accountants, Doctors, Nurses et al., dictating judgements to the Saskatchewan Courts.

What could/would happen, given the absolute corruption of the Saskatchewan Queens and Appeal Bench Courts where the Argues would have no defence whatsoever, if they (the Argues) were granted development zoning, RM Administrator Strudwick, or any RM Administrator, could expropriate the Argues 350 gpm (gallon per minute) spring water flow leaving the Argues without water and a useless development being sued by the individuals who the Argues had sold lots too because suddenly there was no water.

Expropriation of the Argues spring water flow by Strudwick has always been a worry, and when the NDP Administration of Lorne Calvert refused to accept the “annexation by a Village” solution designed by the then Liberal Minister Responsible, Jack Hillson, note Web site segment dated September 2nd 2009, FOLLOW THE MONEY, I (Lee) serving as the Argues Representative, designed a alternate solution, as follows:

In my (Lee)s August 28th 2006 written submission, FLOWERS, CHOCOLATES AND PERFUME, to then NDP Premier Calvert, his Cabinet and Caucus, I (Lee), serving as the Argue Representative, offered the Calvert NDP Administration a solution to the problem, to wit: that to solve the Argues zoning problem with Strudwick, the Argues turn their development quarter and its 350 gpm (gallon per minute) spring water flow over to SASK WATER at no charge and my (Lee)s plan was that in return SASK WATER grant the Argues, in “perpetiuty”, (google) a lease on their 160 lot development plus a extra acre or two more land for their planned brewery, plus the right to use a negotiated amount of their spring water flow, say as little as 20% (twenty percent) with all the rest of the spring water flow, 80% (percent), going for Saskatchewan public use under the direction of SASK WATER.

The plan that I (Lee) set out for Calvert, his Cabinet and Caucus, to resolve the Argue/Strudwick zoning debacle was a sound plan and I (Lee) was very proud of it. The fact is that there was a precedent for my plan because SASK WATER has run a Water Pipeline from the Town of Outlook to the west along Highway 15 for the little Villages along number 15 Highway between Outlook and Rosetown.

BUT of greater importance to my (Lee)s plan was the fact that SASK WATER had already assumed ownership and responsibility for the operation of the water works in the Town of White City, which is about four miles away from the Argues Development quarter and its 350 gpm (gallon per minute) spring water flow. White City is short of water and there can be no doubt whatsoever but it would cost the taxpayers less money for SASK WATER to hire a firm of Consulting Engineers to call tenders to build a four mile pipeline across open farm land from the Argues development quarter to White City than it would for the Regina City Engineers to negotiate a Contract with Wappell to build a water pipeline out from Regina along number one highway to White City.

Notwithstanding the commonsense of the plan I (Lee) set out for the Calvert brain trust to solve the Argue/Strudwick problem, the NDP Administration of Lorne Calvert ignored my SASK WATER proposal to resolve the Argues refusal to pay bribes to RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick to obtain development zoning and insisted that the only option the Argues had to obtain zoning for their thirty million dollar development was to carry flowers, chocolates and perfume, (pay bribes) to Strudwick “supreme court of canada summary statement case 31940” (google)

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that for the Argues and I (Lee), serving as the Argues Representative, to be treated fairly, will require that the Wall Administration order a public inquiry conducted by a Alberta Judge into why the Argues were denied development zoning after thay had met all Provincial Department conditions and why I (Lee), serving as the Argue Representaive in a effort to obtain that development zoning without bribing RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick, was personally destroyed for my refusal to “carry flowers, chocolates and perfume” ( bribes) to Strudwick when told to do so by the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor.

The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal has ruled that all zoning issues are political and the Courts must not interfere and there can be no doubt whatsoever but that while it might annoy Donna Strudwick and her RMAA ilk in the short term it may be in the best long term “political” interest of the Wall Administration to order a public inquiry into the fact that Lorne Calverts NDP Administration did deny the Argues zoning because of their refusal to bribe RM Administrator Donna Strudwick to provide that development zoning a bureaucrat who reports to the Premier “strudwick reports to premier” (google).

While recent polling shows the NDP has a problem, “ndp running into a solid wall mandryk” (google) the predicted recession over the next couple of years has the potential to reverse that NDP problem to be a problem for the ruling Sask Party, “bad news for everyone but the ndp mandryk” (google) and the situation for the NDP may not be hopeless whether or not criminal charges in the “ndp meadow lake membership fraud” (google) are ever laid against Link or any of his backroom advisors.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that when Link loses the November 2011 General Election, Saskatchewan’s natural governing Party, the NDP will simply boot Link and elect a new Leader, and the Wall Administration will always be vulnerable to the fact that their spiritual God father, the Devine Gang, did disappear Ten Billion dollars of Saskatchewan Tax payer money, again note Murrays Political Column “bad news for eveyone but the ndp mandryk” (google), the Sask Party will never shake lose from those Devine Gang ties and a large portion of that Ten Billion dollars is still on the Provincial balance sheet as a debt and with “saskatchewan likley facing recession; finance minister james wood” (google) that huge debt will not be paid off any time soon.

As a result the Wall Administratiuon would be well advised to prove that when it comes to corruption there is nothing to choose between the Calvert NDP Administration and that of the Devine Gang, note Web site segment dated June 18th, 2009, TWEEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE, and a simple way for the Wall Administration to set out that proof to the tax paying voters would be a public inquiry conducted by a Alberta Judge into the fact that the Argues were denied devlopment zoning until they paid bribes to a RM Administrator, a woman named Donna Strudwick, a Government Bureaucrat who reported to the NDP Premier, “strudwick reports to premier” (google).

This Website has set out in Web site segment dated June 18th, 2009, TWEEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE, considerable and conclusive evidence that except for a question of degree, the Devine Gang and the Calvert NDP are identically corrupt. The Devine Gang disappeared Ten Billion dollars of Saskatchewan Taxpayer’s money, whereas the group of NDP Senior Politicians, along with their hotshot lawyers and bureaucrats are content to launder considerably less of the taxpayers money out of the system, BUT like being a little bit pregnant, the principal of corruption is the same and there can be no doubt whatsoever but that it would be of Political benefit to the Wall Administration to have the fact of the Calvert NDP corruption established by a public inquiry.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that to be fair to the Argues and I (Lee) serving as the Argues Representative, it is crucial that the public inquiry be conducted by a Alberta Judge rather than a Saskatchewan, Manitoba or Ontario Judge. The NDP control the Administration of Justice in Manitoba and one of the focuses of the inquiry would be the fact that the Judge for Strudwick’s libel action against me (Lee), serving as the Argues Representative, is a NDP activist, the Honorable Lady Justice Janet McMurtry, who was married to Premier Calvert’s Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Chris Axworthy, a individual who is now serving as Dean of Law at one of Manitoba’s Universities, note Web site segment dated July 26th 2007, RURAL ZONING IN SASKATCHEWAN, so the use of a Manitoba Judge to conduct the inquiry would be a waste of time and money.

The Wall Administration must not ask that a Ontario Judge conduct the inquiry because the Honorable Lady Justice Janet McMurtry’s father, Roy McMurtry, is a Political/ Legal/Judicial legend in the Province of Ontario “ontario judge roy mcmurtry” (google) and with Roy McMurtry on the Board of Directors of “just energy income fund” (google) which owns a large Saskatchewan Ethanol Plant which will require Rural Development zoning control to allow Ethanol Plant expansion, it would be a equal waste of time and money for a Ontario Judge to conduct the inquiry.

It is a question as old as the Greeek City States “who will watch the watchers” (google) but there should be a answer somewhere and perhaps Newfoundland Premier Danny Williams might allow one of his Judges to conduct the inquiry or maybe since Premier Brad seems to be getting along so well with the US State Governors, a Montana or North Dakota Judge, or a Judge from any northern tier US state, might be the answer.

To be certain of a fair inquiry it is crucial that the inquiry Counsel be as fair, unbiased and knowlegable as the Judge conducting the inquiry but that is a difficult role to fill because all senior Saskatchewan lawyers are political, either NDP, Sask Party/ Conservative or Liberal. Saskatoon Lawyer Jack Hillson is a Liberal, he ran for the Leadership of the Provincial Liberal Party, but Jack (Hillson) does fit as perfectly as it is possible to find because the Liberal Party of Saskatchewan, down to 5% in the polls, is no longer a politically relevant force in Saskatchewan.

The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal has ruled that all zoning issues are political so there must be a political solution to any zoning issue here in Saskatchewan and Jack Hillson has proven that he is a Liberal but since the Saskatchewan Liberals are no longer politically relevant in Saskatchewan Jack would be perfect as inquiry counsel. Jack Hillson has proven beyond doubt that he is truly a Honorable man, as well as a able and experienced lawyer with Ministerial level experience in Government and has a encyclopedic knowledge of the issues surronding the Argue/Strudwick zoning dispute.

Assuming that a public inquiry conducted by a Alberta or United States Judge supported the premise that the Argues refusal to pay bribes to RM Administrator Donna Strudwick as instructed by the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, to obtain development zoning, was legally, ethically and morally unacceptable and that my (Lee)s personal destruction for my refusal to pay those bribes to Strudwick on behalf of the Argues was legally, ethically and morally unacceptable and that fact was spelled out clearly in the inquiry’s report that inquiry may work out well for the Wall Administration.

The reason that it might work out well for the Wall Administration politically is that if a public inquiry concluded that the NDP Administration of Lorne Calvert was as corrupt as the Devine Gang and that fact was in evidence before the Saskatchewan taxpaying voters in this Website as advertised by Access TV, in “perpetuity” (google) it is possible that, recession or no recession, “ saskatchewan likley facing recession: finance minister james wood” (google) and even noting the fact that “budget might cloud poll glow mandryk” (google) the Sask Party could stay in power in Saskatchewan in “perpetuity”, such as in Alberta, or at least for a few decades.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that if the actions of the five Sasktel employees “five sasktel employees in conflict of interest” (google) warrant being fired and a Regina City Police Criminal Investigation is ordered into their alleged corruption then the action of the NDP MLA for the Battlefords, Len Taylor, the then Minister Responsible as being the Argues only option to obtain zoning from RM Administrator Donna Strudwick for their (*the Argues) thirty million dollar residential subdivision was to carry her (Strudwick) “ flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) and if the Wall Administration was to charge Len Taylor with contravention of Section 464 of Canadas’s Criminal Code, COUNSELLING AN OFFENCE, note web site segment dated August 25th, 2009, TURNING OVER ROCKS that may lead to a public inquiry.

If the Regina City Police conduct a Criminal investigation into how many acre feet of flowers, tons of chocolates and gallons of perfume, Regina lawyer Wil Olive, “ one of the ten most influential men in saskatchewan olive” (google), NDP Party Vice President and NDP “ heavy hitter”(google), carried to the SPMC Bureaucrats to be granted the right to a option to purchase the 200 acre Old Fort San Lake front property, note Web site segment dated September 2nd, 2009, FOLLOW THE MONEY, and note that this Wil Olive is the same Wil Olive who orchestrated the “ndp meadow lake membership fraud” (google), then this may lead to a public inquiry.

At the end of the day there can be no doubt whatsoever but that something has got to be done about Rural Zoning Corruption in Saskatchewan and all Web readers are asked to begin a campaign by phone, letter, fax, or e-mail to their Sask Party MLA requesting a public inquiry conducted by a Alberta or United States Judge into the facts surronding the situation where the Argue family of Regina was prevented from being granted zoning for their thirty million dollar residential development because of their (the Argues) refusal to carry flowers, chocolates and perfume (bribes) to RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick.

Despite the fact that there was no mention in the Throne Speech of any change in the way Rural Zoning decisions are made in Saskatchewan rumour is rife that the Wall Administration is planning to have its mini-ministry “Enterprise Saskatchewan” remove Rural Zoning control from the RMAA (Rural Municipal Administrators Association)and give that control to the Senior Provincial Bureaucrats in Community Planning, (Manitoba did that years ago) and it would serve the Developers and ultimately the taxpayers, much better than the three hundred Rural Administrators maintaining dictatorial control over zoning in each Rural Municipality.

The RMAA members will scream bloody murder at losing their bribe money from the Developers but will calm down when it occurs to them that all they will have to do is up their bribe demands from the equipment suppliers, the culvert suppliers, the gopher poison suppliers, the contract ditch grass mowers, the Grid Road Engineers and the Grid Road Contractors to end up with the same level of bribe income.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that the Municipal Corruption situation in Rural Saskatchewan is akin to that of Montreal, “ police probes, mafia allegations in the palermo of canada peritz”, and any one who thinks that even the Mafia could get any of that stimulus money out of a City of Montreal bank account without a Municipal Bureaucrat signing a cheque is living in a dream world, yet the Province of Quebec refuses to act, just as here in Saskatchewan, both the Provincial Administration and Official Opposition refuse to address the Rural Zoning Corruption issue, note Web site segment dated June 18th 2009, TWEEDELDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE.

The aforegoing notwithstanding there may be hope for the Argues Development because there can be no doubt whatsoever but that if Premier Brad does move Rural Zoning control to the Community Planning Bureaucrats it can be assumed that should solve the Argues Zoning problem because the SMB (Saskatchewan Municipal Board) ruled on December 22nd 2004 that the Argue Development had received all Provincial Departmental approvals and it should be noted that under the Municipal Board Act Section 20 (9) SMB rulings have the same weight in law as a Public Inquiry “Saskatchewan municipal board act determining matters of fact or law 20 (9)” (google).

All Web readers are asked to note that one of the conditions that Strudwick and her Council had originally set for the Argues to obtain development zoning was that they (the Argues) had to hire Professionals to design their development and the plan approved by the various Provincial Departments was set out by Regina Architect Joe Pettick but Strudwick and her Council claimed to have never heard of Joe Pettick so it is gratifying to note that it is now a matter of public record that Joe Pettick has designed over 500 (five hundred) buildings in Saskatchewan and is the subject of a award winning short film “the man who built my childhood brian stockton” (google)

Many Web readers will assume that the the Argues would be granted development zoning by the Community Planning Bureaucrats BUT the problem with that assumption is that RM Administrator Donna Strudwick is a close personal friend of one of Premier Brad’s Cabinet “heavy hitters” (google), the Hon Jim Reiter, Minister of Highways and Infrastructure, and during the years 2006 and 2007 the Hon Jim was Executive Director of the RMAA with Strudwick as Director for Division 2 and the two became close friends “strudwick reiter” (google)

In 2005 the RMAA Executive Board dismissed the complaint that I (Lee) had lodged with the RMAA Executive Board under Section 19 (1) of their Act “rural municipal administrators act section 19 (1)” (google) regarding Strudwick’s refusal to grant the Argues development zoning until her bribes were paid and within a month of that Executive Board ruling Strudwick had sued me (Lee) for libel so Strudwick will now simply order the Hon Jim to use his Cabinet clout to instruct the Community Planning Bureaucrats to deny the Argues development zoning notwithstanding the Provincial departmental approvals.

All Web readers will have noted that the solution I (Lee), as the Argues Representative, have advocated is to simply wipe the RM’s, SARM and Strudwick’s Union, the RMAA, from the face of Saskatchewan and form Counties, as advocated by Meyer Brownstone over fifty years ago, thereby eliminating the RM of Edenwold and its Administrator Donna Strudwick, and solving the Argues zoning problem, BUT all Web readers will have also noted that then Minister Responsible, Jack Hillson, designed a balanced solution, Jack amended section 14 (1) of the Urban Act whereby, if he wished, a corrupt Developer could bribe Strudwick to be granted zoning, or if his (the Developers) soul could not stand the thought of bribing Strudwick, he (the Developer) could simply find a Village to annex his Development out of Strudwick’s Rural Municipality, note Website segment dated September 2nd 2009 FOLLOW THE MONEY and/or Website segment dated October 15th 2009 WHY IS CANADA SO CORRUPT?, but Strudwick is so greedy that she wants all the “flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) available and has successfully fought the Hillson plan to this day.

So at the end of the day it will come down to Premier Brad. Just like Calvert before him Premier Brad is going to have to decide whether or not to run the political risk of annoying Strudwick and the RMAA by granting the Argues development zoning in the face of the Argues continuing refusal to pay RM Administrator Donna Strudwick bribes.

In some ways Premier Brad has a easier political choice than Calvert because he, Premier Brad, owes his soul to only SARM ( Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities), basically the Reeves and Councillors, whereas Calvert owed his soul to the RMAA (Rural Municipal Administrators Association), basically another Union which controls the NDP, and the Wall Administration could solve some economic development problems in Rural Saskatchewan by eliminating the RMAA which is a self regulating agency and above the law, http://www.rmaa.ca/ (click onto Association Bylaws and Code of Ethics 04, 06 and 07) and re-creating the position of Secretary who reports to each individual Rural Council rather than the Premier and Minister Responsible “strudwick reports to premier” (google).

The odd problem would remain, such as in the RM of Edenwold, where Strudwicks son sits on the RM of Edenwold Council, but those situations would be rare, and there can be no doubt whatsoever but that eliminating the all powerful, self regulating, RMAA from development zoning control in Rural Saskatchewan would be a very good start.

AND I (Lee) remind Premier Brad’s Brain Trust that there can be no doubt whatsoever but that political events are demonstrating that it may be a political mistake for the Saaskatchewan Premiers to keep bowing to the corrupt Provincial Official scum, such as RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, even if she does report to the Premier “ strudwick reports to premier” (google)

I (Lee) remind all Web readers, especially Premier Brad’s Brain Trust, to note that after this Web site was set up in July of 2007 the Rural Leaders began phoning Outlook Community Leader Lloyd Smith to laugh at this Web site and to tell him (Smith) that I was the stupidest man in Canada if I believed that I could get zoning for the Argue development without bribing the RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick.

I (Lee) always took great exception to the Rural Leaders claim of my great stupidity because I am not, in fact, the stupidest man in Canada, Alberta Premier Ed Stelmach has that distinction “stupidest man in canada” (google) and a few of my (Lee)s Alberta friends do believe that Premier Ed is in fact so stupid as to deserve that distinction.

I (Lee) do not believe that any Premier is stupid, or even a bit slow, but Premier Ed is obviously a good man who is simply unbelievably naive because it appears that he ( Premier Ed) must really think that if he gives his Senior Bureaucrats enough taxpayer money in legal salaries and bonuses that they will forgo demanding bribes from the Business Community, but he (the Premier) is living in a dream world if he thinks that to be true and I (Lee) ask all Web readers, especially Premier Brad’s Brain Trust, to note “bureaucrat bonuses outrage Alberta taxpayers” (google).

Note there can be no doubt whatsoever but that the political outrage over Alberta Premier Stelmach bowing to his Senior Bureaucrats and granting them those idiotic bonuses right in the middle of Alberta’s financial meltdown “Alberta eight billion dollar deficit” (google) was the reason that Premier Ed lost the Calgary By-Election to the Wildrose Alliance, “wildrose alliance wins calgary glenmore” (google)

I (Lee) believe that the Alberta voter outrage over those Bureaucrat Bonuses Premier Ed paid to his top people can be equated with the situation here in Saskatchewan where a Developer is told by the NDP Minister Responsible that his only option to have a chance to obtain Development Zoning from RM Administrator Strudwick, who reports to the Premier, “strudwick reports to premier” (google) is to carry “flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) to the woman to even have a chance at being granted development zoning, when there can be no doubt whatsoever but that NDP order was unacceptable.

I (Lee) believe that NDP Leader Link suffering a near loss in the Douglas-Park By-
election can be politically compared to Alberta Premier Ed losing the Calgary-Glenmore By-election to the Wildrose Alliance and in addition, there can be no doubt whatsoever but that NDP Leader Links forty percent drop in popularity in the strongest NDP riding in Saskatchewan and near loss to a political neophyte, Kathleen Peterson, is a indication of a voter revolt here in Saskatchewan akin to Premier Ed’s loss of Calgary-Glenmore or torch and pitchfork marches on the Legislature in both Provinces.

There is no doubt whatsoever but that the Saskatchewan voters will put up with a lot more arrogant corruption from their Bureaucrats than the Alberta voters will and even if they (the Saskatchewan voters) did want to do something about Rural Administrative Corruption there is no Wildrose Alliance to vote for here in Saskatchewan and there is nothing to choose between the current Wall Administration and Link’s Official Opposition, note Web site segment dated June 18th, 2009, TWEEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE, so the Saskatchewan Political Leaders, Premier Brad and Opposition Leader Link, may believe there is nothing the Saskatchewan voters can do about the absolute corruption, but that may be a political mistake because there may be a limit as to what the taxpaying voters will put up with even here in Saskatchewan.

As example, Web readers have asked me (Lee) how a guy as shyster smart and “cunning as a cartload of monkeys” (google), as Regina lawyer, NDP Vice President and “heavy hitter” (google), Wil Olive, believed that he (Olive) was going to get away with obtaining a option to buy the Old Fort San Lake front property from the SPMC Bureaucrats and use the Hillson amendment to Section 14 (1) of the Urban Act to have the Town of Fort Qu’Appelle annex the Old Fort San 200 acre property out of the Village of Fort San and then make several million dollars by selling the property as Lake front lots, without anyone noticing it, note Web site segment dated Septermber 2nd, 2009, FOLLOW THE MONEY, but I (Lee) believe that Wil Olive is so arrogant that he simply did not care if he was caught.

The Web readers specifically ask why Wil Olive, even if he is a NDP hotshot lawyer, believed that he could pull this off while at the same time his NDP Premier and Minister Responsible were denying the Argue family the right to do exactly the same thing because of their (the Argues) refusal to carry “flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) to RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick and the obvious question is repeatedly asked of me (Lee), ie: how many acre feet of flowers, tons of chocolates and gallons of perfume did Wil Olive carry to the SPMC (Saskatchewan Property Management) Bureaucrats to obtain those options to buy the Old Fort San 200 acres?

But there can be no doubt whatsoever but that the Web readers that have raised the Olive/Old Fort San stuff are concerned, in the main, with, did Wil Olive and his NDP Cohorts, Premier Calvert and his Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, really believe they were going to get away with the blatant corruption, favourtisim and nepotism?

The obvious answer is “ Yes Virginia, Olive and his cohorts really did think they could get away with it, remember that this Wil Olive is the same Wil Olive, the same NDP heavy hitter, who is arrogant enough to believe that he could place 1,000 (one thousand) fraudulent NDP Memberships into Link’s leadership campaign and get away with it”

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that he (Olive) is so arrogant that he believed that he could make a very large sum of money using the brilliant plan that then Liberal Minister Responsible Jack Hillson designed to solve the Argue family zoning problem with Strudwick and at the same time denying the Argues the right to do the same thing because of their (Argues) refusal to bribe RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, this is sick even by the corrupt standard of the Saskatchewan legal and Judicial community.

MORE SICKNESS: as example, I (Lee) have been told that many NDP big shots believe that their Meadow Lake Membership Fraud was a NDP insider matter and none of the public’s business, so it is probable that Wil Olive, a NDP Vice President and heavy hitter, believed that the only downside to getting caught with a thousand forged Memberships, that would have made sure of a Link victory on the first ballot, would be a NDP internal squabble which he (Olive) would win because he is a real NDP “heavy hitter” (google).

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that many of Saskatchewan’s economic problems are rooted in the fact that the NDP, Saskatchewan’s natural governing party, is under the control of “heavy hitters” such as Wil Olive, who are obviously simply two-bit shysters who somehow end up convincing the voting public that they are “one of the ten most influential men in saskatchewan olive” (google).

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that what is truly sickening is that Wil Olive, (as are all lawyers) is a officer of the Court, “lawyers are officers of the court farlex” (google). Swimming in the same sea of Saskatchewan political, legal and Judicial corruption is Wil Olive’s NDP colleague, Government lawyer Glen Dowling, acting for RM of Edenwold Administrator, Donna Strudwick, in blocking zoning for the Argues thirty million dollar residential development until the Argues carried her (Strudwick) the “flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) and who had the power to instruct RCMP Staff Sergeant Brent Lewis to destroy the evidence of Strudwick’s possibly criminal activity and the Law Society of Saskatchewan covered up Dowlings actions in ordering Staff Lewis to destroy that evidence, note Web site segment dated October 4th, 2007, “Update with reply from Law Society of Saskatchewan”.

I (Lee), serving as the Argues Representative, can just repeat the point that the only possible explanation for people such as Wil Olive, Glen Dowling and Donna Strudwick, believing that they can get away with the absolute corruption is to repeat what British Political Leader Lord Acton said many decades ago, “power corrupts and absolute power corrupts absolutely” (google).

But I (Lee) ask all Web readers to note that around the world these “chickens are coming home to roost” (google), as example, note the arrogant corruption of the Prime Minister of Italy has come to a end “ Berlusconi’s winning streak runs out as Italy rules its pm is no longer above the law” (google), enough is enough and the Italian Prime Ministers own wife blew the whistle on him when he started screwing a thirteen year old underwear model.

I (Lee) ask all Web readers to note that if the Italian Prime Minister is not allowed to place himself above the law, then here in Saskatchewan, Donna Strudwick, her two bit shyster of a Government lawyer, Glen Dowling and Wil Olive must not be allowed to place themselves above the law and all Web readers are asked to start a letter, fax, e-mail or phone campaign asking the Wall Administration to order a public inquiry conducted by a Alberta Judge into corruption in development zoning in Rural Saskatchewan.

The Saskatchewan Legislature opened its 2009 fall sitting on October 21st and with Link back in the House the expected three ring circus ensued during Question Period, sort of, but Opposition Leader Links insistence on trying to score some brownie points against Premier Brad outside of the Legislature by catering to the hard left of the NDP by promoting the notion of low-cost housing is almost redundant because the fact is that Link may not be able to gain any ground with the hard left of the NDP under any circumstance because the hard left liked Calvert and it seems that Premier Brad is going to able to prove that in 2003 Link had advised him (Wall) on how to defeat Calvert, “wall puts philosophical stamp on Saskatchewan party policy Mandryk” (google)

All that Premier Brad has to do now is to have his Attorney General, the Hon. Don (Morgan) lay criminal charges of fraud against Link in the “NDP Meadow Lake membership fraud” (google) and the NDP are going to have to hold another Leadership Convention sooner rather than later.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that Links attacks on Premier Brad on behalf of the hard left dooms the NDP to failure in the November 2011 General Election under any circumstance because even if Link is somehow able to ingratiate himself with Dr. Ryan Meili’s people (the hard left) that amounts to only about 20% (twenty percent) of the Saskatchewan voters and means that Link has turned his back on his one time personal constituency, the group that supported his rise as Deputy Premier and Minister of CIC in the Romanow Administration, the section of the voters that drives the Saskatchewan economy, the business community.

All Web readers are asked to note that former Premier Grant Devine, who was recently granted the Saskatchewan Order of Merit “devine right to order of merit mandryk” (google), but was the Premier who had presided over the disappearance of Ten Billion dollars of Saskatchewan tax payers money and the making of Commonwealth history for the incarceration of a dozen of his Cabinet Ministers, note “rcmp probe operation fiddle” (google) believes that Link is in the wrong party “link may be in wrong party devine james wood” (google) and it appears that the NDP Voters, at least the Regina Douglas-Park NDP voters, for once in their life, agree with Devine.

Low cost housing is just not Link. During the more than a decade that Link was MLA for Regina Elphinstone there was not one low cost house built, let alone a development of them, in Elphinstone, which Constituency was, and still is, the poorest and most crime ridden Constituency in Regina, with the worst housing it is possible to imagine and in fact long time City Councillor for Ward 7, Joe Mckeown, a well known NDP supporter and on Links executive was a slum landlord in Regina Elphinstone.

Endless complaining from the slum landlords, such as Councillor Joe Mckeown, that the welfare recipients living in their slum houses were wrecking the houses resulted in my (Lee) suggesting a solution. I (Lee) knew “hugh vassos concrete houses” (google) very well and knew that the Vassos houses were Saskatchewan made at the Vassos plant in Melville, were energy efficient with insulation built in to the concrete walls, were literally indestructible ( unless a welfare recipient happened to own a jackhammer)and cost about a third less than a equivalent size wood house, so I (Lee) suggested that a housing development be built in Elphinstone Constituency using the Vassos Concrete House design…but I (Lee) was told to mind my own business.

Link himself lives in a $600,000.00 (six hundred thousand dollar) house in Gryphons Walk and has about as much real interest in low cost housing as Lane (the Hon. J. Gary),
who also lived in Gryphons Walk, when he (Lane) was the Devine Gang Minister of Finance and disappeared that one and a quarter Billion dollars of Saskatchewan tax payers money, “gov’t made devine error murray mandryk” (google)

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that Link has gone to ground and is trying to shore up his hard left base of the NDP, but to what purpose?, because he (Link)s only goal is to be Premier and he (Link) can not become Premier supported by the hard left of the NDP (about 20% of the voters) alone and given his (Link)s 40% (forty percent) drop in popular support in the Douglas-Park By-election the plan of simply waiting for Premier Brad to make a mistake is a waste of his (Link)s time as Opposition Leader. Link must develop and put forward some policies and no less than “W” Bush’s great Karl Rove, some say the best spin doctor in the world, has stated that “corruption is the most important issue among voters”….. “renaissance for a texan machiavelli craig offman” (google), so corruption in Rural Development zoning is a good place to start.

“what’s done can not be undone lady macbeth” (google) so said Lady Macbeth in Shakespeare’s immortal play, Macbeth, consequently Link would accomplish as much trying to invent a time machine to send his House Leader, Len Taylor, back in time to April 29th, 2004, with instructions to grant the Argues development zoning, rather than rule, as Minister Responsible, that their only option to have a chance to be granted Development zoning was to carry “flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) to RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick.

Another point that Link keeps trying to score against Premier Brad that is beyond belief is the Saskatchewan Government Bureaucrats never ending schemes to launder Saskatchewan taxpayers money through Sask Energy with their never ending natural gas price manipulations, ie: buy low in the Alberta market and sell high to the Saskatchewan consumer.

What makes that particular attack on Premier Brad laughable is the fact that when he (Link) was Deputy Premier to Roy Romanow and Minister Responsible for CIC (Crown Investments Corporation) under Links watch, Gary Drummond and a couple of Sask Energy Bureaucrats pulled off the mother of all such schemes, a Madoff level Natural Gas buy low-sell high scheme and gave Drummond a Billion Dollar “profit” note Web site segment dated Septermber 2nd 2009, FOLLOW THE MONEY.

Every individual who wades through the Hansard transcript of the Gary Drummond Channel Lake inquiry ends up astonished that a RCMP Criminal investigation had not been ordered and Criminal charges for fraud were not laid against Drummond and the two Sask Energy Bureaucrats after the inquiry was completed, but Link was the Minister Responsible, and nothing was done.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that the Media is pretending that this Web site does not exist, but that fact notwithstanding two Saskatchewan media experts have two different takes on the never ending Sask Energy Natural gas price manipulations. Regina Leader Post Political reporter, Murray Mandryk believes that the Sask Energy natural gas price shenanigans are working just fine “gas utility still spins in political hot air mandryk” (google) but at the end of a recent column Regina Leader Post economics reporter, Bruce Johnstone, did hint at the Channel Lake debacle “link’s flawed proposal johnstone” (google).

NDP Leader Links problem is that he just missed living under the last honest Premier that Saskatchewan has ever had, Ross Thatcher, so he Link has never known anything but corrupt Saskatchewan Governments. During Thatcher’s reign as Premier, as long as the Highway Contractors donated 2% (two percent) of the value of their contracts to the Liberal Party of Saskatchewan a corrupt Highway Engineer could be removed from administering their contracts with one phone call to Premier Thatchers office, so having to bribe Highway Engineers was never a problem for the Contractors, but Link came to adulthood at the end of the Thatcher era, under the Administration of Allan Blakeny so Link has never known anything but corrupt Saskatchewan Administrations.

As well, Link spent nearly a decade running errands for Nexen President Charlie Fischer schmoozing the Dictators and their thugs in the oil rich, hot climate, banana belt Countries of the World: all Web readers are asked to note “bribes and grease: the way of the world” (google) for a run down on the challenges Link would have faced in obtaining permission for Nexen to drill for oil in those hot climate Dictatorships.

BUT Link has got to face reality, he has got to accept the fact that times have changed and he is back here in Saskatchewan facing the fact of a world wide financial meltdown caused by corrupt Government officials, the fact that a Black Man was elected President of the United States simply by promising to clean up US Government corruption, the fact that a whole bunch of G-20 Leaders are promising to clean up their Government corruption and the fact that the Canadian Federal Government is promising to clean up corruption “ harper and white collar crime” (google)

Since this Web site was first established in July of 2007 the Rural Leaders have been phoning Outlook Community Leader Lloyd Smith laughing at this Web site and telling Lloyd (Smith) that I (Lee) am the stupidest man in Canada if I think that I can get zoning for the Argues thirty million dollar residential subdivision development without bribing RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick, but the Rural Leaders claims notwithstanding, and stupid or not, my (Lee)s plan actually worked to a certain extent with NDP Leader Links near defeat in the Regina Douglas-Park By-Election, note Web site segment dated October 15th 2009, WHY IS CANADA SO CORRUPT?

It is true that I (Lee) may be overplaying the effect of this Website on the Douglas-Park By-election, it is impossible to see into the minds of the Douglas-Park voters and know for sure if the Web site had anything to do with Links 40% (forty percent) drop in popular support and near defeat to a neophyte in Regina Douglas- Park but now rumors are rife that the Wall Administration’s mini-ministery “enterprise saskatchewan” (google) will move Rural Saskatchewan zoning control from the RMAA to the Provincial Bureaucrats in Community Planning so maybe Premier Brad’s Brain Trust did take note of this Website and Links near defeat in the Douglas-Park By-Election.

Assuming the Wall Administration does move Rural Zoning control to Community Planning and assuming the Argues are granted subdivision zoning by the Community Planning Bureaucrats that fact alone does not solve the Argues development problems.

The original Argue plan was to keep costs down by serving as their own housing contractor which means that to obtain CMHC (Canada Mortgage and Housing Corporation) approval to guarantee the mortgages at the Banks and Mortgage lenders for people wishing to obtain mortgage money for homes in the Argue Development it would be necessary to obtain plumbing and electrical approval from the Provincial Bureaucrats, which means that bribes must be paid to those Provincial Bureaucrats.

To make the Bureaucrat bribery situation worse for the Argues, each Rural Municipality has its own housing inspector, which means bribes to the RM Housing inspector before a Developer can sell a home in any housing development in any Rural Municipality and since the Argue family remain adamant on their refusal to pay bribes to Bureaucrats development zoning alone is not going to solve the Argue problem.

The Argues could do what every other Developer does and contract the house construction out to a housing contractor, there are literally dozens of them, and let him deal with the “bribes to bureaucrat” (google) problem to get a house approved for sale, but since the Argues still do not have zoning approval it is a bit previous for me (Lee), as the Argues Representative, to be fussing about the next Saskatchewan bribery problem.

BUT this is exactly the reason why the then Liberal Minister Responsible Jack Hillson’s brilliant plan to amend Section 14.1 of the Urban Act so as to allow Wood Mountain Village to annex the Argue thirty million dollar residential subdivision Development out of the RM of Edenwold , note Web site segment dated September 2nd 2009, FOLLOW THE MONEY, was so crucial to the success of the Argues Development plan, because no Saskatchewan Village Mayor and Council demands bribes to allow a Developer to build a Development in their Village. In fact Wood Mountain Village Mayor and Council were overjoyed at the prospect of receiving property tax revenue from the Argue Development and the Argue’s designed their development to create a situation where bribes to Provincial Government Bureaucrats to grant approval for electrical and plumbing work to gain CMHC mortgage insurance approval would not be a issue.

The Argue’s planned a high level, completely controlled, walled, gated development, with sanely sized and priced modular (rtm) homes (no monster homes), complete yard and outside maintenance with continuous on site security, for boomers at or nearing retirement age, fifty five plus, no kids, dogs no taller than 14 (fourteen) inches, such a development would have been of interest to home owners who could afford to either pay cash for their retirement home or at minimum at least a 20% (twenty percent) down payment which means that mortgages can be obtained without CMHC guarantee, “cmhc’s growth fuels worries over new risks erman perkins” (google)

The Argue plan was to be able to be able to decrease house costs by not having to pay the amount of the bribe normally paid to Provincial bureaucrats ( two or three thousand dollars) for each house built to obtain electrical and plumbing approval from the Provincial Inspectors so as to qualify for CMHC mortgage guarantee, but Strudwick blocked zoning because of the Argues refusal to pay her bribes so this is immaterial.

I (Lee) had promised the Argues my best shot at obtaining development zoning for them without bribing RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick and after the Calvert NDP Administration refused to honor the plan designed by the then Minister Responsible Jack Hillson to amend Section 14 (1) of the Urban Act so as to circumvent Strudwick demands for bribes to provide development zoning by having a Village annex the Argue Development out of the RM of Edenwold, I (Lee) went on to do what I could to accomplish the impossible for the Argues.

What I (Lee) did was simple enough, do what Dr. Carl Baar told me to do, just keep turning the rocks over until eventually I (Lee) got the Supreme Court Summary Statement for case 31940 and then using the Access zap2it TV Ads and this Website referring to the Supreme Court Summary Statement, just keep on turning the rocks over so the public can watch Strudwick and her cohorts crawl away to get under another rock and to just keep doing that until the corrupt scum run out of rocks to crawl under.

As set out above, implementing Dr. Carl Baar’s plan, ie: using the Access TV Ads and this Web site to keep turning the rocks over to expose the corruption in Rural Zoning has in my (Lee)s opinion, accomplished two things; it caused the NDP Vote to stay home in droves in the Regina Douglas Park By- Election causing the NDP Leader Link to drop 40% (forty percent) in popular support and to nearly lose the By-Election to a political neophyte, and this Web site is probably the reason the Wall Administration is even considering taking Rural Zoning control away from the Rural Administrators and giving it to the Senior Bureaucrats in Community Planning.

While there can be no doubt whatsoever but that some progress has been made toward obtaining zoning for the Argue thirty million dollar residential subdivision Development without bribing RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, I (Lee) am “sickened unto death“ (google) at the level of corruption the Saskatchewan Government has descended to, but unlike Dave Batters who was so sickened at what he saw once he was elected a MP (Member of Parliament) that he had the courage to suicide “Dave batters suicide” (google) I (Lee), simply do not have that level of courage, but there can be no doubt whatsoever but that a public inquiry conducted by a Alberta Judge with power of subpoena would provide answers to Rural Zoning Corruption in Saskatchewan.

I (Lee) do not have the courage to suicide, nevertheless, while “sickened unto death” (google), at trying to function in a Country and a Province, as massively corrupt as Canada, and Saskatchewan, it is still my (Lee)s intent to go the last inch on the last foot of the last mile to deal with this group of Government officials who are simply “white collar thugs” (google) and who are so massively corrupt that a NDP Minister of the Crown rules, and the Courts up hold that ruling, that the only option a Developer has to obtain zoning is to pay bribes to those “white collar thugs” (google) to do their jobs.

I (Lee) remind all Web readers that there can be no doubt whatsoever but that the Saskatchewan Government is so massively, sickeningly, corrupt that in order to make certain of my personal destruction when I (Lee) refused to pay bribes to a bit of Official Government scum (Strudwick) who reports to the Premier “strudwick reports to premier” (google), the Courts assigned Strudwicks libel action against me to be heard by the Honorable Lady Justice Janet McMurtry, who is and always has been a NDP activist, and was married to Chris Axworthy, who had served as NDP Premier Calvert’s Attorney General, note Web site segment dated July 26th, 2007 ZONING PROBLEM WITH A RURAL MUNICIPALITY.

I (Lee) remind all Web readers that there can be no doubt whatsoever but that I (Lee) have done my “political” job perfectly on behalf of the Argues family as ruled by the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal must be done, to wit: all zoning issues are political, so I (Lee) simply used this Web site to turn the rocks over and keep turning the rocks over to keep hammering home to the voting public the well documented facts of the corruption of the Rural Administrators, such as Donna Strudwick, and it appears that after a near decade of effort I (Lee) may have a chance of obtaining development zoning for the Argues without bribing RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick BUT nothing has been accomplished so far regarding the corruption in Government Administration of Rural Saskatchewan so a public inquiry by a Alberta Judge is needed,

A few Web readers have asked if all Rural Administrators are corrupt, probably not, but the problem is that the corrupt Rural Administrators do not have a large red “C” stamped on their forehead. Does any Web reader seriously believe that if the Argue family had been aware that it was Strudwick’s plan, as the RM of Edenwold Administrator, to trick them (the Argues) into spending $175,000.00, (one hundred and seventy five thousand dollars) plus another $30,000.00 (thirty thousand dollars) in legal costs to Regina lawyers and NDP activists, Ron Gates and Barry Nychuk, completing the conditions that Strudwick required to be completed as part of the RM original zoning approval and then to deny zoning once the Argues money had been spent and the conditions fulfilled, that they (the Argues) would have gone within a country mile of Donna Strudwick?

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that, if they (the Argues) had been aware that once they had completed the conditions set by Strudwick and received all Provincial Departmental approvals, that Strudwick, acting for the Premier “strudwick reports to premier” (google) had the power to then block development zoning until she (Strudwick) was carried her “flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) that they (the Argues) would have even tried to realize their dream development, the Argues are not stupid people, but they were not experienced developers.

The Hill family (Harvard) or Dundee, would have known that the bribes had to be paid to RM Administrator Strudwick to obtain development zoning, just as I (Lee) assumed, but since the Argues did not ask me (Lee) to become involved until after the damage was done all that can be done now is to try to bulldoze the situation by using the Access zap2it TV Ads and this Web site, but others advising the Argues, on the ground, at the time, such as Regina lawyer and NDP activist, Ron Gates, “knew or ought to have known” (google) about the need to pay Strudwick bribes to obtain development zoning.

Senior Regina lawyer and NDP activist Ron Gates was the lawyer advising the Argues during the process of Strudwick’s original conditional zoning approval and then after the Argues had spent $175,000.00 (one hundred and seventy five thousand dollars) plus $30,000.00 (thirty thousand dollars) of their capital in legal fees, then denying the Argues development zoning.

All Web readers are asked to note that in April of 2004, the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, ruled that the only option the Argues had to obtain development zoning from Strudwick was to carry her ( Strudwick) ‘flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) so there can be no doubt whatsoever but that only four years earlier, Regina lawyer and NDP activist, Ron Gates, would have known the same thing, ie: Strudwick’s bribes had to be paid to be granted zoning, yet Gates said nothing to the Argues.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that Ron Gates, acting as the Argues legal
Counsel, had an ethical duty to advise the Argues that Strudwick’s bribes had to be paid to obtain development zoning because after the fact, four other Regina lawyers took it upon themselves to advise the Argues that it was impossible to get by Donna Strudwick, implying the need for bribes, but Gates said nothing to the Argues at the time.

I (Lee) believe that the Gates/Argue , lawyer/client relationship, is even worse than Gates ethical failure to the Argues to advise them properly. There is considerable evidence that could be provided to a public inquiry that Ron Gates acted with Strudwick’s Government lawyer, Glen Dowling, to assist Donna Strudwick in her attempt to bankrupt the Argues, (as Strudwick boasted she would do), Gates worked with Dowling to lead the Argues down the garden path into spending that $200,000.00 (two hundred thousand dollars) completing the conditions Strudwick had set before granting development zoning.

It’s not as if Regina lawyer and NDP activist Ron Gates was a political/legal neophyte. Gates was Link’s brother in law, (they had originally married sisters), and Gates bought a small strip mall named Avonhurst Plaza on the 3100 block of Avonhurst Drive in north Regina. He (Gates) put his law office at one end of the Mall and rented out a small space at the other end of his Mall to three NDP MLA’s, Lindy Kasperski, Kim Trew, and Dwain Lingenfelter, for their Constiuency offices. The rest of the Mall, the middle, was filled with the usual collection of Chinese cafes and convenience stores.

The NDP Government allowance for renting Constinuency office space was $1000.00 (one thousand dollars) a month, that is $3000.00 (three thousand dollars) per month, thirty six thousand dollars a year for four years is about $150,000.00 (one hundred and fifty thousand dollars), about a third of what Gates paid for his Mall.

Not a Bernie Madoff level scam but all Web readers are asked to look yet again at “bribes and grease: the way of the world” (google), and it does establish that Regina lawyer and NDP activist, Ron Gates, knew all about NDP nepotism and Corruption when he was advising the Argues during their zoning battle with Strudwick and there can be no doubt whatsoever but that the NDP believes in nepotism and makes use of it to launder taxpayer money into their and their Senior officials, such as Gates and Strudwicks pockets, this fact notwithstanding Ron Gates said nothing to the Argues.

I (Lee) remind all Web readers for the umpteenth time, that when the NDP wanted to make certain of my (Lee)s personal destruction for my complaint to NDP Premier Calvert about his NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor’s, ruling that the only option that I (Lee) had to obtain zoning for the Argues Development was to bribe RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, they (the NDP) used their Administrative power over the Judiciary to make certain that the Queens Bench Judge that the Courts assigned to hear Strudwick’s “strudwick reports to premier” (google) libel action against me (Lee) was the Honorable Lady Justice Janet McMurtry, a long time NDP activist who was married to NDP Premier Calverts Attorney General Chris Axworthy, note Web site segment dated July 26th, 2007 ZONING PROBLEM WITH A RURAL MUNICIPALITY.

This is taking obvious nepotism right to the edge of reason and they (the NDP) were bound to be caught because this was a real life conspiracy to keep the bribe money flowing to RM Administrator Donna Strudwick (and her ilk) and two facts about conspiracies, by their nature they always work, but they are always uncovered, “conspiracies always work and are always uncovered” (google).

I (Lee) remind all Web readers that Dr. Carl Baar, co-author of the Judicial Council of Canada report Masters in Their Own House, which report set out that the Provincial Administrations use their Administrative Control of the Queens and Appeal Bench Judge’s working lives to dictate Judicial decisions, note Website segment dated July 26th, 2007 ZONING PROBLEMS WITH A RURAL MUNICIPALITY, told me (Lee) that Canada is famous for having the most corrupt administration of Justice in both the United States and the British Commonnwealth and that Saskatchewan is known to have the most corrupt administration of Justice in Canada

But the fact is that even given that Saskatchewan is well known for having a corrupt legal and Justice system the evidence amassed in this Web site establishing a corrupt pattern and relationship between several NDP lawyers and other NDP “heavy hitters” (google) within the NDP hierarchy, such as Glen Dowling, Ron Gates, Will Olive and the Honourable Lady Justice Janet McMurtry, must have gone over a line even by Saskatchewan corrupt legal standards because, as this Website receives a increasing number of visits and more publicity, a increasing number of lawyers are stopping me (Lee) on the street to express both concern and tacit (google) support.

I (Lee) have been advised that the evidence amassed in this Web site establishes beyond question the fact of corruption in the Administration of Rural Zoning in Saskatchewan and computer programming experts advise that the level of visits this Web site is receiving establishes the fact of major public interest in the problem of Corruption in Rural Zoning Administration and therefore a need for the Wall Provincial Administration to address the problem and ask a Alberta judge to conduct a public inquiry.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that a solution would be a public inquiry, conducted by a Alberta Judge, which might give the Argue family both zoning for their thirty million dollar residential subdivision development and compensation for the decade long denial of zoning for their development because of the Argues refusal to pay bribes to RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, and, may allow me (Lee), the Argues Representative, to clear my name of Lady Janet’s idiotic ruling that I libeled Strudwick when I complained to then NDP Premier Calvert about her ( Strudwick’s) corruption.

Such inquiry, conducted by a Alberta Judge, may form a basis for the Provincial Administration to eventually do what Meyer Brownstone advised over fifty years ago; remove the RM’s, SARM and the RMAA from the face of Saskatchewan and form Counties to administer Rural Saskatchewan thereby saving the Provincial taxpayers seventy five million dollars a year in Administering the Provinces three hundred Rural Municipalities, less the estimated twenty five million dollars a year to administer the thirteen counties, an actual saving of Administration costs of about fifty million dollars annually.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that it is in the best interest of all Urban taxpayers to see the RMs removed as Saskatchewan’s Rural Administration units, and the only way to accomplish that is through recognizing that the Argues zoning battle with RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick is a perfect example of corruption in Rural Development zoning in Saskatchewan and that solution in that problem may lead to a general solution to Rural Zoning corruption, and so begin a public campaign by letter, e-mail, phone or fax to the Wall Administration MLA’s asking that a public inquiry, by a Alberta Judge, be made into the decade long zoning battle between the Argue family of Regina and RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick.

For three decades Dr. Michael Atkinson has been conducting classes at the University of Saskatchewan on Government Corruption in Canada and has now started holding public seminars on the subject, entitled, “Why is Canada so Corrupt?”, one seminar was held in Regina Wednesday September 16^th 2009 at the JS Window Room, 2nd Floor, Gallery Building, University of Regina College Avenue Campus, a small crowd, thirty or so, mostly academics, attended but they (Dr. Atkinsons audience) were a knowledgeable, enthusiastic group.

Dr. Atkinson, who has been studying the government corruption issue for thirty years, sets out that Canada has two levels of corruption, what he (Dr.Atkinson) calls “petty” and “grand,….. “petty” being bribes to Government officials to provide services, such as “flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) to Strudwick to grant the Argues zoning, note Website segment dated July 26^th 2007, ZONING PROBLEMS WITH A RURAL MUNICIPALITY? which Dr. Atkinson claims to realize is disturbing to the individuals, such as the Argues, who lost (failed to earn) ten million dollars because of their refusal to bribe Strudwick, but even the Edenwold ratepayers loss of millions in tax revenue due to Administrator Strudwick’s corruption Dr. Atkinson dismisses as having little or no public consequence relative to his University level public policy concerns but other Countries, even some third world Countries, adopt a different corruption standard.

Nepal, as example, in contrast to Saskatchewan, takes “petty” corruption so seriously that in a effort to stop the bribe demands of their officials they ( Nepal’s leaders ) have enacted rules that Nepal Airport officials must wear uniforms with no pockets. “nepal’s graft solution: no more pockets” (google) perhaps, here in Saskatchewan, Dr. Atkinson could start to advocate as a matter of public policy that if the Wall Administration carried Legislation stopping the Rural Administrators from having Cayman Island Bank accounts that would solve the Rural Zoning Corruption problem.

But Dr. Atkinson does set out that “grand” corruption involving the top level politicans, Prmie Ministers, Premiers and Cabinet Members, and hundreds of millions of dollars, such as Adscam, (Martin) HRDC (Jane Stewart), Airbus (Mulroney) and the Devine Gang here in Saskatchewan, are of enough significance that Dr. Atkinson agrees that level of public corruption are worthy of his University level public policy interest.

Dr. Atkinson does recognize that the vast majority of Canadian taxpaying voters disagree with his “petty” and “grand” assesment and that most taxpaying voters believe that like being a “little bit pregnant morialekafa” (google) corruption is corruption and that the Politicans, Officials RCMP Officers and Judges are all corrupt to their rotten cores but Dr. Atkinson did not answer his own question, Why is Canada so Corrupt?

But Dr. Atkinson did explain to his audience that it may be a perception problem where the Politicians and their Senior officials keep on setting new rules of behaviour for themselves and can claim that they are not corrupt until it is proven in Court that they broke those rules, to me (Lee) this is why a public inquiry is needed to provide a answer to the question; should the Argues be required to carry RM Administrator Strudwick ‘flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) to be granted development zoning?

Dr. Atkinson sets out that to “ we the people” (google) it is a question of ethics, “public good” stuff, is it in the interest of the public that the Argues carry “flowers, chocolates and perfume” to Strudwick to provide zoning?, and the taxpaying voting public believe that is corruption but the Minister of the day, Len Taylor, and the Courts obviously want to see Strudwick receive her “ flowers, chocolates and perfume”, (bribes) to grant the Argues zoning so they (the Minister Responsible and Courts) simply ruled that the bribes must be paid to Strudwick but conversely the taxpaying voters still believe that is corruption, no matter that the rules were changed by Minister Decree and Court support to actually require, by Ministerial decree, and Saskatchewan law, that the Developer pay the bribes to the zoning officials to be granted zoning.

Dr. Atkinson sets out that there can be no doubt whatsoever but that a vast gulf exists, regarding the seriousness of the “petty” corruption between the Political Leaders and their white collar thugs, along with the business community, the RCMP and Courts, on one side, and the voting taxpayers on the other, and Dr. Atkinson has no answers except to advise that the politicans have their own problems just getting elected every four years, (and once in a while during a by-election) and we the people must just accept our democracy as it is and realize that the “petty” corruption is insignificant and if we do not like it here we should try living in Russia, Dr. Atkinsons position is utter nonsense.

If Dr. Atkinson has a genuine interest in his own question; Why is Canada so Corrupt?, he might think of the 1930’s American Bank Robber Willie Sutton’s response when asked why he robbed banks, Sutton responded simply with “that’s where the money is” (google). Well there is hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars sloshing around in Government and the Senior Government officials have absolute control over that massive slosh of taxpayer money as well as absolute control of both the RCMP and the Judiciary so a corrupt businessman, Politican and Official can launder a few hundred million dollars out of Government, usually without getting caught, and if they are caught they pay no legal penalty whatsoever because of their control of the RCMP and Courts,…… its that simple and about a hundred years ago a British Leader, Lord Acton, stated “power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely” (google), perhaps those facts answer Dr.Atkinson’s question, why is Canada so corrupt?

But taxpaying voters should take heart, the Corruption driven financial meltdown has forced the Western Liberal Democracies right to the edge of the abyss and has created a situation where against all odds a Black man (Obama) was elected President of the United States simply by promising to clean up US corruption and the Harper Feds have promised to clean up Canadian Corruption “harper and white collar crime” (google).

Outlook Saskatchewan Community Leader Lloyd Smith tells me that, against all odds, Saskatchewan’s Rural Leaders have stopped phoning him (Smith) to laugh at this Web site and to tell him (Smith), that I (Lee) am the stupidest man in Canada if I believe that I can get zoning for the Argues thirty million dollar residential subdivision without bribing RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick…..so what has happened?

It matters little why the Rural Leaders have gone quiet. It may be because the facts set out in this Website has finally, after over two years, beaten through the Rural Leaders arrogance into their brains, but something has caused it and while there can be no doubt whatsoever but that it may be a “false euphoria” (google), my friends and colleagues, who until Link nearly lost the Douglas-Park By-Election, had rated my (Lee)s chances at obtaining zoning for the Argues thirty million dollar residential subdivision development without bribing Donna Strudwick at zero, now rate my chances at getting zoning for the Argues without bribing Strudwick at fifty/fifty.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that Links near defeat in Douglas-Park shows that my (Lee)s plan has worked to a certain extent; actually it was Dr. Carl Baar’s plan, (who is co-author of the Judicial Council of Canada report, Masters in Their Own House,) so all that I (Lee) did was what Dr. Baar told me to do and kept turning over rocks until I obtained the Supreme Court of Canada Summary Statement for Case 31940, note segment of this Web site dated August 25th 2009 TURNING OVER ROCKS, and that Supreme Court Summary Statement was probably the turning point for the Argues now estimated fifty/fifty chance at obtaining development zoning for their thirty million dollar residential subdivision without bribing RM Administrator Strudwick.

I (Lee) then used that Supreme Court of Canada Summary Statement as the basis for this Web site and will continue to run the Access zap2it Ads and this Web site making the point that all Economists preach that any Country that runs a “corruption economy” (google) such as Saskatchewan’s Rural Municipalities, is doomed and it is therefore logical to conclude that it is insanity to allow a gang of “white collar thugs” (google) such as the RMAA (Rural Municipal Administers Association), to have self regulating status http://www.rmaa.ca/ ( click onto Association Bylaws and Code of Ethics 04, 06 and 07) and require “flowers, chocolates and perfume” before providing zoning.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that I (Lee) am not the “stupidest man in canada” (google) as claimed by Saskatchewan’s Rural leaders, and that this Web site is not a joke as believed by the Rural Leaders and NDP Leader Link, but neither am I (Lee) the smartest, and to accomplish what has been accomplished so far is simply a matter of a good memory and endless patience coupled with the ability to focus and stay focused on the problem at hand, ie: obtaining zoning for the Argues thirty million dollar residential subdivision without bribing RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick.

My closest personal friends have long ago concluded that my (Lee)s actions, (as Freud set out in his philosophies), are that of a “paranoid obsessive compulsive freud” (google) but to the Argue family and I (Lee), serving as their (the Argues) Representative, it is simply a refusal to roll over and play dead for a bit of corrupt Government scum such as Donna Strudwick and since my only goal is to obtain zoning for the Argues thirty million dollar residential subdivision without bribing RM Administrator Strudwick then the forty percent drop in popular support and near defeat of NDP Leader Link (who had insisted that Saskatchewan’s Rural Administrators, such as Strudwick, had to remain in place with the power to demand bribes to provide development zoning), is a step in the right direction toward accomplishing that goal.

I (Lee), a experienced political watcher, believed that Link was in trouble when he had to struggle to win the NDP Leadership against contenders who were not a “nettie wiebe” (google) level candidate, and in addittion, I (Lee) drove Douglas-Park on Monday September 7th 2009, counting 157 (one hudred and fifty seven) signs for Link and 68 (sixty eight) for Kathleen and recalling when we (Links election team) used to have well over a thousand signs in every General election in Regina Elphinstone for Link and Harry Van Mulligan always had waves of signs on the Douglas-Park main routes, College, Winnipeg, Quinn Drive, Broadway, and the like. Beyond that Kathleen had Link outsigned in the high rent areas of Douglas-Park located south of Wascana Creek and east of Park and on the former NDP stronghold of Quinn Drive.

I believed that Link had a problem but never in my wildest dreams did I imagine that it was as bad as it is. Link dropped forty percent in popular vote from what Harry Van Mulligan received in the 2007 General Election. Whether Links problems can be attributed to the well publicized NDP Meadow Lake Membership Fraud and the resulting RCMP Criminal Investigation or this Web site is a good question and I (Lee) am well aware there is no way for me to prove this Web site cost Link one vote in Douglas Park but there is no way for a Advertising Executive to prove that a picture ran on television for thirty seconds of a pretty redheaded girl in a pretty summer dress sitting on a pretty little bench in a pretty little park with a Irish Setter at her feet drinking a bottle of Coke sells one bottle of Coke but the Coke Brain Trust has those type of Ads churned out decade after decade after decade and kept on selling Coke.

When the new NDP Leader Link chose Regina Douglas-Park as the means to get back in the Legislature many people told me (Lee) that he (Link) would win in a landslide , ( sweep was actually the term used) but the fact is that a political neophyte, Sask Party Candidate Kathleen Peterson, nearly beat him. Web readers who are card carrying NDP members should note that in the 2007 General election Harry Van Mulligan received 5089 (five thousand and eighty nine) votes in Regina Douglas-Park and Link received 3083 (three thousand and eighty three) votes in the By-election, a drop of over 2000 (two thousand) votes or 40% from November of 2007 to today in 2009.

Card carrying NDP Web readers should also note that in the 2007 General Election Harry Van Mulligan had a majority of 2100 (twenty one hundred) votes over his Sask Party opponent, Scott Simpkins, and in the By-election Link had only a 500 (five hundred) majority over Sask Party political neophyte Kathleen Peterson who received 2585 (twenty five hundred and eight five) votes in the Douglas-Park By-election, so there can be no doubt whatsoever but that the NDP supporters stayed home in droves.

On the evening of September 22nd, the day after the By-election, NDP Leader Link was on the evening news setting out that he (Link) had no interest in numbers, only winning or losing, and pointing out that he (Link) had won both By-elections….Links public statement is utter nonsense,…… all Senior Politicians and their back room geniuses only interest is numbers and the “ probability theory” (google).

Numbers is all any of them (Senior Political advisors) in any Political Party ever do all day every day and there is no doubt whsatsoever but that the NDP back room geniuses were sitting in Tommy Douglas House watching the By-election numbers come in on Monday night and getting sicker by the minute, because now it does not matter how many mistakes Premier Brad and his Brain Trust makes, as NDP plans and policy is now structered the NDP is doomed, the numbers prove it and the NDP backroom geniuses know it, given the numbers they can not win the November 2011 General election.

For a truly expert setting out of the By-election numbers and the implications for the NDP of those numbers, all Web readers, especially card carrying NDP members, are advised to read Political Columnist Murray Mandryk carefully, “ underwhelming byelection victories should concern lingenfelter mandryk” (google).

All card carrying NDP Web readers are advised that the only hope the NDP has to form Government in November of 2011, or even to remain relevant, is to look to my (Lee)s plan for then Premier Calvert to win the 2007 General Election and now implement that plan for the November 2011 General election, note Web site segment dated July 27th, 2009, FLOWERS, CHOCOLATES AND PERFUME, ie: campaign on a policy of removing the RMs from the face of Saskatchewan, giving the resulting saving of $75,000,0000.00 (seventy five million dollar) in RM Administration costs to the 450 (four hundred and fifty) Villages as infrastructure grants and turn Rural Zoning control over to those Villages, Rural Saskatchewan would then thrive.

Up until the By-election date this Web site received 5600 (fifty six hundred) household visits, ( fifteen thousand voters) in all of Regina, there are ten Regina Constituencies so assuming that 1500 (fifteen hundred) Douglas-Park voters read this Website by voting day that would account for three quarters of the forty percent drop in Links vote.

The Access zap2it ads go into 55,000 (fifty five thousand) Regina households and a projection more “probability theory” (google) stuff, actually educated guessing, shows that by General Election day, November 2011, virtually all of the 55,000 (fifty five thousand) Regina house holds, 120,000 ( one hundred and twenty thousand) voters will have seen the Access Website ad and the households with internet will have see this Website, and those that do not have internet could get a copy from a friend and if the forty percent drop in popular support Link suffered in the Douglas-Park By-election is applied to all Regina Ridings the NDP will lose five Regina seats.

All card carrying NDP Web readers should note that this Web site was set up in July of 2007, four months before the 2007 General election, with only spotty localized targeted ads and many of Saskatchewan’s one thousand Bloggers believe that over that four month period this Website caused Calvert to lose the ten ridings he lost by less than three hundred votes each in the November 2007 General election but the Rural Leaders ignored this Website until Access began the one year contract for zap2it ads in January of 2008 in Yorkton and North Battleford, with the only result then being the Rural Leaders phoning Outlook Community Leader Lloyd Smith, telling him (Smith) that this Website is a joke and I (Lee) am the stupidest man in Canada if I think that I can get zoning for the Argues without bribing RM Administrator Donna Strudwick.

I (Lee) remind any NDP Web readers ,who are outraged by my (Lee)s actions to try to obtain development zoning for the Argues without bribing Donna Strudwick, that the Argues were long time CCF/NDP supporters, Shari Argues is of Scottish descent and her Grandfathers were colleagues and confidants of Tommy Douglas, active in the formation of the Wheat Pool and CO-Ops and therefore under Saskatchewan law, should have been granted zoning without bribing Strudwick, simply because the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal, ruled in Harker v. Regina (City), [1995] 4 W.W. R. 276 (Sask. C.A.) that all zoning issues are political and the Courts must act only where the process has descended to farce.

But instead of granting the Argues zoning following that Saskatchewan High Court ruling that all zoning issues are political and the Courts must not interfere, NDP Premier Calvert’s Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, ruled that the Argues only option to have a chance to obtain zoning approval for their thirty million dollar residential subdivision development was to carry “flowers, chocolates and perfume” (pay bribes) to Donna Strudwick, a Senior official, who Queens Bench Judge, the Honorable Lady Justice Janet McMurtry, ruled reports to the Premier, “strudwick reports to premier” (google).

Then when I (Lee) complained to then Premier Calvert about the need to pay bribes to Strudwick to obtain development zoning, she (Strudwick) sued me for libel and the Courts ignored their earlier ruling and did interfere, finding me (Lee) guilty of libel, “supreme court of canada summary statement case 31940”(google), and to me (Lee) these uncontradicted facts, in a Western Liberal Democracy, are “sickening unto death” (google).

I (Lee) ask all Web readers who are NDP members, to think about these facts as established by the Supreme Court of Canada. I (Lee) ask that all outraged NDP Web readers, before taking up a collection to have me (Lee) shot, to think about it, the Argue family simply will not pay bribes, as ruled by their NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, as being their only option at having a chance to obtain development zoning, and the Argues, or I (Lee), are not the kind of people to give up and go away, so what did Premier Calvert’s Brain Trust think was going to happen next?

All Web readers who are card carrying NDP should take a deep breath, think about the fact they (the CCF/NDP) have ruled Saskatchewan over the last seventy years, and the “white collar thugs” (google) serving as their officials since Blakney and his Queens clones came to power in the 1971 have collected millions of dollars in bribes from the business community since that time and assuming that Dr. Atkinsons studies are accurate 66% (sixty six percent) of the Saskatchewan taxpaying voters now believe Politicans are corrupt “the paradox that is canada atkinson” (google). Well, the fact is these “chickens are coming home to roost” (google), Links near loss in Regina Douglas-Park proves it.

I (Lee) also ask all Web readers who are card carrying NDP’s to think about the fact that Saskatchewan Opposition Parties usually do well in by-elections and Political Columnist Murray Mandryk believed the NDP should have done well “on past performances by election comfortably in ndp’s pocket regina leader post murray mandryk” (google) but Link nearly lost the By-election and the NDP vote count dropped by forty percent from their (the NDP) vote count in the November 2007 General Election results, and this does not bode well for the NDP at the November 2011 General Election and for that matter it does not bode well for the Saskatchewan taxpayers.

Taxpaying voters are reminded that following 1982, and the collapse of the NDP under Blakeney, the Devine Gang “disappeared” Ten Billion dollars of Saskatchewan tax payer dollars over a ten year period and specifically, Lane (the Hon J. Gary), just prior to Mulroney appointing him (Lane) to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal, he (Lane), serving one year as the Devine Gang Minister of Finance “disappeared” 1.2 (one point two) Billion dollars in a one year period “ gov’t made devine error mandryk” (google) out of a Provincial budget of five Billion dollars.

All taxpaying voters should just picture in their minds that arrogant corruption of Lane (the Hon J.Gary), now a Court of Appeal Judge, he (Lane) caused 25% , twenty five percent, a full quarter, of the taxpayers money that he (Lane) had access to over a one year period to “disappear” into thin air, this must never be allowed to happen again and only the NDP Caucus and Membership can prevent it from happening again.

The first thing the NDP Membership must do is get through to Link that both he (Link) and Drummond already have enough money stockpiled now. Their great, grand kids could not possible squander the millions of dollars that Link has acquired through his Nexen stock options after the Saskatchewan Oil Crown, Wascana, was sold to Can-oxy (Nexen) and moved to Calgary and Link went along with it (Wascana) to Calgary. Nor should taxpaying voters forget the hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars “profit” that Drummond “acquired” through his Channel Lake natural gas buy low/sell high scheme, note Website segment dated Septermber 2^nd 2009 FOLLOW THE MONEY.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that there is no need for Link (and Drummond) to plan a scheme to acquire more Saskatchewan tax payer dollars through taxpayer subsidized Ethanol plants, note Website segment dated September 2nd 2009, entitled FOLLOW THE MONEY, even if Calvert, as Premier, ignored the fact that Saskatchewan had plenty of energy options, “ saskatchewan clean coal technology” (google), and “saskatchewan oil sands” (google) and “saskatchewan nuclear option” (google) and “saskatchewan premier unveils world’s first prototype hydrogen/diesel pickup truck” (google) and “saskatchewan wind power’ (google) and he (Calvert) set up the worst possible, the worst imaginable, energy option for Saskatchewan in the first place, “calvert supports saskatchewan ethanol production” (google).

If the Calvert Brain Trust was so determined to pour more Saskatchewan taxpayer dollars into subsidization of something regarding energy development, why not, instead of subsidizing the ongoing Ethanol idiocy, as promoted by people like Gary Drummond, why did the Calvert Brain Trust not subsidize a couple of brave Alberta farm families near Vegreville, “prarie agri-preneurs battle megafarm waste morgan” (google).

I (Lee) ask all Web readers, as casual interest, to note that truly, there is nothing new under the Sun. I (Lee) recall a man I came to know many years ago, a pig farmer just south of Yorkton and when I read the Morgan article as set out in the preceding pargraph regarding the work by the farm Families near Vegreville, I recall the Yorkton pig farmer telling me he was very impressed, when on a tour of the South West United States, he came upon a Plantation dating back a couple hundred years where they ( the original Plantation) had a system where all the manure was put in a large covered pit and the resulting methane gas was piped to the Barns and the Plantation House, and used as both gas lights and for cooking.,”methane gas from pig manure used for lights and cooking crellin’s hill” (google)……the Southern Plantation that Yorkton pig farmer saw was being used as a museum and exhibit and was functioning exactly as it had over two hundred years before, and he, as a the pig farmer, was very interested and impressed.

As more casual interest stuff regarding today’s use of taxpayer subsidized Ethanol and Bio-Diesel, it should be noted that Rudolph Diesel’s first diesel motor, designed in 1900, ran on peanut oil (Bio-Diesel) “rudolph diesel 1900 diesel motor ran on peanut oil” (google) and Henry Ford’s famous Model A would run on moonshine whiskey,

“ fords model a ran on moonshine “ (google) which Kentucky Hills in the US and our own Canora-Gorlitz area backwood stills, (distillerys) are nothing more or less than Calverts, Links and Drummonds Ethanol Plants.

As furthur example, the Weyburn Distillery has been converted into a Ethanol plant, “weyburn distillery changed to ethanol plant” (google) however Rudolph Diesel and Henry Ford did not have massive conflicts of interest as Provincial Premiers running Political Partys and controlling Cabinets supporting the use of massive taxpayer subsidies to produce peanut oil and moonshine whiskey to power the cars and trucks they (Ford and Diesel) built and sold to the taxpaying public.

To add more idiocy to insult to taxpayer injury, the Calvert Brain Trust ignored a growing realization in the scientific community that the Worlds crude oil supply is virtually unlimited because hydrocarbons are being produced, as this is written, below the earths crust, (which is twenty five miles below the surface), at about the fifty mile level in the mantle of the earth, (more highschool physics) and these hydro carbons, once produced, migrate toward the surface to mix with the existing pools of crude oil located in the earths crust, pools that were formed by the Glaciers squashing forests and dead dinosaurs, “do dead dinosaurs fuel our cars solomon” (google).

These facts regarding the availability of crude oil have been studied since the late 1800’s and are now a reality, yet the Calvert Brain Trust insisted on going ahead with the idiocy of taxpayer subsidized Gary Drummond Ethanol Production and (I (Lee) suggest that the NDP Caucus and Membership advise Link to forget about using the corruption and self governing status of the RMAA (Rural Municipal Administrators Association) to control Rural Zoning and zoning approval for even more Ethanol Plants and get down to business and plan to try to win the November 2011 General election and plan to run a Provincial Administration that will serve all Saskatchewan taxpaying voters, Urban and Rural alike, it would be easy enough to do.

I (Lee) remind all NDP Website readers that Grant Devine sought a seat in the 1978 General Election under Dick Collvers Progressive Conservative Leadership but was defeated and following his victory as the Progressive Conservative Leader was again defeated in the 1979 Estevan by-election but then used the three years between 1979 and 1982 to tour the Province and won a landslide against the NDP’s Blakeney in 1982.

I (Lee) remind all NDP Web readers that after the 1982 disaster for the NDP under Blakeney that it was Link as NDP Party President who saved the NDP from oblivion by spending the next years traveling the Province visiting every NDP Riding Executive until they (the NDP) nearly won the 1986 General Election.

In the countdown to the next General Election it would be even easier for Link than it was for Devine between 1979 and 1982 and Link himself between 1982 and 1986. Link has just finished touring the Province schmoozing the NDP riding Executives during his Leadership campaign and he (Link) could just start over again, touring the Province schmoozing the NDP Riding Executives as well as the Village Mayors and Councils in each Constituency, setting out for them the plan that I (Lee) set out for Calvert to win the 2007 General election, note this Website segment dated July 27^th 2009, FLOWERS CHOCOLATES AND PERFUME.

It would be one of the easiest campaigns that was ever ran in Saskatchewan or in any Western Liberal Democracy. Link has spent a decade travelling the world running errands for Nexen’s President Charlie Fischer, schmoozing the Dictator and his thugs of every oil rich, hot climate, banana belt country, in the world, so travelling Saskatchewan talking to Village Mayors for a couple of years would be a walk in the Park for him.

In addittion, every Village has a Internet address, which SUMA (Saskatchewan Urban Municipal Association) will probably provide the NDP Party free of charge, so parallel to Link touring the Province for the next two years schmoozing the Mayor and Council of the 450 (four hundred and fifty) Villages and small Towns the NDP back room geniuses could use the Internet to send a stream of information to the Village and small Town Officials pointing out the advantages of having the RM’s removed from the face of Saskatchewan and use the $75,000,000.00 ( seventy five million dollars) annual saving in RM Administration cost to give each Village and small Town a annual infrastructure grant of $100 000.00 (one hundred thousand dollars) and Rural Zoning control so as to allow the Developers to use that new Village infrastructure to complete the developments that the RM’s now deny until their Rural Administrators bribes are paid.

Despite Cabinet secrecy a bemused Web reader has brought to my (Lee)’s attention that in 2001 the Romanow Officials prepared legislation to remove the RM’s from the face of Saskatchewan and replace them with Counties, which plan the Romanow Cabinet of the day approved, only to be overruled by Premier Romanow himself. Roy Romanow was, and is, a very great man, he literally saved Saskatchewan from bankruptcy following the Devine Gangs”disappearance” of the Saskatchewan taxpayers Ten Billion dollars, despite this fact Premier Romanow overruled his own Cabinet and also ordered legislation making the RMAA (Rural Municipal Administrators Association) a self-regulating agency http://www.rmaa.ca and click onto Association bylaws and Code of Ethics 04, 06 and 07. Granting this gang of “white collar thugs” (google) self regulating status similar to lawyers, accountants et al, was as insane a act as it would have been to allow the bootleggers of the 1920’s self regulating status.

The Calvert Cabinet was basically the same as Premier Roys, so when RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick refused to grant the Argues zoning until she (Strudwick) was carried “flowers, chocolates and perfume”, and when Strudwick used

“ libel chill” (google) to destroy me (Lee) for refusing to back off from my efforts to obtain zoning for the Argues without carrying her (Strudwick) the “flowers, chocolates and perfume,” that their Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, ruled must be carried to Strudwick to have a chance to obtain zoning, the Calvert Cabinet “ knew or ought to have known” (google) all about the horror and corruption of the Saskatchewan’s Rural Municipal Zoning policies and practices so why did then Premier Calvert refuse to overrule RM Administrator Strudwick and instead threw the Argues and I (Lee), the Argues Representative, to her (Strudwick)’s corrupt RCMP and Judicial wolves?

Another bemused Web reader, after reading the September 2nd Website segment FOLLOW THE MONEY reminded me (Lee) that to be fair to Link (and Drummond), it was Calvert, as Premier, who first started the “drop dead economic idiocy”(google) notion of Saskatchewan taxpayer subsidized Ethanol Plants “ calvert supports saskatchewan ethanol production” (google) and that the Federal Liberals picked up on the idea and then the Harper Feds carved it in stone “federal government mandates 5% etanol use by 2010” (google) and because of that Ethanol support Strudwick, and her ilk ( the RMAA) would have had control of Calvert because if he (Calvert) wanted zoning for Ethanol plants he would have to bow to Strudwick and the RMAA demands for bribes from the Developers (such as the Argues) to provide development zoning.

The Calvert Cabinet, notwithstanding their original decision with Romanow as Premier, to remove the RMs from the face of Saskatchewan, refused to follow through on their original Cabinet plan to carry legislation removing the RM’s from the face of Saskatchewan, which would have solved the Argue zoning problem with Donna Strudwick and gone a long way to solve economic problems in Rural Saskatchewan, which the Urban (City) taxpayer subsidization of Ethanol plants is not going to do, why was that done?, a public inquiry with subpoena power would answer that question.

The NDP Caucus and Membership could draw to the attention of their new Leader, Link, that he may as well get down to business and use his high intelligence, great ability, energy and experience to form a Government that will serve all Saskatchewan taxpayers, Urban and Rural alike, because in the future it is going to be a lot harder to “acquire” hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars, note the Harper Feds are committed to cleaning up white collar crime “harper and white collar crime” (google) and even if Link and Drummond do “aquire” those taxpayer dollars it is going to be a lot harder to hide the money “taxman takes on swiss bank to reveal its canadian fortunes greg mcarthur” (google) and “unearth the dirty money diane francis” (google).

The NDP Caucus and Membership could draw to the attention of their new leader, Link, that whether because of the effort by United States President Obama to clean up corruption in the US, or because of the fact that Government corruption has forced the Worlds economy right to the edge of the abyss, there can be no doubt whatsoever but that there is obvious change to the past policy practice of the Western Liberal Democracy voters accepting the corruption of their Leaders and Senior officials.

Saskatchewan is about as corrupt as it is possible to be in a Western Liberal Democray so Saskatchewan is a administrative area where NDP Leader Link can set a example by using his great ability to try to create a economic climate where a honest taxpayer can make a honest dollar because the way it stands now here in Saskatchewan the only possible way for any citizen to accomplish any economic goal is to have the kind of soul that can force its self to pay bribes to Government official scum such as RM of Edenwold Administrator, Donna Strudwick.

Earle and Sharie Argue are perfect examples of honest Saskatchewan citizens who failed because their souls will not allow them to pay bribes to Government Official scum such as RM Administrator, Donna Strudwick. The Argues are among the most honest, able and hardworking people that I (Lee) have had the privilege to know and they (the Argues), through hard work and diligence were able to save two million dollars toward financing their dream development on their quarter of land east of Regina which has a spring flowing at 350 gallons per minute of high quality water, land they had owned for the last thirty years and had originally bought and used to grow hay for their race horses.

When the Government of Saskatchewan’ Municipal Planning Department set aside a area of the RM of Edenwold as being designated for Residential development that area included the Argues quarter, so the Argues, believing that their chance to go ahead with their dream development had come, applied to the RM of Edenwold Council for development zoning and as the paper trail filed in Court shows, at a RM Council meeting on Wednesday October 1^st 1997 they (the Argues) were granted conditional permission to go ahead with a 160 lot development to be completed in four forty lot stages, and one day later, on October the 2^nd, 10097, the RM Planning Director, Brad Armstrong, M.C.I. P. wrote the Argues, on RM letterhead, stating that the RM shall grant zoning for the Development, note Website segment dated July 26^th 2007, ZONING PROBLEM WITH A RURAL MUNICIPALITY.

All Web readers are asked to note that in law the word SHALL designates that it must be done “shall blacks law dictionary” (google) so based on legal advice from Regina lawyer and NDP Activist, Ron Gates, the Argues spent $175,000.00 (one hundred and seventy five thousand dollar) of their capital completing conditions to the point that they had received all Provincial Departmental approvals, which fact was confirmed by the SMB (Saskatchewan Municipal Board) in their ruling of December 22nd, 2004.

But the fact also is that, at the time, notwithstanding the legal definition of the word SHALL, and Ron Gates assurances, after the Argues had spent the money, $175,000.00 (one hundred and seventy five thousand dollars) and meet all Provincial Department conditions, as imposed by the RM of Edenwold Council, and proven to the Council through Engineering reports, the RM Administrator, Donna Strudwick, acting for the Premier of Saskatchewan, overruled her Council and with out giving a reason, refused to grant the Argues zoning for their residential subdivision development and advised the Argues, in writing, of her refusal as Administrator and ruled that the Argues had no right of Appeal.

All Web readers are asked to note that Strudwick, as RM of Edenwold Administrator, reports to the Premier and Minister Responsible,“ strudwick reports to premier” (google) and her (Strudwick)s decision, acting on behalf of Premier Calvert and the Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, to overrule her Council and deny the Argues zoning for their dream development was taken in conjunction with her (Strudwick’s) Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, ruling that the Argues only option at having a chance to obtain zoning was to carry her ( Strudwick) “ flowers, chocolates and perfume ” (bribes)…… “supreme court of canada summary statement case 31940”(google)

Strudwick, acting for her Premier (Calvert) and Minister Responsible, (Taylor) has cost the RM of Edenwold Ratepayers about $400,000.00 (four hundred thousand dollars) annually in lost property and school tax revenue, over four million dollars to date, and cost the Argues ten million dollars in pretax profit on their Development project and this loss to the Saskatchewan taxpayers due to Strudwicks refusal to grant development zoning does not begin to try to calculate the loss due to Strudwicks refusal to allow zoning for the Argues planned beer brewing plant and its fifty high paying jobs.

I (Lee) repeat; there can be no doubt whatsoever but that while pursuing economic development here in Saskatchewan all the virtues known to man ( and woman), intelligence, honesty, thrift, ability, hard work, do not matter one iota, the only thing that matters here in Saskatchewan is to have the kind of soul that can force themselves to pay bribes to Official Government scum, such as Donna Strudwick, BUT the truly terrifying problem is the corruption of the RCMP and Judiciary protecting the official corruption of Strudwick and her ilk, the RMAA (Rural Municipal Administrators Association).

As this Website gains public attention I (Lee) am occasionally asked; is it as bad as is set out in your Website and can it get any worse?, and the answer is; “Yes Virgina, it is that bad and it can get a lot worse”. I (Lee) suggest that Web readers look at a L.A. Times article “ russia battling legal nihilism megan k.stack los angeles times” (google) for a vivid description of how corrupt a Countries’s Political, Bureaucratic, Police and Judiciary can get if official corruption is not addressed, and there can be no doubt whatsoever but that Saskatchewan is on the same path, headed in the same direction, as Russia.

“color of law” (google) is new legal phrase, coined in the United States and enshrined in law in the US as a Criminal Code offense and while it is not yet in Canada’s Criminal Code, it is defined in Black’s Legal Dictionary, as Police and Judicial Authorities using the law enforcement agencies to achieve corrupt ends for themselves, their colleagues, family and friends “color of law black’s law dictionary 6th edition”(google)

The “color of law” stuff set out in the preceding paragraph shows that the situation here in Saskatchewan is the same as it is in Russia, where here in Saskatchewan RCMP Staff Sergeant Brent Lewis, when told to do so by Strudwick’s two-bit shyster of a Government lawyer, Glen Dowling, Staff Lewis used his Police power as a RCMP Staff Sergeant to destroy the evidence of Strudwicks corruption that the Outlook Community Leaders had given him ( Staff Lewis), note segment of this Website dated October 4th, 2007 “Update with reply from Law Society of Saskatchewan”.

All Website readers are reminded that Strudwick is a Senior government official who reports to the Premier “ strudwick reports to premier” (google) and the Saskatchewan Courts are so massively corrupt that the Queens Bench Judge, the Honorable Lady Justice Janet McMurtry, who was assigned to hear Strudwick’s libel action against me (Lee), the Argues Representative, had been married to Premier Calverts NDP Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Chris Axworthy, note the first Website segment dated July 26th, 2007, “ ZONING PROBLEMS WITH A RURAL MUNICIPALITY’”.

The Outlook Community Leaders, in particular Lloyd Smith, have gone right to the wall to try to see the Argues obtain zoning for their development without bribing RM Administrator, Donna Strudwick. An example of the Outlook Community Leaders exemplary work; before I (Lee) filed my letter to then Premier Calvert complaining about his (Calvert)s Minister Responsible, Len Taylor’s, ruling that my only option to obtain zoning for the Argues development was to bribe Strudwick, the Outlook Leaders obtained a “legal opinion” (google) from four different Lawyers who all advised that my (Lee)s complaint letter to Calvert set out the exact truth and therefore was not libel and notwithstanding Lady Janet’s Judgment upholding Strudwicks’s claim of libel the Outlook Community legal advisors have maintained that same position to this day.

The Outlook Community Leaders positions have always been sound and they have maintained the opinion that the only possible way that RM Administrator Donna Strudwick could have blocked zoning for the Argues development until she (Strudwick) was carried her “flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes), is to have blackmailed the Calvert Administration into submission, which I (Lee) believe that Strudwick could have done over zoning for Ethanol Plants but that is not the “smoking gun” (google) stuff the Outlook Community believes to be the facts of the situation..

There is, in fact, actually a “smoking gun” (google) because I (Lee) can prove to a public inquiry that during the second Devine Administration, Lane (the Hon J. Gary) held a series of high school girl/cocaine parties at the Squire Motor Hotel in Fort Qu’ Appelle for sitting Saskatchewan Federal (Queens and Appeal Bench) Judges and Senior Progressive Conservative lawyers in line to be appointed Federal Judges by Mulroney but that “smoking gun” evidence would apply only to the Devine Gang Conservative’s and not the NDP Politicians Senior Officials and lawyers.

The problem with the Outlook Community Leaders blackmail belief is that notwithstanding a diligent digging effort by both the Outlook Community Leaders and I (Lee) nothing has surfaced, except for Calverts desperate need for Ethanol plant zoning, (which Strudwick could have used to blackmail the Calvert Brain Trust), whereas my (Lee)s claim regarding Lanes (the Hon J. Gary) high school girl/cocaine parties is a easy enough claim to prove because virtually all of the then Devine Gang back bench MLA’s are now back in their ridings running their farms and businesses and a few of these guys (Devine Gang backbench) were instructed to provide a chauffeur service taking van loads of high school girls out to Fort Qu’Appelle to those parties, just like taking a high school girls volley ball team to the next Town, and I am certain that some of them ( the Devine Gang backbench MLA’s) would talk.

I (Lee) also know that it can be proven to a public inquiry that Strudwick worked closely with Lane ( the Hon J. Gary) through Lanes entire political and Judicial career and it is probable/possible that a inquiry Commission and Counsel would accept my claim that Strudwick would have known about Lanes high school girl/cocaine/Squire Motor Hotel parties and could/would have used that information for blackmail purposes, BUT the fact is that none of it applies to the Calvert Brain trust and while the timing is bang on to fit Lady Janet, none of it could have possibly had anything to do with her ( the Honorable Lady Justice Janet McMurtry), who is rock solid NDP and always has been.

Lady Janet graduated from Delhousie University in 1985, was admitted to the Saskatchewan Bar in 1986, was a Partner in the NDP law firm of Woloshyn and Company (the original Taylor/CCF Law firm), and she (Lady Janet ) married the NDP MP, MLA and Provincial Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Chris Axworthy, and Lady Janet was then appointed a Provincial Court Judge by the NDP in 1994.

The only Saskatchewan Queens Bench Judge involved that fits the criteria to be blackmailed regarding Lanes high school girl/cocaine/Squire Motor Hotel parties is the Hon Ron Barclay, who was a Progressive Conservative Lawyer at the time, and was appointed to the Queens Bench by Mulroney and Lane in the late 1980’s and it was Judge Barclay that heard the original case when the Argues went to Court in 1999 over Strudwicks refusal to provide zoning, Argue (E.C.) Holdings, Ltd. Et al. v. Edenwold No. 158 (Rural Municipality) 1999, 179 Sask. R. 142 (Q.B.) aff’d (2002), 189 Sask. R. 130 (C.A.) and it was Judge Barclay who threw out the Argue request for zoning equity in his 1999 ruling that all zoning issues are political and the Courts must not interfere.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that, assuming the Outlook Community Leaders are right that Strudwick uses blackmail to achieve Court rulings that to have a better chance to obtain zoning the Developers must carry her (Strudwick) “flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribe her), the fact is that assuming Strudwick had blackmailed Judge Barclay into submission in 1999 using the threat of going public about Lane (the Hon J. Gary) high school girl/cocaine/Squire Motor Hotel parties as a lever, Strudwick could now use that fact as a threat, ie: Strudwick could threaten to go public over her original blackmail of Judge Barclay in the original 1999 Argue request for zoning equity.

The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal had originally ruled in the Casino Case, Harker v Regina (City), that all zoning issues are political and the Courts must not interfere and the Hon Ron Barclay had used that precedent to dismiss the Argues 1999 request for zoning equity. The Honorable Justice Lady Janet McMurtry is the Daughter of the legendary Roy McMurtry of Ontario Political and Judicial fame so Lady Janet would have had the fact of the endless Ontario Political/Judicial Corruption machinations and manipulations imbedded in her brain as a little girl sitting on her fathers knee and on top of that Lady Janet ended up marrying another legal/political legend, NDP Provincial Attorney General and Minister of Justice, Chris Axworthy, so Lady Janet either “knew or ought to have known” (google) exactly what was going on when Strudwick used

“ libel chill” to sue me (the Argues Representative) for libel.

For decades Senior Government official scum, such as Donna Strudwick, have been using “libel chill” (google) and their two bit shyster Government lawyers paid by the taxpayers to stop dissenter opposition to their (Government Official)s endless corrupt schemes but that questionable use of the Justice system to serve corrupt ends has reached a point where virtually all deep thinkers are arguing that “libel chill” (google) must be taken off the list of tools that corrupt Government officials have at their disposal to destroy infrequent dissenters.

Lady Janet, “ knew, or ought to have known” (google) all about “libel chill” (google) and its use by Senior Government officials, such as Strudwick, to serve corrupt ends and the fact that the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal had ruled that all zoning issues are political and the Courts must not interfere, ( not only general knowledge but because I (Lee) had told her so in Court documents filed on December 15th 2005) yet Lady Janet still found me ((Lee) the Argues Representative guilty of libel of Strudwick, WHY?

I (Lee) have managed this effort to obtain zoning for the Argues without carrying “flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) to Strudwick based on the assumption that Strudwick had control of the Calvert Administration and demanded that Calvert order the Courts to destroy me (Lee), the Argues Representative, so as to ensue that I (Lee) did not come up with a plan to see the Argues granted zoning, but I (Lee) might be wrong and Outlook right, perhaps Strudwick did use blackmail; but it was the original use of Lanes (the Hon. J. Gary) high school girl/cocaine parties to blackmail Judge Barclay into submission in 1999 when the Argues asked for a equity zoning solution, and now used that original fact of blackmail as a tool to now blackmail the Courts today into finding me (Lee) guilty of libel of her (Strudwick).

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that the Courts would cave in to her (Strudwick) blackmail demands because the Saskatchewan Courts constantly go to the end of the earth to cover up judicial error and only cave in when the media and public take a interest, such as in Milgaard and Martinsville, but in a situation where Strudwick was threatening to blow the whistle on Judicial corruption, such as a Queens Bench Judge bowing to blackmail threats, the Courts would move heaven and earth to cover that up, and the only possible means to pry the lid off is a public inquiry with subpoena power.

All Web readers are asked to note in a Murray Mandryk column dated September 4th, 2009 “ colin thatcher: a guilty man finds only crumbs of comfort murray mandryk” (google) the Regina Leader Post political columnist emphasised that the National Media Reporters, in particular Kevin Libin of the National Post, gives Colin Thatchers Book “final appeal colin thatcher” (google) considerable credence simply because of the notoriously corrupt Saskatchewan Justice system “ kevin libin: maybe colin thatcher picked the wrong province to be tried for murder” (google)

I (Lee) ask all Web readers to note that Kevin Libin of the National Post has compared the Administration of Justice in Saskatchewan to China and Iran and a Saskatchewan Blogger has compared the Argue/Strudwick zoning problem and the Saskatchewan Courts support of the fact that the Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, ruled that the Argues, to have a better chance to obtain zoning, must carry “flowers, chocolates and perfume” (pay bribes) to Governemnt official, Donna Strudwick, to Afghanistan, note Website segment dated April 26^th, 2009 SASKATCHEWAN/AFGHANISTAN CORRUPTION.

All Web readers are asked to note that Andrew Coyne, writing in the January 14 th 2008 Maclean’s, takes the media to task for refusing to take on Government corruption “hear no evil see no evil macleans andrew coyne” (google), but except for the fact that the Saskatoon Star Phoenix and Access TV went to the wall for me (Lee) and ran my Website ads the Saskatchewan news media refuse to touch the well documented Rural Zoning corruption, but maybe the National Media’s attention to Colins great book, “FINAL APPEAL”, has started to pry the lid off Saskatchewan’s Judicial corruption.

Notwithstanding the preceding well documented facts, its still impossible to obtain zoning approval for the Argues. Premier Brad owes his soul to SARM and the NDP Leader of the Official Opposition, Link, carrying on with Calvert’s day dream of Ethanol Plants “calvert promotes saskatchewan ethanol production” (google) has his own day dream of being able to use the corrupt power of the Rural Administrators and their ( the Rural Administrators) self regulating status and control of Rural Zoning to make a few hundred million dollars through more taxpayer subsidized Ethanol Plants.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that Premier Brad Wall, NDP Official Opposition Leader Link and the Rural Leaders, until Links By-election near defeat, have viewed this Web site to be a joke and a few of my close personal friends who have been following the Argue/Strudwick zoning situation since day one believe that while this Web site is well documented and effective and makes the point repeatedly of the absolute corruption of our Political leaders and their Senior officials as well as the RCMP and the Judiciary, my friends, nevertheless fear that all that I (Lee) have accomplished is to provide a ton of hard evidence to prove what all Saskatchewan Citizens already know, our Political Leaders, their Senior officials, the RCMP and Judiciary are massively corrupt.

I (Lee) repeat and emphasise, not all, but a few of my friends believe that I (Lee) am “carrying coal to newcastle” (google) because all that I have done is to reinforce what the voting public already know, our Political Leaders and Officials, their Judges and the RCMP, are all massivly corrupt and to make their point my friends use the same poll that I (Lee) have used in this Web site “ the paradox that is canada atkinson” (google) to prove that polling shows that 66% of Canadians believe that the Politicians and 39% believe that the Judiciary are affected by corruption.

It is self evident that my “glass half full’ (google) friends are right, our leaders and their officials are in fact massively corrupt and obviously the voting taxpayers are well aware of that fact, but a miracle occurred in the United States when a Black Man was elected US President simply by promising to clean up US Government corruption, a miracle occurred when Link nearly lost the Regina Douglas-Park By-election and dropped forty percent from the 2007 vote, and a third miracle could occur here in Saskatchewan, and the Argues be granted zoning without carrying “flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) to Strudwick and I (Lee) do not give a “tinkers dam” (google) if the odds of that happening are as little as one in a million or one in ten million, it is my (Lee)s, intent to go the last inch on the last foot of the last mile to try to make that Barack Obama level miracle happen here in Saskatchewan for the Argues.

BUT I (Lee) and my principals the Argues, have no illusions, we face the brutal fact that the media will not touch Rural Zoning corruption, (or any other Government, Police or Judicial corruption) with a ten foot pole and it is very difficult for anyone to deal with the problem where there is hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars at stake in corrupt profits for businessmen and through that massive corrupt profit massive amounts of cash available for bribes to Government Officials such as Donna Strudwick.

Another brutal fact is that while the NDP Caucus and Membership, following Links Regina Douglas-Park By-election near defeat and the NDP Meadow Lake Membership fraud and Criminal investigation fiasco, could try to force their new Leader Link to get down to business and try to form a Government that would clean up Rural Zoning corruption, Link is their duly elected Leader and has dictator level power until he is no longer Leader and will stand firm and keep day dreaming about using control of Rural Zoning corruption to personally make a few hundred million dollars out of taxpayer subsidized Ethanol Plants and will not budge on the issue of Rural zoning corruption no matter what his Membership demands.

CONSIDER THIS: Queens Bench Judge, the Honorable Justice Lady Janet McMurtry has ruled that the Rural Administrators report to the Premier, “ strudwick reports to the premier” (google), the Rural Administrators are the only segment of Saskatchewan Officials to have been given self regulating status http://www.rmaa.ca./ (and click onto Association By-laws and Code of Ethics 04,06 and 07) AND it is now carved in stone in Canadian Common Law that the Developers, to have a better chance to at the Rural Administrators granting Development zoning, must carry them flowers, chocolates and perfume, ( bribes) “supreme court of canada summary statement case 31940” (google), Link is not going to give up the absolute personal power, as Premier, over Rural Zoning.

The Premier of Saskatchewan, as ruled by the Honorable Lady Justice Janet McMurtry as fact, through the three hundred Rural Administrators, has direct personal, zoning control of all of Rural Saskatchewan and since Link now owns about forty sections of Saskatchewan farm land and has direct personal ties to the owners of the Provinces Ethanol Plants he (Link) is not going to give up the personal control that he, as Premier, has of the three hundred Rural Administrators, which Rural Administrators, under Canadian Common Law, Link may now legally pay bribes to provide development zoning, “supreme court of canada summary statement case 31940” (google).

Link is not going to run a campaign for the 2011 General Election based on the elimination of the RMs and turning zoning control over to the Villages which, (if successful), would result in his (Link) not making a few hundred million dollars selling Saskatchewan taxpayer subsidized Ethanol throughout Canada after the Federal Government mandates it’s use “federal mandate of 5% ethanol use after 2010” (google),

All Web readers are asked to note that a Federally mandated 5% Ethanol use (added to all gas sold at the pumps) would require two billion liters of Canadian Ethanol production annually “ federal mandate of 5% ethanol use after 2010” (google) and since Saskatchewan has about half of Canada’s farm land Saskatchewan could logically be expected to produce half of that Federal requirment, or about a Billion liters annually.

In 2004 the United States produced 3.4 Billion Gallons of Ethanol with 81 plants, about forty million gallons ( about one hundred and seventy million liters) annually with each plant and it is probable that Drummond’s Plant at Belle Plaine Saskatchewan would produce about the same each year as each plant in the United States produces, ie: about one hundred and seventy million liters, so if Saskatchewan needs to produce a Billion liters of Ethanol a year to full fill the Federal mandate that 5% Ethanol be added to our car gas and diesel fuel that means that six more Drummond size Ethanol plants would be needed here in Saskatchewan to meet that Federal mandate.

That means that Link and Drummond would need rural zoning control for two reasons, first so that the Rural Administrators could provide their (Link and Drummond)s six more Ethanol Plants with zoning approval, and secondly so as to prevent any competition to their (Link and Drummond)s Ethanol Plants, they need to have the Rural Administrators in place to use the Rural Administrators control of development zoning to block anyone else from producing Ethanol.

That is why control of Rural zoning is as crucial to Link as it was to Calvert, it is all about taxpayer subsidized Ethanol production, which is a endlessly losing undertaking except for the handfull of Saskatchewan families who own the plants and the farm land growing the plant product needed for Ethanol production, and the thugs who oversee their operations for them,CONVERSLY there can be no doubt whatsoever but that it is in the economic interests of the taxpaying voters in the Big Urbans (Citys) that Rural Zoning corruption is addressed, ie; to end taxpayer subsidized Ethanol production.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that it is common practice in all G-20 Countries that the business community must pay bribes to Senior Government officials to accomplish any economic development whatsoever “bribes or grease: the way of the world” (google), and it is also a fact that Canada is so corrupt that for years Revenue Canada allowed bribes to Government officials to be deducted as a cost of doing business, note Website segment dated August 25^th, 2009, TURNING OVER ROCKS.but it is also a fact that all of this is coming to a end for the lying corrupt Government scum, at least here in Canada, note “harper and white collar crime” (google).

I (Lee) am certain that notwithstanding University Professor Dr. Michael Atkinsons stated belief that what he (Dr. Atkinson) calls “petty” corruption, ie: bribes to Government Officials, such as RM Administrator, Donna Strudwick, to provide a service ie: zoning approval once all required conditions are met, is of no public policy concern no matter how widespread it is “ the paradox that is canada atkinson” (google) but I (Lee) believe that I am on safe ground to state repeatedly that virtually all Saskatchewan voting taxpaying citizens disagree with Dr. Atkinson and agree that a public inquiry is needed to determine whether or not Saskatchewan’s policy of insisting that the Developers only option to have a chance at obtaining Development zoning is to carry “ flowers, chocolates and perfume”( pay bribes) to the Rural Administrators.

I (Lee) believe this in part because notwithstanding Dr. Atkinsons University Public Policy lectures and seminars that “petty” corruption, bribes to government officials to provide a service to the taxpayer has no public policy meaning, every senior economist in the world believes and sets out as part of his/her lectures, that Countries that practice a “corruption economy” (google) are doomed.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that Government corruption can be addressed if taxpaying voters decide to deal with it, note the message that United States President Bill Clinton brought to Regina on Tuesay September 8th, 2009, “ clinton communitarian message of hope regina” (google) and if the Wall Administration does agree to a public inquiry, then the taxpaying voters must also demand that upon the completion of the inquiry, it be used as a guide to correct the neverending Government official zoning corruption in Rural Saskatchewan.

The voting taxpayers must also demand that the Government of the day, whoever is in power, after the 2011 General election, note the June 18th 2009 segment of this website, TWEEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE, ie: the Sask Party and Premier Brad Wall or the NDP Opposition Leader Link, do not simply shelve the inquiry results and put the taxpaying voters back to square one as regards the Corruption of the Rural Administrators, such as Donna Strudwick.

“Follow the money” is a famous quote immortalized in the movie “ all the presidents men” (google) and was the real life advise to the reporters attempting to bring then United States President Nixon to account for corruption and the term has been used ever since as advice to reporters to use that axiom as a basis to uncover Government corruption, and it makes sense because Government corruption is always about money.

I (Lee) believe that a Web reader had that version of “ follow the money” advice in mind when he ( the Web reader) advised me (Lee) to go up into the Avord Tower building in downtown Regina and note that Wil Olives Law offices take up floors nine and ten of the Avord Tower and that the Points West/Gary Drummond suites of offices are grouped together above the Olive law office at the east end of the fifteenth floor.

The Rural Leaders believe that I (Lee) am the stupidest man in Canada for thinking that I can get zoning for the Argues development without bribing RM of Edenwold Administrator, Donna Strudwick, nevertheless, stupid or not, I (Lee) instantly realized what the Web reader had taken note of and raised with me, this little band of Ethanol brothers consisting of Points West Consulting and Points West Management Consultants, President Gary Aldrich and Vice President Reg Gross, in Room 1560, Terra Grain Fuels-Drummond Group of Companies with Gary Drummond as Chairman of the Board in Room 1570 and a C-Green Aggregators operating out of Room 1560, the same office as Aldridge and Gross.

These people and their operations may be key word googled in the usual way, ie:
“ points west consulting”……. “c-green aggregators”…..and “terra grain fuels drummond group of companies” and their Websites provide insights as to what they do. Web readers are reminded that Gary Aldrich is the former Chief of Staff to Premier Roy Romanow and was the Campaign Chair for Lingenfelter (Link)’s successful run for the NDP leadership and Wil Olive is the same Wil Olive, Regina Lawyer and NDP “heavy hitter” (google), who organized the NDP attempt to address their Meadow Lake Membership fraud, which is now the subject of a RCMP Criminal investigation, and Gary Drummond of Channel Lake fame needs no introduction to the taxpayers but taxpaying voters new to Saskatchewan may wish to key word google “ gary drummond channell lake hansard” for the transcript of the Channel Lake inquiry into his (Drummond)’s activities.

Any taxpaying voter who wades through the hours of Hansard testimony at the Channel Lake hearing will reach the conclusion that Gary Drummond and a couple of Senior Provincial Government Officials were able to obtain an astonishing amount of Saskatchewan tax payers dollars, nearly a Billion dollars, when Drummond, through a company named Direct Energy, and working with the two Senior Saskatchewan Officials, was able to buy natural gas in Alberta at market prices and then immediately resell it through Sask Energy to the Saskatchewan taxpaying consumers at a vastly inflated mark up, everyones dream of “buy low sell high” (google), stock market stuff, but today would be insider trading, a contravention of the recently amended section 382.1 of the Criminal Code of Canada, “bill c-13 insider trading” (google)

Drummond has now used that Billion dollars of “profit” to establish “terra grain fuels and drummond group of companies” (google), which is simply another Ethanol plant and to add insult to injury, Drummond was somehow able to talk the Calvert Brain Trust into investing some Saskatchewan taxpayers dollars into his Ethanol plant ( located near Belle Plaine) and Drummond, with the help of Reg Gross, is now using the left over money out of the Billion Bucks that he ( Drummond) obtained out of the Channel Lake/Direct Energy/Sask taxpayer buy low/sell high venture to buy Saskatchewan farm land.

Some Web readers will say, great, so what, Ethanol is renewable energy and good for the environment, the farmers will have more sales for their crops, Reggie Gross and Gary Drummond should have statues built in their honor, except that the promoters of Ethanol have the exact same problem the Ancient Alchemists had when they tried to make fortunes convincing the kings of the day they could change lead into gold.

It is a fact that todays scientists can change lead into gold “turn lead into gold is alchemy real” ( google) but the process costs many times what the gold is worth and that is exactly the situation with Ethanol. The seeds of plants normally used for animal feed and food grains can be turned into a burnable fuel but it takes more energy to process and produce a gallon of Ethanol than the energy that gallon of Ethanol produces.

It all goes back to high school physics, “ energy can be neither created or destroyed” (google), all of the infrastructure and heat needed to change plant seeds ( hydrocarbons) into burnable fuel, (Ethanol or Bio-diesel) for a car, truck, or tractor, takes more energy than would be produced by the resulting Ethanol or Bio-diesel, and it is just plain common sense that it is going to take more energy than it produces when compared to real gas or diesel fuel (hydrocarbons) which has already been heated, squashed and squished into crude oil by mother nature ( the pressure of glaciers) over many centuries many millenniums ago so now only needs a bit more refining to make it a burnable fuel.

All Web readers are asked to review the work of several large US Universities on that point “ study slams economics of ethanol and biodiesel” (google). Ethanol production is not viable and the only possible way that Ethanol plants can function is with massive taxpayer subsidies “ethanol taxpayer subsidies” ( google).

Beyond that it is a myth that Ethanol use will reduce the production of so called greenhouse gas, C0-2, “the ethanol scam: rolling stone” (google) because the C0-2 by product of the energy consumed to produce a gallon of Ethanol is far greater than the C0-2 produced by burning a gallon of regular gas or diesel fuel in a car or truck. The production of Ethanol is not viable by any standard, yet the mid western prairie farmers in both the United States and Canada have somehow bribed, bulldozed and brow beaten our political leaders into providing the massive taxpayer subsidies needed to keep the Ethanol plants running.

Another problem for the taxpayers resulting from subsidized Ethanol is that when the farm land is used to grow plants to make Ethanol it is not growing food for animals and people and as food becomes scarce the law of supply and demand causes food prices to go up. Given the level of Government Official corruption our legislators and law makers both here in Canada and the United States are caught between a rock and a hard place in trying to keep the taxpayers out of bankruptcy and from starving to death in normal circumstance but trying to accomplish that in the middle of the worst financial meltdown since the 1930’s using Ethanol plants as a economic tool is a sick joke.

“big oil politicians” (google) have been a problem for the taxpayers for a hundred years but now big oil is moving to other areas of subsidy demands. A example is T. Boone Pickens and wind “lawrence solomon: fill up with subsidies” (google) using control of the politicians to obtain subsidy money from the taxpayers who must have a energy supply to heat their homes, drive to work, and cook their food, so the subsidy situation is getting worse regarding Ethanol/Bio-diesel and wind power in the US and Canada.

But here in Saskatchewan the Ethanol/Bio-Diesel situation is much worse than in the mid western US: we here in Saskatchewan have our very own home grown” archer daniels midland a case study in corporate welfare” (google) except that Saskatchewan’s Big Ethanol group will not have to waste any time and money “schmoozing” (google) the Politicians, who, because of the pesky taxpaying voters may not stay schmoozed, because they ( Big Ethanol) are themselves the Provincial Political Leaders; they have eliminated the middle man, good old prairie farm boy know how never fails.

I (Lee) ask all Web readers to review what I set out near the start of this segment of the Website, the Aldridge/Olive/Drummond group and their support of Link, who, if Premier Brad Wall or any of his Cabinet make one mistake, if there is one Devine type error, which has in fact already been made, “ gov’t made devine error murray mandryk” (google) Link will be on it like a lion on a gazelle and the NDP Meadow Lake Membership RCMP Criminal investigation notwithstanding, Link will be our next Premier and tax payer subsidized Big Ethanol a fact of life here in Saskatchewan and with Link as Premier controlling his Cabinet legislation will have been carried to make sure that tax subsidized Ethanol is as legal as breathing.

CONSIDER THIS: Drummond’s Ethanol plant was built using taxpayer money obtained in the Channel Lake “ bill c-13 insider trading” (google) debacle and the Calvert NDP SPUDCO cover up and payout to the LDPC (Lake Diefenbaker Potato Corporation) group, now also using Calgary oil money, the LDPC group have bought 120 sections of farm land in the Kindersly area of the Province, along with a small Ethanol Plant. Gary Drummond is buying as much farm land as he can get his hands on and Link owns about forty sections of farm land in the Shanouvan area and is buying more.

With Link as Premier and in control of Cabinet the taxpayer subsidies for Ethanol production will be set at whatever level can be legally taken from the taxpayers without bankrupting them and that amount is going to make the Devine Gang disappearance of ten Billion dollars of Saskatchewan tax payers money over ten years look like some one raided the stamp box for lunch money.

As set out above, to accomplish the Ethanol scheme they (Link et al) will need control of Cabinet but they will also need control of zoning in the Rural areas where the farm land is owned and the Ethanol plants built, and that means control of the RM’s and Rural Administrators, SARM (Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities) and especially Donna Strudwick’s Union, the RMAA (Rural Municipal Administrators Association), who will grant zoning in exchange for flowers, chocolates and perfume, ( bribes) “:supreme court of canada summary statement case 31940” (google)

I (Lee) believe that if Saskatchewan eliminated the RM’s and formed Counties,and if those Counties were set up to overlay the thirteen School and Health districts there would be thirteen Counties, each as big as a small European Country, and impossible for Link to control if Rural zoning control was turned over to the 450 Village Mayors and their Councils rather than each individual RM Administrator, such as Donna Strudwick.

I (Lee) believe that is has been shown that there can be no doubt whatsoever but that the reason the Calvert NDP went right to the wall to keep the RM system in place with the Rural Administrators, Strudwick and her RMAA, which are self regulating and a law onto themselves http://www.rmaa.ca/ ( click onto Association Bylaws and Code of Ethics 04, 06 and 07), is because those Rural Administrators will grant zoning for Ethanol Plants in exchange for flowers, chocolates and perfume, in effect bribes.

I (Lee) ask that all taxpaying Web readers give consideration to the fact that if SARM and Strudwick’s RMAA ( Rural Municipal Administrators Association) did not have absolute control of Rural Zoning it would be much more difficult to construct and run Ethanol Plants that are subsidized by the large Urban ( City) Taxpayers and that is the reason why the Calvert NDP went right to the wall to keep Strudwick and her ilk in place and functioning, please bear with me (Lee) while I provide a example of the lengths that the Calvert Brain Trust went to pander to the Rural Administrators:

I (Lee) ask all Web readers to note that Jack Hillson, the then Liberal Minister Responsible, in the NDP/Liberal coalition Government, had , in effect, resolved the Argue refusal to pay Strudwick bribes to obtain zoning by amending section 14.1 of the Urban Municipalities Act. The wording in the Act ( prior to amendment) required that Village boundaries had to be co-terminus (touching) any land that the Village wished to annex, but simply by removing the word “co-terminus” (google) from the Urban Act Jack ( Hillson) allowed any Village anywhere in the Province to annex any parcel of land out of any RM in the Province, thereby allowing any Developer to bypass the Rural Administrators demand for “flowers chocolates and perfume “( bribes) to provide Development zoning, Jacks plan was that simple.

Jack Hillson devised a perfectly simple and simply perfect plan to bypass the need for the Developers to bribe the Rural Zoning Officials, such as Donna Strudwick, to obtain Development zoning. Any corrupt Developer who’s soul could stand carrying flowers, chocolates and perfume (bribes) to a corrupt Government official, such as Donna Strudwick, to obtain development zoning, and was prepared to risk incarceration for five years for paying those bribes, could pay the bribes, or as a alternative, as designed by the then Minister Responsible, Jack Hillson, the Developer could simply find a Village to annex his development out of the RM. Jack Hillson’s plan was truly a beautiful plan.

Jack (Hillson) had amended the Urban Act to solve zoning problems with the Rural Administrators and I (Lee) tried to use that fact to solve the Argue zoning problem with Strudwick and during that process I was advised that Regina Lawyer and NDP activist, Wil Olive and his Development group, Randy Beattie et al, had reached agreement with the Senior Government officials controlling a Crown Corporation named SPMC ( Saskatchewan Property Management Corporation) to acquire, without tender, the 200 acre old Fort San property located on the north side of Echo Lake in the Qu’ Appelle Valley and Wil Olive then tried to go ahead with his plan to turn the 200 hundred acre old Fort San Property into a Lake front subdivision Development worth many millions of dollars when subdivided and sold as lake front lots.

The Old Fort San 200 acres is currently within the borders of the Village of Fort San which Village Mayor and Council had been fighting the Olive Development plan because the Village wanted to keep the Old Fort San 200 acres and beach front within their Village and open for public use, but when Jack Hillson amended section 14.1 of the Urban Act, thereby potentially solving the Argues zoning problem with Strudwick, Olive then used that fact to go ahead with his Development plan for the Old Fort San 200 acres by having the Town of Fort Qu’Appelle plan to annex the Old Fort San 200 acres out of the Village of Fort San, note page 551 of “ hansard crown and central agencies committee november 28th 2005” (google) and Regina Leader Post article by Colleen Silverthorn “Opponents condemn secrecy, potential patronage”, Saturday July 1st 2006.

Parallel to the Calvert Brain Trust’s determination to see Strudwicks bribes paid I (Lee) had been given a heads up as to what the Olive Development group was doing and had been tracking the Olive effort to have the Town of Fort Qu’Appelle annex the Old Fort San 200 acres out of the Village of Fort San and when it appeared to me (Lee) from the media and Hansard that the Olive development deal with the SPMC Officials for the Old Fort San Property was a done deal, then I (Lee) included reference to the Olive Old Fort San 200 acre Development scheme in my “ Flowers, Chocolates and Perfume” booklet that I (Lee) submitted on August 28th, 2006 to then Premier Calvert, his Cabinet and Caucus, and I made the point to Calvert, his Cabinet and Caucus, that the Olive use of the Hillson amendment to Section 14.1 of the Urban Act to support his Development scheme for the Old Fort San property was a exact precedent to support the use of the Hillson amendment to the Urban Act to accomplish a zoning solution for the Argues.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that the Calvert Brain Trust was determined to make sure that the Argues paid Strudwick her bribes to obtain zoning, but the Calvert Brain Trust was also smart enough to be worried about the fact that the media was already interested and would dig deeper if Wil Olive was granted the right to use the Hillson amendment to Section 14.1 of the Urban Act to have the Town of Fort Qu’appelle annex the Old Fort San 200 acres out of the Village of Fort San while at the same time their Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, had denied the Argues the right to use the Hillson amendment to have the Village of Wood Mountain annex the Argue 160 acre residential development out of the RM of Edenwold and had ruled that the Argues only option to obtain zoning was to carry flowers,chocolates and perfume, ( bribes) to the RM of Edenwold Administrator, Donna Strudwick.

I (Lee) was very proud of myself. I believed that the Argue zoning problem with Strudwick was solved because of the fact that I (Lee) had been given the heads up regarding the Olive Development scheme which I (Lee) believed placed the Calvert Brain Trust between a rock and a hard place. In short, I believed that since the Calvert Brain Trust had sanctioned the Olive Development scheme they had to grant the Argues the same consideration or it could turn into a public relations nightmare for them.

I (Lee) repeat; I believed that it was a certainty that since the Calvert Brain Trust had granted NDP Lawyer and Party activist Wil Olive the go ahead for his scheme with the SPMC officials for the Old Fort San 200 acres to be annexed out of the Village of Fort San by the Town of Fort Qu’Appelle then the Calvert Brain Trust would have no choice but to allow the Village of Wood Mountain to annex the Argues 160 acre subdivision out of the RM of Edenwold.

But astonishingly I (Lee) was wrong. The Calvert Brain Trust stood firm, the Olive precedent notwithstanding, the Calvert Brain Trust refused to allow the Village of Wood Mountain to annex the Argue subdivision out of the RM of Edenwold and insisted that the only option that I (Lee) had to obtain zoning for the Argues thirty million dollar residential subdivision development was to carry flowers, chocolates and perfume (bribes) to RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick, “ supreme court of canada summary statement case 31940” (google).

I (Lee) ask all Web readers to note that I had done exactly as the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal had ruled must be done and found a “political” solution to the Argues zoning problem with Strudwick. First by asking the then Minister Responsible Jack Hillson to solve the problem, which he ( Hillson) did by amending the Urban Act, and then by trying to use the precedent set by NDP Political activist Wil Olive to use the Hillson “political” amendment to Section 14.1 of the Urban Act to solve his (Olive)s zoning problem with the Village of Fort San, but the Calvert Brain Trust decision to pander to Wil Olive to solve his zoning problem with Fort San Village while denying the Argues the right to solve their zoning problem using the exact same solution caused even the idiots serving as Calverts Brain Trust to realize that they were headed into a potential public relations nightmare which could turn out to be as bad for them as SPUDCO.

So to solve the potential public relations nightmare the Calvert Brain Trust, instead of granting the Argues a zoning solution for their thirty million dollar residential subdivision development through annexation by the Village of Wood Mountain, as I (Lee) assumed they would have no choice but to do, they ( the Calvert Brain Trust) even though they had already approved the deal the Olive Development group had reached with the SPMC Officials to acquire the Old Fort San 200 acre property and turn it into a subdivision development worth several million dollars, rather than allow me (Lee) to find the Argues a zoning solution for their thirty million dollar residential subdivision without having to bribe RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, the Calvert Brain Trust, to solve their potential public relations problem, simply reversed their approval for the Wil Olive Old Fort San Development scheme.

A public inquiry with power of subpoena would provide a answer as to whether or not, and if so, how much taxpayer money the Calvert Brain Trust paid Regina Lawyer and NDP Activist Wil Olive to be quiet after the Calvert Brain Trust made the decision to cancel their approval of Olives done deal with the SPMC officials to acquire, without public tender, the Old Fort San 200 acre lake front property and then, so as to allow Wil Olive to make several million dollars selling lake front lots, to by pass the refusal of the Village of Fort San to approve development zoning by allowing the Town of Fort Qu’appelle to annex the Old Fort San 200 acres out of the Village of Fort San.

I (Lee) have no way to know exactly how much money Wil Olive expected to make by subdividing the Old Fort San 200 acre property into lake front lots but I do know that the CIBC development financing experts projected that the Argues would show a cash flow ( pretax) profit of ten million dollars from their 160 acre subdivision development so it is probable that Wil Olive would have made at least that much money out of a 200 acre lake front property Development on Echo Lake and there can be no doubt whatsoever but that a guy as aggressive as Wil Olive would not have walked away from a ten million dollar done deal without significant compensation.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that Wil Olive is a NDP “ heavy hitter” (google) and the Calvert Brain Trust would have had to have had a very good reason to renege on a done deal with a guy like Wil Olive simply to solve their public relations problem when I (Lee) put them ( the Calvert Brain Trust) between a rock and a hard place with my (Lee)s demands that they solve the problem of the Argues refusal to pay bribes to Strudwick to obtain development zoning:

Why did the Calvert Brain Trust decide to cost the Saskatchewan tax payers another ton of money, either through the loss to the taxpayer of the Revenue that would have been paid in taxes by the Olive Development group, or financial compensation to the Olive group for reneging on a done deal, simply to solve their potential public relations problem by refusing to address the Argues refusal to pay Strudwick bribes to obtain development zoning.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that the Calvert NDP Brain Trust did whatever it took to “pander” (google) to RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick, and the question is, why did they do that? Originally I (Lee) believed that the Calvert NDP was simply politically terrified of Strudwick and her RMAA, (which is simply another Union), just as the NDP is terrified of all Unions, but it is possible that I (Lee) was wrong as to the Calvert Brain Trust motive for denying the Argues their thirty million dollar residential subdivision development and ordering my (Lee)s personal destruction.

Since that Web reader sent me (Lee) up into the Avord Tower building to see the offices of the little band of Ethanol brothers I (Lee) now believe the answer to the Calvert Brain Trust decision to block zoning for the Argues development and pander to Strudwick and her RMAA is part of the NDP Leaders plan to keep the RMAA in place so as to be able to use taxpayer dollars to subsidize Ethanol/Bio-diesel production and the only way to have Rural Zoning control so as to allow those plants to be built is through the RMAA, a self regulating association, http://www.rmaa.ca/ (and click onto the Association By Laws and Code of Ethics, 04, 06, 07), which Rural Administrators will provided development zoning for flowers, chocolates and perfume (bribes) “supreme court of canada summary statement case 31940” ( google).

Premier Brad Wall is performing far better than any of the political junkies imagined he would but Saskatchewan has been on a political knife edge through the last three General Elections cycles, 1999, 2003 and 2007 and there is no reason to believe that 2011 will be any different and since the NDP will win the November 2011 General election if any of Premier Brad Wall’s Brain Trust commits one Devine Gang type of mistake, which they ( the Wall brain trust) have already made “ gov’t made devine error murray mandryk” (google) Link will be Saskatchewan’s next Premier.

Or if the US economy fails to recover causing a further drop in Saskatchewan sale of natural resources, or if the US continues with its Buy America policy, or collapse of the Alberta economy causes a flood of people to return home to Saskatchewan welfare roles, the NDP will win the next election, Link will be Premier, and just like every hot climate, oil rich, “banana belt dictatorship” (google) in the world Saskatchewan will be administered for the benefit of a few wealthy families and their thugs, and Saskatchewan taxpayer subsidies of Big Ethanol/Bio-diesel will be a fact of life.

It is impossible to do anything about Drummonds Ethanol Plant near Belle Plaine and the LDPC “ lake diefenbaker potato corporation” (google) groups use of the Calvert massive SPUDCO pay off to buy farm land and a Ethanol plant and now, given the fact that the Wall Administration made the mistake they made, “ gov’t made devine error murray mandryk” ( google) it may be impossible to stop the election of the NDP in November of 2011, but notwithstanding that fact, Saskatchewan’s voting taxpayers must not give up hope and the fact is we do not need Ethanol/Bio-diesel to keep from “freezing to death in the dark”. All Web readers should remember that idiotic Alberta bumper sticker slogan “let the eastern bastards freeze in the dark” (google) and also be guided by Pogo’s famous line “we have met the enemy and he is us” (google)

As example, Saskatchewan has plenty of coal which appears to be the fuel of the future, all voting taxpayers should read Globe and Mail article dated August 26th 2009, “ the greening of coal, the fuel of the future neil reynolds”, (google) technology the current Wall Administration has made a rudimentary start on implementing, “saskatchewan clean coal technology” (google) and with coal the fuel of the future, Saskatchewan’s crude oil and natural gas can be saved to power our cars, trucks and tractors.

So we simply do not need Link and Drummond’s Ethanol/Bio-diesel and one way for the taxpayers to keep control of the subsidizing of future Ethanol/Bio-diesel plants and production is to remove control of Rural zoning from the Rural Administrators so as to stop the construction of any new Ethanol plants thereby preventing, a “archer daniels midland a case study in corporate welfare” (google) here in Saskatchewan.

There is no doubt whatsoever but that the only way for Saskatchewan’s voting taxpayers to have a hope of blocking Ethanol Plant construction with the attendant Urban tax payers massive subsidization of those plants would be to remove the RMs from the face of Saskatchewan, form thirteen Counties, and turn zoning control over to the Mayor and Councils of the 450 (four hundred and fifty) small Urbans, ( Towns and Villages), and the time to start those demands of the Sask Party MLA’s to make that happen is now, during the by-elections in Regina Douglas-Park and Saskatoon Riversdale.

The Hon. John Crosbie, now Lieutenant Governor of Newfoundland-Labrador, at the time one of Mulroney’s senior Ministers, gave me (Lee) a copy of the Judicial Council of Canada report “ Masters in Their Own House”,… “masters in their own house judicial council of canada dr carl baar”, (google), the report that establishes that the Provincial Administrations use their control of the Queens and Appeal Bench Judges working lives to control Judicial decisions and on Thursday February 5th 1987, I (Lee), visited the co-author of that report, Dr. Carl Baar, at his office in Osgoode Hall at York University.

At that long ago meeting Dr. Baar advised me (Lee) that the Senior Officials of the Canadian and Provincial Governments have no fear of either their Political Masters or the Judiciary but they (the Senior Officials) were afraid of public opinion because both the Politicians and Judges respond to public opinion and that the only method to deal with the Corruption of Government officials was to keep turning over the rocks so the Public can see those Government Officials slither away to get under another rock and just keep doing that until public reaction forces a end to that particular bit of corruption.

Web readers who believe that I (Lee) overplay the fact of Judicial Corruption protecting Government Official Corruption ( bribes and kickbacks) should note Globe and Mail article “ottawa judge wasn’t judging gender christie blatchford” ( google). The womens rights groups are properly outraged that the Queens Bench Judge dissed a woman, but the fact is that the Judge obviously refused to accept the evidence of Ontario Nepan-Carelton MPP, Lisa Macleod, because it was the only possible method open to him ( the Judge) to find Ottawa Mayor Larry O’Brien not guilty of corruption charges.

This was not a case of a trial judge legitimately questioning the credibility of a teenage bimbo giving her drug dealer boyfriend a alibi for the night one of his drug dealer competitors was gunned down in the street, but a Queens Bench Judge dismissing the evidence of a 34 year old woman Ontario MPP who had received the highest vote of any Ontario MPP ever, simply to leave Ottawa Mayor Larry O’Brien in office, (at least until the next election), receiving Developers bribes to provide development zoning.

To better relate to the absolute corruption of all Canadian Government officials, including Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, I (Lee) ask all Web readers to note Globe and Mail article dated August 4th, 2009, “ how schreiber’s grease money will come back to haunt canada greg mcarthur” (google) and note how former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney states how “shocked” he was to learn that Germany, a G-7 Country, would allow bribes to Government officials to be deducted as a business expense.

Now I (Lee) ask all Web readers to key word google “revenue canada allows bribes deducted as business expense” and /or key word google “the numbers game/andy turnbull circular on deducting bribes” and/or simply turn to the June 18th 2009 segment of this Website, TWEEDLEDUM AND TWEEDLEDEE, for the paper trail proving that until 1990 Revenue Canada had the same rules as Germany, bribes to government officials, such as Donna Strudwick, could be deducted as a business expense without even naming the Government official who was paid the bribes.

I (Lee) am very surprised that the Globe and Mail would allow Mulroney to get away with the obvious lie claiming that he was “shocked” to discover that Germany, a G-7 Country, would allow the cost of bribes to Government officials be deducted as a business expense when it was the Globe and Mail itself, in a article by Richard Cleroux, dated April 19th, 1989, “Jelinek condemns circular on deducting bribes” that broke the fact that during the time Mulroney was Canada’s Prime Minister Revenue Canada allowed deductions of bribes to Government officials as a cost of doing business.

Mulroney had to have known that Canada was even more corrupt than Germany, because bribes to Canadian Government officials were allowed as a business expense without even naming the Government officials, such as Donna Strudwick, who received the bribe, which meant that the Canadian Government officials did not even have to pay tax on their bribe income and NDP Web readers will be interested to know that it was their very own MP, Lorne Nystrom, who raised this issue in the House of Commons.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that Donna Strudwick, the Administrator of a po-dunk Rural Muniucpality in the Province of, Saskatchewan, had a corruption blueprint set for her (Strudwick) by our own Prime Minister, and there can be no doubt whatsoever but that Dr. Carl Baar is exactly right, the only hope to end the corruption is to just keep turning the rocks over so the taxpaying, voting public can see their Officials ranging from a mickey mouse po-dunk official, RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, to former Prime Minister Brian Mulroney, slither and scurry to get under another rock.

Turning over rocks is a common euphemism for dealing with official corruption “turning over rocks claire foss journal” (google) and I (Lee) have been trying to follow Dr. Baar’s advise to obtain zoning for the Argues 30 million dollar residential subdivision development without bribing RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick by running the Access zap2it ads and this Website, ( turning over the rocks), to publish the problem of Rural Zoning Corruption and Bribery but so far I (Lee) have accomplished nothing except to uncover more “ institutionalized corruption” (google).

A few years ago a friend who often makes the Saskatoon-Regina drive at night mentioned that for a few seconds he thought that he was on the wrong road because he was so used to seeing Girven’s street lights just north of Craik that when there were no lights he thought, for a few seconds, that he was somehow lost and on the wrong road.

When I (Lee) investigated for him it was discovered that when “girvin” (google) gave up as a Village, turned them selves into a Hamlet and placed themselves under the control of the RM of Arm River, that the first thing the RM did was order their street lights turned off, and I (Lee) believe that is what lies ahead for Rural Saskatchewan because
I (Lee) also discovered that SARM (Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities) has been lobbying for many years that the Provincial Political Leaders order all Towns and Villages turned into Hamlets and placed under the control of the RMs, leaving only the Cities and SARM (the RM’s) as Provincial Municipal Administrative units.

I (Lee) believe that the implementation of the “ cities act” ( google) in 2003 separating the Cities from the Towns and Villages under the Urban Act, and then in 2006 lumping the RM’s, Towns, and Villages under the “municipalities act” ( google) was a forerunner to the Provincial Leaders bowing to SARMs demands to take over legislative control of all of Rural Saskatchewan, including the Towns and Villages.

“power tends to corrupt and absolute power corrupts absolutely, great men are almost always bad men” (google), so said Lord Acton in his 1887 letter to Bishop Mandell Creighton, and over the years his quote had been shortened to “ Power Corrupts and absolute Power Corrupts absolutely”, which I (Lee) believe to be a great truth that accounts for the absolute corruption of Saskatchewan’s Rural Administrators.

The Provinces deep thinkers have always viewed the three hundred Rural Municipalities as a economic millstone to the Saskatchewan taxpayers but in the 1930’s a effort to remove them as Rural Administrative units failed. Then in the late 1950’s Meyer Brownstone designed a plan to remove the RM’s from the face of Saskatchewan and replace them with Counties only to have Ross Thatcher’s Liberals win the 1964 election by organizing the Rural Leaders in a massive campaign to elect Ross Thatcher and block the elimination of the RM’s. All of this is set out in a Book “ rumours of glory” (google) by “dale eisler”(google) available in the reference section of the Regina Public Library.

The next effort to deal with the RM’s was in 1991 when Roy Romanow came to power. Premier Roy’s then Deputy Premier, Clay Serby, tried to force SARM (Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities) to make economic sense, but ever cautious Premier Roy ordered a poll conducted in Rural Saskatchewan which (poll) showed that 95% of the farm voters wanted the RM’s and their corrupt Administrators to remain in place.

Roy Romanow is a very great man, he alone, literally saved Saskatchewan from Bankruptcy following the Devine Gang leaving the Province ten Billion dollars in debt, but this fact notwithstanding, it was Premier Roy who, in July of 2001, removed Jean Lazar and Darlene Hawes, the Chair and Secretary of the Board of Examiners (Rural), which ended Provincial control of the RMAA (Rural Municipal Administrators Association) and then Premier Roy ordered legislation granting the RMAA the right to function as a self regulating association (click on to Association Bylaws and Code of Ethics, 04, 06, and 07,) similar to the doctors, nurses, lawyers et al.

One Saskatchewan self regulating group, the Accountants, do attempt to control corruption by their members, note “accountant fined following hearing jason warwick snn” (google) but despite two years of my (Lee) endless public complaint in the Access zap2it Ads and this Website there has been no effort made by Strudwicks self governing association http://www.rmaa.ca/ to address the Strudwick zoning corruption issue.

It is bad enough that our Provincial Leaders pander to the true Professionals (Lawyers and so on) allowing them self regulating status, but to allow a select section of the Senior Provincial Government Officials, (the RM Administrators) like Donna Strudwick, self regulating status is insanity, akin to what would have happened in the 1920’s if the bootleggers had been allowed to self regulate their criminal activities.

It is insanity to give a “white collar thug” (google) such as Strudwick, this much power, the end result is that the then NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, a individual of long experience as a North Battleford City Councilor, a MP, a MLA and Cabinet Minister, risked his career by ordering that the only option that I (Lee) had to obtain zoning for the Argues 30 million dollar residential subdivision was to carry “ flowers, chocolates and perfume” (pay bribes) to RM Administrator Donna Strudwick to obtain zoning for the Argues “ supreme court of canada summary case 31940” ( google).

Because of the ruling by the then Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, that my (Lee)’s only option to obtain zoning for the Argues was to bribe Strudwick, and my refusal to pay those bribes on behalf of the Argues, many millions of dollars have been lost. The Argues have lost millions of dollars in lost profit and the Edenwold ratepayers have lost four million dollars in tax revenue, and I (Lee) serving as the Argues Representative has been destroyed because Strudwick used “ libel chill” (google) to destroy me when I complained to then NDP Premier Calvert that his Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, had ruled that my only option to obtain zoning for the Argues was to bribe her (Strudwick).

It was Edmund Burke (1729-1797) British Statesman, who said “ the only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing” (google). I (Lee) was raised in a home that believed that Corruption in Government is unethical and was later trained that Corruption in Government is counter productive “corruption economy” (google) so when given the option running my Highway Contracting Company I (Lee) simply refused to pay bribes to the Saskatchewan Department of Highways engineers and now have spent eight years trying to obtain zoning for the Argues 30 million dollar residential subdivision without bribing Strudwick but so far, despite two years of Access zap2it Ads and this Website, I (Lee) have accomplished nothing.

I (Lee) can see why our Political Leaders have done their best to separate Church and State,…..any decent Church would have burnt all our political leaders at the stake years ago, “ beware of false profits: pope calls for an ethical economy ahead of g-8 eric reguly” (google). None of our Provincial leaders, Sask Party, Liberal or NDP appear concerned there is now a law in place that a NDP Minister of the Crown ruled, and the Canadian Courts upheld that Ministerial ruling, that the Developers must carry “flowers, chocolates and perfume” ( bribes) to RM Administrator Strudwick to obtain zoning.

The new “judge made law” (google) regarding the fact that bribes must be paid to Senior Government Officials, such as Strudwick, to obtain development zoning is a legal contradiction because if the Developer, or his Representative, carry anything to officials such as Strudwick, they are subject to five years in prison “ section 123 (1) criminal code of canada part iv” ( google), so the Developers are caught in a “catch -22′ (google).

Because of that Catch-22 and the fact that if the Developer, or his Representative, complains to the Premier about the corruption there is now a precedent “judge made law” (google) in place to support the Rural Administrator use of “libel chill” (google) to destroy the Developer, or his Representative, who had complained about having to pay bribes to obtain zoning. There can be no doubt whatsoever but that ensuring the destruction of anyone who complains about having to pay bribes to the Rural Administrators to obtain development zoning is a sick joke even by Canadian standards.

The situation gets even sicker. All Web readers are asked to note that years ago the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal, to solve the problem of the Romanow Administration desire to go ahead with the Regina Casino when the Church groups were fighting the project, ruled in Harker v. Regina (City), [1995] 4 W.W.R., that “ all zoning issues are political and that the Courts must act only where the process has descended to farce”.

The Saskatchewan Court of Appeal ruled all zoning issues are “political” and all Web readers are asked to note that I (Lee), when asked by the Argues to solve their zoning problem with Strudwick, did my “political” job perfectly on behalf of the Argues. I went to the then Minister Responsible, Jack Hillson, who solved the Argues zoning problem with Strudwick “politically” by amending Section 14.1 the Urban Act.

The original Saskatchewan Court of Appeal ruling in the Churches vs. the Regina Casino is that all zoning issues are “political”, so Jack Hillson, the then Minister Responsible, solved the zoning problem of Developers refusing to pay bribes to Government Officials to obtain zoning, by “politically” amending Section 14.1 of the Urban Act, allowing the Developers to find a Village to annex their developments out of the Rural Municipalities, bypassing the zoning control of the Rural Administrators.

But the Court of Appeal, determined to make sure that Strudwicks bribes were paid to provide the Argues with development zoning, ignored their original ruling that all zoning issues are “political” and the “Courts must not interfere”, and the Courts did interfere, and upheld the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor’s, ruling that my (Lee)s only option to obtain development zoning was to carry “ flowers, chocolates and perfume” (bribes) to Strudwick, “supreme court of canada summary statement case 31940” (google). Even in the currently corrupt G-20 world this Saskatchewan ruling is a sick joke beyond any normal or even understandable G-20 corruption standard.

Based on the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal original ruling that all zoning issues are “political” the Calvert NDP were actually required by law to grant the Argues zoning because the Argues had always been strong NDP “political” supporters. Sharie Argue was strong CCF/NDP because Sharie is of Scottish descent and her grandfathers were colleagues and confidants of Tommy Douglas and were active in the formation of the Co-op and Wheat Pool. Sharie Argue, with two masters degrees served the Community as a English and Music teacher and was active in the Teachers Union, and both her and her husband Earle always supported the CCF/NDP in every election with all the usual stuff that supporters do, donations, signs, door knocking, envelope stuffing and so on.

I (Lee) should have been a “political” positive serving as the Argues Representative in the refusal to bribe Strudwick for zoning because I had worked like a slave for the NDP, knocking on doors in every election and by-election, both Federal and Provincial, winter and summer, for well over a decade, yet the Argues (and my) NDP “Political” ties made no difference, all that mattered was that Strudwick had to be paid her bribes.

Notwithstanding the strong NDP qualifications of the Argues and I (Lee) serving as the Argue Representative, and the fact that the then Liberal Minister Responsible, Jack Hillson, (then serving in the NDP/Liberal coalition Government), had solved the Argue/Strudwick zoning problem with his (Hillsons) brilliant “political” plan of amending Section 14.1 of the Urban Act to allow the Village of Wood Mountain to annex the Argue development out of the RM of Edenwold and the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal ruling that all zoning issues are “political”, the Calvert NDP still insisted that the Argues only option to obtain zoning for their 30 million dollar residential subdivision was to bribe RM of Edenwold Administrator, Donna Strudwick. “ strudwick reports to premier” (google). Did Strudwick share her “ flowers, chocolates and perfume” with the Calvert brain trust?, only a public inquiry would answer that question.

All Web readers are asked to note that Premier Brad Wall’s “ Minister of Everything”, the Hon Bill Boyd, was agitating in the media “ndp says sask party playing political games” (google) that unless the NDP asked for a RCMP criminal investigation into the Meadow Lake Membership fraud that the Sask Party would go to the RCMP, but now that lone First Nations member has solved that problem by lodging a criminal complaint.

All Web readers are asked to note that after the 1991 election and the fall of the Devine Gang, Premier Roy used the Criminal Code “rcmp probe operation fiddle” (google) to destroy the Progressive Conservative Party of Saskatchewan and that destruction resulted in the NDP winning at least one of the next General elections, (if not two), before the Provinces right wing could get reorganized under Premier Brad Wall, and it is understandable that Premier Brad and his Sask Party will be looking for revenge, its payback time and stuff such as the RCMP criminal investigation of the NDP’s Meadow Lake Membership fraud is going to be the order of the day for a decade or two.

But I (Lee) remind all Web readers for the upteenth time that my (Lee)s efforts on behalf of the Argues, established by no less than the Supreme Court of Canada, that the then NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, ordered that the only option that I (Lee) had to obtain zoning for the Argues 30 million dollar residential subdivision development was to carry “flowers, chocolates and perfume”, (bribes) to RM Administrtator Donna Strudwick “ supreme court of canada summary statement case 31940” (google).

And I (Lee) remind all Web readers that there can be no doubt whatsoever but that it is a contravention of Section 123 (1) MUNICIPAL CORRUPTION, of the Criminal Code to carry anything to a Municipal Official to obtain zoning and that it is a contravention of Section 464 COUNSELLING AN OFFENCE of the Code to advise anyone to commit a Criminal Act, (even if the Criminal Act is not committed) hence there can be no doubt whatsoever but that Len Taylor should have been charged with a contravention of Section 464 of the Criminal Code of Canada when I complained to Premier Calvert.

I (Lee) remind all Web readers that when I wrote my complaint letter to then Premier Calvert regarding his Minister Responsible, Len Taylor’s, ruling that my (Lee)’s only option to obtain zoning for the Argues was to bribe Strudwick, that as part of my complaint to Calvert I included reference to the fact that Taylor was in contravention of Section 464 COUNSELLING AN OFFENCE of the Criminal Code for that ruling, and Taylor should have been charged when I (Lee) complained to then Premier Calvert.

A Web reader has brought to my attention that I (Lee) am wrong about what I set out in the first paragraph in the July 27th 2009 segment of this Web site “FLOWERS CHOCOLATES AND PERFUME” where I (Lee) question why the fuss of a RCMP Criminal Investigation into the NDP Meadow Lake Membership fraud when the First Nations people were clearly not defrauded but I (Lee) was wrong, and perhaps, as the Rural Administrators are claiming, I (Lee) am the stupidest man in Canada, because I did not spot what the First Nations people are planning.

I (Lee) am told that under the definition of fraud “section 380 of criminal code of canada fraud” (google), that the NDP Meadow Lake Membership falsification, in law, is in fact fraud and the First Nations people will use that finding of fraud to sue the NDP Party of Saskatchewan, for the amount they ( the First Nations People) think that they deserve for being falsely identified as NDP party Members, (when they all claim to be either Sask Party or Liberal supporters). So pick a number, any sane, round number, say $10,000.00 ( ten thousand dollars) per First Nation person who was defrauded, its enough money that Tony (Merchant) may decide to take it on as a class-action suit.

The NDP activist falsified NDP memberships for 1000 First Nations people, all of who are named and listed, so that is a total of ten million dollars and those First Nations individuals named and listed will all have “cause of action” (google) against the NDP Party of Saskatchewan for that amount of money, and to make matters worse for the NDP members all political parties function as a Society, (not a limited liability company) and each NDP member is jointly responsible for the Society debts. Tommy Douglas House might be worth a million dollars so the rest will be about a thousand dollars for each member, a total of ten million dollars. Tony (Merchant) likes this kind of money, he would get a third of that in contingency fees.

Until the NDP party Lawyer, Wil Olive, convinced the NDP Party officials to accept those 1000 fraudulent First Nations Memberships the Meadow Lake problem was a problem only for Links leadership Campaign, but Wil Olive ensured the entire fraud landed up in the NDP head office so it is now a problem for the entire NDP membership.

In view of the First Nations members “cause of action” (google) against the NDP Party based on the assumed RCMP finding of fraud in the NDP Meadow Lake Membership scandal a few Web readers, encouraged by “tories promise action on white-collar crime daniel leblanc” (google) believe that the same reasoning is a solution for the Argues efforts to obtain development zoning without bribing RM Administrator Strudwick.

The RCMP are trained to cover up white collar crime “edmonton journal cover up culture fills rcmp:officer tim naumetz” (google) and the RCMP did in fact destroy the evidence the Outlook Community Leaders provided them regarding Strudwicks corrupt actions, please note the segment of this Website dated October 4th, 2007, “Update with reply from Law Society of Saskatchewan” and it is true that Strudwicks fraud of the Argues occurred in the Rural Areas of the province which is under RCMP control just to the east of Regina City. In fact the RCMP detachment is in the RM of Edenwold building, Strudwick is the RCMP’s landlord, and it is no coincidence that RCMP Staff Sergeant Brent Lewis destroyed evidence of Strudwicks corruption.

BUT some of the fraud against the Argue family occurred within the City of Regina, in Len Taylors Legislative office, right inside the Provinces Legislative building. and a few Web readers believe that since I (Lee) have already lodged a official complaint with then NDP Premier Calvert, one answer for the Argues would be for the Wall Attorney General, the Hon Don Morgan, to ask the Regina City Police to investigate a contravention of Section 464 of the Criminal Code, COUNSELLING AN OFFENCE, when then NDP Premier Calverts Minister Responsible, Len Taylor told me (Lee) that my only option to obtain zoning for the Argues was to carry flowers, chocolates and perfume (bribe) Strudwick, “supreme court of canada summary case 31940” (google)

Any experienced Regina City Police Detective, using his/her computer, could spend a day or two using this Website along with the legal community Websites, in particular the Supreme Courts, to determine if there was a possible contravention of Canada’s Criminal Code under Section 464 of the Criminal Code by Len Taylor when he (Taylor) made the ruling that my (Lee)s only option to obtain zoning for the Argues 30 million dollar residential development was to carry flowers, chocolates and perfume, (pay bribes) to RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick.

Or the Regina City Police investigating officer could go all out, do a Cadillac type of criminal investigation and go to the Court of Appeal Registrar and obtain the Factums and Appeal book regarding Strudicks libel action against me (Lee) and/or go to the Supreme Court of Canada and obtain my (Lee)s Leave Book, Strudwick refused to respond to the Supreme Court, so only my (Lee)s Leave Book is available at the Supreme Court, but all of that provides a detailed and definitive paper trail for study of a possible contravention of Section 464 of the Criminal Code by Len Taylor.

If the Regina City Police do find that criminal charges are warranted it is self evident that Queens Bench Court Judge, the Honorable Lady Justice Janet McMurtry’s, close personal NDP ties ( her marriage to Calvert’s NDP Attorney General Chris Axworthy,) would cause a travesty of Justice if the charges against Taylor were heard in Saskatchewan and Lady Justice Janet McMurtrys husband, Chris Axworthy, is now Dean of Law at the University of Manitoba so Manitoba Courts would be as corrupt as Saskatchewan’s, the only answer is for the Saskatchewan Attorney General, the Hon Don Morgan, to ask Alberta Justice to hear any criminal charges against Len Taylor.

39% of the voting public believe that the Judiciary take bribes. “ the paradox that is canada atkinson” (google) but 61% of the voting public believe that the Judges do not take bribes, so Web readers, many are optimists, “glass half full” (google) people, believe that a Alberta Judge, or Judge and Jury, (Taylors choice) may find Taylor guilty of a contravention of Section 464 of the Criminal Code of Canada for his (Taylor)s ruling that the Argues only option to obtain zoning for their thirty million dollar residential subdivision was to carry Strudwick flowers, chocolates and perfume (bribes).

The Web readers believe that if Len Taylor was found guilty of a contravention of Section 464 of the Criminal code that would give me (Lee), the Argues Representative, more grounds to ask the Wall Administration for a public inquiry, conducted by a Alberta Judge, into the fact of the Calvert NDP Administration ruling that the only option the Argues had to obtain zoning for their 30 million dollar residential subdivision was to carry flowers, chocolates and perfume (bribes) to Strudwick.

It is true that the Saskatchewan Municipal Board ruled on December 22nd 2004 that the Argues had received all Provincial departmental approvals for their Development and a public inquiry may establish that the only possible reason for Strudwick, the RM of Edenwold Administrator to block zoning was the Argues refusal to carry her “flowers, chocolates and perfume”, (bribes) as instructed by her Minister Responsible, Len Taylor.

All honest, taxpaying, voting, Web readers are asked to refer to Globe and Mail article by Patrick White dated August 15th, 2009, “ as potash falls saskactchewan tightens purse strings patrick white” (google) and “poor economy hammers health of canadians survey shows andre picard” (google) and I (Lee) suggest that all taxpaying voters ask themselves the question, “ Why should the Rural Administrators have self regulating status and the power to demand bribes from Developers to provide development zoning when honest taxpayers are facing economic and health ruin”?

Added to the cost to the Provincial economy from the blocked economic development because of the refusal of some Developers to pay the Rural Administrators bribes to obtain zoning, the Provinces honest, taxpaying, voters keep needlessly putting out seventy five million dollars in Rural Administration costs,( needless because the Provincial bureaucracy already do all administrative work for all Provincial citizens, including the farm families) a year to pay SARM and the RMAA (Rural Municipal Administrators Association) to administer the farm families with a total farm population of 150,000, 15% of the Provincial Population.

The Rural Administrators salary schedule for a “A” certificate range from $48,000.00 (forty eight thousand dollars) to $71,000.00 (seventy one thousand dollars) per year
“ rmaa salary schedule” (google) and the Rural Administrators live in Villages where the taxes are a couple hundred dollars a year and Urban Education taxes pay for the diesel fuel for the school buses to pick the Rural Administrators kids up at their door in the morning and take them to school and then back to their door at night, so ask your MLA’s the question; do the Rural Administrators really need self regulating status giving them the power to demand bribes from the Developers to provide zoning?

The by-elections in Regina Douglas-Park and Saskatoon Riversdale are a ideal opportunity for the taxpaying voting public to demand the candidates ensure there is a public inquiry into the fact that the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, ruled that the only option the Argues have to obtain zoning for their project is to carry flowers, chocolates and perfume ( pay bribes) to Donna Strudwick, the RM of Edenwold Administrator Responsible for zoning approval.

One lone First Nations person complains about fraud “rcmp investigate ndp meadow lake membership scandal” and the RCMP hop to it, crank up their computers and cruisers and hit the investigation trail instantly, but where is the fraud?, it was Link’s leadership campaign supporters money that went to pay for the First Nations memberships and at the end of the day the NDP head office kept the $10,000.00 (ten thousand dollars) so maybe Links campaign donors were defrauded by their own head office, but it cost the First Nations people nothing, so First Nations was not defrauded.

I (Lee) ask all Web readers to compare that RCMP instant response with a criminal investigation of the NDP Meadow Lake membership fraud to what I (Lee) am trying to deal with as the Argues Representative. The then NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, ruled that the only option that I (Lee) had as the Argue Representative, to obtain zoning for the Argues 30 million dollar residential subdivision development, was to carry “flowers, chocolates and perfume” ( a bribe) to RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick, “ supreme court of canada summary statement case 31940” (google).

If I (Lee) had been stupid enough to act on Taylors statement that my only option to obtain zoning for the Argues was to carry flowers chocolates and perfume to Strudwick, I (Lee) would have been in contravention of Section 123 (1) of the Criminal Code of Canada “ criminal code of canada section 123 (1) part iv” (google) for bribing her (Strudwick), but Taylor put himself in contravention of the Criminal Code with his ruling because it is a contravention of Section 464 of the Criminal Code “section 464 counselling offence that is not committed” (google) which sets out it is a contravention of the Criminal Code to advise anyone to commit a criminal act.

In my (Lee)s complaint letter to then NDP Premier Calvert, ( the letter that Strudwick used as a base to sue me for libel) part of my complaint to Calvert was that his Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, had contravened Section 464 of the Criminal Code by advising me ( Lee) that my only option to obtain zoning for the Argues was to bribe Donna Strudwick “ supreme court of canada summary statement case 31940” ( google)

The Outlook Community Leaders filed a copy of my complaint letter to Calvert, (and all support material), with RCMP Staff Sergeant Brent Lewis, who, after receiving a phone call from Strudwicks Government lawyer, Glen Dowling, refused to undertake a criminal investigation and destroyed all material, note the section in this Website dated October 4th 2007, entitled “Update with reply from Law Society of Saskatchewan”.

“ you can’t fight city hall” (google) but taxpaying Web readers are urged to think about the fact that the RCMP investigate the NDP Meadow Lake membership fraud based on a complaint from one First Nations person, yet the RCMP refuse to investigate and destroy evidence relating to a fraud complaint costing members of the non First Nations community, the Argues and Edenwold ratepayers, millions of dollars. Polling shows that 66% of the Canadian people believe that the Politicians are corrupt and 39% believe that the Judges are corrupt “ the paradox that is canada atkinson” (google), and the pollsters have included RCMP corruption in with the Judges, so is the RCMP double standard as a result of corruption or racism?

If the explanation for Donna Strudwick’s success in blocking zoning for the Argues 30 million dollar residential subdivision development until her (Strudwicks) bribes were paid is that the Politicians, the RCMP and the Judges are all “on the take” (google), then where did the money come from to pay all the bribes? Strudwick never stops bragging about how wealthy she is is, but she would never use her own money to pay bribes to the Political, RCMP and Judicial Authorities and the only other place for her to get the money would be the RM of Edenwold coffers, so did taxpayers money pay the bribes?

It is true that four different Regina lawyers told the Argues that it was impossible to get by RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick to obtain zoning for their 30 million dollar residential subdivision and Dwain Lingenfelter, “link: don’t ever sell him short” (google) who will be coronated shortly after June 30 th 2009, as a Candidate to replace Harry Van Mulligan in the Constituency of Regina Douglas Park, told me (Lee), the Argue Representative, the same thing, it’s “ impossible to get by strudwick” (google).

Its also true that Political Scientist Michael Atkinson teaches a class in Political Corruption at the University of Saskatchewan “the paradox that is canada atkinson” ( google), and he (Professor Atkinson) must have done a excellent job of instructing on the mechanics of Political Corruption over the last two decades because I (Lee) know with certainty that Government Corruption has increased many fold over that time, nevertheless, I (Lee) soldiered on and tried to obtain zoning for the Argues development without paying bribes to RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick and the end result of my effort was that Strudwick used “ libel chill” (google) to successfully destroy me (Lee) by sueing for libel, leading to the “ supreme court summary statement case 31940” (google) which lead to the Access zap2it Ads and this Website.

During the summer of 2006, while waiting for Queens Bench Justice, the Honorable Lady Justice Janet McMurtry, to write Summary Judgment regarding Strudwicks libel action against me (Lee), Regina Architect Joe Pettick warned me that Court of Appeal Judge, the Honorable J. Gary Lane, a close personal friend of RM of Edenwold Administrator, Donna Strudwick, had been shortlisted to replace Bayda as Chief Judge.

By August of 2006 it had taken Lady Justice Janet McMurtry nine months to write a Summary Judgment regarding Strudwicks libel action so when Joe (Pettick) warned about Lane being shortlisted to be Saskatchewan’s Chief Judge I (Lee) took action and prepared a 120 page booklet “ Flowers, Chocolates and Perfume”, dated August 28th, 2006 and delivered the booklet to then NDP Premier Calvert, his Cabinet and Caucus.

The “ Flowers, Chocolates and Perfume” booklet was prepared for two reasons…..first, Joe (Pettick)’s warning that Strudwicks long time personal friend, Lane (the Hon J. Gary) had been short listed to replace Bayda as the Provinces Chief Judge meant that if Lane was appointed Chief Judge the Argues 30 million dollar development was doomed, because Lane, as Chief Judge, would grant Strudwick the legal right to expropriate the Argues development quarter and 350 gallon per minute spring (gpm) for her own use.

To try to solve the Lane for Chief Judge problem, I (Lee) provided copies of the Flowers, Chocolates and Perfume booklet to not only the NDP MLA’s but also the Senior Legal Community as well as local members of the Liberal, Conservative and Sask Party, with the end result that Lane ( the Hon J. Gary) was unable to obtain local support for his candidacy to replace Bayda in the position of Saskatchewan’s Chief Judge and Lane ( the Hon J. Gary) withdrew his name from the shortlist, so the first part of the plan to solve the Argues zoning problem with Strudwick worked, at least I (Lee) saved the Argue development quarter from being expropriated by Strudwick.

The second purpose of the “ Flowers, Chocolates and Perfume” booklet did not work because of the corruption of the Calvert NDP. The Sask Party, then in Opposition, lead by Brad Wall, was boasting that they owned Rural Saskatchewan and I (Lee) believed that Wall owed his soul to SARM ( Saskatchewan Association of Rural Municipalities) and I believed that the Argues would have no hope whatsoever of obtaining zoning for their development under a Wall Administration so notwithstanding the NDP corruption I hoped that the NDP, if elected, under threat of public exposure, might grant zoning.

I (Lee) knew that in the 2003 election Walls Sask Party had won 14 of their Rural Ridings by a average of 700 votes, so I (Lee) prepared a plan for the Calvert NDP to win the 2007 general election based on my study which showed that in those 14 Rural Ridings the Village vote was double that of the farm ( the RM) voting population, and it could be safely assumed that was the voting situation throughout Rural Saskatchewan.

There are 300 Rural Municipalities in Saskatchewan and the Administration budget for each RM averages about $250,000.00, per year. That is just administration cost, SARM’s annual levy, Administrator and Assistants wages, per diem for Reeves and Council, travel, SARMs twice yearly monster bash in Regina or Saskatoon, office costs, and the like, it does not include the guys who do the real work, maintain the roads, cut the ditch grass and so on, just administration, so multiply that administration cost of $250,000.00 per RM by 300 RMs and the product is $75,000,000.00 ( seventy five million dollars).

I ( Lee) set out in the “Flowers, Chocolates and Perfume” booklet, dated August 28th, 2006, and sent to the entire NDP Cabinet and Caucus, that the Calvert NDP, to win the 2007 election, should plan to eliminate the RMs from the face of Saskatchewan,( as had been recommended over 50 years ago by Meyer Brownstone), and form Counties as the Provinces basic Rural Administration unit and I (Lee) urged Calvert and his brain trust to campaign for the 2007 election on a platform of eliminating the RM’s from the face of Saskatchewan, paying County Administration cost out of the seventy five million dollars saved each year by eliminating the 300 RMs and give the remainder of the saving, estimated at fifty million dollars, as a grant to the small Towns and Villages.

There are about 450 small Towns and Villages so each would receive a annual grant of over $100,000,00 ( one hundred thousand dollars), plenty of money for each small Town or Village to build infrastructure and give the Mayor and Council of the small Urban Municipalities rural zoning control so as to allow developments to make use of the infrastructure, and I (Lee) believe the Calvert NDP would have won the 2007 election.

The NDP back room geniuses liked my plan but Calvert’s brain trust overruled them, the Calvert brain trust in fact ruled that the NDP back room people could no longer even talk to me and that the Argue family had no option but to pay bribes to Strudwick to be granted zoning, so I (Lee) started running Ads and this Website in July of 2007 and the Calvert NDP lost ten ridings of the November 2007 election by less than 300 votes each.

I (Lee) have been pushing hard in this Website that all Judicial problems result from the fact of “masters in their own house judicial council of canada dr carl baar” ( google), which states that the Provincial Administrations are using their control of the working lives of the Queens and Appeal Bench Judges to control Judicial decisions, but it has been brought to my attention by Web readers that I (Lee) might be wrong, and that since the Judges are nothing more than Government officials the problem with them (the Judges) might be the usual problem of bribery of Government officials.

It is possible to deal with Politicians (elected officials) every four years at a election but it is self-evident that the only way to deal with non-elected Government Officials is to bribe them, blackmail them or go public turning over rocks and I have managed the Argue zoning problem assuming that the Calvert NDP Administration blackmailed the Saskatchewan Judiciary into finding me guilty of libel but 39 % (thirty nine percent) of Canadians believe that the Judges take bribes “ the paradox that is canada atkinson” (google) and there is good reason to believe that our Judges are “on the take” (google).

Web readers are asked to use key words “ canadian judges take bribes susan mcgrath” (google) and note that the Canadian Bar Association Lobby President, a woman named Susan McGrath, threatened the Federal Government that unless the Queens and Appeal Bench Judges are given the 18% raise they demand from the taxpaying voters that they
( the Judges) will demand bribes from taxpaying litigants to make up the difference.

Web readers are asked to note this astonishing fact. All lawyers are officers of the Court
“ lawyers officer of the court” ( google) and the Judges have the Canadian Bar Association, the peak of the anthill of lawyers in Canada, “shill” (google) for them (the Judges), by having the Bar Association lobby President, Susan Mcgrath, threaten the Federal Politicians that unless the Judges get the 18% raise in wages they demand from the taxpayers that they, the Judges, will start demanding bribes from the taxpaying litigants until their income is at the level the Judges are demanding.

This is sickening even by Canadian Justice standards, (which is the most sickening in the G-20 Nations), because if the Queens and Appeal Bench Judges received the wages they demand their salary would be higher than a US Supreme Court Judges, and the Harper Federal Administration has refused the Judges demands for a 18% ( eighteen percent) wage hike, “canadian judges salaries higher than us supreme court judges” (google), so the theory is that Donna Strudwick, who by her own boasts is a wealthy woman, bribed the Saskatchewan Judges to win her libel action against me (Lee).

The theory that Strudwick bribed the Honorable Lady Justice Janet McMurtry fits perfectly the uncontradicted affidavit that Outlook Community Leader Lloyd Smith provided the Court ( the evidence that RCMP Staff Sergeant Brent Lewis destroyed), which provided information from RM of Edenwold ratepayers that RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick was blocking zoning for the Argues development because she ( Strudwick) wanted to obtain the Argues development quarter and its 350 gallon per minute ( gpm) spring water flow for her own use to grow hay to feed her dairy herd, which uncontradicted Smith affidavit was ignored by all levels of Court.

There is no doubt whatsoever but that Strudwick and her two bit shyster of a Government lawyer, Glen Dowling, have been using “ libel chill” (google) to have their own way in the RM of Edenwold for over two decades but this time, based on the number of visits to this website, they (Strudwick and Dowling) may have gone over a line and Strudwicks “ libel chill” (google) action against me (Lee) may have backfired because this Website is getting over 200 20 visits a day, and while all that has to be done is to key word “rural zoning corruption” (google) and this Website may be accessed along with many others through out North America, but the tracking shows most of this sites visits are local and there may be a “ hundredth monkey effect” ( google) regarding Strudwicks Corruption which might solve the Argues zoning problem with Strudwick.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that my (Lee)s efforts on behalf of the Argues have established that zoning corruption in Rural Saskatchewan is absolute and costing the Urban taxpayers a great deal of money and whether the Judiciary are blackmailed, bullied or bribed into submission is immaterial, the Courts are useless to solve the zoning corruption problem so the only solution is Political.

Harry Van-Mulligan resigning his Regina Douglas-Park riding to give the new NDP Leader, Link, a seat in the Legislature, means the 2011 General Election Campaign is effectively under way, which will give any concerned Urban voting taxpayers a avenue to ask for a public inquiry into rural zoning corruption, a inquiry that I (Lee) have been asking for in this Website for over two years, OR simply demand that the RMs be removed from the face of Saskatchewan as recommended by Meyer Brownstone over fifty years ago, OR do what the Regina Leader Post Editorial Board advised in a Editorial dated February 20th, 2007, eliminate the RM of Edenwold and create one large RM surrounding Regina similar to the RM of Corman Park surrounding Saskatoon.

As set out endlessly in this Website it is my, (Lee)s, belief that the best solution is to remove all the RMs from the face of Saskatchewan,( as advised by Meyer Brownstone over fifty years ago), establish Counties as overall Rural Administration units and place Rural zoning control in the hands of the people most affected, the elected officials administering the Villages, but who am I (Lee) to argue with the Editorial Board of one of the Provinces largest daily newspapers that the best and simplest solution is to just remove the RM of Edenwold and form a new RM surrounding Regina City.

The Leader Post Editorial Board believe that Corman Park RM is working well as a Rural Administrative unit, and Outlook Community Leader Lloyd Smith advises that since the small holding (acreage) people have taken control of the RM of Corman Park Council away from the farmers it (the Council) is working very well and since removing the RM of Edenwold from existence would solve the Argue zoning problem with RM Administrator Strudwick, maybe that is the best that I (Lee) can do for the Argues.

Web readers are asked to google up “ rmofcormanpark.com’ and click onto the division map, note that it is a huge RM, big as a County, and to replicate it (Corman Park) around Regina City would require that not only the RMs of Sherwood and Edenwold would have to be eliminated but also the RMs of Lumsden and Pense to the Northwest, West and South West of Regina and those four RMs would fight the plan to the death but I (Lee) ask all Web readers to note that as a example of general RM “thuggery” (google) the RM of Swift Current is so astonishingly greedy that it (the RM) is demanding $15,000,000.00 ( fifteen million dollars) from the City of Swift Current to allow the City to expand its borders “ municipalities disagree over growth of swift current” (google).

A $15,000,000.00 ( fifteen million dollar) hit on the City of Swift Current taxpayers would amount to about $3000.00 ( three thousand dollars) extra on every residential taxed property. The RM of Swift Current demand is insane and some feel that a answer is for the Provincial Leaders to carry legislation creating a large municipal area around each of the ten Cities allowing a “sane economic development” area around each of the Cities leaving the rest of the Rural areas to the RMs to loot but that solution would leave the tiny Rural Urbans at the mercy of the corruption of the Rural Municipalities.

But whatever is done to solve the absolute power of the Rural Officials and the resulting Rural Zoning Corruption problem there can be no doubt whatsoever but that it is in the economic interest of the taxpayers in the Urban centers to end zoning Corruption in Rural Saskatchewan and I (Lee) have always believed that if it is not possible to solve a Corruption problem one way then another way must be found and the OECD ( Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development) is demanding that Canada live up to its agreement to address its Bribery and Corruption problem “ canada cited for lax anti-bribery measures canwest news service” (google).

Web readers are asked to note that I (Lee), set out in the segment of this Website dated January 22nd 2009, “Start Cleaning Up Bribery At The Bottom” the fact that Bribery and Corruption of our Canadian officials must be dealt with and that the place to start is right here, in po-dunk Saskatchewan, right at the bottom of the corruption chain, with RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, and please note that no less than the OECD is now reminding Canada that it agreed in writing to eliminate Bribery and Corruption.

Web readers are reminded that the Argue’s refusal to pay Strudwick bribes to obtain zoning for their 30 million dollar residential subdivision development is a example of blocked economic development and the Courts support of the NDP Minister, Len Taylor’s, ruling that the Argues only option to obtain residential development zoning is to carry flowers, chocolates and perfume (bribes) to Strudwick, “ supreme court of canada summary case 31940” (google), must be viewed as unacceptable

I (Lee) took on the task of solving the Argues zoning problem with Strudwick and while the Court destroyed the tape of the Court proceedings, it is true (and I can prove through witnesses ) that on December 15th, 2005, Strudwicks two bit shyster of Government lawyer, Glen Dowling, argued in Queens Bench Court before Lady Justice Janet McMurtry, that I am not a lawyer (true) and do not understand the issues (not true).

I (Lee) am certain the OECD is run by lawyers (everything else is, why not the OECD?) who know the same thing that I (Lee) knew during the Court hearing on December 5th 2005, the issue is ending corruption and the OECD is now demanding that Canada live up to its written agreement to end bribery and corruption and the taxpaying voters should demand that their MLA’s do their jobs and end Rural Zoning Corruption here in po-dunk Saskatchewan by removing the RM’s from the face of Saskatchewan.

A good place to start with those demands is on the doorsteps during the by-elections to fill the MLA vacancies in Regina-Douglas Park, where NDP MLA Harry Van Mulligan stepped down for the new NDP Leader, Link, and Saskatoon Riversdale where former NDP Leader Calvert resigned to become Principal of St. Andrews College.

“Tweedledum and Tweedledee” are two fictional characters from the Lewis Carrol novel, Through the Looking-Glass. The two fictional characters are famous for being indistinguishable and the relevancy to Saskatchewan politics is that the June 6th, 2009 election of Dwain Lingenfelter (Link) as the NDP Leader is the start of the 2011 election campaign with the voters facing a “lose-lose” (google) situation because unlike the Scandinavian Countries where the Political Parties seem to be equally honest “equality corruption and social trust” ( google), here in Saskatchewan, the Sask Party and NDP have identical policy positions allowing Rural zoning Corruption.

Premier Brad Wall is a amiable enough man but his Sask Party is the direct descendant of Grant Devine’s Progressive Conservative Party that “ disappeared” ten Billion dollars of tax payer money “saskatchewan tories in fraud scandal” ( google). Grant Devine set a Commonwealth Corruption precedent by having a dozen Cabinet Ministers incarcerated for fraud “ rcmp probe operation fiddle” (google), and Devine’s descendant, Premier Brad Wall, refuses to end the Rural Zoning Corruption policy established by the NDP.

Notwithstanding the NDP membership debacle “ ndp membership report robert hale” ( google), I know Dwain Lingenfelter ( Link) to be the finest, most experienced, able and honest man to serve as a Saskatchewan Political Leader since Ross Thatcher and believe that Link should be our next Premier even if his hands are tied by the Corruption of the NDP Party he now leads having ordered that bribes must be paid to their Senior Official, RM Administrator Donna Strudwick, to provide development zoning.

The Party that he (Link) leads is just as corrupt as the Devine Gang because the Calvert NDP also set a Commonwealth Corruption precedent by having a Cabinet Minister order that the only option that a Developer has to obtain zoning for his development is to carry flowers, chocolates and perfume (bribes) to their (the NDP)s Senior Official, Strudwick,
“ supreme court of canada summary case 31940” (google)

The Criminal Code states that it is a contravention of the Code to provide a benefit of any kind to a Municipal Official to obtain zoning “ criminal code of canada section 123 (1) part iv” (google) and it is a axiom of Common Law that the Minister speaks for the Crown and the Crown Commands “ minister of the crown wikipedia” ( google) so
based on Common Law, a Ministers order is as if the Crown itself, (the Queen), ordered bribes paid to its Senior Official (Strudwick), to obtain zoning, consequently I (Lee), acting as the Argues Representative, lodged a written complaint with then Premier Calvert regarding the Crown order to carry his (Calvert)s Senior official “ strudwick reports to premier” ( google), flowers, chocolates and perfume, a bribe.

Before I (Lee) filed that written complaint with then Premier Calvert the Outlook Community Leaders obtained a “ legal opinion” ( google) from four lawyers and all four agreed that my complaint letter to Calvert set out the truth and therefore did not libel Donna Strudwick or anyone else, “ truth is defense against libel” ( google)

But after my complaint to Calvert Strudwick used “ libel chill” (google) to sue me (Lee) for libel and Calvert’s brain trust used their administrative control of the Queens and Appeal Bench Judges to make sure that Strudwick won her libel action against me for my complaint to then Premier Calvert about his Minister (Taylor)’s order to pay her
(Strudwick) bribes to provide the Argues with development zoning. Web readers are asked to refer to “alberta legislative library online catalogue masters in their own house” (google) for access to the Judicial Council of Canada report which establishes that the Provincial Administrations control Judicial decisions.

The new Common Law “ judge made law” (google) regarding the fact that flowers, chocolates and perfume (bribes) must be carried to RM Administrator Donna Strudwick to obtain development zoning is a legal contradiction because the Developers, or their Representatives, are subject to five years in prison under “ section 123 (1) municipal corruption criminal code of canada part iv” (google) when they carry anything to the Rural Administrators to obtain development zoning so the Developers, and/or their Representatives are caught in a “catch -22” (google), asking, which law takes precedent?

Because of that Catch-22, and to add to that Corruption horror, consider the fact that when the Developer, or his Representative, complains to the Premier about the need to pay bribes to the Rural Administrator to obtain development zoning the Rural Administrator uses “libel chill” (google) to destroy the Developer, or his Representative, by charging him with libel for his complaint to the Premier about the fact that his only option to obtain development zoning is to pay bribes to the Official who grants zoning.

My (Lee)’s personal destruction by finding me guilty of libel for my complaint to then Premier Calvert about Taylor’s (his Minister) ruling that my only option to obtain zoning for the Argue development was to bribe Donna Strudwick is the same idiotic nonsense as when, with no hard, or physical (baby bones or some such) evidence whatsoever, and based on the word of a couple of young children with a ax to grind who had been watching too much television, Saskatchewan Justice charged Richard Klassen with running a Satanic Cult and eating babies, yet Klassen is granted a inquiry “ martensville saskatchewan justice richard klassen inquiry” (google), while both the Calvert NDP and the Wall Sask Party ignored the established fact of Rural Zoning Corruption, a problem that costs the voting tax payers enormous sums of money.

Strudwick’s win of her libel action against me (Lee), the Argues Representative, has had the effect of the continued blocking of zoning for the Argues residential subdivision until Strudwicks bribes were paid, as ordered by her Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, and the Argues thirty million dollar residential subdivision would have paid about $400,000.00 ( four hundred thousand dollars) annually in school and property taxes.

There are 300 Rural Municipalities in Saskatchewan, 300 x $400,000.00 equals one hundred and twenty million dollars, the annual loss to the economy assuming that every RM is blocking a Argue type of development until the Administrators bribes are paid.

Another example of a economic loss to the taxpayers due to Taylor’s order to pay Strudwick bribes and her (Strudwick)s apparent control of the Calvert brain trust is that the Argues development quarter has a spring that flows at 350 gallons per minute (gpm), enough water flow to service a urban population of at least 3500 (thirty five hundred) and I (Lee), acting as the Argue representative, offered Calvert a deal where the Argues would turn 80% of that spring water flow over to the public for their use if the Calvert Administration would grant the Argues residential development zoning and allow them (the Argues) to use the remaining 20% of the water flow to service their development.

BUT Calvert’s brain trust refused the Argue offer to give their spring water flow to the public, and maintained their position that the only option that I (Lee) had to obtain development zoning for the Argues was to carry RM Administrator Strudwick flowers, chocolates and perfume “ supreme court of canada summary case 31940” ( google) before zoning would be granted and it is impossible to calculate the loss to the taxpaying voting public due to the Calvert brain trust refusal to accept the Argues offer to give 80% of their spring water flow to the public in exchange for being granted development zoning without having to bribe RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick.

NDP activists will claim that comparing the Devine Gang Corruption to the Calvert Corruption is comparing apples and oranges because it would take eight years for the annual loss of one hundred and twenty million dollars under the Calvert Corruption to equal one Billion dollars which would still only be one tenth of the ten Billion dollars of taxpayers money that the Devine Gang “ disappeared”, and that is true on the face of it.

But I (Lee) believe that if you factor in the “ culture of corruption” ( google) and loss of hope caused by the Calvert Minister ordered, Court sanctioned, institutionalized, in house Corruption, ie: the payment of bribes to Senior Government Officials, such as Strudwick, under the NDP, to provide development zoning, that in the long run it is probable that the Calvert Corruption will cost the taxpayers as much money(ten billion dollars) as the Devine Gang “ disappeared” over their ten years in power.

In house, institutionalized, Court approved, Corruption costs honest taxpayers a great deal of money in other, more oblique, ways. As example, in an attempt to delay the Corruption driven financial meltdown forcing the US and Canada to the edge of the financial abyss, both the US Treasury and the Bank of Canada are printing money,
“ carney printing money” ( google), and inflation will follow as night follows day, “china picks gold francis” (google) which means that Corrupt Government Officials, such as Strudwick, to maintain their standard of living, are going to demand higher bribes to provide development zoning for the Developers.

Up until 1990 Revenue Canada allowed Developers to deduct the cost of bribes to Corrupt Government Officials, such as Strudwick, as a business expense “ revenue canada allows deduction of bribes as business expense” (google). Bribes to Corrupt Government officials, such as Strudwick, were considered by Revenue Canada to be a cost of doing business, which decreased inflationary pressure by allowing Developers cost of bribes to Corrupt Government Officials to be included along with all their other development costs such as lot surveys, road construction, sewer and water installation.

But, the Developers were not required to name the Corrupt Government Official that the bribe was paid to, so the Corrupt Government Official receiving the bribe did not have to pay tax on the bribe, putting unearned income in the hands of the Corrupt Government Official, such as Strudwick, causing a increase in inflation offsetting the decrease in inflation by allowing the Corrupt Developers to claim bribes to Corrupt Government Officials, such as Strudwick, as a business expense.

It was a Revenue Canada trade off to try to decrease Corruption driven inflation but in 1990 fear of public outrage forced Revenue Canada to change the law to prevent the Corrupt Developers from being allowed to deduct the cost of bribes to Corrupt Government Officials, such as Strudwick, as a business expense, note page 235 in
“ comparative income taxation: a structural analysis hugh j. ault” ( google), creating a murky Corruption/bribes for zoning situation between 1990 and 2006.

But then, in 2006, the Calvert NDP Administration and the Saskatchewan Queens and Appeal Bench Courts ( upheld by the Supreme Court of Canada) “ supreme court of canada summary case 31940” ( google) ruled that the only option that a Developer has to obtain development zoning is to “ carry flowers, chocolates and perfume” ( pay bribes) to the Corrupt Provincial Government Officials, such as Strudwick, who approve zoning, thereby re-establishing the fact of Government sanctioned bribes for zoning..

The Saskatchewan Crown has now reinforced the fact that democratically elected leaders around the world have long established, behind the scenes, unofficial policies of forcing the business community to pay bribes to Senior Government Officials, such as Strudwick, “corruption and government susan rose-ackerman” (google).

But I (Lee) believe that this time the Corruption has gone over a line here in po-dunk Saskatchewan because you can search the Web “ until the cows come home”( google) and there is no other G-20 Country in the world, or no third world Country, not even Afghanistan, where a Minister of the Crown actually orders that the only option that a Developer has to obtain development zoning is to carry flowers, chocolates and perfume (bribes) to the Senior Government Official ( Strudwick) responsible for approving development zoning, “ supreme court of canada summary case 31940” ( google)

As public interest in this Website grows I (Lee) receive a lot of neat stuff, as example one bemused Web reader provided information taken from the Globe and Mail that a German shrink, Dr. Michael Linden, developed a theory regarding insanity, “post-traumatic embitterment disorder dr michael linden” ( google) and my mind instantly turned to how fortunate I am that the German shrink had not developed his theory 25 years ago because at that time I (Lee) was trying to publicize the fact that the Devine Gang was massively Corrupt and Lane (the Hon J. Gary), now a Saskatchewan Court of Appeal Judge, then the Devine Gang Finance Minister, made public claim that I (Lee) was insane, but he (Lane) did not dare to try to prove his public claim because he knew that I (Lee) was right, the Devine Gang was causing many millions of Saskatchewan taxpayers dollars to disappear, “disappeared” ( google)

When I (Lee) refused to back off, Lane, (then the Devine Gang Attorney General and former Minister of Finance), had me (Lee) charged under the Criminal Code with threatening for my public statement that he (Lane) “should” be shot, but of course because Lane, as Finance Minister, had just finished presiding over a annual deficit of one point three BILLION dollars, it was impossible to swear in a Jury that did not agree with me that Lane “should” be shot, so my jury returned a” not guilty” verdict and it was shortly before the 1991 election that Prime Minister Mulroney appointed Lane (the Hon J. Gary) to the Saskatchewan Court of Appeal, where he has been ever since.

But if Lane, ( the Hon J. Gary) had of had the German ( Dr. Michael Linden) shrink’s theory to wave around at the time, “ post traumatic embitterment disorder dr michael linden” (google) he might have been able to prove that I (Lee) was insane, rather than having to try to find a jury that did not agree with me that he (Lane) “should” be shot.

I (Lee) remind all Web readers that until recently our society has allowed “disgruntled dissenters” (google) to function and the shrinks had a view that revenge is theraputic
“ revenge is sweet” (google) yet I (Lee) have been destroyed by Ministerial and Court rulings because of my refusal to pay bribes to a Senior Government official, Strudwick, to obtain zoning for the Argues, and in our current “politically correct” (google) and
“ libel chill” (google) world, a world of such absolute Government Corruption, that I may be found insane for complaining about the need to pay bribes to obtain zoning.

Of course I (Lee) am bitter, (and offer no apology for that bitterness), about the fact that our Political Leaders are so determined to protect the Corruption of their Officials that they (our Political Leaders) create a nonsensical medical mental situation to deem a individual insane “ post traumatic embitterment disorder dr michael linden” ( google) for refusing to accept a Crown Minister order that the only option to obtain development zoning is to bribe the Corrupt Government Official, such as Strudwick, who controls development zoning “ supreme court of canada summary case 31940” (google), if anything is insanity, it is Len Taylor’s order to pay Strudwick bribes to obtain zoning..

IN SUMMARY: the Calvert NDP Administration ruling has created a economic situation here in Saskatchewan where the Developers only option to obtain development zoning for their projects is to pay bribes to the Senior Government officials, such as Strudwick, to grant zoning, except that now the Corrupt Developers paying the bribes can no longer deduct those bribes as a business expense and must absorb the cost of those bribes personally, so lot prices must go up so that the Developer can maintain his own standard of living and still pay bribes to Corrupt Government Officials, such as Strudwick, which will lead to ever higher property assessment and ever higher taxes.

This inflationary cost spiral based on a ever increasing nontaxable bribe income to the Corrupt Senior Officials, such as Strudwick, will lead to financial disaster for many honest taxpayers and will lead to hyperinflation by 2010, “hyperinflation special report” (google) and honest taxpayers in a cold climate country such as Canada will freeze to death in the dark. Look at a documentary “i.o.u.s.a.” (google), and note hyperinflation in Germany after World War I, “ hyperinflation in germany post ww I” (google).

During the period of the NDP/Liberal Coalition Saskatchewan Administrations I (Lee) found that the two Liberal Ministers, Jack Hillson and Ron Osika, to be honorable men who, by amending Section 14.1 of the Urban Municipalities Act, allowed a Village to annex the Argue Development out of the RM of Edenwold, bypassing the need to pay Strudwick bribes to provide the Argues with development zoning, but their (the Liberal Ministers) brilliant plan was denied by the NDP, the dominant partner in the Coalition, and except for those two Liberal Ministers, Government Corruption Policy has remained entrenched since the last honest Administration, that of Premier Ross Thatcher.

The Corruption of the Saskatchewan Department of Highway Engineers under NDP Premier Blakney, the Corruption of the Devine Gang, “saskatchewan tories in fraud scandal” set British Commonwealth history and the Calvert NDP Corruption regarding Rural Zoning are all examples of the “culture of corruption” (google)

This policy of absolute corruption is responsible, at least so far as a Province of a million people can be held responsible, for the financial meltdown facing the US and Canada, but despite this fact the Leaders of the Sask Party and NDP Opposition, the Tweedledum and Tweedledee of Saskatchewan Politics, refuse to address zoning Corruption in Rural Saskatchewan, hard evidence that our two Political Leaders are leading Political Parties as identically Corrupt as those ruling Afghanistan.

Please note ” afghan corruption a growing concern” for a TIMES ON LINE article dated March 31 2008 by Aryn Baker and based on that article, and this website, a blogger has tagged this website as a related post in a comparison of the corruption of our officials here in Saskatchewan to the officials in Afghanistan.

A Edmonton Journal article by Tim Naumetz dated May 15th 2007 ” edmonton journal coverup culture fills rcmp:officer” ( google) states the RCMP are trained to cover up white collar crime, also note ” rcmp involved in coverups” ( google) for more media on RCMP corruption and cover up. The RCMP slaughter citizens who annoy them ” ian bush robert dziekanski” and the RCMP destroyed evidence in the Argue/Strudwick zoning/bribery dispute so given that the RCMP has a culture of slaughter of innocents and covering up of corruption it should be no surprise that the Afghan police are corrupt with the RCMP training them.

The corruption comparison between Saskatchewan and Afghanistan is accurate. When my (Lee’s) Access zap2it ad and this website ran in the Rural areas for over a year the only response was phone calls from the Rural Municipal Leaders to Outlook Community Leader Lloyd Smith that I ( Lee) was the stupidest man in Canada if I believed that I could get zoning for the Argue development without bribing RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick. This arrogant and corrupt attitude on the part of Saskatchewan’s Rural Leaders proves a level of corruption that will only be matched by the Afghan officials after their RCMP training.

Saskatchewan is the only Province of a G-20 Country so openly corrupt that the Minister Responsible and the Queens and Appeal Bench Judges carry a public Ministerial and Court ruling that a Developers only option to obtain development zoning approval for his project is to carry flowers, chocolates and perfume, ( bribes) to Donna Strudwick, the Provincial government official responsible for approval of that zoning, ” supreme court of canada summary case 31940” ( google).

It is true that both the Argues and I (Lee), the Argues representative, were warned about Strudwick. Four different Regina Lawyers told the Argues that it was impossible to get by Strudwick, Dwain Lingenfelter, ( then Deputy Premier) told me ( Lee) that it was impossible to get by Strudwick to obtain zoning for the Argue development project and Jim Hipkin, Reeve of the RM of Lumsden, told me to be very, very careful of Strudwick because of her close personal relationship to Court of Appeal Judge, the Honourable J. Gary Lane.

I ( Lee) a slow learner, am starting to get the message that Saskatchewan’s Rural Leaders may be right, maybe I am the stupidest man in Canada for trying to get zoning for the Argues development without bribing Strudwick, nevertheless it is my intent to go the last inch on the last foot of the last mile to solve the Argues zoning problem without paying bribes.

As this website gains publicity more people ask why I am doing it, a good question, and the answer is money. The only thing that ever really matters to anyone is money and the Argue/Strudwick zoning dispute is no different, Strudwick wants her bribes and the Argue family want to make the ten million dollars from the sale of the 160 lots on their residential development, 160 x $70,000.00 = $11,200,000.00 ( eleven million two hundred thousand dollars) less a million or so development costs, so as usual its all about money.

And as usual, the taxpayers are suffering because if Strudwick had provided zoning and the Argue development had gone ahead the Edenwold and area ratepayers would have benefited from the $400,000.00 ( four hundred thousand dollar) annual school and property tax revenue from the Argues development.

Beyond the property and school tax revenue the Argue development quarter has a spring that flows at 350 gallons per minute of very high quality water; Sharie Argue’s family have been in beer brewing business in England for the last couple of hundred years and based on the quantity and quality of the Argues spring water flow were prepared to establish a draft brewery operation which the Provincial Liquor and Gaming Authority estimated would gross about $5,000,000.00 ( five million dollars) annually and provide about 50 high paying jobs adding more tax revenue, all of which is lost because of Strudwick’s power to refuse zoning.

There can be no doubt whatsoever but that the only hope for the Argues’ development and the provision of the tax revenue is a public inquiry such as “adscam, milgaard, mulroney schriiber” (google), which I ( Lee), serving as the Argue representative, am certain would result in a solution, because, as example, there is plenty of official evidence contained in ” masters in their own house judicial council of canada” ( google) to establish for a inquiry the fact that the Provincial Administrations use their administrative control of the working lives of the Queens and Appeal Bench Judges to control Judicial rulings so it follows as night follows day that the Provincial Administration would use that control to destroy a developer who refused to bribe a Provincial official to provide development zoning approval after being told by the Minister Responsible that his only option was to bribe the official responsible for that zoning control.

There is no doubt whatsoever but that nothing more is needed to prove that Strudwick is a “white collar thug” ( google) than the fact that her Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, ruled that the only option to have her ( Strudwick) provide development zoning was to carry her flowers, chocolates and perfume, ” supreme court of canada summary case 31940″ ( google)

A thug is a thug and a bribe is a bribe whether that thug is US Senator Chris Dodd, Chairman of the US Senate Banking Committee, receiving a hundred thousand dollar bribe from AIG to draft a loophole in the US stimulus package to allow a one hundred and sixty five million dollar bonus package to be paid to the AIG executives out of the US stimulus money, or the brother of Hamid Karzai (the Afghan President), receiving millions of dollars in bribes to protect the activity of the Afghan drug lords or Donna Strudwick, a two bit Rural Administrator here in po-dunk Saskatchewan being carried flowers, chocolates and perfume to grant the Argues develpoment zoning.

Before Strudwick sued me, ( Lee) for libel a NDP activist tried to make the bribery/zoning issue go away quietly. I ( Lee) can prove to a public inquiry that before Strudwick commenced her libel action a NDP activist came to me ( Lee) with a suggestion that I have a lawyer sue the Province on behalf of the Argue family for $1,000.000.00 ( one million dollars) for ” breach of implied contract” based on the fact that the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, had overturned two Liberal Ministers ( Hillson and Osika) orders to bypass Strudwick by finding a Village to annex the Argue subdivision out of the RM of Edenwold.

The legal theory is that the Argues had ” cause of action” ( google) against the Province for “breach of implied contract” ( google) and the breach occurred when the NDP Minister Responsible, Len Taylor, refused to honor the solution ordered by two earlier Liberal Ministers during Saskatchewan’s 1999-2003 NDP/Liberal coalition administration, to wit: bypass Strudwick and the need to pay her bribes by having the Village of Wood Mountain annex the Argue subdivision out of the RM of Edewnold, but Taylor refused to agree to those Liberal Ministerial orders and instead ruled that the Argues’ only option was to carry flowers chocolates and perfume to Strudwick ” supreme court of canada summary case 31940″ ( google).

The Argues, because of the well established and well publicized corruption of the Provincially controlled Queens and Appeal Bench Courts refused to accept the NDP activists’ advice, so the NDP activist stated that the matter would never get into Court and the one million dollars of tax payer money would be paid out to the Argues as a out of Court settlement for the ” breach of implied contract” ( google) but the Argues would have to agree to not try to establish their dream development again, ever.

At that point, I ( Lee), as the Argues representative, made a serious mistake, I ( Lee) “underestimated the enemy” ( google) and advised the Argues that if the Calvert Administration was so worried about the potential for negative publicity from Taylor’s instructions to bribe Strudwick to provide development zoning that they were prepared to pay out a one million dollar bribe of taxpayer money for the Argues to go away, than, if challenged, the Calvert Administration would cave in and grant the Argues development zoning, but I ( Lee) was wrong, very wrong, the Calvert Administration stood firm, Strudwick’s bribes had to be paid to obtain zoning.

To their everlasting credit, the Argues refused to accept that one million dollar bribe of taxpayer money to go away and asked me ( Lee) to carry on trying to obtain zoning so Strudwick tried to use ” libel chill” to end the problem and sued me ( Lee), the Argues’ representative, for libel for my written complaint to Premier Calvert about her corruption, but I ( Lee) fought the libel action through to the Supreme Court of Canada, resulting in the Supreme Court Summary Statement, the Access TV zap2it ads, this website, the refusal of the Wall Administration to deal with the corruption and the request for a public inquiry.

Taxpayers are reminded that all economic development depends on zoning and on the Provincial Government official who controls that zoning and if the current Provincial Ministerial and Court rulings regarding zoning are allowed to stand only corrupt Developers bribing corrupt officials such as Strudwick will function in Rural Saskatchewan; the only answer is a public inquiry such as ” adscam, milgaard, mulroney schreiber” ( google).

The taxpayers are also reminded that there is no “free lunch”. The bribes the corrupt Developers must pay to the corrupt Municipal Administrators, such as Strudwick, to be granted development zoning, must be passed on to the taxpayers in higher lot prices which result in higher assessments and higher taxes, and all economists agree that corruption in Government is harmful to the economy, please study these expert opinions at ” corruption economy“.

The taxpayers should know that the US Chamber of Commerce has no illusions about the corruption of the Canadian officials and in the countdown to NAFTA the US Chamber of Commerce lobbied the US Senate to carry the ” nafta bribery bill s. 651” a US Senate bill that allows US business owners to bribe the Canadian Government officials, please go on to the next segment of this website.

BRIBERY BILL UPDATE

The Corruption of our Government officials is so well known that the United States Chamber of Commerce lobbied the US Congress until it signed into law as part of the NAFTA trade agreement US Senate Bill S.651, the so called “ Bribery Bill” allowing the US business community to pay bribes to our Canadian Government officials. This absolute corruption has brought both Countries to the edge of a financial abyss that will make the 1930’s depression appear to be a “technical recession“ in comparison.

In the countdown to the NAFTA trade agreement a full page Globe and Mail article by Brain Milner dated June 21st, 1986, entitled “Bribes or Grease: the way of the world” sets out the cute definitions that are used to denote bribery and corruption around the world. In Nigeria it’s called “dash”, in Yugoslavia, it’s “nitto”, in Turkey its “ rushvet”, in Brazil its “jetto” ( finding a way) in the Middle East including India it’s “baksheesh”, ( a tip) in Mexico it’s called “the bite” in Honduras it’s “a piece of the action” in France it’s called a “ jug of wine” in Italy it’s the “little envelope” in Japan it’s called “ Palm Oil”.

Here in podunk Saskatchewan a NDP Minister of the Crown, Len Taylor, ruled (and the Courts upheld), that the Developers must carry “flowers, chocolates and perfume” to the Rural Administrators such as RM of Edenwold Administrator Donna Strudwick to obtain development zoning. That was and is economically a very dangerous Government ruling.

Canada is a trading nation, 80% of our GDP comes from trade and 80% of that is trade with the US. The US Democrats often use protectionist solutions to any economic problem; the US voters are in a fury over their own officials’ corruption, and the implications for Canada-US trade are profound if the US Senate “Bribery Bill” becomes a issue and NAFTA is axed when the US voters fury is extended to Canadian officials as a result of that Senate Bribery Bill allowing the payment of bribes to the Canadian Government officials and 64% ( 80% x 80%) of Canada’s GDP disappears overnight.

There is no doubt whatsoever but that the corruption of the Canadian Government officials must be addressed and a start would be to begin right at the bottom of our Governments official corruption chain, right here, right now, in podunk Rural Saskatchewan with RM Administrator Donna Strudwick and her Government lawyer Glen Dowling.

Please see the information below, and at the bottom you’ll find details on how to obtain the book that explains in depth problems with Saskatchewan’s justice system.